/hansen/ - HvP/TCAP General: Take A Seat Edition

There's a whole community of actual pedophiles on here. Ever noticed threads where a really young actress is put into the OP, and they stay up for hours? This has been going on for years since at least 2008.

i assume the busiest ones ITT were molested as kids. same thing with the guys behind perverted justice.

How often do you get a free pass from society to enjoy the suffering of another human being (especially a horrible one) like this? There's nothing better than seeing the bad guy get what's coming to him.

What the fuck is wrong with his head. It looks like a damn marshmellow

you're forgetting dank memes from predators
I experienced /ss/ as a kid does that count?

what is the relevance of that shit being legally consider entrapment or not?

people with power make the rules according with their convenience anyway

>its not a her

MY FUCKING SIDES

Keep crying, pedo. No one's listening.

>the system sucks wake up sheeple

It's not actually entrapment in the first place, this is just the rallying cry of the pedophile put in a corner by Saint Chris.

It also helps that entrapment doesn't extend to private entities. Only applies to law enforcement.

>don't bring the girls

>arrested, facing serious charges
>court date coming up
>your lawyer tells you the name of the judge
>it's judge arthur wick

And what is the definition of PEDO itt?

it seems like everybody has its own, and you can't get any meaningful discussion like that.

>found the pedo
Kill yourself

was Chris Handsome anally molested as a kid?

i bet he was a cute boy.

>not actually entrapment
>judge literally calls it entrapment

>someone on Cred Forums got hansen'd
This isn't farfetched, I mean most of them got released after three years, and TCAP ended in what, 2007-2008?
>mfw I realize the sperg was probably one of them

A lot of euros like me don't consider 14-16 pedophilia because it's just stupid. It's not socially acceptable where we live, but it's common knowledge these girls fuck around with early twenties boys at that age and grow up to be normal. Americucks find this outrageous though for some reason.

Does this basically mean that the government can just use private companies to entrap people (not saying that's how the show works)? Since the entrapment law only counts for law enforcement? Should be entrapment by proxy then, right?

>judge literally calls it entrapment
Too bad it was in such a way that nobody, not even that judge, could use it to support any other case.

>judge literally calls it entrapment
There's a difference between calling it entrapment and ruling it entrapment, pedo.

Read the definition of entrapment and then commit sudoku upon realizing it doesn't apply to private entities. :^)

it doesn't matter.

it's just the same morally repulsive hypocrisy, either if is legal or not

There was a guy in one of the threads yesterday who claimed he was on the show once. I don't think he was the sperg, though, because he didn't mention entrapment once in his post. Still, I bet the sperg has done time for it, or at the very least been bamboozled and blackmailed.
>mfw

Who's "the sperg".

same definition in america. only sjw whales and edgy teenagers would say otherwise.

the user who responds to random posts acting like a rabid anti-pedo, caps lock engaged. There was also this one user who was spamming the picture of the next president of these united states. Could be the same person, could be another.

Do you guys think something terribly fucked up will happen again that will force them to cancel the show like they did in 2007?

I have a feeling one of these days some guy will walk in with a gun and use it on someone, or on themselves. People are really on edge nowadays. Not saying everything was pretty and rosy 10 years ago, but thanks to the media and internet I kinda feel like people give less of a fuck about doing horrible shit.

Lurk the Hansen generals and you'll notice him, he's the one with his own special snowflake definition of entrapment that has nothing to do with the actual legal definition (posted in the OP for your convenience).

>the same fucking sound effect as soon as text, pictures or symbol comes up

come on chris

Oh and he does this trying to derail the threads and force them to bump limit.

I honestly can't tell if this is shooped or not.

>I have a feeling one of these days some guy will walk in with a gun and use it on someone
>have a seat over there
>put the gun down on the table
>what was your plan here?

kek. there is really a legal definition of entrapment there. see what about a definition of pedo. that's what everybody gets wrong here.

it's not

That's why it fucking sucks to see a guy like in the OP falling for it. He's obviously not that kind of a kiddy fiddler that would actually turn a young girl into a traumatized husk of a person.

Threadly reminder every case against the paedos has been dismissed because entrapment

>morally repulsive
That's like saying it's morally repulsive to put up flypaper or lay mouse traps around your house. It's not our fault that vermin are too retarded to not get caught.

