Ask a anarchist anything Cred Forums

What the hell kind of question is that??.

Am I edgy enough? :(

How's the 7th grade going?

Double dubs.
/thread

whats the ideal ratio of distribution/destruction of capitalist assets?

What variant of Anarchist theory do you subscribe to?

I follow a Modified Anarcho_Syndicalist idea

How do you feel about mutualism? & can we make common ground with libertarians?

Not OP, but I think Mutualism can be used as a steping point towards AnCollect and Ultimately AnCom.

And We cannot make common ground with Libertarians, best we can so is convert them.

>Anarchist
>Old enough to be on Cred Forums
Pick one. Anarchy isn't possible at all you retards.

agree with you on mutualism, though i think if it stalled there it wouldn't be too bad either.
as for libertarians, allying over social issues is probably the best way to expose them to the positives of our ideology & convert. not to mention libertarian philosophy has radical implications if carried to logical conclusions (e.g. Nozick's property theory)

Catalonia
Rojava
Free Territory
Native Iroquois (Anarchist in nature)

Meanwhile you cuck yourself wasting your equally meaningless efforts on something you've been conditioned into believing is possible but don't value as highly. Nice waste of a life

True, I agree with you on Mutualist, and Libertarianism. The goal with libertarians should be their conversion, not allying with them

No we cant they are terrible.

Pretty much the same as you user.

I would add medieval iceland, most currently existing indigenous societies to some extent or another (not just iroquois though good example)

Now let's look at educated and strong nations. Funny how none of them are anarchist, huh?

>ha ur just part of the flock xD wake up sheeple

I love this meme

Meanwhile all the rich strong nations are so because of horrific violence elsewhere and hugely unequal property access based ultimately on historical feudal theft. If you care about having a strong nation you're an idiot who is happy to suck the dick of a rich man as long as he's from your country

>Now let's look at educated and strong nations. Funny how none of them are anarchist, huh?

Beginning days of Spanish Civil war. Who kept Republican spain free? Anarchists (Until Stalin started funding Communists, and they stabbed em in the back)

Who's fighting Isis in Syria? SDF, Majority of which are YPG/J, a Libertarian socialist militia

Also, Free Territory (Makhnovist Ukraine)

>The Bolshevik government in Petrograd initially allied with Makhno and considered allowing an independent area for Makhno's libertarian experiment.But the Bolsheviks increasingly saw the Makhnovists as a threat to their power, both as an example and as a site of anarchist influence.It restarted a propaganda campaign declaring the Free Territory to be a warlord regime, and eventually broke with it by launching surprise attacks on Makhnovist militias despite the pre-existing alliance between the factions.

And We have the EZLN, which liberated parts of Chiapas in Mexico

True.

We are conditioned by the Schools to believe that it is not obtainable.

Kek.

This was my question. i believe all assets and means of production must be destroyed so that there is no hording of wealth or monopolizing of opportunity. Then the whole populace must be involved in the labor of rebuilding, avoiding division of labor because that would just re-instill the old values of class segregation. everyone is broke homeless and hungry and has to work along side their equals or starve, i would hope people would be charitable to to those who deserve it.
I think libertarian maybe more in favor of mutalism because it resembles corporate structure i disagree with its premise because of interest.

you're supposed to be over 18 to post on this board

A lot of "An"Caps and Libertarians first jump to Mutualism, then maybe onto other varieties as t hey read more about other theories

What's an anarchist? What's an anarcho capitalist vs anarcho communist/socialist/marxist?

How does anarcho communist make sense? Abolish the government but you want communism?

No shit Sherlock i am 23.

the difference from socialism and communism is a governing body that decides value is the state in socialism and in Communism all value is equally. So i agree anarchosocialism is counter intuitive.

Fuck you. I won't play by your rules.

In a world that only seems to be moving more and more toward capitalist and democratic governments, how do you think anarchy will ever replace these as a viable option?

When the revolution happens will you be looking for a leader to follow or will you organize your own group/

I paid 50 bucks for this how'd I do

In a square state

Whats it like to be 13 in this modern age?

Does being an anarchist also mean your typing is slow as fuck?

Ginger hair?

Not OP.

