Should all pedos burn in hell?

The people who scream "PEDOS, BURN IN HELL!" are just ignorant buffoons. Ignorant of facts, ignorant of terminology and unwilling to be anything other than over-emotional sheep.

what if i only fap to 2d pictures?

Depends, are they abusing children or just jacking it to cartoons online... The former yes, the latter no.

>The ones that act on their desires, yeah
>act on their desires
>act

act=rape

Disgusting nonces

No, we have to leave some to be gangbanged to death in prison

Though they'll burn in hell after that, so it's all good;

why should people burn in hell for being exactly how god made them?

a religous person wouldn't be a pedo anyway. said it before, will say it again; atheists are the source of all the evil in this world, god bless us all.

God makes everything pure it's the serpent of temptation that causes evil

sauce

youtube.com/watch?v=RcU7FaEEzNU

no.
Child molesters should... but only the males.

An image of a REAL child being harmed or sexually abused propagates the photographer's to create more photos

Supply and demand

This is coming from someone with 5gb of Shota. Just keep it fantasy. Support artists not rapists.

Wait...what? So pedophile priests just never happened? You know that happens across the board of religions? Strange how believing in the blood god doesn't in any way halt the effects of nature...

Define pedo please.
You do realize there is no moral age of consent. It is a construct made up after the second world war. Before that you could get married at any age. If you want to put heaven or hell into it...traditiin shows joseph was most likely 15 at the time he married mary(the mother of jesus) and she was likely 12. At one time we as a society was not so embarressed by sex. It was actually the parents job to prepare their kids to have a family and what theuir husband would expect in the bedroom. (they didnt care if the girl was satisfied). So should all pedos go to hell? Only if its a person who rapes a child. Not obe who likes ti look at pictures. Or would have consensual sex with one

sure, all those priests abusing kids are atheists in disguise.

from himenos mikan's "Loli Konnichiwa - Hello Lolita!"
nhentai.net/g/150933/
this part starts at page 49.

thats sexist.

Who can't get cured... yep

"cured"

Pray the pedo away?

...

nah, just the truth.
Women get a slap on the wrist if they diddle their kids.

...

are we talking about would or should?

SHOULD pedo girls get punished?
WOULD pedo girls get punished?
i was asking the first you answered the 2nd

you're acting

so if the kid consents you're good to go?

but i don't harm anyone!

moARR!

>should pedo girls get punished?
no, however if you asked:
>Should female child molesters get punished?
Then yeah, they should. even though they won't get it as bad as male molesters do.

is it a request?

Nah. It's normal to be attracted to a certain young age group (12-17). It's human nature. Society is what has made it "gross" or "sick and demented". Females get their periods roughly around age 12. That's when they can have babies and it's normal to be attracted to that. Now... for grown men that fuck babies and toddlers? Yes.... burn. That is not normal.

but user, i already gave link

You're right, being attracted to that age isn't necessarily bad, however the laws are set where they are because girls that have kids at 12 are in danger of complications. And having children at such a young age prevents them from completing education and living a full life.

>Are images illegal? How can an image -- any image -- be illegal?
because there are some pathetic dumb shits out there who believe you can rape someone by looking at a picture

yes

yes you sick faggots

why?

>An image of a REAL child being harmed or sexually abused propagates the photographer's to create more photos
there is not a single evidence for that

You're probably the first person that responded to me on here with logic and understanding. Thank you for actually getting it.

nhentai.net/g/150933/ don't work

>nhentai.net/g/150933/
working just fine for me

don't worry it isn't sad panda
are you perhaps using chrome or some other intrusive browser?

you're fantasizing, and will act. you're literally the guy in this comic

you faggot americans will never get it

you will hunt more and more people, trying to repress them with hard sentences and believe you are good people

you will never get that your society has a problem and that you should focus on prevention rather than deterrence, because the latter does not work.

I think you secretly need the pedos and are happy to have them, because you need someone you can legitimatelly hate and wish to torture without feeling guilty for it.

You mean like a pedo-pedo that rapes 4 year olds, or the 26 year old sexing up the perfectly willing 13 year old? Because there's an enormous difference.

>its a thought crime
typical.

vivaldi
I will try to find on "Loli Konnichiwa - Hello Lolita!"

It's not "normal" to be attracted to the average 12 year old. The majority of 12 year old girls have not had their period, and look very much like children. Just because some people are attracted to 12 year olds (you) , does not make that normal.

Same way you need Americans to project all your insecurities on. How else would you feel intelligent?

...

>laws are set where they are because girls that have kids at 12 are in danger of complications

You don't actually believe that, do you? This is ALL about forcing morality on other people. The same as alcohol taxes, weed prohibition, marriage restrictions, sodomy laws, etc.

It would not surprise me if the AOC laws surfaced in part because women didn't want the competition from younger girls, so they convinced their sons and husbands to get involved and rally against it.

