>good at sports without even trying
>popular among student body
>receives special treatment from teachers and faculty
>close group of friends
>gets attention from girls
>is a legacy before he even stepped foot inside the school
Why did they make 8 movies about Chad Thundercock?
Other urls found in this thread:
Because no one wants to read about user Hufflepuff and the Crippling Autism
Kek
Harry wasn't really popular with girls until the 6th book, when he got a little taller and everyone found out that there was an army trying to kill him.
.....there's a lesson about female psychology in their somewhere.
...
>right side
>Chad thundercock
More like Jaimie sucksoncocks lmao
*in there
Wasn't every girl trying to fug him when he created Dumbledore's Army or something
They didn't though, they made one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
He gets cucked constantly
Cho Chang. And again only because his reputation.
He was a manlet so it all balanced it out.
Daily reminder that he ended up marrying a ginger who got BLACKED
No, only the asian chick. And even she wasn't really into him. In Book 5 Harry was a nutcase with an abusive childhood.
The life of the party is here
>chad
That's pretty alpha
That guy looks like a super-jock Eminem.
hey man f- fuck you
fpbp
His dad was the original Chad. It's hereditary.
He was cool unlike one of the dullest shitposts in the history of movie shitposts. Each shitpost following /lit/ wizards and their pals from /r9k/ as they fight assorted kinographers has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the lack of film analysis the shitposts only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of images and pasta?all to make fantasy unfantastical to make witchcraft seem kiddie.
Perhaps the die was cast when Quentin vetoed the idea of shitposting on /lit/ directing the shitposts at Cred Forums, he made sure the shitposts would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-posting for his (You). The shitposts might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-atmospherical anaylsis in its refusal of critique and watching for the plot. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the shitposts are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the books were terrible and the films were much better. As I read, I noticed that everytime he shitposts, Quentin wrote instead that Brave New World "was a low tier form of art."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that shitpost was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. The shitposters mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that he has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of shitpost by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are shitposting at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you shitpost you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>shit copypasta now has counter copypasta
>good at sports without even trying
This one is accurate, though it should be noted that he's only "good" without trying, he still has to work at it to become exceptional
>popular among student body
Not really. Especially in the 2nd book, the first third of the 4th book, and nearly the entire 5th book.
>receives special treatment from teachers and faculty
Literally the only "special treatment" he gets are Snape's occlumency lessons and Dumbledore's History of Voldemort lessons
>close group of friends
Nearly everyone has this outside of Cred Forums, and his close friends are really only Ron and Hermione - he's friends with quite a few other people too for sure, but Ron & Hermione are the only close friends
>gets attention from girls
He's literally one of the top 10 most famous wizards alive (probably top 3 really) and even then he had trouble getting a date to the Yule Ball
>is a legacy before he even stepped foot inside the school
Yeah but he's not a cocky dick about it
>disregard women, acquire bitches
It was written by a woman
and Harry Potter is actually a woman
>He is famous without even doing anything, he is already known by people for just being born. It's an ultimate female fantasy about being "princess"
>He is an enemy with Malfoy in girly way. Boys don't act this way. If they are tension between boys they are fighting and pranking not bitching and rivalry
>Potter lives with awful "parents" that hates him. It's also an ultimate female fantasy, because girls hate their parents no matter what and want to belive that they might be adopted or something that real parents are somewhere there and those "idiots" are not real parents
>Harry Potter is already a friend with many powerful people, that's literally Mary Sue
Just ching chong and ginny.
>Rowling’s politics didn’t create those of the Harry Potter fantasy – she is, remember, not an author but a fan. Instead, the books themselves distilled all the latent fascism out of the political mainstream, boiling the discourse into a heavy green slime, and she drank it all down in one gulp. People sometimes try to play a fun game in which they match the Hogwarts houses to political ideologies, usually ending up with a ranked list of what ideas they like and don’t like (Gryffindors are nice social liberals like me! Donald Trump is a Voldemort!). This is the wrong way of looking at it; any division into types must itself exemplify a particular type, so that the four together express a single Weltanschauung. Gryffindor are fascists according to fascist ideology itself, the ideal-ego of the fascist subject: a natural elite, strong, noble, honourable, yellow-haired, and respectful of difference, but only within strict limits. Slytherin is the same figure as she appears to the outside world, her negative aspects projected onto a despised other. Hufflepuff is the fascist’s ideal ordinary political subject, dull and stolid, but essentially good-hearted; Ravenclaw is the indeterminate other that resists assimilation into this conceptual matrix, the thing that constitutes the order through its exclusion, the figure that in the early twentieth century was identified with the body of the Jew.