But depending on Locale I would do either.

I already know people withing different Socialist circles, so I may try joining up with them, and if that feels, I would join up with a similar ideological militia.

There will be a point where Capitalism is no longer sustainable, and will imploded. We are nearing that point.

wat does it smell like
and niggers don't say weed

>GTFO
>asks another question

IMO anarchy causes chaos, makes people more selfish and people will steal a lot more. Imagine all the women getting raped.

Unnaturally of pine and berries, so strongly it makes me ill to take a deep breath of it with the baggy open

Also glamor shot

Remember. Anarchy is without Rulers, not without Rules.

There still could be Workers Patrols maintaining peace and order

Two things.
What school of thought are you?
Is your name Dallas?

reglamor

That is some really fucking good shit for an illegal state

What are your plans for humanity after you kill Satan and god?

What's your flavor? AnPrim/AnCap?

How does it feel having an ideology whose history results in a state which doesn't call itself a state.

Yours truly, a Marxist-Leninist.

HQ mate

R u an antisocial anarchist that sound like so and so

imported it, its some MA medical

well it's time to grow up then

...

that shit looks fire!

lol

-A Trot

Does your mother buy your underwear?

>a anarchist
Tells a lot about you.

ty m8ty ty

You might be dyslexic user

...

hold your horses cowboy
watch those spurs buddy

Do you like acustic punk?

youtu.be/f7rJqpbk7k0

kek. Trots infest the local Marxist meetings here. All they do is split into more factions than one can count because of ideological discrepancies and cry about Stalin. Pic related.

- the same Marxist-Leninist

which side are you on, collectivism or egoism?

Artemis, are you here?

What's your take on techno-futurism as a mechanism to bring about communism?

are you aware that anarchy is impossible because even in a state of nature an extremely simplistic form of government exists in which communities are made up of whoever happens to be in the same place at the same time and ruled over by whoever among them happens to be the scariest?

So anarchy is not possible. This is because true anarchy would require society to devolve to a primal and more natural state. So no phones or Bullshit. No one would accept that to become more natural and true over security.

If you were a true anarchist you would not be on Cred Forums, in the arms of society and comfort if technology. You aren't living off the land. You're a delusional cunt faggot who makes bad b8 and need to accept that enough is enough kill yourself to make this site better.

A legitimate one

>conditioned
So did you have psychology 101 in high school or did you read about it online somewhere? Cause you seem to randomly toss that word around as if it's the explanation of everything you don't like

Isaiah get off of Cred Forums and just tattoo "EDGY" on your forehead like i told you to.

anarchy wouldn't be possible even in a primal and more natural state

see

Whatever I got my point across

>anarchy can't work because the rules would be to complicated

You are a little off bud.

anarchy can't work because it goes against human nature

see

Fuck yeah i do.

So, police?

These are apperently a bunch of fucking an-commies so that meme doesn't apply. I don't understand how people are stupid enough to think anarchy can coexist with communism.

Incorrect. If you're fluent in cultural anthropology, you would be aware some tribes were organized in an egalitarian and without solid hierarchies. The Kung people are an example of this in action up until recently, when they were forced into wage slavery. Not the Kungs exactly but other tribes also inspired Marx's interpretation of, what he called, 'primitive communism.' The book The Dobe Juǀʼhoansi would be a good read, if you're interested.

- from a Marxist-Leninist, not an anarchist

>well it's time to grow up then.

What are you implying exsactly??. .

Ian?

You are a fucking retard. I didn't say anything about anarchy having rules. Anarchy can't have. Rules fucking idiot. I swear you are just as bad as OP

Do your parents have a finished basement, at least?

Mfw an-commie police try to stop me from trotting threw the dusty wasteland.
I shoot them all dead because I'm an adult and they don't tell me what to do,

Fuck off all of you and watch this video - youtube.com/watch?v=FWlycoyNtHs

Think you mean 'furnished,' bud.

How? If I simply don't do what the rest of you are doing, I am my own anarchic body. Works for me all the time.

that's not anarchy though

anarchy means without rulers

unless these people were fearless to a fault and would allow themselves to die before they would serve anyone, there were inevitably times where some small handfuls of them were ruled over by the more powerful and aggressive, whether it be outlaws, enemy tribes, wild animals, etc

in this sense, real anarchy would require nonviolence, not only of the community in question but of all other neighboring communities, and of all individual members therein

this would require fundamental changes to human nature

...

