Apart from The Master, what have been some literal 10/10's of the 2010's?

Apart from The Master, what have been some literal 10/10's of the 2010's?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=zTEEx4JMi-E
youtube.com/watch?v=cAfYGW0isow
youtube.com/watch?v=KmNsOe8bVkg
youtube.com/watch?v=7w3QadfoWcU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

the only 10/10 in the 2010s was Mad Max: Fury

Drive

Not sure about 10/10s but if you disagree that these were very good films then you are probably a contrarian and can't argue your point without using the words 'reddit' or 'pleb'


Black Swan
I Saw The Devil
Bone Tomahawk
Drive
Inception
Whiplash
The Hunt
A Separation
12 Years A Slave
Tree of Life

A Separation

these threads should be 2000+

...

Carol
Mr. Turner

The Martian was surprising good quite funny in places, also the nice guys is a good watch

Nah. I really liked it, one of the best major studio action movies in the last decade, but it has too many flaws to be a 10/10.

>Black Swan
>I Saw The Devil
>Bone Tomahawk

>I Saw the Devil

lol

black swan is aronofsky's masterpiece

No, that would be The Fountain.

Blue Is The Warmest Color
Only God Forgives
The Neon Demon
The Turin Horse
Beasts of No Nation
Amour
Under the Skin

Only 10s mate no 9 or 8
That movie certainly wasn't a 10

That's not pi or the fountain

Dredd. Every other action movie is filled with faggotry and filler.

Leviathan (2014)
The Tale of the Princess Kaguya
Frances Ha
The Hunt
A Separation
Certified Copy

45 Years
Mr. Turner
12 Years a Slave
Beyond the Hills
Amour
The Master
Shame

is the master the best movie thus far of the decade? i vehemently believe this is the case but not sure if its good enough where its sort of universally accepted to be the masterpiece i see it to be

Yeah I want to add Leviathan and

Under The Skin and

Shame to

>The Tale of the Princess Kaguya

The Tree of Life is the best film of the 2010s, only fedoratipping ribbitards would disagree.

If The Master and TWBB were my favorite movies of the last 15 years, which other directors would you recommend? Trying to dig into older stuff but haven't found anything that clicks.

I've heard that PTA basically rips off Robert Altman

That's more true for his earlier films. Boogie Nights (especially the opening, which is pretty much the opening of The Player iirc) and Magnolia are a heavy attempt to emulate Altman.

The Master and TWBB are different from that style.

>Inception
>Black Swan
ayy youtube.com/watch?v=zTEEx4JMi-E

Character studies of heavily flawed and/or amoral protagonists?

70s and 80s Scorsese would be right up your alley.

From more recent times, films like Nightcrawler, Shame and Oslo, August 31st would fit that description.
Maybe also the works so far of Dennis Villeneuve would interest you.

There hasn't been a single one

How about from the 50's and 60's?

I personally really liked

>Pain & Gain
>Beyond the Black Rainbow

I don't watch loads of new stuff though.

Dredd was a lame adolescent power fantasy. It's the 'Boondock Saints' of our time.

The Skin I Live in
Jersey Boys
Blue Jasmine
Foxcatcher
New World
Confessions
Killer Joe
The Raid
Magical Girl
JCVD
The American
Swiss Army Man

>I Saw The Devil
>Bone Tomahawk
>Drive
>Inception
>12 Years A Slave

(thou)

It's not only stunning and has the best perfomances of the decade so far but also very open to interpretation so you can watch it once a week and everytime feels like new

Inherent Vice was pure KINO too of course

if you like PTA Ophuls is a good place to start. His influence is pretty apparent on PTA. Earring of Madame De... is a decent jumping off point.

Kubrick, obviously.

if you liked TWBB you may like Giant.

Also, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

Mad Max Fury Road

Knight of Cups

Drive

>I don't watch loads of new stuff though
>Dredd was a lame adolescent power fantasy

well that says everything we need to know about you, chief

Universal Soldier Day Of Reckoning

>New world
Gook one with Choi Min Sik?

Dredd wasn't particularly good. The movie has nothing going for it outside of decent but uninspired visuals and competent action direction. The best 2000AD movie is still 'Hardware' by a mile.

Yes.

Didn't Hardware have Iggy Pop and... must have been either Lemmy or the fag from Judas Priest in it? That was pure garbagekino, classy B movie shit

Dis

Lemmy plays a water-taxi driver and Iggy Pop is a radio DJ.

It's funny, just recently after over a decade of having no work the director got funding to make another movie. He's going for 'The Colour Out of Space' by H.P. Lovecraft. Sure, Lovecraft is a meme at this point but if anybody can bring the heart of his work to the screen and make it work it's Stanley. The man earned Marlon Brando's approval, he knows his stuff.

...

>Black Swan
Stopped watching it pretty early on. Maybe I'll try it again, as I can't formulate why I didn't like it that much.

>I saw the Devil
As far as revenge porn goes, it's pretty good, but the protagonist is unrealistically skilled, yet idiotic at times, and the ending, (like all these revenge stories), is very unsatisfying.

>Drive
Good, not very good. Not a particularly compelling plot and the characters, (aside from the protagonists), weren't interesting either.