>all these pedofags getting btfo
glorious

edgiest post itt so far, bravo kid

here is your (You)
Nobody else give this post a (You)

When is ep 4 commin?

...

Do all you fans of this show feel bad for pedophiles that don't act on their urges becasue they know that would be bad? Or do you just hate all pedophiles.

Next Tuesday, to my knowledge.
It's an apt comparison, PIDF. Pedophiles are attracted to 12/f/Connecticut posts as flies are to a fruit basket and a mouse is to cheese.

>all original To Catch a Predator eps

Thank you so much for this. Currently rewatching all of them.

>that don't act on their urges
They all say that because they got caught

>"nibblin' on sponge cake"

You seem to be attracted to pedophiles like flies to a fruit basket.

>#3 didn't bring snacks for Chris
That guy is getting shanked in jail.

He's a predator of predators

I'm not talking about the pedos in the show, they're obviously acting on it, in some way. But the ones that don't.

Not true at all, they got Boss Papi to fess up to giving in to his urges with Chinese chicken noodle.
Why so defensive? :^)

>this is entrapment
>they would have never done anything if they had not been baited
>Papi admits he fucked a 15 year old boy.

my personal belief is that you can think whatever you want as long as you keep it as that - a thought.

Who's the best predator, and why is it Anthony Palumbo?

youtube.com/watch?v=dvOk7dxvOHQ

But, user-kun, the pedos in this show all kept it a thought and occasionally voiced it. You seem to hate free speech. 8-)

>2008
m00t is a pedo. It's the reason he founded Cred Forums after getting ejected from SA.

Everybody post your best predator chat logs.

>m00t
who?

he founded Cred Forums to get a cool email.

no, they were manifested in the chat and by their act of actually going to the house.
he made Cred Forums so he and his weeb friends could discuss anime

...

The one that keeps bringing up "thought crimes"?

>durr I dunno how do I know you're not my dad trying to set me up
gr8 bantz

Honestly I can't tell if that's the same guy or a different one, I'm sure we'll get more used to their posting styles as time goes on and learn to differentiate between them.

But, user-kun, those were just thoughts in the chat that he expressed as a free man in a free country. Then he went to a house he was invited to. You sound like a hypocrite to me.

This is what the anti pedo 'le it's not entrapment because I said so even though a judge called it that and I work in burger king and know more about the law' posters look like.

they're smart, these PV types

what was the guy that committed suicide in tcap actually suspected of? it couldn't have been intent since he didn't show up. did he send nudes?

It's not that original of an idea and you guys keep getting triggered by it.

>tfw in Concerned Mothers of Cred Forums thread

It's not entrapment because the United States Department of Justice says so, old buddy old pal, read the OP. :^)

>sjws and edgy teenagers think having sex with children is wrong!
>If an sjw doesn't like it that means it must be good!

Solicitation itself is a felony.

Exactly. There's plenty of loli and shota hentai to fap away. No pedo is forced to bugger kids. They make a moral choice to fuck someone who can't give proper consent. And 3D kids are fucking annoying anyway. 2D is the way.

is this the guy that said cops were legally obligated to admit that they were cops over the internet? and then when the decoy said no, he was just totally cool with it? imagine his surprise.

Did it come on today? Or is it tomorrow?

Why a stormtrooper user?

Whatever cop came up with the "undercover cops have to confess if you ask if they're cops" rumor was a fucking genius, I still hear people repeat that to this day.

Looks like a pretty cool guy to be quite honest famiglia.

i thought solicitation was only about prostitution, as in there's money involved.

>N4-PR

I LIKE TO

Word. Knew a number of girls myself as a teenager who had boyfriends in early 20s. Never really understood those boyfriends though, because after getting to early twenties myself I couldn't stand being in anywhere close to teenage girls. Shit, even the decoys in this show want me to boot up Hotline Miami.

He had CP on his computer.

did they give that to him? or just assume he had some.

...

And there's the ones who keep repeating that soon SJWs are going to legalize pedophilia, yet all the pedo apologists are here and not on Tumblr.

That was this guy
youtube.com/watch?v=MHFjm-P2BaQ

you might be gay or something.

are you into gerontophilia, by chance?

They found it on his computer after he blew his brains out.

