/advanced/

Dude, wtf? Go follow him on ltb and stop crying.

it's a copypasta

>i'm autistic and I don't care who knows

Also, does anyone legitimately enjoy the films of Gaspar Noe and not see him for the Winding Refn level hack he is?

Bad Neighbours 2
Ted 2

They were so artsy and cool.

1. Rachat de la pénitentiaire (1994)
2. Le Parrain (1972)
3. Le Parrain II (1974)
4. Chevalier noir (2008)
5. La Liste de Juifs (1993)
6. Douze hommes en colère (1957)
7. Pulpe Récit (1994)
8. Le Seigneur des Anneaux: Le Retour du Roi (2003)
9. Le Bon, la Brute et le Truand (1966)
10. Club du Combat (1999)

Enter the Void is my favorite film period.

>Tarko/v/sky

This was good

imdb.com/title/tt0192718/

Irreversible, Enter the Void and I Stand Alone are objectively good movies. you probably have a bias against "shocking" cinema

There are some patrician titles and the rest are midlevel even though it's copypasta. You should watch them.

>un homme qui dort
literally me

Irreversible and Enter the Void were both film-school level trash. Haven't seen I stand alone, but Love was just as pretentious and trashy as what I've come to expect from that adolescently trapped boy

>"shocking cinema"

just realized you trolled that response out of me. Fuck.

>Tokyo Tribe
Genuinely worse than capeshit.

>film-school level
>adolescently

as predicted, you do have a bias
juvenile doesn't mean bad

i'm not trolling. that's how most people would describe his cinema, that's how noé himself describes his dialetics. his cinema is pulpy and juvenile and goes for shock value. he's edgy as fuck and he knows it

Don Hertzfeldt is a legitimate and genuine artist. Got to hang with him at Sundance last year after the World of Tomorrow screening.

So... what's your point? It's OK because the director admits he's trite?

post your most ancient kinography, i nominate
Mosquinha (1890)
La vague (1891)

On a filmmaking level his films are adolescent and trashy, not in terms of content. His ideas and style are the kind of stuff the guy who makes every frame a painting would put out - straight-up textbook and utterly unchallenging.

>filter /lbg/ trash
>Still leaks
kys yourself sage

>Kurosawa, , Kubrick, Lynch, Villenueve, Welles the list goes on!

The hallmarks of the tasteless and the uninitiated. It's okay if you're just getting into the medium, but there are some (even here, on a so called ''film'' board) that actually believe they are cultured or have a snippet of taste because they like these directors, when in actuality they are nothing more than embarrassing cringeworthy copy/paste babbies with no opinion on the medium they claim to love whatsoever.

For a cinephile like myself, it is truly disgusting to watch, and the main reason I, and many others, steer far away from this pit of despair and depravity.

my point is you couldn't provide an objective assessment of his art even if your life were in the line because you have a bias against his methods and probably has a calcified view of what "high art" ought to be

No shit I have a biased view. You have a biased view too judging his films like you are doing right now, or do you seriously believe objective film taste exists, much less that you yourself are objective?

His art is his art. No one is calling it meritless or "bad". When you step into the realm of cinematic commentary with your "art", however, you open yourself up to criticism on a foundational level. All of Noe's films attempt to critique the medium, and in doing so his shortsightedness and basic ideas prevent his art from maintaining any legitimacy.

It's the reason why Apichatpong Weerasethakul and David Lynch are more capable filmmakers than people like Nicolas Winding Refn and Gaspar Noe.

What did it feel like when you realized all your favorite films were reactions to the works of the people you listed above?

i'm not claiming to be an 100% objective spectator, however I try to take his movies as they are. "juvenile", "trashy" and "film-school level" are empty signifiers. it's like criticizing a Tarantino flick for being too adolescent

>No one is calling it meritless or "bad"
have you even read this thread?

>When you step into the realm of cinematic commentary with your "art", however, you open yourself up to criticism on a foundational level.
the criticisms provided so far are surface level and tell more about yourselves than the artist being discussed

>Villenueve
and why would you include him in there? a fine filmmaker no doubt, but none of his films will be called back upon 10 years ago

You pretentious little shit, get fuck out of my board.

Can anyone recommend me some truly scary films? The only director that have ever succeeded in spooking me is Lynch.

I hear the same mainstream recs over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again so please only obscure films. The last i watched that i got recommended and was good was Cure from 1997

you grouping refn and noe is another tell here. their movies are similar only on a very superficial level

saló

>I try to take his movies as they are
>Enter the Void and Irreversible are ****objectively**** good movies

You've come apart at the scenes, bud. You'll be a fine high-school film teacher one day.

maybe try other Kiyoshi Kurosawa flicks?
The Curse (2005) is cool
Blair Witch Project is terrifying if you're in the right mood

This \/
is a troll post.

I can't give you any recommendations myself. There are countless numbers of legitimately terrifying moments in cinema throughout the ages, but the vast majority are from unfrightening films.

lads... i think i can feel something thick and creamey moving down...