>Inception
NOPE. Plot holes galore, wretched awful Nolanesue dialog, and bizarrely stupid plot.

>12 Years a Slave
Not too sure about this one. A fairly unique story, competent cinematography and acting, but not much of a plot. The title is somewhat of a misnomer, as it could have been 12 weeks, or 12 months. A movie like a pianist is somewhat similar, as showing the trying period of an individual, yet you get a sense of the situation getting progressively worse and more difficult for him and his surroundings. Not really the case with 12 Years. It's just more and more of the same.

>Tree of Life
lmao, I've been trolled. I actually responded, 81/0.

Well I am in complete agreement then. Gooks do Scorsese better than Scorsese at this point, never mind the 10/10 soundtracks.

youtube.com/watch?v=cAfYGW0isow

youtube.com/watch?v=KmNsOe8bVkg

youtube.com/watch?v=7w3QadfoWcU

Thank you thread king. Would you like to give us your insight on every other flick posted ITT. I'd be lost without you.

I personally never liked Scorsese much.

Is that the Stanley that got fucked by Val Kilmer during that awful Moreau production?

Are you all trolls? this is all literally fucking reddit shit!

I like not-gangster Scorsese more than I like gansgter-Scorsese, though Casino and Goodfellas have great rewatch value.

Not too sure if this is sarcasm or not. Whether my post was unnecessary or not was irrelevant. Suggestions of movies were made, I read them, and gave my opinion.

Yeah, that Stanley. His career pretty much died after Moreau but it looks like he might be on a second wind now. Elijah Wood's company Spectrevision are funding him and Panos Cosmatos (the Beyond the Black Rainbow guy). I think some good stuff will come of this.

I can't stand his gangster movies. They're reasonable entertainment but nothing more than exploitative melodrama at heart.

Well you have my upvote good sir

For your consideration:

Certified Copy
Meek's Cutoff
Magic Mike
Margaret
Social Network
Drug War

>complaining about "plot" as if it matters
>not recognizing TTOL as one of the best films recently made

Where do mongoloids like yourself actually get the temerity to think your opinion on film matters? Just kill yourself my dude.

give more opinions. I need to know if these movies have good or bad cinematography

>reddit the post

>Panos Cosmatos doing another film
HNNNNG nigga you don't know how much joy this brings me, BtBR is one of my favorite films of the past decade. Based Frodo saving exploitation cinema.

>They're reasonable entertainment but nothing more than exploitative melodrama at heart.

I agree, tho I feel I like them more than you do. His branching out in these last few years is interesting tho, I like Hugo more than anything he's done since Bringing out the Dead probably.

Tree of Life is perfect my man. You're pretty accurate in your other opinions though. What did you think of The Master?

Jesus, what Scorsese stuff ISN'T exploitative melodrama?

FIVE
>not liking a plot
>telling people to kill themselves

You're not getting a (you) out of me sonny

>complaining about "plot" as if it matters
How does plot not matter?

>not recognizing TTOL as one of the best films recently made
I won't because it's not. Home movies beginning with nonsensical stock footage and ending with surrealistic nonsense does not a masterpiece make.

Taxi Driver
After Hours
The King of Comedy
Mean Streets
Wolf of Wall Street

>>Tree of Life
>lmao, I've been trolled. I actually responded, 81/0.

Go away and don't come back until you grow up, kid

Holy shit, I just gave my opinion as opposed to just listing movies. Is there a problem in being contrarian when I'm being honest?

How so?

OBJECTIVELY GREAT FILMS OF THE 2010's
>The Master
>Knight of Cups
>Whiplash
>Upstream Color
>The Lobster
>Amour
>The Social Network

Which footage is nonsensical stock footage?

>it's centered around a family and growing up, I'll just call it a home movie lol
wow

Surrealistic nonsense? So you're saying you didn't understand it and that's why you hate it?
You sound very illiterate in the language of cinema and I highly recommend you go back to that movie once you've become a bit older and gained some perspective. Maybe you'll be able to see then what is so great about it.

>Taxi Driver
>Mean Streets
>Wolf

not melodrama? You and I have very different definitions, but each to their own

In my opinion this is his better stuff by far.

Casino and Goodfellas have blended into one movie in my mind they're that damn similar and junky.

It's not that you're contrarian. You can dislike whatever you want. People are giving you shit for how shallow your posts were.

>Drive
>Good, not very good. Not a particularly compelling plot and the characters, (aside from the protagonists), weren't interesting either.
Damn, somebody should give you Armond White's job.

>The Social Network
I haven't seen this one in a while. Was it that good?

I'll give you Wolf, but TD and MS are too somber and depressing to be melodramas

They were not more shallow than those movies.

>Inception
>Black Swan
DUDE LETS RIP OF SATOSHI KON LMAO

>Tree of Life is perfect my man.
I will allow that the director had a goal in mind and that he possibly did it very well, but that it was ill-conceived. I personally like films with clear, central conflicts that are set up the beginning, elaborated more in the middle, and resolved in the ending, with characters that have clear growth. What was I supposed to be thinking during Tree of Life other than, "Okay, I guess childhood could have been like than in 50s."