My grandpa touched my bird when I was 5 and 6 but besides that he was an upstanding citizen who everybody remembers fondly, so I've never told anybody in real life about it. It make me me happy to see dirtbag pedos get what they deserve so everybody knows how shitty they are.

loli is actually legal. Thaddeus McMichael got arrested because he had pictures of naked 3dpd children on his hard drive.

>drug dealer pulls out a gun.
>Are you a cop? You have to tell me if you're cop. Because I never sell drugs to a cop. So if you're baiting to me and I sell you drugs, then that's entrapment.
>I- I'm not a cop...

>what was going on in your mind to make you sa-
>FUCK, CHRIS, MY MIND? MY MIND? YOU THINK IT WAS MY HEAD MAKING THESE DECISIONS? DO I HAVE TO WHIP OUT THE MASTERMIND SO YOU GET IT?

has anyone done this?

he isn't on tv trying to fuck a 12 year old

>good luck proving intent
Nobody gives a shit about your law for McDonalds employees script, user. Go back to potatoes.

m00t was literally underage when he made Cred Forums.

Are you soliciting me to have gay sex with you?

The definition of what constitutes legal porn and illegal porn depends on the jury. It's a crapshoot.

...

Episode 4 is tonight, right?

I hope they make a TV show about catching people downloading loli and broadcast it on national television.

Why do people keep asking this?
All these guys are the bottom of the pedo barrel. They all have IQs of 70. None of them have the brain capacity to be witty.

>McDonalds employees script

Pedo #1 is a Trump fan.
twitter.com/stevebuck6985

This is another good point I don't see brought up very much. It's essentially outsourced crime fighting and vigilanteism. I am surprised they're ever able to keep from getting the charges dismissed. What is to stop me from wearing a cape and mask and foiling crime in the ghetto like my capeshit of choice?

I like the show for its entertainment value, but it's pretty ludicrous when you consider it. Never mind that it's not pedophilia by definition and is likely to be entrapment more often than not.

>the law only matters when it helps me
Keep trying to sound dismissive instead of desperate and defensive, pedo-kun, it's totally working. ;^)

actually none of the guys is technically a pedo. bottom of the non-pedo barrel.

The civilians are not arresting anyone. It's like taking photos of drug dealers on your street corner and submitting them to the cops. They're not taking the law into their own hands.

I can't remember where the exact page was (didn't mark that page because there's literally nothing there worth marking down) but CP is illegal, while drawn depictions of what appear to be children aren't. Also, porn involving adults who look like and pretend to be minors aren't illegal.

big surprise

Tell that to the judge.

...

the judge wasn't deciding on whether they are pedo or not. He was merely deciding on whether they violated the crime they were accused of. "Being a pedo" is not a crime; "doing pedo shit" is.

Good luck with that. This legislation changes faster than I change my pants.

Is HvP/TCAP the best reality TV show of all time?

youtube.com/watch?v=BtRe4KaxfeE

It still depends on the jury. There is no objective definition of what constitutes obscenity. It's for the jury to decide. It is indeed pretty much difficult if near impossible to get convicted for 2D, but not out of the question, depending on your jury. The thing is most district attorney won't bother with 2D because they've got bigger fishes to fry.

its okay he ate his dinner

It's in the same tier as The Hunt with John Walsh and Cops.

Tell that to the judge.

It's genuinely pretty shit and survives off pretty pathetic schadenfreude combined with parental paranoia. Survivorman is the best reality TV show of all time.

>hey are u a sting operation that baits online pedophiles?
>oops I probably shouldn't have typed that

I'm not sure what's more offensive between his pedophilia and not bringing his cunny some food.

Why? The judge knows that already.

lmao

It's kinda of a horseshoe, the progressive/liberal side is the "apologist" side, claiming pedos are just victims.

The conservative/right-wing side is more on the "it's healthy to be attracted to children" claim.

From what I've seen only way, either way the best arguments that have are "your an sjw if you think x"

sure let me get my books from year 1 when the outline would suffice.
Primary source would be the code and the actual cases. The books we used are actually commentaries of those two.