>Harry Potter is a profoundly reactionary fable; its fantasy isn’t really about dragons and broomsticks but the tired old fantasy of the British class system. Harry Potter is the petit-bourgeois boy who goes to a magical Eton (one that, incidentally, runs on actual slave-labour), faces a few tribulations along his way, but eventually finds himself admitted to the ranks of the aristocracy. The central moral dilemma is one of inequality – what do you do when you have one class of people who, by dint of their extraordinary powers, are innately superior to the society surrounding them? (This goes some way to explaining its popularity: Harry Potter is a book for people who are very pleased with themselves because they love books and love to read, without any judgements on what’s being read; it was never for children and always for the bored 29-year-old human resources workers they would grow into. To read Harry Potter uncritically is to adopt the posture of a Hufflepuff.) The crude, cartoon fascism of Voldemort and the Death Eaters answers that they must rule, killing and enslaving the lesser races. The good characters, meanwhile, want the wizarding world to coil up into its own superiority and seethe in its own ressentiment; every adult is seemingly employed by a government bureaucracy whose sole purpose is to maintain a system of magical apartheid. But remember that these are not actually opposing factions, only varying perspectives of a single ideological object; the difference between Dumbledore and Voldemort is as illusory as that between white nationalism and white supremacism.
>When JK Rowling announces what Dumbledore would do, she’s announcing the politics of the entire work, its good and evil figures all rolled into one. This is what fandom-hermeneutics fails to understand: you can’t introject a single character sliced off from its text; you can only swallow the whole thing. When JK Rowling ventriloquises her friendly wizard to say that Palestine solidarity or socialism make the Hogwarts man feel very sad, watch her head spin round to reveal the pale leering mouth of the Dark Lord.
-Sam Kriss
TL:DR, even though Harry by all appearances is some relatable nerd, the story's central conflict and and structure is easily amenable to fascism, the ideology which most valorizes Chad Thundercock, meaning that for Harry to be an appropriate heroic figure he must fit all those trappings.
>needs help from other students and teachers to succeed
>is considered really skilled despite relying on others
>people get insanely jealous of his achievements to the point of trying to ruin his reputation
>thinks teachers are unreasonable for making him try to focus on class instead of having conversations
>Slytherin is the same figure as she
>she
Was this written by a retard, what am I saying of course it was.
top kek
Do you get mad when people refer to boats as "she?"
I always thought this pic was showing an unbiased tier of good books. now I see it has kanye west biography in middle tier
you know, that pic is some decently crafted bait
imma save it
>decently crafted bait
How new are you it was stale months ago
*years ago
quite new, I don't come to Cred Forums land all that often
sorry to be a newfag, I'll get back to silent lurking
Its been spammed in every single hp thread lol its ok
I guess you're right but it was still baiting months ago before it was posted every single time
...
but he was a nerd
keksimus maximus
That chad looks like a closet homo.
youtube.com
the bad guys won
All I get from that is that Malfoy should have been a grill.
...
lol it would be funny to have a HP story line from the point of a total loser autist though
>that reveal when Harry's dad is a prick Chad who bullied Snape and probably fingered Lily when he knew Snape was watching
>Nearly everyone has this outside of Cred Forums,
Heh ;-;
Honestly, Snape had it coming.
He was essentially if a robot miraculously managed to find something he was good at.
lel
>a little taller
The key word there being 'little'
Harry Potter is not accurate to real life because manlets cannot be chads
He's a cyborg at best
>manlet
>average looking
>best friends are losers like himself
>bullied by snooty Chadwick and his schoolyard bullies
>Chad steals his crush.
>girls still avoid him like the plague during the triwizard tournament
Having said that he still ends up getting married, rich and has kids
>popular among student body
that's not true though
>>gets attention from girls
like 3 in total
>supposed to be a chad
>is 5'5" tall