The TFA of movie reviews

the TFA of movie reviews
fucking hack frauds

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sg29Sa6QFes
lmgtfy.com/?q=why would anyone want to be anonymous?
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>negative review

It was a negative review of the prequels.
More than half of it.

He wasn't that negative. He said what most people on Cred Forums have been saying.

It was a safe soft reboot on IV. It took zero risks, but was ultimately a far better narrative than the poorly executed imaginative prequels.

VII was a forgettable cash grab.
But that doesn't make the prequels good, and being memorable for being shitty shouldn't be goal.

I was pretty surprised 3/4 of the "review" wasn't even about VII though.

This review was indulgent, (especially in attacking the prequel ring theory), rather unfunny, poorly paced, and much less insightful than the Star Trek 09 review, especially in regards to the analysis of reboots. The review of TFA would have been longer if it didn't just retread what Mike said in the ST09 review, but much less through.

To be fair, I don't know why you expected anything different from a Mr. Plinkettt video.

>I was pretty surprised 3/4 of the "review" wasn't even about VII though.
I guess he felt he didn't have much to say, and what he said about TFA was very obvious.

I'm still surprised they gave that ring theory shit the time of day. The prequels recycling shit from the original movies isn't some brilliant ancient storytelling technique. Even if it was, it doesn't change the fact that they're shitty unwatchable movies. There was no reason to give the article any exposure.

Could you link the negative review pls?

Oh never mind, here it is:

youtube.com/watch?v=sg29Sa6QFes

If there isn't a part 2 that actually dives into the characters and shit then fuck RLM the hack frauds

>I'm still surprised they gave that ring theory shit the time of day.
Maybe he was more inspired by shitting on the prequels in a redundant fashion than praising TFA. Can't say I blame him, as attacking is almost always easier than praising.

>There was no reason to give the article any exposure.
It's an odd decision, but maybe he felt the need to have this review as long as the previous one without having nearly enough material for it. TFA is just so forgettable when you can just go on and on about the poor decisions in making the prequels.

Literally who?

Guess I'm the contrarian that enjoyed the fuck out of the review and basically agrees with everything it said.

I'm glad the Half in the Bag review capture what a true pleb Mike is.
>"I loved it, it was everything i hoped it would be".
And it's on record for all eternity

>Jew Jew Banks
dropped.

same

Nobody likes your unfunny shit.

>lol meemz
>this will get the 9gag crowd

Really? Wouldn't you admit the jokes were at least much flatter than in previous reviews?

I, too, was blinded by IMAX 3D. But, as soon as I started thinking about it after rewatching it the day after, I hated it.

But it wasn't a better narrative than the prequels.

The characters in TFA were schizophrenic and incoherent. And almost all narrative development was thrown under a bus in favour of constant action.

> 30 minutes of discussing some shitty internet theory that no one cares about.

Why was this necessary?

Only part that made me laugh was the Plinkett in Hell gag. Everything else felt so phoned in.

But did you enjoy it? Are you the same person? Fuck this, who still thinks user ids are a bad idea?

The TFA review is just a soft reboot of the phantom menace review.

I'm a different user. And no, I didn't enjoy it. It was a gigantic waste of time and Mike was waaaayy to soft on it despite the film having some serious and obvious flaws, every bit as bad as the prequels.

No one in the prequels was remotely human. It's like a child wrote them.

>despite the film having some serious and obvious flaws, every bit as bad as the prequels.

>people actually believe this

I got a laugh out of "JJ's fan service".

>105 minutes review
No, thanks.

He is basically sucking himself because the movie loosely resembles what he mentioned in their previews plinkets.

Thanks for your input.

user you are replying to. I thought the jokes were pretty good and laughed hard a few times. I don't recall the number of times so I can't do a laugh count comparison, but I think I enjoyed this one about as much as the earlier ones.

I did find it odd that he spent so much time on the ring theory, I was actually predicting around that time that the joke was gonna be that he would never get to TFA and would use the entire 2 hours to just shit all over the prequels more, which I would have been more than okay with.

Also, it was weird when he said "cuck".

Same shitty dialogue, horrendous acting, mostly on the part of Rey, worthless villain, Rey is untouchable throughout the entire movie and renders all other characters obsolete and in fact supplants other roles.
That's just trying to simplify everything I hate about that movie, too.

>Mike starts praising George "the cuck" Lucas
what a time to be alive

It's actually about half of that. For some reason he talks about completely irrelevant shit and the prequels for a long portion of it.

Because the ring theory was created as a backlash to the Plinkett reviews. Mike unintentionally created the ring theory. Je needed to BTFO it.

>but I think I enjoyed this one about as much as the earlier ones.
I would be very surprised if this is a majority opinion.

>when he said "cuck".
wat

the only good part of the video is the pizza phone sex

Literally the only thing worth watching is 1 hour in, who cares about retarded theories and clickbait? And he should have done it like his regular self, the plinkett persona was wasted on this fake review.

Incoherent characters > non-characters.

It's a state of the union, but for Star Wars.

the fucking video can be trimmed down 50 minutes if you get rid of inane talking about the original trilogy and prequels that pertains to nothing about TFA

don't listen to autists and disney shills on Cred Forums
they are daft to all reason and logic and will try to convince you they know better than someone who took the actual time and research to put a decent review like the plinket episodes together

You are aware that Plinkett is a character right? Going on and on about a stupid, random fan theory is totally something I'd expect from one of these videos.