>This legislation changes faster than I change my pants.
They were cases from the 80's and 90's and are still applicable
The jury will be instructed to determine certain facts exist to be applied to pic related

Shaman needs to finish off that Lorne audiobook

>Chris's voice is so smooth and soul-piercing, a pedo's snide Cred Forums personally imminently goes into full retard mode

I think that's why user

They're being arrested solely due to crimes committed during the sting operation set up by and operated solely by civilian not for profit groups. The only point the police are involved is the arrest.

It's like me convincing someone to help me rob a bank and telling the cops about it beforehand. I think these types of stings should be limited to actual government agencies, you know, like what they get paid to do. It's entrapment, sure, but I don't really have a problem with it other than it circumvents established agencies and oversight.

What if Lars Ulrich makes his own agency to catch people who pirate?

>whether certain facts

PEDOVET

>that voice

Fucking kek

Then cite the code? Are you going to refer to the script pages during the exam too? How fucking lazy are you.

>trumpfag pedos yelling about entrapment

kek so glad this show is back

police got me for some chat msg
>better tell i wanna had sex wit 12y old decoy
>better tell the that i was sexual with underage boy few months back
not sure if real stupid or staged as fuck
pretty sure its the second

No, it's like you asking someone to help you rob a bank and having them turn you in to the cops. The decoys aren't initiating any kind of sexual interaction, here, they literally specify this at the beginning of every episode.

Just to point it out, user, I really don't think anyone here genuinely thinks that the decisions made by judges regarding these cases were cases of incorrect application of the law. It's mostly shitflinging.

well at least in the latest one they found a legitimate pedo. 12 is unforgivable. Good riddance

LET THE SALT FLOW BROTHER!

I'm so glad there's more Hansen

lel found it
same page is also instructive regarding the jury-judge interaction re: obscenity

lol we're not even instructed to cite the specific code provision in our exams except if it's super important (amendments, etc)

There was no incorrect application of the law. The "NBC committed entrapment" thing was obiter dictum

They gave the guy's name and hometown, along with the jurisdiction he was arrested in. It would take about two seconds of effort to find out about this on an official government website.

Mr Hansen, I'm tag along.

So they say. I guess we'll have to take their word for it. Another reason why this sort of thing should be handled in a way there would be oversight and transparency.

Even if they're telling the truth, they are still likely goading the creep into sending pics, meeting up, coming into the house, etc. They're doing a lot more than just opening internet explorer and going afk until a creeper starts messaging them dickpics.

>There was no incorrect application of the law.
I think everybody knows that.

>lol we're not even instructed to cite the specific code provision in our exams except if it's super important (amendments, etc)
Didn't see that one coming. Civil law students are expected to do so quite regularly, though they may look up the codes in the process.

Found Boss Papi's court and conviction details.
jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/CaseDetailDisp.aspx?source=Pending&Key=4b141fc4-8c86-4aea-8dc9-f325c5d3bcef

>though they may look up the codes in the process.
>open book exams
Yeah no but seriously, it's less of "what specific law is this" and more of "how well do you understand the law and its application"

>It's entrapment,
I stopped reading there.

HEEEEEEEEEERES PAPI

>Do we know if he's serving consecutively or concurrently yet? Couldn't find that detail in the link.

Its not even the pedos, its pure schadenfreude.

Thanks for sharing.

We're all pedos

if its real he is stupid as fuck
its like you got caught for Jaywalking and randomly confess mass murder drug trafficking and operating a prostitution ring
just because

kek

>just because
Chinese takeout is legit you faggot

It doesn't specify, but the way they phrased it in the show and in the link by saying suspended after three makes me think concurrently.
Does law school bro have an interpretation of this information?

twitter.com/stevebuck6985

To be fair, on most laws, its basically impossible to induce a crime without also being guilty of a crime.

Like convincing inducing another guy to rob a bank would make you guilty of conspiracy.

Solicitation of a minor is possibly the only crime (at least that I can fucking think of) on the books where a civilian can induce another civilian to commit a crime, yet be guilty of no crime themselves.

So, yea, the loophole here being, because it was thought to be impossible for one civilian to induce another civilian into committing a crime, without both being guilty of crimes, entrapment law didn't need to cover civilians.

>i will quickly read through five books of civil code in the exam
I am aware. It's probably the same everywhere. Just surprised that you do not cite the codes/cases when solving a legal case during an exam.

...

