What is the saddest episode of South Park and why is it The Hobbit?

FFS is there a single thread on Cred Forums where you dipshits haven't infiltrated?

Kenny Dies, because one of their f-friends dies and Stan doesn't even man up enough to say goodbye to him in time.

I'll fuck that

Nobody would do it if it didn't trigger you faggot

>FFS is there a single thread on Cred Forums where you dipshits haven't infiltrated?

No. And we're coming to a voting booth, a school board, a jury and a legislature near you. See you real soon! ;^)

The one where Stan turns 10, and everything is shitty.
I guess I was feeling old, hit me right in the feels.

So glad I'm not American. Y'all are fucked either way.

Elaborate

There are lots of pro-Trump people across all the internet. Doesn't matter what country you live in, unless it's North Korea or one of those shitty Middle Eastern durka countries.

>trump supports still think that hes any different to clinton
She will pass the same laws as him. Both will fuck you over, the only difference is you would suck Trumps dick to have him do it, while you'd assassinate Clinton is she were the one doing it.

>South park threads turn into Cred Forums thread in less than 7 posts

What is wrong with you guys?

There are actually extreme right candidates popping up all over eastern Europe, as well. They all share common themes with Cred Forums and Trump in that they're nationalist, racist and homophobic. They all like Putin, too.

Damn, Wendy Testaburger looks like THAT?

there are retards who still havent realised that its not just Cred Forums, its the majority of Cred Forums who hold conservative views

>Uh...uh DEY RAYCIS and ummm..NASHUNULIS and ummm.....THEY HATE FAGGOTS and umm...ISM ISM ISM

>muh nation
>muh race
>muh tradition
Literally kill yourself you spooked mother fuckers

Is she gonna show her pussy to Cartman

I cincearly hope so

What are you talking about? They're just basic commonalities between Trumpsets rhetoric and supporters and the candidates in those countries. Its a nationalistic reaction to increased liberalization throughout all of the West

Don't bother, the only people who don't realise this are tourists and newfags, combined with tumblr trying to be the new raid site.

Trips sent from Kek to alert us to how much of a delusional fag you are.

Trump is rich based on Real Estate. He fucking hates the financiers, the same financiers who are the ones who raped the global economy and got away with it.

Hillary has been paid millions for 'speeches' given to those Wall Street financiers and has never deigned to release the content of those 'speeches'.

But I don't know why I'm dealing with facts. You're a drooling, partisan faggot and I declare you my enemy and an enemy of reason. Be warned that even if Hillary wins, we will not disappear. We will fall quiet for a while and wait. A time will come when you'll pray that you voted for Trump, for the horrors that will be necessary to right the world will be far worse than anything you can imagine.

...

Its a symptom of late stage capitalism.

That's not the point. The point is that in this thread we discuss south park, not Trump v Hillary, if you want to discuss that and circlejerk about how immigrants are so bad go to one the threads discussing that. It's not wrong to just want to have one moment where you discuss something else.

>nationalist
Oh my god how evil! Why won't these sick people just learn to enjoy flushing their nations down the shitter?

Nobody cares about faggots IRL, we're more concerned with Islam and the influx of refugees (the majority of which aren't even from fucking Syria but Afghanistan and North Africa in general)

Yes that's been the basic argument of nationalism since it's inception.

>t. Globalist scum

...

>No borders! No distinct culture! One world, one race!

FUCK. OFF. GLOBALIST.

>globalism
You sure sound spooked friend
If you just read Stirner you would realise you are my property

Fuck off to /leftypol/ your memes are shit.

Another thread successfully derailed into Cred Forums. You're welcome.

I really liked the way it ended. No punchline. No cut to credits. Just Wendy hanging her head in shame and choking back tears as she conforms because her message has gotten misinterpreted as being a hater and she was treated as the outcast because of it.

I love it when the characters have to eat shit. It's at a point now where no one gets to be on their high horse and be the generic morality pet of the series/season anymore. Every major character [and some secondary] receives their comeuppance in some way, shape or form to keep South Park from being all preachy and up it's own ass with messages. It took them like 15 fucking seasons to really paint Stan as having any instabilities or emotional issues as he and Kyle were generally immune to being ripped on. Glad to see characters like Wendy getting their shit pushed in too.

>he thinks liberals are leftists
lmao @ ur life right now

Right because your ideology has become such a joke that it has been swallowed by neoliberalism.

