What am I in for

What am I in for

porn

A shit movie.

CGI porn

Nigger dicks

FUCKING LARS VON KEKMASTER

should I not even bother watching it

A male perspective meditation on the mystery of female sexuality.

I enjoyed it
Volume 2 is where it is at though. Volume 1 is a tease.

Decent central-Eurpoean-depressioncore that ends with a really strange song choice over the closing credits, followed by Vol II which is more depressioncore with a weirdly lazy shit final scene in Volume II.

A really shit excuse for sexual content

Just watch porn, it probably has a better story

The extended editions though.

Lmao

Is this what you truly believe?

Lars Von Trier claims another victim.

But that could be hot, is it still good? It could just be erotic, like erotic stories, not porn.

Vol. 1 is a young girls exploration of her vagina and how she has sex with shia lebeuf multiple times.

Are you serious? Holy shit what an absolute waste of time then.

How is this any different from browsing Cred Forums

where the fuck is the porn did I get a cut down version? because I only got niggerdicks humping and the pedo getting a boner..

This.

Lars is like Hitchcock: he's obsessed with women because he wants them but doesn't get them and doesn't understand them. Hence all his movies basically being an exercise in him trying to figure them out.

Anti-Christ and Melancholia are basically "WHY ARE ALL WOMEN CRAZY??" and Nymphomaniac is basically "WHY ARE ALL WOMEN WHORES??"

He's basically an /r9k/ poster on a perpetual misogynistic rant.

And the brilliance of it is that he's right.

Whether he's right or not is immaterial

It's not entertaining or engaging at all, what a pile of shit.

>Anti-Christ and Melancholia are basically "WHY ARE ALL WOMEN CRAZY??"

How retarded do you have to be to have gotten this impression? Especially Antichrist, where the man is literally responsible for things going south in the first place.

fishing

So lemme get this straight. You think it's just a coincidence that he's made three movies in a row with female leads that are certifiably mentally unstable or having huge mental breakdowns?

Yes

He uses female leads for almost everything he's done and that trilogy just happens to be about depression. He's had plenty of films with stable and/or sympathetic female leads.

If he was a closeted cross dresser, that would solve the mystery

I enjoyed it but I'm a cultured European so YMMV.

Trier clearly has mommy issues.

He's a cuck baby after all.

>DUDE, SEXUAL LIBERATION, LMAO!!!

Watched 1 and 2 and thought they were both disgusting but I'm sickened by female sexuality unless it's directed at me so . . .

>That scene where she gets doubleteamed by two big black africans who then start fighting for no reason afterward so she sneaks out through the back

Depends. Are you a pleb? Are you a prude? Are you familiar with Trier?

>fighting for no reason afterward
She explicitly explains the reason:

They could feel each others penises during the double penetration.

Our boy Shia was pretty convincing aswell. Worth a watch

Four hours of pic related.

that sounds fucking hilarious

It made me angry. I would rather dig out my ingrown toenail than watch it again

i just skipped all the boring shit and went straight to the sex bits lol

got to see shias d!ck xD

I fucking love toe surgery

I skipped around until the train handjob scene and beat my dick and then turned it off

You were reading the river of your cock, user

It's very funny, especially vol. 1.

Why are there like 5 Von Trier threads up?

Are you seriously complaining about non-capeshit/meme threads?

lol

Fair point.