Attempt To Commit Sex 2-Vctm13-15Y,Actr>3Y Older
Attempt To Commit ILL Sexual Contact-Vctm
Attempt To Commit Enticing A Minor By Computer
>Do they give a Nobel prize for attempted chemistry?

>You can smell my breath
>I am not gay or anything, I am just saying

He is, and he is criminally underrated

criminally underrated

I just woke my dog up laughing at that

no idea brah, I'll go with consecutive since they were separate offenses and they didn't originate from separate acts (one chat session: one act)
the specific codes and numbers aren't usually required, but citing the laws themselves (FRE, RMBCA, UCC, especially UCC Art 2, for example) are a good idea. The problem with citing the exact provision (or case title) is that you will usually get shrekt if you make a mistake even if what you answered was correct.

Will they ever make a realistic call of duty?

They act as bait, they're not soliciting pedos. It's like carrying a big bag of TNT and waiting for Jihad Joe to offer to buy it. The bait isn't committing any crime.

>and they didn't originate from separate acts
I obviously meant "a single act"

>2018
>new CNBC program, TCaP (To Catch a Pirate), debuts
>Lars Ulrich as host
>a non-profit, Deviant Morality, uploads flagged files to TPB and logs the IPs of those who download
>Ulrich and camera crew go to the hovels of the downloaders to confront them on camera
>he shows pictures of his children and asks why they would want her to go hungry, etc.
>okay, you're free to go
>but this is my house, Mr Ulrich
>not any more

How fucked would we be?

And how do you reconcile this information with the fact police can't set up similar stings without a civilian agency, because it would be entrapment?

>a show about an obsecnely rich person taking property from people who can't even afford to buy music

... yea that would go over so well.

>but this is my house, Mr Ulrich
>not any more
this couldn't happen because the dirty pirate did not get his day in court, there was a violation of due process. To be realistic the pirate should be given a trial first.

why is it every time someone tries to argue this isn't entrapment, they manufacture a real world situation where the decoy just hangs out outside and people walk up and commit crimes at it?

Is it because normies just don't understand the internet?

>To Catch A Pirate/Hansen vs Predator inadvertent crossover episode

It's generally the same problem with legal Latin. Not required, good to have and points off for confusing nullum crimen and furiosi nulla.

>because it would be entrapment?
depends on who starts the sex talk, the pedo or the cop. in the show, usually the pedo does, so then it wouldn't be entrapment. it is not entrapment to supply an opportunity for someone to break the law.

in their later episodes TCAP makes it clear that the decoys were contacted first by the predators.

Don't what you're talking about cuz the FBI catches terrorists that way.

This, otherwise literally every victim of every crime ever could be accused of entrapment.

>manufacture
The FBI has caught plenty of Jahidists trying to buy weapons and explosive that way.

>Your honor, I wouldn't have robbed that bank if they had kept their doors locked. It's entrapment!

New show. Camera crew leaves a golden bracelet on a bench and films people picking it up. Someone approaches them a minute later and asks if they had not seen the bracelet. Some people say no. Police walks out pointing guns and the dude is put before a judge for theft, since he obviously took another's property with no intend to return it.

So, again, how do you reconcile this information with the fact police can't set up similar stings without a civilian agency, because it would be entrapment?

You're trying way too hard.

>the FBI catches terrorists with weapons buy-busts

... and how is this related to the internet at all?

>Is it because normies just don't understand the internet?
> Sending dick picks to underage kids and telling them how you are going to fuck them is completely normal and not illegal
ITS THE INTERNET MOM! YOU JUST DONT UDNERSTAND! REAL LIFE RULES DOESN'T APPLY ! GOSH!

How would it be entrapment?
The pedo's not forced into doing anything. They're the ones who show a willing intention to fuck a minor.

there was a sliders episode like that.

Big fat wallet laying on the ground with like a 20ft circle around it that no one but the main characters would cross because everyone knew what was up.

Source.

t. pedo

wow...

Not at all. Causing individuals to commit offences is trivial as fuck, but that is not the objective of the legal system. You want to resolve conflicts rather than create new ones.

>with the fact police can't set up similar stings
i just told you they can though? do you think police hire civilian agencies to do their stings?

There actually was a show similar to this where they left cars (usually expensive) in the ghetto with the keys still in them and filmed the thieves driving. The car was rigged to shut the engine off after so many miles.