>What did you think of The Master?
I haven't seen it.

>Go away and don't come back until you grow up, kid
My opinion of that movie isn't going to change.

If you were half the film buff you want to protray youself as then you'd know that ToL polarises critics everywhere. Accept someone has a different opinion you, you fucking faggot.

The Social Network is legit a masterpiece. It's flawless in its execution and despite a contemporary subject, at its core lies a timeless story.

>nonsensical stock footage
You should be hung for calling Lubezki's Malick-ian camerawork that.

I think it's time for another viewing then.

>How does plot not matter?

That's not what film is ultimately about. It can be about it too, sure, but it doesn't need to be.

>Home movies beginning with nonsensical stock footage and ending with surrealistic nonsense does not a masterpiece make.

Literally none of it is nonsensical or surrealistic. Stop talking about films please.

The Social Network is one of the best plot driven movies of the decade imo. Editing, score, cinematography - it's all on point.

I mainly included it to appease the fuckers in this thread who think a movie NEEDS a plot. You should definitely give it a watch it though.

>I come to Cred Forums to not listen to other people's opinions

To The Wonder

Whiplash

>That's about it

>too many flaw

name one. and no, "muh feminazis!" doesn't count.

>Which footage is nonsensical stock footage?
The creation of the universe and the dinosaurs.

>it's centered around a family and growing up, I'll just call it a home movie lol
I called it that because, home movies, it doesn't have a plot and the setting are mundane.

>Surrealistic nonsense? So you're saying you didn't understand it and that's why you hate it?
The characters walking around on a beach is what I consider nonsense. There's no circumstance that explains what's actually happening, it does't follow from happened before, and it's of course impossible because it features the same character at different ages.

>You sound very illiterate in the language of cinema and I highly recommend you go back to that movie once you've become a bit older and gained some perspective.
Am I supposed to gain that perspective by watching more movies, or it will just dawn on me because I'm older?

>People are giving you shit for how shallow your posts were.
I don't see how the other posts that just list movies are any less shallow.

>Damn, somebody should give you Armond White's job.
I'm mostly giving my impressions, not a review.

>"Okay, I guess childhood could have been like than in 50s."

The timeperiod doesn't even matter (only set there because it's Malick's own childhood), this alone shows how much you've missed the point.

It tries to convey universal feelings about childhood, growing up, losing your innocence. How much we take away from our parents versus our own nature. An overhanging loom of religion, of evil, of inherent kindness and beauty in all life. And it ties it all together, with a Job parallel and witnessing the creation of life itself (and trying to examine the meaning of it all by also having that final act of implied afterlife).


It's a very optimistic / heavily religion inspired view though, if you are open for it. If you're too cynical you might not feel the film as much.

>director's masterpiece is a direct ripoff of an anime flick

really shows how much of a hack he is eh

With all due respect, I think you MISSED the point of Tree of Life. Malick really tried to break conventional standards of storytelling by ditching a plot. Instead, he went for a montage style of storytelling to invoke the feeling of recalling nostalgic memories (or at least that's what I got from watching it).

The movie's probably just not for you, which aint a bad thing. I suggest getting super high and watching it though.
>dude WEED lmao
No but seriously, it's honestly an experience.

>If you were half the film buff you want to protray youself as
I don't think I do that. I have an idea about what makes a film good, but I haven't seen that many films, or not nearly as many as people on this board.

>ToL polarises critics everywhere.
And I'm with those who don't like it.

>Accept someone has a different opinion you, you fucking faggot.
I guess I have to accept it because it's apparently true.

>You should be hung for calling Lubezki's Malick-ian camerawork that.
Camera work? Wasn't all of it just special effects?

Stopped reading after your first point, you obviously don't even understand what stock footage means because literally none of that was stock footage you ignorant pleb

Yeah, I think Bresson's quote of "I'd rather people feel a film before they understand it" heavily applies here. Muh-Plotfags would not get TToL at all, and it seems like tripanon is one of those.

The beginning wasn't. The creation sequence though was done by the guy who did the effects for 2001, so you're insulting another master.

There were no computers involved in the Creation sequence, no.

iirc the only CGI in the whole film is the dinosaurs

Bresson was right tebehe and that guy is a pleb. I didnt like ToL because it left me emotionless unlike say Days of Heaven or other more abstract pieces of kino like Angel's Egg. I suppose ToL is not for me tho I will rewatch it when I feel ready.

>That's not what film is ultimately about. It can be about it too, sure, but it doesn't need to be.
True, and some films emphasize it less than others, but some stories need more of it. Plot doesn't matter so much as constantly making the viewer engaged and having them ask, "What happens next," and some do extremely well at that, and some films don't.

>Literally none of it is nonsensical or surrealistic
Are you telling me all the character walking on the beach isn't surrealistic?

yeah that's definitely my vote

My god how intense this movie was
The absolute power ride
I'm fucking pumped right now just thinking about it

>no Django

DELET THIS

>he went for a montage style of storytelling
I see I wasn't that far off dismissing it has home movies.

>he went for a montage style of storytelling to invoke the feeling of recalling nostalgic memories (or at least that's what I got from watching it).
This would make its audience rather limited, (to those had childhoods like that), and they would accomplish that better by literally watching their own home movies of their childhood.