Me to.

But Stan and Kyle where immune to criticism because Trey and Matt self inserted as those guys. My only problem is that Cartman was a much better character in the early seasons. Just a little fat selfish kid , we all knew someone like that when we where kids. But now it seems like he is only some fat cry baby.

What's he sitting on?

>ill just keep voting for people who support billionaires
>that will show those fuggen commies
You are the definition of a cuck

>Muh equality tho

She is. Initially I was looking at it as a win for Cartman because, hell, it's gonna be his first close up with a vagina. That shit is special when you're young and experimenting and out of the other boys he'd be the first to make it that base so it's a win considering he achieved it through his friends turning on him.

But I think I know where the joke is going. Cartman is unironically insisting that chicks are funny and "muh vagina" humor is comedy cold. Heidi Turner is going to show him her pussy and he's going to be like "I don't get what the joke is. There's literally nothing there. Vagina's aren't funny. Women aren't funny." And then either report that vagina's may be whatever but that ultimately they're a poor source for humor and thus worthless. At least I'm hoping. Unless he makes it a crusade to gauge how funny women are by first inspecting their vaginas.

I don't know. I just hope they don't disappoint with the direction they're going.

Blame South Park for having its main theme about the upcoming election and blame them for delving into PC culture in the first place and adding fodder to the subject.

>I cant enjoy cartoons the post

No fun allowed, ha?

>muh idpol
>this level of confusion over simple ideological differences
Sorry to trigger you so hard stormnigger

Dude don't get mad, you've been completely co-opted by neoliberalism, just accept it.

p.s. you can't be for class struggle but against identity bullshit, they all stem from the same kind of reasoning

I like this
Either that, or he will freak out because vaginas are gross and he'll start some conspiracy about females being monsters/aliens or some shit.

Shh he'll realize it someday.

Please explain to me what you mean by co-opted by neoliberalism? Are you refering to parties that used to be center-left turning to the right? Because a political party an ideology does not make

Fuck off separatist, your tribal world view is so 20th century.

>repeatedly say i dont give a fuck about things like race, black or white
>HE MUST HATE WHITES REEEEE
Stay mad cuck
Protip: it's the economy stupid

>Please explain to me what you mean by co-opted by neoliberalism?

Marxists are the court jesters of neoliberalism. You're allowed to speak your mind because it doesn't hurt them at all. Everything that you're for and that has a chance of happening, neoliberals are also for it.

Didn't they already kind of do this with the bush and Butters finding out that under the bush there where only a pair of joker lips?

Of course you can, just don't be niave in thinking that these topics won't come with general discussion on SP, at least for now.

Token?

>neoliberals are also for it
That's why they freaked the fuck out by a moderate like Bernie right?

What you say is completely meaningless, what matters is what you advocate for, which is ultimately and undeniably anti-white.

That's true, but we already had 100 threads about butthurt trumpfags and Shillarys.

Just for this thread, the question was "which is the saddest episode".

>live in a country that was under soviet occupation for 50 years during the cold war
>everyone is a fucking putintard

Disgusting

>this level of delusion
Ok, keep staying mad at the jews then

Are you an idiot?
Cred Forums as a whole has been like this for ages.

>implying neoliberals have any issues with modern social-democrats

ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, they basically control every social-democratic party in europe

>can't refute him, better say he's deluded

Please, remind me of the great marxist opposition to, for example, open borders.

it's not, the thing squats to pee.

>social democrats are left
nice meme
If communism was actually achieved, immigration would be minimal.
Think dialectically senpai.
Why do people leave their country? Because their country is shit and they need to move somewhere that they will have higher chance of employment and steady income.
Why is this? Corporations and states exploit weaker countries for resources and to generate profits through war.
This causes further degradation in first world countries by sending floods of immigrants to places like Europe and the U.S
Protip: they don't like your shitty country - why? Because they liked their own before westerners fucked up theirs.
I don't give a shit where anyone lives, but I'm happy in my own country like the majority of human beings - communism would solve this problem.

>dude you're not allowed to have standards for women or else you're sexist lmao
Nah, it was the most SJW one, though.

>nice meme

How is bernie sanders not a social democrat?
You're not refuting anything I say.

Again, everything you guys state on a social level is something neoliberals also like. Everything you guys think when it comes to economics has no chance of happening.

Court jesters, this is what you are. Marxist views come at no social cost in any pc circle.

