Snyder is the Terrance Malick of capeshit

Snyder is the Terrance Malick of capeshit.

Other urls found in this thread:

vimeo.com/144447762
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Malick is a hack tbqh mi familia

>Terrance

no u

You don't need to spell to make Kino. See: Zack Snyder

Kinda want to watch it again

this, kino is of a primal nature, not a societal one.

You're not wrong.

Actually, Cred Forums
Joss wheaton is the malick of capeshit

this is assuming you've seen voyage of time though and actually understand cinematic language

It's gorgeous.

>this is assuming you've seen voyage of time

Yes, it's safe to assume everyone here was at Cannes.

One of the best things about BvS was the slow progression and build up to night, when night comes you really get the impression that it's all been leading to this.

Regardless of how you think it played out after that, that was excellent.

Idk, his framing and use of the color pallet are very, very boring. Same with all marvel movies. 0 rewatchability value.

Then you have these beauties.

He's trying incredibly hard to be, but he's failing miserably because he fundamentally misunderstands what he's trying to copy.

You talk about cinema and malick yet don't see his films at the first showings? Stay on imdb or stick to comics. This is an art board
>actually understand cinematic language
So no you don't

Why? Because you say so? You haven't impressed me yet either.

>marvel movies look bad I swear it!!! why dont they take place entirely at night during a rainstorm like real movies?

lol

Meh...

IS that supposed to be flash in the last panel?

Why are there so many establishing shots?

So he's shit and a try hard? Totally agree

The Russos are television directors

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugg pure to the wonder/knights of cups tier art

>all that shitty color filters
>all that bloated CGI
>it's either people staring at something or doing weird faces

yeah, kino my ass

>color filters
It's the work of an auteur

>bloated
Gonna need more detail if you want your argument to have credibility here

>silly faces
K now you just sound flustered

>>bloated
>Gonna need more detail if you want your argument to have credibility here
The first and last shot.
There's no background, they have just added tons of CGI effects. I know it's action, but it looks extremely uncanny. An instant immersion-breaker.

There are backgrounds in both shots, just not viewable in those particular frames.

>michael bay cinegrid

If you could just kill yourself, that'd ne swell.

You first, I'm right behind you.

I watch have watched the ultimate cut 8 times since release.
Honestly I love this movie, so much replay value

AGREED

I watched BvS TC 2 times and UC 1 time

i will probably watch it one more time in 2016

Wait a minute. Is the Joker lying in the center of an omega symbol?

Forgot pic.

I love this movie so much.

so a talentless hack who can and will continue to make films forever for reasons completely unrelated to his talent or ability?

hahahathe hell are those

knight of cups was shit

the fight against doomsday being at night was a terrible idea
should have been at dawn

Neo/tv/ everyone.

They are works of art. Malick is a godamn artist.

there's some nice looking shots but when you're watching the movie it just doesn't stand out. not really memorable at all.

yeah you have no aesthetic discernment, watch synecdoche new york and then tell me knight of cucks is art

I wish I could watch it again in the movie theather

Voyage of Time premiered at Venice, dingus

It is. Most of the dialogue is improvised, and therefore comes off as very genuine. The shots have an ethereal floating perspective to them.

And as well shot as synecdoche is, Malick is in a league of his own.

I ask this every time but never get a response - in second image what the fuck are those things coming from the sky? Like a lava column .

kino
it's kino explosion
pure kino

Ain't that what OP be tryin to say?

>comparinc synecdoche new york to based Malick

there is zero depth to koc, floating shots of christian bale looking at the ground with his brow furrowed then saying some random fucking shit is not a good film

>Charlie Kaufman
>aesthetics

vimeo.com/144447762

They're not coming from Earth. Notice those structures way up in the sky above Gotham's skyline? That's Apokoliptan tech harvesting our planet's core. It appears they're encapsulating the earth.

At least that's what I think.

Woah you certainly didn't trivialize it to meet your subjective perception. I guess I'll never watch it again now.

I'm not saying you picked bad shots, but it seems that you chose images based on some form of bias

Looks bland as fuck.

>tfw not alpha enough to be a DChad

Oh shit. You are right.

From the sky, I meant.

very nice

you'll make it one day bro, I stopped drinking milk, drinking using plastic containers and stopped eating supermarket meat.

those xenoestrogens ruin your mind.

These shots are ugly. Watch more films.

Kaufman is one of the few who writes for the image above all. Gondry and himself have done wonders with his material. It's not his fault Spike Jonze is a hack. Watch more films and study screenwriting.

>Kaufman is one of the few who writes for the image above all.
Then how come his solo directorial effort was visually boring?

tfw the avengers cinematographer went to my film school
tfw its actually something to be embarassed about when it comes up

That started popping up unironically in cinegrid threads years ago, it's really is the best The Avengers can do.

Marvel Netflix on the other hand, is kino.

>These shots are ugly. Watch more films.
Like BLACKED marvelshill?