>Malick really tried to break conventional standards of storytelling by ditching a plot.
I was not engaged while watching this movie at all. I saw no reason to keep watching. I personally don't care for the cinematography, I'll allow that it's good, but to the extent that story or complex characterization is important in movies, this film doesn't try.

>I suggest getting super high and watching it though.
This is not a good recommendation.

Its a modern deMille Biblical epic

Ffffffffucking Whiplash

>you obviously don't even understand what stock footage means because literally none of that was stock footage you ignorant pleb
That was clearly a dysphemism. I meant that it was footage that doesn't actually relate to the story and was used to represent what was happening. This went on far too long and only relates in a symbolic way to the rest of the story.

I'm thinking of quote about special effects and story, or lack therefore, and something being boring, but it evades me.

Fucking Taxi Driver melodrama?
You have to be fucking kidding

I honestly don't want to sound insensitive (there's enough of that going around this board already) but it seems like a simple movie would be more your speed.

>There were no computers involved in the Creation sequence, no
Really? How was it created then?

This still seems like defending Lucas's use of CGI in the prequels because models were constantly used, missing the point whether the use was appropriate or not.

>tripfagging
literally die

Culturally, the 90's ended in the aftermath of september 11th, I'd say around 2003-2004. From there on up until now the current trend has been taking shape, getting defined from around 2010-11.
The mid to late 2000's were mostly a transitional period, less clear in its definition than the 90's or the 2010's.

You guys agree Y/N?

>Drive is a movie that represents the autistic element present in the 2010s but taken to an extreme.

Nope. Just want a movie with well-balanced plots and character roles with at least minor characterization, along with dramatic tension. Creative cinematography also goes a long way to making it pretty to look at, as well as sharp dialogue that isn't distractingly clever. I think Tree of Life got about 1 out of those.

no

I wasn't waiting for this, but I should have.

Under the Skin
The Act of Killing
The Lobster
The Comedy
The Hunt
Drive
Only God Forgives

>Whiiplash

kek

No, 00's style was already present in films like Matrix of LotR back in 1999. From 2007 onwards starts the time of "internet culture" but other than that 00's have a distinct feel to them. Also slowly even 10's are chancing now, with the polarization in politics to either idealize or condemn minorities. The feeling today is completely different from 2011 for example, while both being still in the internet era started in late 00's with shit like lady gaga, Cred Forums's rise of memes and dark knight.

Tabu
Carol
12 Years a Slave
House of Tolerance
The Tree of Life
Certified Copy
Blue is the Warmest Color
Samsara
Once Upon a Time in Anatolia
We Are The Best!
Shame
Carlos (miniseries)
Embrace of the Serpent
The Great Beauty

lol

the lobster uc wp and master hav eno business being called 10/10

really mediocre imdbdrone thread

TTOL is fairly weak Malick, that and The New World are his worst imho. TTW and KoC were both better.

RAK TI KHON KAEN, APICHATPONG WEERASETHAKUL, Thailand, 2015
UNCLE BOONMEE WHO CAN RECALL HIS PAST LIVES, APICHATPONG WEERASETHAKUL, Thailand, 2010

TO THE WONDER, TERRENCE MALICK, United States, 2012
KNIGHT OF CUPS, TERRENCE MALICK, United States, 2015

CERTIFIED COPY, ABBAS KIAROSTAMI, France, 2010
LIKE SOMEONE IN LOVE, ABBAS KIAROSTAMI, Japan, 2012

THE SOCIAL NETWORK, DAVID FINCHER, United States, 2010
THE ACT OF KILLING, JOSHUA OPPENHEIMERCHRISTINE CYNN, Denmark, 2012
SENNA, ASIF KAPADIA, United Kingdom, 2010
KIŞ UYKUSU, NURI BILGE CEYLAN, Turkey, 2014
CAVALO DINHEIRO, PEDRO COSTA, Portugal, 2014
NORTE, HANGGANAN NG KASAYSAYAN, LAV DIAZ, Philippines, 2013
A TORINÓI LÓ, BÉLA TARRÁGNES HRANITZKY, Hungary, 2011
SAMSARA, RON FRICKE, United States, 2011
IDA, PAWEŁ PAWLIKOWSKI, Poland, 2013
NOSTALGIA DE LA LUZ, PATRICIO GUZMÁN, Chile, 2010
KAGUYA-HIME NO MONOGATARI, ISAO TAKAHATA, Japan, 2013
HARD TO BE A GOD, ALEKSEI GERMAN, Russia, 2013
OSLO, 31. AUGUST, JOACHIM TRIER, Norway, 2011
FILM SOCIALISME, JEAN-LUC GODARD, Switzerland, 2010
LEVIATHAN, VERENA PARAVELLUCIEN CASTAING-TAYLOR, United Kingdom, 2012
HAI SHANG CHUAN QI, JIA ZHANGKE, China, 2010
MEEK'S CUTOFF, KELLY REICHARDT, United States, 2010
SČASŤJE MOJO, SERGEI LOZNITSA, Ukraine, 2010
NOTHING PERSONAL, URSZULA ANTONIAK, Ireland, 2009
SHI, LEE CHANG-DONG, South Korea, 2010
LE QUATTRO VOLTE, MICHELANGELO FRAMMARTINO, Italy, 2010
DES HOMMES ET DES DIEUX, XAVIER BEAUVOIS, France, 2010
CARLOS, OLIVIER ASSAYAS, France, 2010
LA PIEL QUE HABITO, PEDRO ALMODÓVAR, Spain, 2011
AMOUR, MICHAEL HANEKE, France, 2012
MAGIC MIKE XXL, GREGORY JACOBS, United States, 2015


In my opinion, so far, but there are so many films I haven't seen and so many that need rewatching. Not all of them are '10/10s' but they're my favorites from 10s.