>If communism was actually achieved, immigration would be minimal.

Yeah because you guys would have already mixed all the people together by then.

>If communism worked and every country was shit then you wouldn't have to worry about people coming from their shit country to your shit country
bravo

I never said he wasn't. The U.S doesn't have basic social democracy like Europe, which is moderate as fuck. I'm from a country that has a social democratic party that was consumed by neoliberalism. The fact that someone has basic as Sanders, who I don't consider a genuine socialist had to be OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN by the democrats is an embarrassment for a party that keeps insisting that Clinton is a "progressive"
So I'm not allowed to ignore arguments and make shit up, but you are. Okay.
See above

Marx didn't fight for or against anyone; he lived a nice, comfortable, bourgeois live in London

He had to be shut down because Clinton is perfect for them, not because he couldn't be co-opted or because he's this great danger for them.

And yet Sanders had huge popular support, now Clinton is struggling against Trump because she has fuck all support
Makes sense to me

>So I'm not allowed to ignore arguments and make shit up, but you are. Okay.

You can make every argument you like about the completely hypothetical state never reached by any society, it's all meaningless.

What matters is the here and now and here and now marxists argue for completely open borders and other shit that is 100% damaging for white people.

>And yet Sanders had huge popular support,

Sanders had pretty much 0 support from minorities. In fact, Sanders' victories weres inversely correlated to the percentage of minorities in a state.

And without minorities, the democrats are completely fucked. They wouldn't have won any election aside from a couple since ww2 without the negro/hispanic vote.

> now marxists argue for completely open borders and other shit that is 100% damaging for white people.
You clearly know very little about Marxism.
There is an incredible variety of views, including those who argue for marxism in one state and even so called "nationalist marxists"

>implying minorities vote
He had the youth vote
Now the youth aren't voting
I stand by my earlier comments.

Ok, let me rephrase it.

99.9% of marxists argue for open borders.

There, I've excluded nationalist bolsheviks, all 12 of them.

>implying minorities vote

Are you stupid or what?
I'll repeat myself: without the minority vote democrats would have lost every single election from ww2 to our days, bar one (clinton). Obama would have lost, kennedy would have lost and so on and so forth.

So yes, they vote, in fact they're the determining factor in democrat victories.

And every century that preceded it and includes this one.

What part of world wide homogeny do you not realize is ideologically incompatible and impossible to integrate because each tribe carries baggage called culture and traditions nobody wants to give up, which is one of many actions people would have to do in order for everyone to get along.

It's not really separatist when we were never together in the first place.

I just wanted to have a South Park thread :(

The problem is you keep saying "open borders".
I'm assuming, and please correct me if I am misinterpreting you, that you are thinking of the world as it is today - but with no restrictions of movement over people between countries.
What most Marxists argue, is that people should be free from exploitation of corporations - different socialists argue for either a state that helps direct a country towards socialism, and others that argue that the state must be dismantled completely from the get go - please note that a nation and a state are not the same thing.
Once the exploitation of working people is ended, the quality of life for ALL people rises.
At this point I ask you - why would people living in satisfactory conditions want to leave their homes to come to your country? Because of a Jewish conspiracy? Because niggers just want to fuck white women? Sorry if I come across as a prick about it, but I cannot wrap my mind around what the fuck you are arguing.
Well you country sure is fucked then. Where I'm from - with compulsory voting - most minorities are conservatives.
I sure am enjoying the new season
Remember Reagan? Remember when there wasn't so many Mexicans?

I hope you aren't having sex with anyone from outside of your family, those Jones' are a bunch of degenerates, they aren't a part of our family so you better stay away from them

I feel you bro. I was excited about this thread as well.

Cred Forums is reddit and Cred Forums's battleground

>anti-pol is reddit
kys

>but I cannot wrap my mind around what the fuck you are arguing.

I am not arguing shit, I'm stating a simple truth.

The overwhelming majority of marxists hic et nunc are arguing for open borders. They're not saying "when/if we'll have achieved X then open borders", no, they're saying "OPEN BORDERS NOW".

And you keep denying this which is basically as sane as denying that the earth is round.