Next they're gonna say that it's a thought crime because the bait wasn't actually 12 years old. If the cops ain't bringing a child to a sting operation then it can't be legal. It's literally the argument that same idiot made the other day.

Pedophiles don't get to decide what the justice system does, sorry.

> Causing individuals to commit offenses
maybe in your contrived fictional example, but the crimes committed on this show were caused by the individuals themselves, same as in every other police sting.

This is also one of the reasons why people are calling entrapment on this show, whereas it really isn't. A number of these individuals would very likely never commit an offence and continue contributing to the society. Now they are artificially incited to solicit a minor and are put in jail, where they may meet other criminals and turn them not only into non-productive members of the society, but harmful ones.

The idea was not entirely original. I've read a sociology study a few years ago where they did basically that. The purpose was of course not to arrest anyone, but to see if people would return the item and under what conditions they are more likely to return the item. Children and well-dressed individuals usually got their things back, whereas people looking like bums didn't.

The cops will do that in areas where car theft is a big problem.
>the car was bait so it doesn't count. Entrapment!!

This show has attracted a fair bit of criticism over how they lure in the predators. There isn't exactly a great deal of oversight over PJ.

Somebody getting into the car and trying to drive it away does not necessitate theft, at least not under the legal traditions I am familiar with, the Anglo-American one unfortunately not being one of them. It is the desire to remove property without intending to return it. Someone getting in may well want to drive it to a nearby police station to prevent it from being stolen by someone else.

So in either the original series or this one has Chris ever taken out a woman?

KILLKIT'S COURT INFORMATION:
jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/CaseDetailDisp.aspx?source=Pending&Key=7fb057bc-9704-4cc3-b818-c732ed6a9517

The example with the bracelet is very different in this regard, because the individual removing the object is approached by someone who can reasonably be assumed to be the owner and does not mention that he had removed the bracelet.

They got so close once. Guy wanted to bring his girlfriend for a threesome, they talked to her on the phone but she never showed

I think it was in the Georgia episode
>all original To Catch a Predator eps
>drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0Bx5i7KZDL0-4WWlaaHBJZTRhVms

Never. He was asked once, and as far as I can remember, they had never caught a woman.

WORM'S COURT INFORMATION:
jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/CaseDetailDisp.aspx?source=Pending&Key=7a780ced-b786-47aa-8a4e-a2376733c5d7

He looks cute.

>not under the legal traditions I am familiar with
That explains a lot.

>dindu nuffin
>they good pedo

No. Chris said that women are more likely to go for kids they know so they don't end up in these things.

chris keeps those tapes and pics for himself

Oh, look, it's exactly the same in Connecticut:

>Connecticut law defines larceny as occurring when a person wrongfully takes, obtains, or withholds someone else’s property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property, or to appropriate it to a third person. (Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 53a-119).

Who would have fucking thought otherwise.

I made the thing I said I would do yesterday, have fun

>haha it was just a prank your honor I was gonna give your car back in 3 or 4 years hahaha

He just wanted a hug

Jesus Christ episode 3 is fucking great.

dude. Chris Hansen has the sentencing down to a T. In the earlier episode of TCAP people were getting like 36 months in jail, maybe a few years tops. Now all three of these people on Hansen vs Predator have gotten like 8 years in the penitentiary. I'm trying not to feel bad for this sick fuck but I look at his sad face and realize he's doing 8 fucking years for one night all because Chris Hansen wanted to do a tv show. It's painfully funny to enjoy the show at this mans expense of the next 8 years of his life in prison and the rest of his life as a sex offender. Fuck.

>it's ok to be a pedo if you don't act on your urges
well, yeah. depends what you mean by ok though, it's probably terrible.

You did good work.

It's spelled pressuring, though.

You are a paramount example of life being easy for the ignorant and the stupid, but it is not as simple as it seems. Specifically in the case of teenagers, what very often occurs is not theft, because they don't actually need the car past taking it for a ride and have no intention to sell it. They don't get away free, because they have de facto committed theft of the fuel in the car and reduced the value of the car by using it, but they are typically not convicted of stealing the car.

Everybody got that! B4!

wut

Women are smarter.
/r9k/ BTFO

>feeling sorry for pedos
kys, pedo

...