It's funny, imo.

thanks for spamming this in every thread, I sure appreciate you shilling your shitty channel.

I'm just a fan m8. I never thought to do it until I watched RLM''s review. Now I realise that I have a duty to save this board.

Reddit is very welcoming, I hear.

It's obvious he's been wanting talk about the pointless shit for long time since he's done the original reviews but his autism prevented him from creating independent videos for them.

Probably because he knew no one gave a shit but he wanted to force people to listen to his autistic ramblings.

>shit better than shit.

That may be true, but it was sort of redundant at that point, and so extraordinarily silly on its face, (here are some similar shots, Lucas a genius), that it didn't need a rebuttal this long. I also suspect that Plinkett is underselling the theory, not that it's valid, but if it really is just pointing out similar shots as evidence, it's completely fucking worthless and may have overrated its importance by seeing it featured in clickbait.

idiot

Fuck off. I see no reason to have user ids on Cred Forums, but not Cred Forums.

Holy shit you're right. It's almost as if Cred Forums shouldn't have user IDs.

Holy shit, the fucking comment section for the video is filled with triggered Cred Forumstards. I can't fucking breathe.

>diversity is good

yeah it was fine before it

turned that shit off immediatly

It really bothered me that even when she was captured and needed help the writers couldn't possibly let her be a "damsel in distress", instead of having her work with her new found allies to overcome the situation she just magically develops superpowers and continues to need no man.

...

And why not? What possible benefit is there to not being able to identify the same persons speaking within a thread?

Before the Plinkett review
>the ring theory proves that the Prequels are true pieces of art. Lucas is a genius

After the Plinkett review
>n-nobody cares about the ring theory anyway

Will Prequelfags ever recover?

...

Ironically, when I was watching it in the cinema and we see her about to get tortured and mind-probed, I was thinking back to the Ep 1 review where Plinkett says something like "Oh, NOW i'm on the edge of my seat"... and then she frees herself and all tension leaves not just the scene but the whole movie. I instantly assumed from that point on that Rey would never be in any actual danger and would never need any help for anything and I just kind of switched off, and of course, I was completely right.

I think the only time I learned of it was when Plinkett mentioned in his review of the TFA trailer, or something like that. This might have obsessed him and it doesn't seem like him.

lmgtfy.com/?q=why would anyone want to be anonymous?

...

Anonymous posters confuse Ieddit tourists.

I honestly never heard of ring theory before this review.

i just dont get all these "the magic is back" comments that movie got.

It didnt really give me the same feelings as the originals and honestly i think the star wars universe was the strongest in certain games like the jedi knight series, Tie-Fighter or the two Kotor games.

This just felt like an action-movie utilizing the universe as some backdrop.

After the TFA release back in december articles about were posted everywhere and the prequelfags on Cred Forums were making multiple threads about it, praising Lucas a genius. Now that they've been eternally BTFO they pretend they never cared about the ring theory

>conflating user identifications in a thread with losing anonymity

Was pretending to be retarded part of your plan?

you make some really fine points with this gibberish

There are all of the same benefits to not having IDs as there are for not having permanent board names/trips. Sometimes I just like to shitpost in a thread and then later I'll actually want to contribute, or vice versa. Sometimes I even shitpost on both sides of an argument. Why would you want to take that away form me?

Oh. Was there any more to the theory than individual shots throughout prequels resembling other shots in the OT, which, if even part of a grand scheme, doesn't make them good?

I totally lost it at the pic related part

Those fucking edits of people including the actress talking about cpt Phasma and what she represents before cutting to repeated shots of her getting punched in the face and Han telling Chewie to dump her in the trash compactor

Not really

Despite how hard you tried to make that dude into a strawman, that cartoon still sounds way more rational than you.

Literally nothing in this is wrong, though, outside of there being some issues with being an independent.

both sides do have some valid points, both sides have some truly stupid-ass bullshit as well. Having a polarized and partisan viewpoint of the world is small-minded and is a great way to ensure that you end up in an echo chamber of like-minded retarded faggots. See: tumblr, Cred Forums, stormfront, SRS, etc.

You having this saved as a legit argument reveals you to be a complete faggot who sticks your fingers in your ears whenever you hear any criticism, no matter how valid, of your worldview.

>I treat politics like they're a sport
>my team is better than yours

Very subpar regarding the jokes and the content.

He already did very successful videos regarding the prequels.
Unless it's some very elaborate form of trolling, wasting the first part of the movie is just a cheap rehash of his previous works, more like a filler to make the whole thing longer.

If he doesn't have the inspiration or the ideas for a proper Plinkett video maybe he should just kill the format.

>>conflating identifications with losing anonymity
???

>There are all of the same benefits to not having IDs as there are for not having permanent board names/trips.
Not really. With user ids, it will automatically be indicated to other users which posts are made by the same user, instead of having to put a name every time, or just leaving it there and becoming less anonymous. At the very least, they should make it an option to have yourself identified or not. You can't lose anonymity unless somebody could identify you from a single thread, which is unlikely. You also can't create personalities really by being identified within one thread.

>right to shitpost
There's no such right. You're proving that this system would likely lessen shitposting, or at least yours, even though I don't think anybody would give a shit or think less of your current posts if you were shitposting earlier in a thread.

What was the point of getting her for that role? Why hire an actor known for playing a strong imposing character, hype her up as something similar for your movie and then do absolutely nothing with her except make her look as pathetic as Kylo Ren?

I'm in many ways a Cred Forumstard and even I'm finding it amusing.