Fuck that, the boys were stupid but Wendy was an incredible cunt to Butters for no reason
She deserved it

sorry tumblr

Modern left is 99% identity politics. Deal with it.

t. former leftist

>>ill just keep voting for people who support billionaires
Who in the hell can you vote for that doesn't support them though? Face it man you're a political dinosaur, the planet belongs the billionaires now. The lower classes can't exert pressure on the upper class if their jobs can just be sent off to china at a whim, they don't need you anymore and therefore you have no pull whatsoever.

You lost.

>most minorities are conservatives

Where and which minorities. Blacks/mestizos are never conservatives unless they're highly selected (say, Igbos in the uk)

thats not the same thing. Tribes are by definition a collection of many families that form a village town or whatever populous. Suggesting that an individual is the same as he sum of all people that represent the tribe and should therefore not attempt to marry outside that tribe in relation to their movement in a global context is misplaced application of logic

Want to try to form an analogous argument again?

These people you speak of are clearly not Marxists.
Maybe you browse one of those faggot infested reddit boards where they ban you for being a non-feminist marxist but will welcome you aboard if you're a non-marxist feminist.
See above
>99% of the planet is fucked
>i guess we can't do anything about it
Australia. Immigrants like the country as they find it, change makes them nervous. And shit, have you not met Asians and Arabs? They're the most conservative people on the planet.
I was more mocking the framing of your argument, not the argument itself.
Globalism is bourgeois as fuck. I'm just indifferent to the supposed differences in cultures/biology. Spooky concepts.

Truth.

>These people you speak of are clearly not Marxists

oh god here we go...am I ever going to find a true marxist? I feel like Diogenes for fuck's sake.

>have you not met Asians and Arabs?

Yes I have, that's why I said mestizos and blacks.

Why is every argument against nationalism this same type of ridiculous strawman horseshit? I don't think I've ever seen a real argument against it, just accusations of racism and this idea that nationalism means turning your country into North Korea, which isn't really true.

>I'm just indifferent to the supposed differences in cultures/biology

>biology is spooky

please tell me you're actually trolling us

there are retards who still haven't realized that the "conservative" views expressed by the users of this site are an attempt at contrarianism to the once atheistic, nihilistic character that this site originally had, and that most of it is just pretending to be retarded for fun. But, of course, the true retards think they're in good company.

It promotes an "us and them" mentality that, in general, isnt very helpful

Because contemporary opposition to nationalism spawns from decades of indoctrination against it.

Only liberals give a shit about idpol, it's the simplest fucking difference between us.
They call us "brocialists" because they're so swallowed up in feminist nonsense that they have become the fucking stereotype you guys spew.
In all fairness, Africans are conservative as well.
I said supposed biological differences. Sickle cell isn't exactly a mark of cultural difference.

>I was more mocking the framing of your argument, not the argument itself.
to try to rephrase my argument, I was trying to suggest there are too many incongruous facets of people that make it difficult if not impossible for us to get around and be a single collective. Perhaps that's still not good enough

Globalism is bourgeois as fuck. I'm just indifferent to the supposed differences in cultures/biology. Spooky concepts.
Good for you then.

See here , this is what I mean in That's one of the dumbest comments ever. It's not born out of reflection and pondering, it's just garbage propaganda.

Every single ideology or current of thought promotes an "us vs them" mentality, how is this even a half decent objection?

> They're not saying "when/if we'll have achieved X then open borders", no, they're saying "OPEN BORDERS NOW".

You should try not to be so partisan all the time and really LISTEN to different opinions for once instead of building strawmen out of arguments deprived of context.

>Only liberals give a shit about idpol
>They call us "brocialists"

"they" are thousands more than you are, they don't claim to be liberals, they claim to be marxists and they regurgitate marxist rhetoric at every occasion.

Face it, they're marxists, they just take it further than you do and they're more successful than you brocialists.

I do "LISTEN" to different opinions, that's how I know that the overwhelming majority of marxists are for open borders.

If "marxist" to you includes only national bolshevists and strasserites, then fine. But it doesn't.

>muh race is a spook

Literally Stirner's entire analysis depends on race. Look at the chapter headings for Einzige.

No, I agree with your argument.
I believe that communities need to work for their mutual benefit. I don't care on the make up of any community, homogeneous or heterogeneous.
Hell, I barely believe that major cities with millions of people can function.
Unless you're living in a utopian society, I don't see how you'll ever see this go away.
It's understanding that others are looking for their rational benefit that makes the difference. Not some crude hatred for "us".
Marxism is an economic theory, the only cultural aspects related directly back to material conditions.
Fuck, I imagine Marx would claim that trannies are a result of a broken society that has led to an increase in mental illness.
You don't have to agree with a bunch of liberal retards to understand our economic beliefs.
I'm not arguing with anyone because I want you to believe everything I do, I'm here because I'm trying to encourage you to really look at how the world works.
>implying stirner isnt a meme

>We should give up our national and cultural identity to appease immigrants.