>Are you all trolls? this is all literally fucking reddit shit!
>trolls
>fucking reddit shit!
Shut the fuck up newfag. Pretending to know why reddit sucksreddit and pretending to know what constitutes being "reddit" is cringeworthy.

Spring Breakers, OBVIOUSLY.

>Thank you thread king. Would you like to give us your insight on every other flick posted ITT. I'd be lost without you.
The whole point of these threads to post and rate. He rated, now he should post.

what the fuck up with these new tripfags popping up recently?
i havent seen them for a long time except muffin here and there, and now there are 2 of them shitting up every fucking threads

>Shitting up every thread.
You can't 'shit up a thread' in what is essentially a worse than Cred Forums board.

you should also leave this site.

we are now lower than Cred Forums and Cred Forums?
goddamn, i thought we would be top 3 or 4 from being the worst

only s4s is worse than Cred Forums

Underdeveloped story

>Magic Mike XXL
one of these is not like the others

It was amazing.

Good critique, great contribution, wow thanks for the insight buddy boy

Not shitting on your taste, just surprised to see it amoung a bunch of artsy foreign flicks

So you're incapable of enjoying movies that break away from your standards? That's depressing.

Best movies of the past 6 years? I admit I'm probably among the more casual viewers here but whatever:

The Hunt
Nightcrawler
Edge of Tomorrow
The Revenant (for the cinematic experience alone, but I wouldn't say 10/10)
Whiplash
Inception

Jesus fucking christ why are you here

I never understand this attitude. It is very narsisstic and assumes people should just watch American crap. Sorry.

And only one country is 'not foreign' 4U.

Apologies, I don't spend 15 of my 16 waking hours watching the latest Turkish or Vietnamese indie movie made in a dungeon-prison using sticks for cameras, hoping for a diamond in the rough. Maybe you are right.

There's no greater (sign) of stupidity than being proud of ignorance.

So why are you here then?

Discussing Television & Film.

>not watching Asian movies made in a dungeon-prison

Go to Cred Forums and discuss pitchfork BNM because you're doing the equivilant here
Ignorant cunt

Weak story
Sub-par audio mixing
Mostly weak supporting cast

No pride in it, in any way. Simply don't have the time or resources to watch everything. Any recommendations.

Carol

No, I was describing what an ideal film should have. I guess I should have mentioned great music though. And other things, like acting.

I will say that films, regardless how competent they are, that are supposed to be "experiences," and not actually tell stories or have conflicts that have to be resolved, no matter how well-executed they are, are missing something fundamental for movie making, though I will say that it's for me. If you don't have sympathetic characters going through struggle, or important themes that should be played out, or a mystery compels a viewer want to understand something out of curiosity, why should I keep watching it? There are some films that don't have this, like Fantasia, but that's almost like another sort of film altogether.

There are plenty of films with cinematography as good and better than TToL, but actually have a plot, or relatively complex characters in addition, as well as music and other things I mentioned. I really don't understand what can be seen in movies like TToL when they are missing something fundamentally important for virtually every sort movie. What compels people to keep watching? Because they nostalgic for their childhood? Because they sympathize with the kid, or the parents? Do the yearn for a simpler timer? I don't get it.

this is the reddit board. what were you expecting m8

Mein negger

Is there a board with worse tripfags
than /teevee/?

>"I'd rather people feel a film before they understand it"
How would understanding not precede emotion? This would likely produce confusion more than anything.

...

That image is irrelevant to why I use a tripcode, as nobody can identify me with handler unless they actually memorized the tripcode or searched for it in the archive or on Google.

Jesus Christ, you're fucking retarded. Movies are about mood and atmosphere. There's plenty of great movies that require repeated viewing to "understand" it. If you just want muh story and plot and characters, go watch tv. The one benefit of you using a trip is that it makes it easy to filter you.

>The Neon Demon
Poor man's Drive

A good film, though several problems. The uncle wasn't sufficiently developed as an antagonist, the sex scenes were too indulgent, the story was too simple to have so much time spent on it, the framing was a little too flat, (but usually quite good), the mistress of the house was uncharacteristically clever, the expectation from the conman was quite foolish to expect the handmaiden would stay in the asylum without escaping, and her escape wasn't properly explained, (I guess she caused a fire, but that wasn't explained).

shut the fuck up holy shit i have a headache

It's already out?