It wasn't really that prominent an issue in this film. It's not as offensive as some of the other pointless things they get worked up about on a regular basis and the only casting choice I really doubt is Daisy Ridley... well her and all the cameo actors phoning it in.

They waste all their energy on being indignant about stupid shit like this. There really was a time when you could have interesting discussions about niche and taboo politics and philsophy there. Now it just seems to be filled with kids getting triggered by everything and posting dank Trump memes. I think the US elections and Gamergate ruined the place for me. I only stuck around for brit/pol/ during the referendum.

For a single thread? How fucking autistic can you be to want to be anonymous for a single thread, unless you want to shitpost?

K. I bet people were probably just trolling then.

>Captain Phasma was a phenomenal character
What did she mean by this?

It was just the Star Trek films with a new skin. Mindless action/adventure. That's really all the originals were meant to be but they resonated on a level TFA failed to, though to be fair I don't think it's something they could recapture.

Unfortunately I think he realizes the whole "nitpicky Youtuber" thing is played out. He did nitpicky Youtube videos on the prequels and they were great, but now Cinema Smegma and Movie Cum Dumpster channels are everywhere doing the exact same thing hours after the film is released. The Plinkett channel lost what made it special, so he can't just do a comedy nitpicky review anymore.

All of this, though he shouldn't kill it as much as only do it when he can do it well. All the Plinkett movie reviews had some clear creative spark, even the Indiana Jones one which he didn't want to do, but this felt very forced and mediocre.

He said "kook", not "cuck".

>unless you want to shitpost?
or have multiple conversations or post from multiple viewpoints without retards attacking posts you've made throughout the thread

for instance, I'm calling you a fucking idiot while trying to talk about the Plinket review. I don't want you to attack me based on my opinions about the Plinket review, and I don't want anons getting frustrated at me for indulging your retarded Reddit sensibilities

Do you think maybe it was all lost in editing and they filmed a lot more with her? It's possible. I thought she was wasted as well, even though I'm not particularly fond of the big shiny stormtrooper as a concept.

I didn't waste my time playing a character who is one screen for a total of 2 minutes and most notable plot point is a reference to the first film.

Because she was in Game of Thrones. That's literally it. Same reason Sophie Turner and Peter Dinklage were in X-Men.

Interesting point, though I think your concern is overstated. I don't think this is a problem on Cred Forums.

>I'm glad they agree with me instead of disagreeing with me

That would be my guess, either way the final product was extremely disappointing. Same with Poe, I have no idea why people keep bringing him up as some amazing new character, he barely does or say anything. Really there was only two new main characters introduced, not counting the "villain" and one of them is also really lacking a role.

Some people definately was. But others really tried to defend the prequels to death

/TRIGGERED/

>I don't know any anti-SJWs who are against diversity
Literally made me spittake. Cred Forums is so fucking deluded.

Cred Forums isn't an echo chamber.
Tumblr can be, since you choose who to subscribe to, but plenty of SJWs probably see a lot of opposing views.

It was more a rant is current year star wars and hollywood.
But the average autistic Cred Forums user takes everything literally, so he expected a 2 hour TFA rant

please stop shilling your shitty videos

Every echo-chamber has on the internet has its fair share of dissenters that get immediately memed into oblivion. In tumblr you're called sexist misogynistic pigs, in Cred Forums you're numale cucks

The point was marketing
There is a climate in Hollywood that wants to tell the world how great being diverse is
brown and black man and woman, asians, hispanics, all people together including white woman
White men however are mostly protrayed by this neo hollywood as gay or disabled or simply plain evil.
Notice how Finn and Poe are gay, Adam Driver who is a jew is passed off as an emo white man child because normies do not know what hollyjews are really up to just as long they can cheer for the next cape shit and villain of the week block buster.

exact;ly, they force their agenda with people or things that are popular, simply rehash and sell them again and again.

To the hollywood jews people are cattle and the white race is evil, this is not some Cred Forums fantasy if you look at how races are represented in these new block busters from let's say now to a year ago there is an unwavering motion to force diversity and multiculturalism down our throats where the majority of mankind according to hollywood must be brown or negroid ruled by jewish overlords (portrayed in movies as evil white man played by a jew in the case of TFA)

If you want evidence just watch the DNC from a few months back, that is the democratic national convention related to Hillary Clintons campaign, it's a giant circus of diversity and it starts with a man who tells the public they want white America to be queer and disabled.
The audience is filled with blacks and brows, all obese mostly, it's a disgusting circus but this is what democrats want.
Soft minded weak people of mixed heritage and this is what hollywood incl Disney pushes as propaganda on a massive scale through their movies

theoretically? True, both tumblr and Cred Forums technically allow outside opinions in, and thus can allow outside opinions contradictory to the majority hivemind in, too.

For all practical intents and purposes? lol, no, both are absolutely echo chambers. Tumblr, in fact, is designed to allow separate groups to remain isolated. The far-right on tumblr (yes, they exist) will literally never ever even see the SJWs on tumblr if they don't actively go out hunting for them, and even then, it's likely the SJWs have blocked them.

He very clearly said that the amount of diversity we got was not even needed in Star Wars, no idea why people seemed to have missed that. I didn't even like the review either.

The difference is you can't block people from Cred Forums just because they say something you don't like. In Tumblr you can, same with twitter, and in reddit you can bury comments under dislikes. In Cred Forums you can hide comments, but you're also not stopping anyone else from seeing them. Huge difference.