Fuck off, you wouldn't tell Middle Easterners to drop their identity or any non-white immigrant for that matter. You want whites to be a cultureless, indistinct monolith because it makes it easier to demonize a faceless majority, it's how you control the masses via collective guilt and prioritizing the visible minorities.

fuck off cunt.
go back to your boi pussy in melbourne you faggot.

>Marxists are the court jesters of neoliberalism. You're allowed to speak your mind because it doesn't hurt them at all. Everything that you're for and that has a chance of happening, neoliberals are also for it.

That's the most stupid thing I've ever read in Cred Forums
Let that sink

>Please, remind me of the great marxist opposition to, for example, open borders.
read Zizek's last book on the refugee crisis

>muh melbourne
This is what a northerner says when confronted by a post with more than 20 words

>Marxism is an economic theory, the only cultural aspects related directly back to material conditions.

P-fucking-lease.

Blank-slatism and other sociological nonsense has been propped up by marxists since their inception.

kekitus maximus

Why the fuck are you writing political essays on a pedophilia and shitposting board on a Polynesian paper-folding website?

>The overwhelming majority of marxists hic et nunc are arguing for open borders. They're not saying "when/if we'll have achieved X then open borders", no, they're saying "OPEN BORDERS NOW".

Latinisms don't make your view any less ridiculous.

newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/02/slavoj-zizek-what-our-fear-refugees-says-about-europe
>The obvious fact that there are terrorists, rapists, criminals etc, among the refugees, while the large majority are desperate people looking for a better life
>The other dimension is the humanitarian idealization of refugees. This dismisses every attempt to openly confront the difficult issues which arise when those who follow different ways of life cohabit as a concession to the neo-Fascist right. The tragic-comic spectacle of the endless self-culpabilization in which Europe allegedly betrayed its own humanity – the spectacle of a murderous Europe leaving thousands of drowned bodies at its borders – is a self-serving one, with no emancipatory potential whatsoever. Everything “bad” about the other is dismissed, either as our (Western racist) projection onto the other, or as being the result of our (Western imperialist) mistreatment, through colonial violence, of the other. What lies beyond this closed circle of ourselves – or, rather, the projections of our “repressed” evil side onto the other” – what we believe we encounter as the “authentic” other when we truly open ourselves up to them, the good, innocent other, is also our ideological fantasy.
Either you don't know what materialism is or you are talking out of your ass. I'm guessing both.
Because someone has to fight back the tide of political essays from the pedophiles and shitposters.

You're mad because it's true, I get it. You really like the idea of being the underdog.

Imagine this scenario. You're someone who works in academia or you're a journalist or someone else who lives in a similar social circle. Tomorrow you go among your peers and state "I must say I'm a marxist, the workers should seize the means of production". What happens to your social standing? What happens to your career? Nothing at all, declaring oneself a marxist isn't politically incorrect in those circles.

Now imagine the same scenario except you say "I must say I believe that racial differences are innate to a significant degree". Please, try to bullshit me that you're not getting your social life and career destroyed within half a second of uttering that.

>tfw only 6 posts in this thread are on topic
Cred Forums is dead

>Either you don't know what materialism is or you are talking out of your ass. I'm guessing both.

Either you've no idea what blank-slatism is or you're talking out of your ass.

D A B !!!

>Because someone has to fight back the tide of political essays from the pedophiles and shitposters.
What a waste of your time on this earth

I'm not that guy.
I work at the bottom of the ladder. In this day and age if I told anyone in my work place I was a communist and it made its way to my boss, they would have grounds to fire me.
In social circles people feel uncomfortable.
It's not that different quite frankly.
And honestly, as someone who actually has a fucking education, I can tell you that most academics (which nearly every fucking one is a liberal) would just consider it quaint.
No, I don't, because it's clearly not a fucking marxist concept.
Why, what are you doing on your saturday?

As if Zizek is not a controversial figure among marxists.

Nowadays he's two steps away from third-positionism.

