>>56895145

It is nothing, my friend. Do not worry about it.

Other urls found in this thread:

tools.ietf.org/html/rfc920#page-2
youtube.com/watch?v=HHgxOXEQaFU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Literally nothing will change other than countries that are not the US will get Freedom of Speech on the internet.

>What does he mean by this?
He means ICANN is not some company that can censor shit you post. It does not filter data traveling over the internet. It administers the topmost DNS directory, decides what TLDs can be registered, that sort of thing.

ICANN has been doing a great job.

Republicans want it to remain in the US congress' hands so they can kill Net Neutrality. Eliminating Net Neutrality = Enables Internet censorship. (They are already constantly attacking Net Neutrality for their donators.)

If Trump wins, there will be zero to stop the death of Net Neutrality for 2 whole years.

>If Trump wins
You say that like Obama didn't flip flop on that front.

>The whole internet handed over to China
>The whole Cred Forums to be handed over to the jews

Thanks Obama

Give tl;dr please

Implying Clinton wouldn't kill Neutrality if she had the chance

>if Trump wins
How about that cyber

They are the same pieces of shit that dont let individuals register domain names and force us to work through 3rd party shit sites that make huge money off of domain names.

>us makes internet
>us used ".com"
>everyone else uses some fuckboi extension like .co.uk .co.au .de .ch for their unique country ids
>.com was us's country id
>everyone else wanted a piece of the American pie
>fuckboi obongo hands over control of .com
>us gets robbed of .com rights
>we will have to now develop some other fuckboi extension like "google.co.us" or some other faggot shit

also
>.com was in the US
>iccant is going to host it overseas
>.com's are nolonger protected by the constitution
>NWO-fuckbois.. I mean the UN wants to ban hate speech, which is anything that isnt 100% PC / globalist, etc..
>.coms are not under us jurisdiction, which means sites can be taken down if they dont comply with nwo laws

Stupid dumb Cred Forums scum shouldn't IDZ HABBIDING over shit they don't even remotely understand.

>current year + 0
>using thanks obama
get a load of this guy

...

>Cred Forums trolling Cred Forums off of Cred Forums

>.com was us's country id
what is .us

a domain made up for sites that couldnt afford the .com premium (brought on by the faggot iccant making "registrars" a thing and not letting people register shit directly).

Sure there were other countrys sites on .com, but thats no different than how people use ".io" when they dont live in an indian shithole territory.

.com is for commercial organisations

USA has a top level domain just like all those other """fuckboi""" countries but americans obviously never understood that.

.com is for commercial. It's not country-specific. What is so special about .com that everyone would want it? Nothing.

You have .us, .even .gov and .edu

Yea, commercial US companies.
Is "gamefaqs.com" commercial? What do they sell? What about redit? are they commercial? Google or yahoo? They didn't sell shti in the beginning, (now they sell you).
Whats myspace and facbook selling?

Maybe.. JUST maybe.. .com actually comes from the term "com port" or "communication". Maybe this whole "commerce" thing was just a misunderstanding by some faggot journalist in the 90s.

tools.ietf.org/html/rfc920#page-2
It is what it what initially intended for. But the meaning got lost among advertisers.

>.com actually comes from the term "com port" or "communication"
Still doesn't make that much sense. Something like .web would be better as a TLD everyone wants to use.

The meaning of .com is not open for debate. It literally means commercial.

Also, if you still don't understand how all those companies you mentioned make money you are either 12, a troll or really, really mentally challenged.

idk, I just thought of that as I was about to sumbit the post, was just a thought. Kinda like how tv shows like to use buzwords like honeypot all wrong.

>.gov
Why doesn't the government give over .gov to icant.. the other countries ARE government websites after all.

I think the republicans see how poorly their front man is doing and they're pushing this shit twice as hard to draw attention off of him and onto Obama and the dems.

youtube.com/watch?v=HHgxOXEQaFU

> ICANNT

new EU edition

b-but muh we pure aryans are're saving da interbutts!!11!1