...

Only if they act on their desires against non-willing victims.

If they just think it, or if the minor in question is willing, I see no issue.

With regards to the subject of being willing, that's a topic of hot debate. Obviously a 16 year old girl can be more than willing to have sex with an 18 year old guy - as has been seen MULTIPLE times, even though it constitutes statutory rape. However it has been brought into question many times whether a 14 year old girl could be willing to have sex with a 30 year old guy (I would argue yes -- I knew plenty of girls who fantasized about older men in high school) or whether a 10 year old girl could be willing to have sex at all. For the latter I argue it depends on the definition of sex. Just as plenty of 5 and 6 year old boys rub their penises because it feels good and passes the time, plenty of 5 and 6 year old girls rub their vaginas because it feels good and passes the time. I even know a girl who at 8 years old would induce her dog to lick her because it felt good. I'm sure if there weren't people panicking and screaming and making a huge fuss over it, plenty of them would be interested in someone else both demonstrating other ways to play and aiding them in their pursuit of pleasure. However as it stands if a girl tries this she suddenly finds herself talking to a police officer, everyone makes a HUGE fuss out of it, the guy who she thought was her friend and she was just playing with is suddenly in jail (was it her fault?), and she is surrounded by confusion and loss.

I think there's good reason to have laws protecting children from predatory sexual-inclined adults. A father holds a lot of authority over his daughter and so without proper legal recourse he could abuse that power to scar her for life. However I think it's silly that we put such a broad, sweeping law out which punishes consensual and mutually enjoyable activities, especially when those activities are performed in a safe and healthy manner.

I dont care, I just tell you that things will only get worse the way you guys handle them, because violence is the only answer you know

I mean look at donald trump, you really are about to vote THAT guy in the white house.

Only the ones that act on their urges by harming children.

By harming I mean directly by sexually assaulting them or indirectly by supporting makers of child porn (of real children, cartoons don't count).

Women don't make laws or influence laws much. All laws are made by the men in the topmost positions of power. Everything in our modern society has been allowed because these men in power have an agenda for society to be that way, including feminism.

Women's petty jealousies do not influence laws in any way

>a 14 year old girl could be willing to have sex with a 30 year old guy

>Women: I can't make myself look that young and compete. Damn her! No fair!
>Men: I am so fucking jealous of that dude
>Parent: B-b-b-but my baby girl!
>14 year old getting laid: Holy shit that felt great and he buys me lots of cool stuff. My friends are all so jealous.
>14 year old friends: I'm so jealous, I'm gonna go tell my parents and ruin that girl's fun.

>result: people of voting age win

if they're just ill with pedophilia, they shouldn't, but if they abuse kids, they definitely deserve that

That's why I said that they convince their sons and husbands to rally. Women would have nothing if men hadn't allowed it. But it's gotten WAY out of hand at this point and now they pretty much run shit because of men that still put a pussy on a pedestal and let themselves get walked all over. Women would never allow a man to do that to her. And that's where we stand. Women now have power and aren't allowing men anywhere near it. Good job, men.

Just like playing GTA will make me a criminal? Because thats acting and to your logic im a criminal?

so basically the only people that suffer are the ones immediately associated with what's going on, because everyone else can't mind their own business.

.... sounds about par for the US.

>result: the majority wins
fify
democracy sucks

Just because God made someone a certain way doesn't mean you can't rise above the primitive backwater urges you have because you're mentally ill, get a hobby kid diddler

sounds like Europe.

no they should be accepted by anyone else as long as they do not actually rape a child. if they do they should get a jail sentence or therapy, depending on how bad their crime was, and then given a second chance

Здаров, я из России задавайте свои вопросы!

this

what if you molest like a 100 children?

Nyoes

Why do lolifags pretend they aren't pedos?

because society tells them being pedo is the worst thing on earth, sure they try to deny it, even to themselves

why do newfags pretend that anyone cares?

Europeans always try to act like they're above human nature. Always the more righteous side eh?

Meanwhile you get your facts from Vice documentaries while sitting in your parents' house at 25

why do furfags pretend they aren't into animals?

No one is saying that people who diddle pre-teens are perfectly fine. Most men agree to varying extents that 14+ should be fair game. Or, if they don't agree, they at least understand how a 14 year old can be sexually desirable.

Because most loli porn isn't actually little kids. Small chests and no pubes? Sure. But they have mature curves, hair, and bone structure. This strikes a chord with our subconscious because it signifies a sexually mature female. It is skating a fine line, for sure. And there is always the outlying stuff that is obviously made to appear like 3 year olds without all the body shaping, but it is an extreme minority. It only seems common because this is Cred Forums. You never see that stuff elsewhere and mainstream loli always have adult features.

Yes. Next question?

Why?

Depends who you ask......

depends.

people who love people below the age of 14? I'd say no

people who like hurt core? yeah, maybe they should