You were just drooling about how anarchist couldn't have phones.

Not allowed phones = rule

Eschewing government as you know it isn't eschewing government altogether, just willfully reducing your standards to the stage of government by force. You're not a real anarchic body unless you won't allow yourself to be ruled even by a man who literally has you chained to a wall with the barrel of a loaded gun in your mouth.

I didn't say no phones allow3d. I was saying that we would go back in technology because no internet or fucking cellular towers, hell would break loose and... God you're fucking thick kys make this world better

...

But they didn't serve anyone.. just themselves and each other, they had no obligation to serve each other outside of their common survival. It is anarchism at it's purest form, that being communism. I'm not an anarchist, I'm a communist (Marxist-Leninist), because it acknowledges the necessary social upheavel necessary and seeks to establish that. Which is why Marx is one of the founding fathers of the social sciences.

Self-proclaimed anarchists simply want to 'smash the state,' rather than taking control of it, turning it into a people's state, and then setting out to destroy what necessitates the state into material existence.

Why would you let someone like that rule you? Unless you like it. Idk

Anyways, what if I want to let him rule me? What if I'm waiting till I have the jump on him??

(samefag) And by the way, refusing to be ruled in that situation is impossible. If such a man willed you should die, you would die. You would be physically unable not to obey him. Therefore, he rules you, in the most intimate and violating sort of way.

Would the utopia have Courts, judges, or contracts?

They did. They served whatever more powerful party could get its hands on them. Because, by the definition of power, it was impossible for them to do otherwise.

Unless you're claiming no one of this tribe was ever killed.

It's not a matter of letting. Someone like that WOULD rule you. You would be unable to prevent it.

Not quite police. As police serve to protect property rights and keep us down.

A workers Patrol would serve more so to just ensure that no Raping or murdering is going on. Thats about it

no such thing

Nice try, retard.
lmgtfy.com/?q=finished basement

Have you actually studied the Kung people as I inferred? I gave you the name of a terrific book which explains counter to what you're saying (The Dobe Juǀʼhoansi). If you need a simpler breakdown, here's the Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ǃKung_people

It was the perfect embodiment of Marx's detailed 'primitive communism.' Right down to egalitarian social relations.

Oh wow. Now no internet or cell towers? Your leadership sucks. I'm starting a revolution.

Kill yourself, autistic unloved friendless faggots. And do it soon.

sure but it wasn't anarchy if any of them ever succumbed to acts of violence at the hands of any party internal or otherwise

No they wouldn't "rule you."
Place you in a position with limited choices yes. But you still have choices.

This is retarded.

I'm fucking done with this shit, kys
B8 from beyond

STOP LIKING THING THAT I DON'T!!!

Fuck off Reddit.

first of all not necessarily, they could conceivably put you in a position of no choices

secondly having choices and being ruled aren't mutually exclusive, the ruling party is simply whoever has more power and exploits this discrepancy of power to always get their way

>I'm and anarchist.
I'll have you know I was voted president of my high school anarchy organization

(samefag again) like it or not OP, not all power is an institutional construct. some is physical. unless you can find a way to do away with physical power, there will always be government, even if it's as simple as "hurrrr me hit you."

I agree with .. All you've really proven is you speak on a subject without reading about a subject.

if anarchists would define anarchy differently then they've chosen a poor name for it. because the only conditions in which there can truly be NO rulers at ANY social scale are those which i've described

>call someone out on their edginess
>DURRRR UR DUM AND LE REDDIT XD

Kids these days

...

>Implying Cred Forums isn't 90% all newfag kids when in reality it is.

Also only Redditfags use the term edgy.

...

whats wrong whitchu?!

What do you think of the current events in france?

Do you know a part of human history where no state or some group of people had a monopoly on violence?

Did a 12 year old write that shit? cant make out what it says.

I really don't care to be honest.

Nature wrote it.

Look closely and you'll notice every red line is just tracing over a branch. Nature literally swore at the photographer.