I think Mike felt obliged to do the ring theory segment, because for some reason soon after TFA came out a bunch of prequel apologists surfaced like the shitposters from Cred Forums.

He probably didn't want to dedicate too much time to TFA because he loved the movie, and knows that the general consensus is that it was at least good and 50 times better than the prequels so there was no reason why he would shit all over it like many here probably wanted.

>negative
I think the word you're looking for is "critical."

I'm think lots of far-left/right Tumblrites seek out opponents to flame, but you're right that it's easy to block anything.

lol so funny... fuck blak people

i love steve universe ! jaja

Again, yes, Cred Forums technically isn't in that dissenting opinions can post there.

Too bad that for all practical purposes, they don't and never have, except for a few exceptions who instantly get swarmed with meme images, smug reactions, and buzzwords.

But it was far too long for something most people have long settled their opinions on and something that really wouldn't change anybody's opinion. He just needed to point out that similar shots neither a grand scheme nor good movies make, and he didn't even make that last point, as if all the "poetry" in the world could save the other numerous other flaws of the prequels. That wouldn't have taken as long as it did. It was just padding, my friend.

I would have liked something as extensive as his Star Trek 09 review, which I enjoyed immensely.

>BIRTH CONTROL
It was funny, I laughed out loud on multiple occasions. I don't really share Mike's views on TFA and he did go easy on it, but the video was a solid ~2 hours of entertainment. Everyone complaining about HURR HE DIDN'T SAY EXACTLY WHAT I WANTED HIM TO AND DARES TO HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION THAN ME needs to chill the fuck out. Didn't like the video? Leave a dislike or unsubscribe. Or better yet grow up and understand that not everyone around you thinks the same way you do.

>Too bad that for all practical purposes, they don't and never have
Come now. Cred Forums has a clear conservative/ibertarian/fascist/alt-right bias, but it's a hyperbole to say contrarian opinions aren't posted. Just about every other thread is contrarian bait that's usually inordinately popular.

Honestly, that distinction is 100% irrelevant. You go look at Cred Forums any day of the week and you'll know everyone with a dissenting mentality that legitimately wants to argue in good faith has left that shithole. All that's left there are people who want to bait or falseflag.

Doesn't that equally apply to people who didn't like or agree with the review, or does freedom of expression only apply if you make a video like Mike did?

The reason there's not many lefty posters in Cred Forums is that most lefties are terrible at actually understanding their own beliefs. They can survive in safespaces because all they ever have to do is virtue signal and SAY they support lefty ideologies. That's not good enough on Cred Forums and there's no mod going to ban people or delete comments for not sucking off John Oliver.
The real reason Cred Forums is largely right wing is not some shadow group of anons scaring people away, it's because the left thrives on echo chambers far more than the right. There is NO place on the internet for lefty political ideology that happens to be lightly oderated. It just doesn't exist. In fact Moot tried very hard to keep Cred Forums and /new/ from being right wing and it never worked.

>be redpilled
>understand that corporation abuse the social constructs for money and control
>"BUT ITS GOOD GUYS I DONT KNOW WHY BUT ITS TOTALLY GOOD WHO DOESNT LIKE BEING BRAINWASHED EH?"

i will never understand beta male thinking process.

Cred Forums is the biggest safe space on this website

My bad, I thought I added that bit to my mini rant. But yes, this applies to everyone. I'm on the anti-SJW side but both us and SJWs gotta learn how there's this thing called individuality that makes people believe, say and do different things. Also, either be a full on tripfag or don't do it at all mayne. Cheers.

It has an oddly large amount of Israeli posters and limited moderation for a safe-space.

>Come now. Cred Forums has a clear conservative/ibertarian/fascist/alt-right bias,

OH MAN SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST BIASED TOWARDS TRUTH AND FACTS.
HOW FUCKING DARE THEY AMIRITE.
I PREFER LIVING IN LIES. REALLY COMFY AND SECURE.

kek, I was defending Cred Forums and I'm fairly right-wing myself, but you're just shitposting, user, and the point of my post clearly was not to discuss the merits of political spectrums.

>libertarian
>fascist
Those are slightly different things.

Fucking this.
>left tells you to feel sorry for the migrants which are mostly innocent women and children
>majority are actually men from mid teens ("children") to 30s and are actually causing huge amounts of crime, violence and rape
>QUICK, LOOK AT THIS SAD IMAGE OF A BOY WASHED UP ON A BEACH

Gee, I wonder why they lean away from left-wing retards. What a mystery.

>All that's left there are people who want to bait or falseflag.
This might be true, but it's annoying rampant.

Not him but don't conflate fascism with national socialism. You can be both a liberitarian and a fascist.

everyone's upset because only Mike can spam and shill his Plinkett videos

and they're upset that some random college kid made a better Plinkett review of Star Wars than Mike did, despite Patreon and years of time to think about it

You can't really. Only a bastardization of one or both.

yeah i sure love Cred Forums-lingo and epic memes punctuated by 3 second clips of completely unrelated movies as a punchline with no overall structure to anything in the review other than talking through the plotpoints like an idiot

>some random college kid made a better Plinkett review of Star Wars than Mike did
are you fucking joking?
>shitty memes all throughout
>not a single genuine joke
>not actual analysis; just a list of problems (even though it's accurate)
the opinions in the video aren't wrong but the video itself is really, really shitty, amateur, and too short

A Plinkett review without kidnapped hookers in his basement is no good Plinkett review at all.

The majority of them don't have this. It's really just the prequel reviews.