That's how he describes his films, you've said as much yourself. They aren't empty signifiers, they're necessary general attributes that are necessary to discussion considering I don't remember all the details of his works nor do I need to.

At this point you still haven't clarified your point, you haven't even really made one.

His films are edgy, trashy, pulpy and lack depth. You haven't argued about his films at all so far, all you've done is be pedantic and ramble abput semantics you don't even understand in a meaningless adolescent effort to be objective while tossing all meaning in film discussion out the window.

Tarantino respects where his ideas come from. He doesn't try to push the medium forward on his juvenile and trashy ideas. Gaspar Noe is Iñárritu but with less of a hard on for religious collective ideas and not a sell-out

I have watched both noroi and blair witch project, good films that come more close to being genuinely terrifying than most horror films. But i feel that there was something missing in both to make the horror go all the way for me personally.

I wish I could suspend my disbelief to the level Blair Witch requires for it to be scary. It's truly a brilliant work, but I derive zero pleasure from watching it. I've never made it all the way through in one sitting.

I only like dystopian/doomsday/tech movies.

Soylent Green
Logan's Run
Silent Running
Last Night
Strange Days
1984
The Day After
Alphaville
Rollerball
The 10th Victim
A Boy and His Dog
Radioactive Dreams
Hackers
Blindness
Cloud Atlas

>implying I don't have better taste than you

hyperbole

"edgy, trashy, pulpy" work as descriptors, not criticism. you see it as criticism because of the aforementioned biases

tarantino and noé have totally different intentions, that example was meant to point out how people usually miss the point of these movies

Ju-On 2.

Sorry I'm late, I got caught up watching that Pirates of the Carribean marathon. Have you
seen those things?

soylent green is good but only because how referenced it is

I still love the first one like a lot of people (no one here, obviously) love the Goonies.

Btw, anyone seen the Neon Demon? So deep and INTERESTING

>he still watches cinema
>he hasn't advanced to kinography or at least ćiñémä

>(no one here, obviously) love the Goonies

What did he mean by this?

Buncha puffed up cinephiles couldn't possibly enjoy anything remotely resembling stranger things

I've watched probably hundreds of horror movies back when I was a teenager, and I must tell you that maybe the thing you're looking for doesn't exist
Most people don't really get scared after certain age. I mean, they DO get scared but I think it has more to do with the mindset they carry into their viewing experiences than the movie itself. I usually enjoy horror because of its oddness; when coupled with good directing/writing/etc it makes for a fine experience. Getting legitimately terrified with movies is very very rare, in my opinion.

babby

Have you watched Inland Empire?

>no actuality
Pleb

You started watching movies last week or something?

...

How can you not tell that this is a tranny?

You spelt psycho wrong, spaz.

>Radioactive Dreams
Nobody likes this movie for good reason.

you'll come back to capeshit and flicks when you realize Cinema is artsy bullshit for pretentious faggot who prefer to pose and whine rather than having fun and who still believebeing capable of arguing about anything is more important than being a nice person

>people usually miss the point of these movies
what's the point of tarantino's movies?

5 o'clock shadow on the first pic

Vaimoke (Vaala, 1936)

That's pure cinemäto kinö flickcore for you

and the last one

...

can i just say that this general is full of plebs
just in case anyone was under the assumption the op or anyone else was anything other than that
anyone posting in this general unironically should watch more movies then kill themselves

MOSQUINHA

Why do people, who have watched thousands of movies, still have shit taste?
I see them on letterboxd all the time. I really don't think watching more movies = better taste.

fucking this. kys all of u

you included

I love you all and i am completely fine with what films you like to watch

that everyone here is underage

Oh, wow, you've seen thousands of movies! Congratulations! You've accomplished so much in life!

tsar we miss you come back to the discord!!

Կոմիտաս (Ասկարյան, 1988)
ボクサ(寺山修司, 1977)
Al primo soffio di vento (Piavoli, 2002)
వాల్మీకి (దుంగన్, 1945)
Игpoк (Бaтaлoв, 1972)
Galini (Markopoulos, 1958)
香雪海 (費, 1934)
O Desafio (Saraceni, 1966)
ምርት ሦስት ሺህ ዓመት (ገሪማ, 1976)
Ko puca otvorice mu se (Babac, 1965)

Amaranth posting is cancer

no u

:j.y.,3mten xc'Cvw tsfgsncx c

my friend db is always right

Letter Never Sent is shit

-lddddd
*plsss

Kip Aanbestedingen Bloedbad (2016)

what did he mean by this?

the spirit (2008)

salt much

never been there

sup star?

hello friend

She looks like the average college freshmen in my country that once get admitted tries to be more sophisticated and says she likes Frida Khalo ,goes to artsy movie theaters and reads Foucault

Ozu was a reactionary fool and his movies are garbage.

Anyone else here hate malick?

I don't hate him, I just haven't necessarily liked anything he's made since Days of Heaven.