>drawings should be illegal

0/10

I unironically feel sorry for pedos that don't do anything, if they exist. Imagine going through your entire life suppressing your own sexuality and denying it to yourself because it's literally the most hated thing on the planet.

I'm B4 and B5.
Molest 2D; leave 3D alone.

Could always leave the country after his sentence expires. Won't bring back whatever time he has to serve, but a clear record. Granted, he will be quite old by then.

Not him but that's literally textbook larceny/theft, the intent is still required

Thanks user, I only worked on it for like a few hours so it might be changed it from time to time

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Can't tell if troll or eurofag.

Sometimes it's just not enough user~

>A number of these individuals would very likely never commit an offence and continue contributing to the society.

At least according to the show, they never initiate contact with the guys first and they never bring up sex first. They just make a profile of a fake young girl and then go along with whatever the guy who talks to them says. So the guys they catch are already in chatrooms/apps/whatever where they are actively looking for underage girls, and several of them admit as much once Hansen catches them. So they are very likely getting guys off the streets who would likely be looking for another underage girl anyway, not to mention sending a deterrent to others by doing it in a very public way.

Bait Car

youtube.com/watch?v=WeWROGE4piM&

Nah, it's actually pretty easy.
You just jerk and you're done.
It's pretty easy living with yourself when you're not buggering children.

>because they have de facto committed theft
I wouldn't say theft, because in your example there is no permanent intent to deprive the true owner of the car. I would say interference with enjoyment of chattel

Real children are dirty and annoying.

I know that's what they claim, but here is a statement directly from NBC themselves which is the polar opposite:

>In many cases, the decoy is the first to bring up the subject of sex. However, the transcripts show that once the hook is baited, the fish jump and run with it like you wouldn't believe. These Internet prowlers not only seize upon the sex talk, they take it to disturbing levels of lewdness with startling speed.

nbcnews.com/id/11131562/#.V-Rr8vCGOUk

Papi admitted he buggered a boy.

Guess sex doesn't mean much to you then. I'm talking about the males, with testosterone.

Yes, but if you read three words further, it very quickly does become theft, because the perpetrator most likely does not intend to return the fuel used or rejuvenate the parts of the motor that suffered wear as a result of the car being used.

The subject of sex is vague.

Man if there were a people to feel the most sympathy about.... are child-fuckers, those poor sons of bitches dindu nuffin!

You'll understand when you're older.

You must have quoted the wrong person, you post has nothing to do with that post.

DO THE MARIO!

the show lost a little bit of that old charm, it's all in crisp hd now, with a fat chris.

i want to go back.

The user specifically said he feels sorry for pedos who are not child-fuckers. Which makes sense to me, nobody chooses what perversions they have so you can sympathize for the ones who understand that it's evil/illegal and don't act on it.

how about uploading episodes of "Hansen vs Predator", like op?

>tfw you'll never have a 19 year old theater student gf who can pass a preteen to role-play Hansen vs Predator episodes with

Well boo-hoo cry me a river, you want me to feel bad because you want to fuck kids but you can't go throw yourself in a fire

Not vague enough to not cause them to "run with it like you wouldn't believe". Look, I am for making the society safer as much as you are, I just don't think that the way to do it is through public humiliation by a guy making a career and a big sack of cash through luring in people that might otherwise have been building bridges for the rest of their lives and never touched a kid. You may argue that you are preemptively catching pedos, but by that same logic you would also be preemptively catching thieves through the bracelet trick. It being entertaining is of course a separate matter entirely.

try craigslist

Who's going to play Hansen in the roleplay user?

>because the perpetrator most likely does not intend to return the fuel used or rejuvenate the parts of the motor that suffered wear as a result of the car being used.
lol. At most they will be asked to pay for wear and consumption of fuel, but your example is so hilarious I might raise it to fellow lawbros and ask them what they think

who touched you user, was it your mustachioed uncle? are the stereotypes true?

He fucking knows Chris Hansen, I love this face, he knows he fucked up

Probably he is a Cred Forumstard or robot as well

>Cred Forumstard
>robot
>Cred Forumsack
>/diy/
I guarantee it

My cat... I will never forgive Mr. Whiskers...nor will my asshole

dyncdn.me/posters2/9/93efbfeffd8ce394d2a043ccc80fea85509e54c5.jpg

>Oh cwap I was just making fun of christfags yesterday
>I'm only doing what is natural!