>A Plinkett review without kidnapped hookers in his basement is no good Plinkett review at all.
More like one without the questioning star trek extra.

Look at this shit.
That's the thing with Cred Forumsfags. Once the realize they're on the same camp the conversation ends. They're only interested in indoctrinating fresh blood. You guys are exactly like the left you hate so much.

Hit the nail on the head, user

So, how many years until another Plinkett review? 10? 15?

>people find common ground and compromise
Dreadful.

>conversation continues
>enjoy your safe space circlejerk
>conversation ends
>you're only interested in indoctrinating fresh blood

I didn't see his response, actually. I didn't care if he were SJW or not, I just didn't like the idea that Mike could express his unnecessary opinions about TFA, but people couldn't attack them.

>tfw lonely gay

>Also, either be a full on tripfag or don't do it at all mayne.
I'm not interested in creating a personality, just to archive my posts, and I think people are just that much less likely to bitch if I don't use a name.

I think the reason why he mentioned the prequels so much is because Mike really wanted to talk about everything that TFA stirred up. I think its fair to include something like that because TFA is the start of another film empire and the end of anyone remembering the prequels.

I'm the second guy and you're mentally retarded.

>1h 45 minutes long review
lmao, I ain't watching that shit

Almost 500k views already. Since when did RLM become mainstream?

Keep telling yourself that. TFA was a garbage reboot and literally everybody knows it. You're on denial user.

No worries man it was just banter.

The actual TFA review is less than 20 minutes, this shit has more filler padding than the Hobbit trilogy.

This is my first time watching any Plinkett review.

>lol white people white people white people xD
>everyone is gay!! haha
>why don't these men fuck amirite, why arent more people GAY ughhh
>look at these idiots who dislike diversity!!
>star trek was so sexist!! ughhhh

Does Cred Forums SERIOUSLY like this?

Their Best of the Worst reviews usually average around 400-500k views.

Oh and, ya know, the prequel reviews have several MILLION views.

yes, back to your safe space with you

You know the purpose of this video is not just to review TFA right?

I don't know what you faggots were expecting. Mike has no teeth left.
Just look at the recent Plinkett reviews, the JJ Treks.
The one about the first movie he was being an apologist for the new universe, and even in the second one, which he hated, he was not nearly as funny or witty as he was in the previous Trek reviews (which was how I discovered him), or in his prequel ones.
Fuck me it was 10 times less funny than the Cop Dog review.

I have no expectations from Mike since he said he loved Jurassic World.

>literally everybody knows it.
I fucking wish. Everyone gave it a free pass because Lucas wasn't involved and muh strong womyn character.

these guys are terrific

> first time watching any Plinkett review.
Okay

>Does Cred Forums SERIOUSLY like this?
The consensus is no.

Exhibit B:
Cred Forumsfags in love.

got pretty funny, and had some good meems, once the actual review started. good review and pretty much what I been saying, a decent flick but a safe and soulless cash grab. hope the next films have some fresher ideas in them, I think they will. but I don't think they'll ever have as much heart or inspiration as the original trilogy.

>talking about "safe space" while unironically trying to shoo away everyone who disagrees with you and defending ideas coined by social justice warriors

I never even went to Cred Forums btw

>The one about the first movie he was being an apologist for the new universe, and even in the second one, which he hated, he was not nearly as funny or witty as he was in the previous Trek reviews
He didn't do a Plinkett review for Into Darkness. What are you talking about?

Lets look at things this way: If having a very diverse cast wasn't the hot new thing, would TFA have been even half as diverse? Diversity isn't a bad thing but its also not a good thing. I think it's fair to say that TFA got it right with it's diversity. We just have to wait and see if the upcoming Star Wars movies get any worse or better with diversity.

Mike shouldn't have touched on the whole diversity thing so much. The real world politics of a movie like Star Wars don't matter in a Plinkett review

He did a short Plinkett video. Not a long, documented and in depth review.
Because he doesn't care anymore.

>tfw CTR shills realized they lost the war and have resorted to shitposting on Cred Forums
I refuse to believe people this retarded exist.

Strangely the bit where George talks about Hollywood making the same shit all the time was pretty good.

>>Lol i have opinions about well made videos that are given to me free of charge.

>this thread
god damn sometimes I'm reminded that Cred Forums is just a bunch of children in their late teens or early twenties

>Disney is milking Star Wars for all it's worth
>laughably stupid prequel ring theory has holes
>Plinett has been influence and is now no longer original
>clickbait defenses of the prequels are pathetic
>Star Trek did politics better than Star Wars
And a few other things. This is mostly common knowledge or not that important. Not worth such a long video.

>spend almost an hour about a theory made by fanboys that nobody that knows the slightest bit about george lucas would consider worth discussing
what did he mean by this

You know the purpose of this video is just to make money right?

I'm pretty sure there's easier ways for RLM to make money than spending months editing what is essentially a feature length documentary.

>Bah he was to easy on the film. it's was bland, boring, safe corporate bullshit and should call it what it is. bland, boring, safe corporate bullshit but in a way I find funny. *strokes chin fat*

Jesus Cred Forums give it a rest already that's cringey as fuck

Yeah it's to astroturf Blabbr app
Available now in the App store and Android Marketplace

Jackpot, both in realization and digits.

Does Mike bring up the character test and how no one in TFA passes it?

kylo ren alone proves you wrong

Just polaks leaking that can't handle satire banter of rlm

Kylo passes

>bland, boring, safe corporate bullshit but in a way I find funny.
I haven't heard anyone say they enjoyed how bad TFA was because it's not really enjoyable on that level.