I recently saw Andrei Rublev (Aндpéй Pyблёв) on film at a revival screening. It just further bolstered for me that Tarkovsky is the greatest of all time director hands down.

you ghtought this was a serious threadl mfao fucking retard

>5+ years
Whoa dude you're totally advanced. You've been watching only kino since 2011.

hey are u the same tsar that use to come into irc and ask for film advice and then just ape everyone taste

well, if you have never seen that film you should anyways regardless if this is a serious thread or not, it is fantastic.

this thread is just shitposting with old pastas and some whore's image from /lbg/ threadsl el

gotcha, maybe my autism is real (._. ) tks for the heads up

>deadpool
Stopped there shittaster mcgee

what irc? never aped taste in my life

>Having Deadpool but not having Blade

cmon man

>He watches films made before 1910

Ground control to major pleb

Närä Livet is the best underrated Bergman.

Deadpool

What is /advanced/'s consensus on Dolan? Kinomaker or flickhack?

buit about tarkovsky what i like about him is when letterboxd kiddies say he aint good or that good and then you rewatch his films and he is just that damn great

this is a great idea for a general, Cred Forums needs to talk about artfilm more

>he watches films made before or after 1968
IT'S PLEBEIAN POLICE, PULL OVER

no I'm pretty sure its you

If Cred Forums wanted to talk about artfilm it would already be talking about artfilm. Generals 100% of the time only result in circlejerking and shitposting

It usually correlates

>Watch lots of movies
>Start thinking about what makes them good and start discussing movies more
>Thinking about films in a different way
It's a natural process

old Cred Forums managed to pull these threads off without looking like utterly self-absorbed twats.

I genuinely think Blue Velvet is not that good

i think like 20s to 50s is the best era for film and the second best is the past 16 years :v9

i've been watching a lot of films from beginning of the last century and 20s and watching these films I find new things in my old favorites and love 'em even more :p

>2.5 on imdb
Seems like kino to me

These are all fine other than uTorrent

>he still doesn't get it

this thread is half-bait, half-serious
the op is purposefully absurd

it's a shitpost from /lbg/ newfriend made by some Villeneuve loving cuckfaggot

>old Cred Forums managed to pull these threads off without looking like utterly self-absorbed twats.
When was this? before 2008?

Which Lynch spooked you?
Nothing of his really spooked me other than some MD scenes (the jumpscare got me good).

I'm plebeian af and recognize every movie here

Wow, your list goes on and on.

well your wrong my friend

reminder that if you don't know at least 90% of the auteurs from level 5 and below, you don't belong in this thread

kys

kys

Nice booty kinémeïrâ

reminder that this pathetic thread shouldn't exist

>I'm quite the cinephile myself! Tarr, Bresson, Akerman, the list goes on... Vincent Monnikendam? Never heard of him

why are women so fucking pathetic

t. embryo

100% tranny

women are all about the image of having an interest but not being interested in the interest itself

Seems like somebody here is still stuck at level 2

>that thing
>woman

lmoa

i'm deeper than anyone itt

i just read the wiki plot synopsis and really liked it. now i can pretend to have seen it too.

>Blue Velvet

Amazing How they found two of the oldest looking kids in hollywood with massive chins.

Movie had some potent scenarios (for teens). But felt too much like a self-insert cool cat kid who actually tries too hard to seem like he is not trying to impress the girls. I turned it off after the guy started yelling into the vagina like it was his mother.

Must be genetic since your mom appears to be extremely deep too

>all taste was literally hand selected by others for him
>>embryo
hes lower than an embryo

BABY WANTS TO FUCK

You stopped before it got real gud famalam

my mum is very deep in the clunge

yes

you should actually watch it, nerd

exactly

wait a second here

are these threads made by that dumb fuckin pleb Alessandro?

probably synt and his boyfriends

reminder that i am the only good poster itt

unfollow fabs king of the jumblywangs

this is literally the best movie ever made and only plebs will disagree

whats wrong with Utorrent?

Boring, pretentious and way too long for what it is. The only thing it's best at is putting men to sleep.

t. philistine with no attention span whatsoever

It mines your data and had bitcoin miner

U guys are stupid and have shitty taste.

But dont be offended.

Love is pornographic 3D bullshit.

bump

>jewgle's algorithm already picks up amaranth cause /lbg/ cucks look up >her pics to fap

delete this

>implying I don't have them all already saved in cold storage

>a thread dedicated to hipster faggots
kek, nice of you all to contain yourselves here.

looks like we've all been BTFO by (You)

then upload them you cuck, i wanna fap too

they are all in the archive

Has she shown her hairy pits yet?

this is Cred Forums, we're all hipsters here

whoa
that one is nice

ayyyyyy lmaooooo

bump

It implies Windows

seeing this thread got me into reconsidered if /film/ could be helpful. The amount of level entry "cinema" posted in the /advanced/ is astonish.

Who's the president of this club?

the pest

the masketta man

Would it help? Pretentious faggot.

>IMG_XXXX.jpg

no