>Movies are about mood and atmosphere
Some are, some aren't. Most movies are about the plot, or the resolution of a conflict. Some are more about character development, or growth. Some are about flashy, mindless visuals. If there was supposed to be a mood and atmosphere to TToL, it was at first confusing, then monotonous, and then eventually monotonous and tedious.

>There's plenty of great movies that require repeated viewing to "understand" it.
Like? Strictly speaking, this isn't true, as if somebody had a retentive enough memory, watching the movie again would produce nothing. I think this would apply to small details, not having the movie in its essence being understood. Could you give an example? I don't think this would apply to TToL.

>If you just want muh story and plot and characters, go watch tv.
TV has many advantages in this regard, (especially having characters and plots that can be far more developed than on TV), but the idea of a movie should be immensely quality over quantity.

hey faggot
this is an image board so either post some images or get the fuck out

>dude that isn't my trip!!
fucking kill yourself !Q2mcredditor lmao

Not user but
>Weak story
How is the story any weaker than Mad Max 2 aka the gold standard?
>Sound mixing
I disliked how the Guitar Guy's guitar was barely hearable besides his first closeup, but the rest (ignoring Tom Hardy's inability to spit out the load he just sucked off) seemed solid.
>Weak supporting cast
Hoult was solid, Joe's actor was great, and the rest didn't really need to be any better than they were.

amidoinitrite?

k brah

Came out ages ago
It's just try hard lewd korean cinema though

...

The Tree of Life
The Place Beyond the Pines
Inside Llewyn Davis
Under the Skin
A Separation
Dogtooth

>The Master 10/10
Moar like 3/10

>I suggest getting super high and watching it though
lmao kys

Bone Tomahawk is amongst the worst films I have ever seen

Then you obviously don't like that type of film. It was great at what it attempted to do.

Tree of life, one of the greatest movies made, easily

>easily
Why?

fuck you and the neon demon

OVERRATED PIECE OF SHIT

>literal normie reddit tier movies
>you can't use the word reddit!
take a reddit reaction

>I hate the film medium

Why not?

>Black Swan
5/10
>I Saw the Devil
4/10
>Bone Tomahawk
6/10
>Drive
7/10
>Inception
4/10
>Whiplash
7/10
>The Hunt
8/10
>A Separation
9/10
>12 Years A Slave
8/10
>The Tree of life
10/10

A Separation , Once Upon a time in Anatolia, A Touch of Sin and Winter Sleep are all better.

The Social Network

The Place Beyond the Pines is so out-of-place here. Don't put a hack like Cianfrance on the same level as Malick or Farhadi

There Will Be Blood is the only other one, also directed by the same man.

There are literally hundreds of movies that could be considered some of the greatest ever made, it should be at least a little difficult to be considered one of them. Also, the burden is kind of on you to show it, not me to say why not.

There's always at least one retard who can't read OP properly

You're still here? Lel kys goddamn

explain

i can only tell you about literal 10/10 anime of the 2010s

Avengers
CA: Winter Soldier

Like?

>anime of the 2010s
>10/10
pick one

there's only one, my friend

>anime
>above 5/10

Pick uno.

What is this supposed to be?

conkino revolutio

I honestly don't get why people liked it that much. Maybe it's because of how much people hyped it up but I was underwhelmed.
Good action flick, that's pretty much it

>Black Swan
7/10

>Bone Tomahawk
6/10

>Drive
9/10

>Inception
6/10

>Whiplash
8/10

>The Hunt
9/10

>12 Years A Slave
8/10

some anime that are objectively above 5/10

kuuchu buranko
gankutsuou
gungrave
kaiji
mononoke
ping pong
tried to list some that you don't see getting mentioned in literally every non-Cred Forums anime thread, although none of these are exactly obscure

some anime is Cred Forumseddit for a reason though

THERE WILL BE BLOOD

I was going to watch one episode before I reported back, but I don't like any of this at all. It's like they combined anachronistic digital technology with Dynasty Warriors and made it into an anime. Considering this series is supposedly "10/10," how long should I go before I stop watching it because I don't like it at all, or when is it supposed to get good?

Social Network is an undisputed 10/10

Kill yourself

i was memeing, not even the most diehard conrevo fan would be able to unironically call it a 10/10 without being retarded although i do think it's better than most anime of the 2010s

it gets more interesting in eps 4/5 but it sounds like it's not for you, so you should probably drop it

i don't really see any resemblance to dynasty warriors though

I like this list. No matter what people say everyone's list will be "Reddit" or "IMDb," but I think this is a fairly close list. I may also add the assassination of Jesse James and tree of life

sup reddit!

Oops disregard Jessie James, didn't see you said 2010s

Oops disregard Jessie James, didn't see you said 2010s

The Lobster was total garbage. Bad idea executed adequately, not funny at all.

...

>The Lobster
>not Dogtooth

why?

The grandmaster
Holy motors
Amour
A touch of sin
Mr turner
Tinker tailor soldier spy
The wind rises
Like father like son
Cosmopolis
Mommy
The hunt
La grande bellezza
Prisoners
The master
A most violent year
Shame
The raid
Inside llewyn Davis
Upstream color
Melancholia
All is lost
I'm still here
Moneyball
Jiro dreams of sushi

I fucking forgot Coriolanus.