Are you a retard?

They are all renamed Star Wars characters and a black guy nobody likes and shouldn't be there.

No. as in make fun of it in a way I find funny.

Which is?

Who gives a shit about this fucking movie, there will be a thousand more like it.
You can complain about them next year, only 30$ at the theather, don't forget your snacks!

>Finn
Cowardly (at first), but ultimately strong spirited and good willed. At times the comic relief. Goofy. Compassionate.

>Rey
Brave. Mysterious. Very clever. She has a strong desire for adventure. Reluctant to give up hope.

>Poe
Cocky. Arrogant. Fearless. Very capable. Possibly homosexual.

Well considering the post is making fun of people....who knows.

My favorite part was when he listed the names of the channels.

I only got Movie Blob since I've heard of that lameass before.

He could have spent the entire review talking about snowglobes and it would have been fine, my issue is that the review simply wasn't funny nor did it add any real discussion on Star Wars, that we haven't already heard of.

Plinkett became a victim of his own success.

Ironically RLM turned into Lucas, their Star Wars review were a lot of hard work and passion and ended up being loved by millions. Then they got really lazy and half-assed everything and decided to throw together some shit barely related to Star Wars for some cash.

Considering that they've continued to grow and create new projects, your analogy doesn't work at all and is borederline retarded.

Lucas also made Red Tails and other shit movies, which like RLM's other trash is also horrible and lazy.

The "skits" he made we're cringey. They're not funny at all. If my SO or parents walked into the room while it happened to be on him in the cahir talking about nothing I would turn the vid off.

This is so easily done with this movie

After watching the TFA video I watched the Star Trek:First Contact video, and realized how much Mike changed.
Just listen to the first minute of the review.

>'Cringey'
>SO
>'Cahir'

You have to go back.

Yeah but if you were watching the Phantom Menace review and your parents walked in during the skit with an abused hooker held captive in a basement I'm sure you would have left the video playing

fucking retard

We can all be as smooth as you, Mr. Draper.

this hurt to watch

where's the part where he reviews the film because him going on aimlessly about the "landscape" of star wars and his terrible skits are boring and painful respectfully

Did anyone enjoy the ring theory stuff? It went on too long imo.

can't*

>a black man that won't shot? That must be a first

lel

I think he spent so much time addressing it because he feels somewhat responsible for its conception, in the sense that prequel apologists began to crop up after his dissection of those films.

does it make you cringe? Is it cringe-worthy? Does this make #1 on your top 10 cringe list factor?

no

The mass internet 'fame' killed them. This shit is uninspired copy of the originals. Just like the Star Wars movies, pottery.

yup!

>Over 30
>Being on Cred Forums

I think you're the sad loser here.

You might as well just tripfag; you already have the thirst for attention necessary for it

>people aged under 30 posting on Cred Forums
>wasting the best years of their life in this shithole

No user, you are the sadcase

This isn't Cred Forums

Cred Forumsacks don't care for trips either. You are clearly a newfag. You crave attention so badly that you post in hopes of making unrelated threads entirely about you and why you aren't anonymous, which is exactly what you are doing here. Way to contribute faggot, hope the (you)s are worth it and your ego gets fed enough to satiate it for one night.

Yes, you won't have time to do such things when you're 30 when you're out on your yacht with your model girlfriend.

Face it, if you enjoy doing this shit now, you'll enjoy doing it in 16 years when you turn 30.

Aren't you supposed to be at work

>Not being a phoneposter and browsing sparingly throughout the day

Lmaoing @ your life pham

>20s
>best years of your life
lmao'ing at your life

Every thread on Cred Forums has some form of debate, whether it be shitposting out of pure contrarianism or an actual heated discussion between several parties. How is that an echo chamber?

Well its not like anyone mulled over their dislike for TFA for a decade.

It was bland corporate product tailored to offend as little as possible. Thus its impossible to feel strongly about in any way.

As a real oldfag, the early years are absolutely not the best years of your life unless you're a total loser. If you peak when you're 23 then that's just sad.

yeah dude, i know im not learning shit from my prof anyway

Bullshit

I had to work yesterday, so I'm only now getting around to watching it.

The clickbait article part reminded me why I enjoy RLM above all other internet critics. That part is spot on.

Mike Stoklasa, Jay Bauman, and Rich Evans have transcended being solely internet movie critics to being internet critics of the internet. Pottery.

Go there and pick any thread, preferably one with over 50 replies. Tell me there aren't contrary opinions. also
>not an argument

The final nail in the Prequels was delivered. There will be no recovery.

I said when TFA came out that it was worse than the prequels, everyone here said no.

Now it's a common fact lol

This is so fucking bad, most of the video is his butthurt over people arguing the the Prequels weren't that terrible as he initially said they were from his meme videos and him nitpicking some reviewer that was low hanging fruit. He only spends like 30 mins talking about TFA. The rest is basically damage control and more unfunny Plinkett jokes that nobody likes.

>mad prequel apologist detected

That clip at 1:06 made me realize how fucking great Ledger was. Rip in piece.

>duty

Top kek.

Cred Forums won't censor your opinion.

Tumblr and reddit will.

That's why leftists are always so buttmad about Cred Forums. They know the truth and facts are not on their side and they can't censor it.

If a debate happens it's between several flavor of "alt-right", because if you don't show your nazi credential you're bombarded with (((((you))))), "thanks for correcting the record", or good ol' JIDF.
Much like the debate over at tumblr are between several kind of retarded leftism.

