How does trying to convince as many people as they can to mutilate their sons penises fit into their grand plan?

0.9% is 'more and more' than 0.7%

>Circumcision rates are declining in the US since 2000 anyway
That's mostly due to non-white immigration.

More than half of the males in Australia are circumcised.

And who owns America? (It's Jews)

It doesn't make sense for religious people at all to do it anyway. You're disrespecting the work of your god by saying he fucked up a little

The USA's population consists of barely 2% Jews.

Australia has less than 1% Jews.

That's only old people. My generation basically has the same level of circumcision as Europe

And what % of Americas most powerful people are Jews?

Define "powerful"

you forgot the
illuminati/reptilians

If you feel bad about circumcision and aren't going to restore, just come here and your self esteem will be fixed.

Local shiksas love the circumcised dick. It's a novelty for them against the average smelly dago cock and they like it because hygiene, etc. You can trust me, I talk from experience.

t. Ashkenazi masterrace

>ashkenazi still living in south america
Are you 1/16 Jewish or something that you can't leave?

bullshit
underpants+pants and your little fellow is safe

>t. israel where healthcare is free

The percentage of newborns who are circumcised in the United States has been on the decline in recent decades, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Between 1979 and 2010, the rate of newborn circumcision among males declined from 64.5 percent to 58.3 percent, the report found.

The rate was highest in 1981, at 64.9 percent, then declined during the 1980s, rose again in the 90s, and fell again in the 2000s, reaching a low of 55.4 percent in 2007, the report said.

The biggest overall decline was seen in the West, where the rate dropped from 63.9 percent in 1979 to 40.2 percent in 2010. At its lowest point in 2003, the circumcision rate of male newborns in the West was just 31.4 percent.

The fluctuations in rates occurred during the same time period as changing recommendations regarding circumcision, said study researcher Maria Owings, a health statistician at the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics.

In 1989, the American Academy of Pediatrics said that there were potential benefits to circumcision, but in 1999, the organization said there was insufficient evidence to recommend the procedure.

Another factor that may influence circumcision rates is reimbursement by insurance. According to a 2012 study, Medicaid policies in 18 states have stopped covering routine infant circumcision in recent years. Another study found that hospitals in states where Medicaid covers circumcision had rates that were 24 percent higher than those in states that did not cover the procedure.

you may only respond to this post if your country has a jewish prime minister (australians welcome)

I think there's about to be a very rapid decline in America like there was in Australia. Particularly people in their 20s who will start having kids within the decade seem to be more against it