>oh cawd

I suggest you bring it up with your tutor. It's an introduction to criminal law classic. There is also a specific term, but I can't for the life of me remember what it is.

>There is also a specific term, but I can't for the life of me remember what it is.
Theory of accession?

>that cops ass at the end of episode 2

it could be just like old times. we could wrestle

joyriding?

Dumb JOJO poster

No, I'm afraid not.

fuk u

With those... sexy hands?

That's for the car. There is a specific legal term for the damages caused as a result of taking someone's property and returning it in a different state, because it is impossible to return it in the same state. It's the same as me eating half of your sandwich and being unable to return it (in a way it was before).

I'm having trouble understanding why there should be theft because of lost fuel and diminished value of the chattel. They did not intend to take the fuel, they intended to take the car. They did not intend to damage the car, they intended to take the car. There would be no theft because they did not have the intent to take those two things. With regard to those two, they could be civilly liable for damages but since there was no intent, there could be no theft.

Episode 4 when ?

Ok you pedos and pedo-apologists, you can have one free pass to get the boy's hole only if you pay the TROLL TOLL acceple payment in dubs

Not a crime then. Another classic of intro to criminal law is "penal statutes are construed heavily against the state," which means among other things "if you can't prove all the elements of the crime, you can't convict that guy of the crime"

What changed?

you already know its next thursday

...

>Eyyy Mario you out diddling kids again?
>Shut up Luigi

are the unseen tapes worth watching or are they just a bunch of b-roll?

I think you would find it quite difficult to present a case wherein someone takes another's car, drives it around and returns it to the original location without informing the owner, but while doing so can claim in good faith that he did not have the intend to deprive the owner of the car of the fuel or that he had intend to return the fuel.

>intent
sorry, it's late

They're basically extended episodes with Chris Hansen commentary

>I get to listen to his voice more
>literally no downside to this

>watch ep 3
>at the end during the police interrogation the guy says he banged a 15 year old
>this fukcing freakshow managed to get Prime Teen Pussy
>meanwhile im a virgin

fugg im jealous to be honest

8 years sounds a little excessive.

why can't they just do this shit with actors, like every othe realitiy?

>papi just straight up admits with no effort from Chris

How can you possibly be this retarded?

ok nevermind i paused it at the exact moment he said it, but immediately after i pressed play again he said

>its not a her

not jealous anymore

i wonder if they tracked down that kid

ratemds.com/doctor-ratings/50455/Dr-Maurice-Wolin-Piedmont-CA.html

youtube.com/watch?v=k-u16l4mE2g

same. cannot really emphatize with a faggot.

He was going to jail with or without Chris Hansen. He just documented his greatness

>I think you would find it quite difficult to present a case wherein someone takes another's car, drives it around and returns it to the original location without informing the owner
Not theft because no intent to permanently deprive the owner, as evidenced by it being returned. The one who is going to have a hard time with this is the prosecution. This could be joyriding, but not theft.

I love how the decoy holds her disgust and tries to smile.

>so jealous he got to bang prime teen pussy
>ok nevermind
this show never stops giving

Those poor pedos, all they wanted to do was have sex with minors! WHERE IS THE JUSTICE!?

>Oh fuck I'm so jealous such a lucky guy to fuck an underage gi
>EW FUCKING FREAK!

wew lad

>He'd bang a 13 year old girl, but will not give her alcohol
A man of integrity, and I can't help but think you could edit something on to the snacks he pulls out of his bag for a reaction image.

this. but unironically

No intent to permanently deprive the owner of the fuel? Good luck with that.

But why user? You suffer from being a freak of society too?

you've seen the chat logs, they were all dtf.

Yeah, if they had the intent to permanently deprive the owner of fuel, they would have siphoned the fuel itself after returning the car. They would be civilly liable, but not criminally.

>NEW THREAD
NEW THREAD
>NEW THREAD
NEW THREAD
>NEW THREAD
NEW THREAD
>NEW THREAD
NEW THREAD
>NEW THREAD
NEW THREAD

>auto-prune status in less than four hours

Yeah, no, only in defence attorney lalaland, user.

I'm genuinely curious to that intro to crim law basic, user. So basic that you forgot about it.