The only good, genuine debates on Cred Forums are Cred Forums material, or done way better on /his/

I thought this review was undershelming and a chore to watch. It should've left the theory bullshit be, acknowledge the clickbait for only a bit, focus on TFA more and the stupidly absurd merchandising.
I liked TFA, wasn't as good as OT, much better than the prequels but I still wanted to see it ripped apart by someone who isn't a contrarian memer.

Because you can't. You'll do everything short of it tho.

>prequel reviews is Plinkett's original trilogy, the classic that set the standard of the genre
>TFA review is Plinkett's Phantom Menace, much anticipated, incongruous and disappointing

Mike Stoklasa is literally George Lucas

It's your fault for bothering to retain my tripcode in your memory.

getting BTFO is not censorship

>Cred Forumsacks don't care for trips either
I was aware of that.

> You crave attention so badly that you post in hopes of making unrelated threads entirely about you and why you aren't anonymous
kek, that's an interesting theory and I admire your cleverness in thinking about it, but no. Consider me vain, but I want my posts archived, so I use a tripcode, and I wish people would not pay attention to it, as it often derails threads.

>TFA played it safe
>Mike played it safe with this review
POETRY

He actually addresses that though with the house analogy. Bear in mind the Half in the Bag episode was shot in the early morning, about 3 hours after they had gone to seen the film.

Lel, you're so powerless it's not even funny. And you would censor me outright if you could, but you can't, so that is beside the point. You will call everyone a JIDF, cuck, numale or any other retarded buzzword you don't even fully understand. Fuck off, Hiro will delete you.

I said it was a forgettable cash grab.

Its just, the shitquels sucked dick, its time for you to accept that. It was literally the worst thing since AIDS, but at least that didn't effect anyone around me. VII was a better executed movie. However that doesn't say much because its compared to the prequels.

Neither the shitquels or VII can touch the OT. But are you really getting that triggered over which one is higher on the shit pile?

Lol, liberals always project so much it's hilarious. I thought it was a meme at first, but you guys suffer from so much cognitive dissonance you will try anything to deny the truth.

So you just proved me right didn't you?

TFA is better than ROTJ imho.

>TFA is better than ROTJ imho.

thank goodness nobody cares about your opinion

I will never understand the reason why it was that nameless Stomrtrooper with the cattle prod and not Phasma who thought Flynn. It didn't make any sense not to have her in that position, it would have built up for further fights in the sequels.

>TFA is better than ROTJ imho.

Ewoks are the worst thing in SW. That includes Jar Jar.

Sure did. I totally proved your hallucination that I would suppress your free speech if I only could.

You got me bro.

>shitquels or VII
I'm sure episode III and episode VII are as good as episode VI

No but you failed to address my point, made a sweeping generalization and called me a buzzword you didn't fully understand. The fact that you don't censor me is beside the point since you can't.

established the first order was prepared on multiple levels to deal with jedi

III is not. The NOOOOOOO thing alone makes it bad.

worse than a poorly written Mary Sue?

Ewoks were pretty dumb, and it was the first sign of Lucas going off his rocker.

Still though, everything on the Death Star 2 more than make up for its short comings.
And while I understand the criticisms with Jabba Palace scenes (minus any shitty CG edits) it was enjoyable.

Jar jar is the key to all of this

You have no idea what Mary Sue means. Wesley Crusher was one, Rey wasn't. Stop using words or terms you don't fully understand you pleb

Weird that Plinkett doesn't address the Mary Sue shit.
He made fun of Landis for that before.

You didn't have rational point. Ironically, your point was a sweeping generalization that I was as bad as you. Top kek my friend.

I get it, it's hard being a liberal now days in the age of the internet when information is so freely available to everyone. I'd be mad too if all my talking points were falsehoods.

If you haven't noticed, you alt-rightfags are the minority in a minority. Being in that echo-chamber of yours of course shielded you from reality and you think you rule the world. You idiots. Stop replying.

III is fucking garbage.

>meme dialog
>hacky acting
>retarded motivation just to hurry up and tie up loose ends

But what? You exicted about the 4 hour duel and CG backflips on some volcano? Or was it the epic Yoda versus Sheev fight?

It's sooo dark right? That's why its good.

III is only good for a laugh.

Cool buzzwords, deflection, and ad-hominem. But then your kind is incapable of anytime more, after all.

>The NOOOOOOO thing alone makes it bad.
Feel bad for you, but I have the original chinese subtitles option in my DVD and I use them everytime I watch it, it makes the movie better.

>user plays it safe with his post

>real world
Wage gap is a myth. There is no systemic racism in USA. There is no rape culture. Blacks have lower IQ on average. The best correlator for crime is race. There is no biological basis for homosexuality. Islam is an objectively shitty ideology that supports homophobia, pedophilia, incest and oppression of women.

Welcome to the real world kiddo.

>A Mary Sue is an idealized and seemingly perfect fictional character, a young or low-rank person who saves the day through unrealistic abilities. Often this character is recognized as an author insert or wish-fulfillment.
Now how does that not apply to her?

And before you say something retarded, let me just remind you that Luke was not one. IV would have sucked if Luke challenged Vader and beat him or if he just effortlessly took on waves of tie fighters (they blew up a few that were ordered to let them get away) after never flying a shit before. He was a whinny but likeable teenager who blew up the Death Star at the end because Han and a ghost helped him.