Soundtrack by Ministry too desu

bone tomahawk is uneven as fuck, also ugly as sin. Baller move but nowhere near 10/10

the martian

This was an amazing film to see in the theater in 3D.

Leviathan (Russian drama not fishing documentary) was possibly the most overrated film i've ever seen

lmao

There are no 10/10s this decade.

It was very good, but I don't think it's a 10/10. That might be because I liked Polanski's version a lot and this was different (though obviously it had to be).

its amazing

lmao

Solid.

Good to see some mention of Meek's.

...

Stay classy CIA

Interstellar

am i the only one that thinks Her was pretty good.

because it's from 2009

it was, but don't worry, you'll get called a nu-male cuck for liking it soon enough

>tfw I was gonna watch The Master on Netflix, but they deleted it

nude scenes with the girl on the left any good?

why? The movie was about a man feeling disconnected in a ever "connected" world. The story and the presentation was fucking beautiful.

the writing in bone tomahawk was beautiful. it also managed to callback to westerns AND exploitation horror in a way that was smooth while feeling extremely original.

trust me when I say that it will be praised in the future as much more than people think it is now.

Cred Forums hates anything with meaning that is not capeshit

The middle of Bone Tomahawk was so fucking great I could probably jerk off to it.

Intouchables
It's such a beautiful day
The Hunt
Jodorowsky's Dune
Kaguyahime Monogatari
Social Network
Nebraska
The Master
Super 8
Moneyball
Shame
Beasts of the Southern Wild
Moonrise Kingdom
Amour
Upstream Color
The Place Beyond the Pines
W imię...
All is lost
Inside Llewyn Davis
Pod mocnym aniołem
What we do in the shadows
Filth
Snowpiercer
Foxcatcher
Ex Machina
The Lobster


The Revenant
Birdman
Frank
The Tree of Life
Drive
12 years a slave
The Artist
Black Swan
127 hours


Guardians of the Galaxy
Inside Out
How to train your dragon
The LEGO movie
Looper
Oblivion
Interstellar
Hateful Eight


Gravity

>Black Swan
didn't see but i saw Perfect Blue so what's the point
>I Saw The Devil
please that's just poor mans Oldboy
>Bone Tomahawk
don't care
>Drive
yes
>Inception
came out in 2009 and nowhere near a 10
>Whiplash
really great but not sure about being a 10
>The Hunt
yes
A Separation
almost
>12 Years A Slave
nope but i'd give you Shame
>Tree Of Life
still didn't see

Denial

Truly the most important film of 2016

forgot
Jiro Dreams of Sushi
Les Miserables
Exit through the Gift Shop
Margin Call
Everything must go

Pain & Gain. What a misunderstood masterpiece
Her

The Revenant

do people not think There will be blood is a 10/10? Its PTAs best film.

nobody yet to tell me how shit my taste is? come on Cred Forums-friends, I made it so easy for you

you are aware of margin call and the underrated masterpiece that it is so all other transgressions are forgiven

Embrace of the Serpent
Black Coal, Thin Ice
Under the Skin
The Act of Killing
Amour
Spring Breakers
A Simple Life
Biutiful
Confessions
Incendies

The Wrestler is the only thing he ever made that felt original and authentic.

>Whiplash
>good
Fuck back to your containment site you plebeian.

I was completely bewildered by Snowpiercer, so I couldn't come up with anything to say.

War On Everyone

Jake gillinhal movies

You're the 3rd retard to bring up this movie, which is completely irrelevant to the thread

The Greasy Strangler

thank you my patrician friends

The Wolf of Wall Street was Scorsese at the top of his game. It's a better adaptation of a book than Goodfellas was.
The New World is just a slightly above average but ultimately unremarkable Korean gangster movie.

is this some edgy meme where we pretend TWBB isnt a 10/10 and PTAs best film?

You play fast and loose with your 10/10s.

Fucking Looper and Oblivion. Come ON.

Most of them are good/great but I wouldn't say they are 10/10 desu.

2007 isn't a part of the 2010's son. So if anything you should be whining about Jesse James not being in this thread.

>of the 2010's?

I know. I just enjoy movies very much.
but the actual 10/10s are

Intouchables
Nebraska
Kaguyahime Monogatari
What we do in the shadows
The Social Network
Birdman
The Hateful Eight

this

nope not at all. complete shit compared to the road warrior. cash grab reboot by a director who never was able to recreate the success of the first two films

theres still like 3 more years of films to go, its a bit early for this innit?

>i don't really see any resemblance to dynasty warriors though
The resemblance is that they had swords and were fighting and they were saying pretty stupid dialogue. I was drawing a blank.

kek

>Interstellar
>Inception
>Drive
>The Hunt
>12 years a slave
>Cloud Atlas
>Mad Max
>Beasts of no nation
>Under the skin
>The neon demon
>Only God forgives
>Birdman
>Clouds of Sils Maria
>Grand Budapest Hotel
>Wolf of Wallstreet
>Revenant
>Her
>Ex Machina
>Gone Girl
.
.
.

There has been great kino.

how thick are you?