And more importantly he was far better written than Rey who is basically just a cute girl, but that's about it.

That single mistranslation makes all the prequels worth it imo

I'm 20 minutes into this and he's still talking about the prequels and some ring theory that I don't give a single shit about.

wtf

He's making fun of millennials and prequel defenders for like the first fucking hour.

like the last 20 minutes are about VII. Most of it is about how bad the shitquels were and how bad most of the Star Wars fanbase/Disney is.

He should have brought up saganfag's theories instead, that would be way more entertaining.

I agree somewhat with your short statement there OP.

Personally, I would've enjoyed him laying into TFA in Plinkett full autism style, but RLM changed it up a bit.

Having Plinkett more triggered by the fact that people were starting to defend the prequels in line to how the character is I guess.

The sad thing is the prequel defense really only started happening when the TFA was such a monumental boring retread it actually made the prequels look 'good' by taking a risk.

>repeating the Luke narrative with a girl is boring

As fuck.

I can't stop laffing from this.

Mike "The Nigger Grave Digger" Stoklasa is one of us.

tfa is literally 2/10

fuck off he barely touched on the shittiness of rey kys

this is an actual review

daisyfags and literal retards BTFO

this

literally kys

kill your face

Dude, the Ewoks are not worse than Jar Jar. The Ewoks are basically Muppets. Star Wars needed a little bit of a lighter side after Empire. The good guys needed to wisecrack a little and be heroes in the finale. An easy way to do that was to have them meet the Muppets. It worked because you can kind of believe that a race of teddy bear savages could win one large guerilla battle against the Empire.

In the end, Star Wars is kind of on the same level as the Muppets and so it works. They're both a little goofy, but, you know, there's personality and creativity at work. When the originals get silly at least there's a fun reason for it (the cantina, Jabba's palace, the Ewoks). At least we have fun looking at puppets and people in costumes.

Jar Jar is a Tom & Jerry cartoon beside real people. He was fucking stupid and so are you. I'd rather watch Roger Rabbit than the shitty prequels.

>fuck off he barely touched on the shittiness of rey kys
Okay, well he left out some obvious parts, but what he said was obvious. That wasn't a positive.

>the irony of all these daisyfags getting triggered by a review that shows she cant act
>literally complaining about memes on Cred Forums
>acting like the know anything
>acting like their opinion suddenly matters

thats okay but tfa part wasnt nearly as long as the other reviews most of it was more complaining about george lucas it seems and his cuck viewers ate it up and think its a tfa review when only maybe a third of it touched on tfa

>TFA is better than ROTJ imho.
I know that ROTJ is the lowest point of the OT, but Jesus fucking Christ get some fucking taste.

I know the ring theory is retarded but did they have to spend so much time on it?

>>the irony of all these daisyfags getting triggered by a review that shows she cant act
Where did it show that?

That part made me laugh.

mike was savage and raw inb this video

shitting on shitty youtubers and calling out Cred Forums in the most subtle ways

fuck, he's back boys. he's back. thank god

>Prequel loving fags getting BTFO once again

Feels good

The other review that keeps getting posted. Haven't seen it all but it's right on the money about Daisey, she was appalling in TFA.

please fuck off and die.

It's ok dude no need to defend your video so hard :^)

Are you talking about the HITB one?

No some youtuber. I honestly have no idea who he is, pretty sure he's a literally who.

MORE LIKE MIKE KEKLASA LMAO

Disappointing review
One laugh

Fuck Star Wars why did not he review Martix series?

"A black guy that didn't want to shoot his gun? Now that realy is a sci-fiction"

XD

What went wrong?

endometriosis

What the fuck?

>we want the black audience

THICC

fucked up midichlorian count

Cute to abominable in a few cheeseburgers.

She is pretty ugly on both tbqh mi familia

They upped her workout routine for the sequel film. We're going to see some scary shit in the next film.

>fat
You're fucking retarded or blind or perhaps both.

/thread

trips confirm

morphing into the next stage

roids

This is exactly what I expected, and exactly right.

Overall the film was fine, and young people who hadn't been desensitized to everything Star Wars by repeated watchings of the OU seemed to find it a magical experience like I did when I first saw ANH.

Its failings were that it was literally ANH. Which is fine, it just... isn't for me, as ANH is my ANH.

Anyone who thinks the prequels were better than this is in an intense state of denial. There was NOTHING good about those films. They were, shot to shot, moment to moment, complete shit.

He just repeated earlier jokes it seemed, but I like how he included how the society's perception of star wars has evolved since the prequels and how ridiculous it has become.

Its weird to me that people tell me the prequels were 100% garbage but then say tfa was fine. Theyre both garbage, the biggest criticism of tfa is the main character which says a lot about the movie when shes almost in every scene/plot point. Not to mention all he blantant rehash hollywood trends of taking elements from originals and just making them BIGGER THERFORE BETTER.

Maybe the sting of lucas shit makes people accept a different flavor of shit. But I gotta say that TFA was almost as big of a disappointment as RoTS for me. Theres hardly any thing good or interesting to talk about with it. TFA is the jurrasic world of star wars films.

>Tell me what to think Mike-sensei

And you faggots wonder why your subreddit is a giant meme.

Pretty much this

this is the first time i watch one of those red letter media videos all you faggots seems to praise. it was painfully unfunny and cringy all the way, it would have been better without the stupid unfunny jokes tho

You're acting like someone is going validate your opinion.

>I enjoyed it
>negative review

This place has really gone downhill. NipponMoot can just shut it down.