I wouldnt know since I dont go to reddit but you seem to be pretty well versed in what they like faggot.

>Her
Didn't expect this movie to be soo good.

Do you really only watch Amerishit?

I said the same when I was a teenager.
>also a tripfag
jej

Post movies, not the typical contrarian reply.

>he fell for the "Winter Sleep won the Palme so it must be great" meme

>Danish
>Mexican
>English
>Australian
>French
>American

Seems like you dont know your directors son.

>MUH PRODUCTION

Add some I missed.

Not seeing any arguments, here. If you aren't going to try to convince me, then your argument basically amounts to saying you know better because you're older, meaning you're know better than me except perhaps by being born earlier, which required no effort on your part than staying alive slightly longer.

a 10/10 movie has never been made, and a human will never make a 10/10 movie

post your movies of the decade

Do you mean since 2010?

yes

That looks pretty cool, whats it called? Reverse search aint giving me shit.

>thinks Bone Tomahak is anything more than a fun movie to get comfy to

>Upstream Color

Ha! GAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY!

Macbeth

>Paul Thomas Anderson
>Innaritu
>Tarantella
>post-80s Scorsese
>Nolan
>Fincher
>Noe
>Korine
>John Hillcoat
>Jon Favraeu
>Shane Black
>The Russo Brothers
>Steve McQueen
>Nicolas Winding Refn
>post-70s Ridley Scott
>Tom McCarthy

THAT KON FUCKING KEK

nice list sperg

I can't really answer this question, because I generally don't enjoy modern movies, maybe because I'm jaded or whatever. The movies I've enjoyed most in recent memory were Korean films like New World, A Hard Day, even though I can't pinpoint what distinguishes them from average thrillers other than the fact that they'e Korean. Maybe that makes me a hipster and I'm less critical because they're in a different language, I've enjoyed these movies more than any other since 2010. I haven't seen Mad Max: Fury Road, or Whiplack, or The Hunt, or Whiplash, or the Master, or plenty of movies that have been mentioned in this tread, but I have a fairly limited taste in movies.

Thanks for asking.

>Still no movie list
Thanks for playing.

Thanks. Now i know to filter you

I gave two.

Was there any list I could have given to prevent that?

No. You were actually destined from the start

Then there was no point in asking me, was there?

>The sex scenes were too indulgent

Elaborate.

I too enjoy Looper and Gravity and Birdman and Cred Forums can go fuck itself

Looper is 10/10 easily

Curiosity

This. People always try to make a 2deep4u drama film-fest-bait-tier list because they think it makes them look sophisticated.

Looper was an almost perfectly executed genre flick, great shit. Don't get the hate.

How is Looper 10/10? I liked it, but I don't see how anyone can think it's perfect.

I guess he meant it was perfect for what it was trying to accomplish? Definitely the best of those sorta-sci-fi movies that came out in the last decade or so.

I get that, I just don't get the specifics. It'd just didn't feel that great to me, but I can't put my finger on why.

This. How come it never gets talked about?

My feeling on it too. I think it was the movie turning into a chick flick half way through.

Oh my god what utter trolls! Get back to 9gag amirite!?
>also Under The Skin should be on everyone's list, it is literally the type of film that when people attain a collective understanding of it will build acclaim like The Shining, Stalker or Aguirre, Wrath of God

>blue is the warmest color
10/10 jackoff material. Everything else not so much.

The world and character building is fantastic and even though it has timey wimey plot holes, its a time travel movie so that comes with the territory. It was visually stylish and it also had a great soundtrack. Near future atmosphere feels really authentic. Film language is on point and there's not a single wasted shot. Slickly edited, though I do wish that more of the Kid Blue material had made it to the final cut.

I've watched it over a dozen times and I appreciate more every time. It will age spectacularly.

I guess I agree, it's just that I feel the story is lacking some undefinable quality. This is probably where personal tastes come into play.

So many movies came out since like '05 that were basically "here's a really cool sorta-mind bending premise, and some action scenes", but this and Inception are the only ones I can remember that seemed like they actually had effort put into them, as opposed to the producers just being like "dude what if we put Ben Kingsley's head into Ryan Reynolds body?" and rolling with it.

A lot of people talk about how the second act really slows everything down and that farms and kids are shit, but these are the kind of daring choices I think really distinguish the film. It could have been Blade Runner 2.0, but it built a near future Midwestern United States instead, complete with agricultural rural areas. 10/10 worldbuilding in a feature. Only film where I think pandering to China was well executed too.

I think I need to rewatch it to find out why exactly I found it just "good". You make a lot of good points.

Okay. I'm still still curious why I should appreciate TToL to an extent to consider it the greatest movies of all time, but I guess it's not something that can be expressed as an argument, or even convincing details.

loo

honestly if it wasnt american people wouldnt regard it so highly, same goes for citizen kane. overseas it had been done before and better

Okay, but for me, this begs the question of why this type of movie should deserve its prominent, even among American movies.

Why the fuck is there a gigantic man on a ship?

There isn't, it's just a bunch of tiny men

jesus.

You could make a decent argument that 2 of those are above 7/10, but the rest are "I just graduated from nolantino and have become a tru patrishiun XD" tier.