The social stigma of the ideology has literally NOTHING to do with the fact that it actually challenges the system. A marxist regime destroys neoliberalism, a racist regime fits it like a glove.

>tfw cant tell if tripfags name is ironic or not
does it even matter anymore

Yung mike ross

Zizek is basically the only real voice for Marxism that isn't hidden away in academia.

>Nowadays he's two steps away from third-positionism.
cool story

South Park is highly political, so far all of the storylines in new season are about political or social issues so turning the discussion in Cred Forums is justifiable.

Hush, old fag. Your words fall on deaf ears.

>Why, what are you doing on your saturday?
>NO U
You've made at least 8 rambling posts replying to multiple people, none of which are on topic, please just take a break for at least five minutes

>The obvious fact that there are terrorists, rapists, criminals etc, among the refugees, while the large majority are desperate people looking for a better life
>The other dimension is the humanitarian idealization of refugees. This dismisses every attempt to openly confront the difficult issues which arise when those who follow different ways of life cohabit as a concession to the neo-Fascist right. The tragic-comic spectacle of the endless self-culpabilization in which Europe allegedly betrayed its own humanity – the spectacle of a murderous Europe leaving thousands of drowned bodies at its borders – is a self-serving one, with no emancipatory potential whatsoever. Everything “bad” about the other is dismissed, either as our (Western racist) projection onto the other, or as being the result of our (Western imperialist) mistreatment, through colonial violence, of the other. What lies beyond this closed circle of ourselves – or, rather, the projections of our “repressed” evil side onto the other” – what we believe we encounter as the “authentic” other when we truly open ourselves up to them, the good, innocent other, is also our ideological fantasy

on
fucking
point

>In this day and age if I told anyone in my work place I was a communist and it made its way to my boss, they would have grounds to fire me.

Yeah, implying that wouldn't be illegal

>I can tell you that most academics (which nearly every fucking one is a liberal) would just consider it quaint.

You're making my point for me. "quaint" isn't the same as "say goodbye to your career, forever".

>The social stigma of the ideology has literally NOTHING to do with the fact that it actually challenges the system

top fucking kek, the stories you guys tell yourself to keep believing you're the underdog.

"well they won't do anything to us and they would basically kill the racists but it's us who are the real danger"

This is beyond delusional.

Thinking isolationism benefits neoliberalism is also completely delusional.

errata corrige

>In this day and age if I told anyone in my work place I was a communist and it made its way to my boss, they would have grounds to fire me.

Yeah, implying that wouldn't be illegal

>I can tell you that most academics (which nearly every fucking one is a liberal) would just consider it quaint.

You're making my point for me. "quaint" isn't the same as "say goodbye to your career, forever".

it's what any other aussie would say when confrunted by this commie bullshit.
melboune is the fucking hell mouth for this shit You know it I know it the fucking world knows it.

go get aids or something.

>No, I don't, because it's clearly not a fucking marxist concept.

I guess it's just a big coincidence that marxists have been the strongest supporters of it since forever. People like Lewontin are just liberals, not real marxists.

isolationism != racism
and if you don't think that a marxist regime would completely destroy neoliberalism while a racist one would pose no problem to it you're really beyond saving
please explain how a marxist regime would benefit neoliberalism
that's absolutely retarded

does a marxist have to support what other marxists have supported?
really?

This. I think Cred Forums and most of Cred Forums being elitists can relate. I expected an epiphany at the end of the episode on how to deal with it but nope, that's just how it is

>please explain how a marxist regime would benefit neoliberalism

Why should I explain something that I never said? What I said earlier is that a marxist regime has no chance of happening in the west therefore marxists aren't dangerous to neoliberals. In fact, with all the rhetoric about fags and trannies and minorities, they're helpful.

It's not just "other marxists". If I were to take a survey of marxist opinions on the matter, almost every single one of them would say that differences between individuals are almost entirely due to socio-economic factors.

I don't care about marxist opinions on the matter, I care about Marx's opinion on the matter

Marx opinion on the matter is the same: SES explains all of the variance between individuals.

>all the rhetoric about fags and trannies and minorities, they're helpful.
Not mentioned by Marx

> a marxist regime has no chance of happening in the west therefore marxists aren't dangerous to neoliberals
of course, it has no chance unless marxism actually spreads

[citation needed]

That might be too cinister for South Park though

Yeah what a loss for our community lol

Anyone who racemixes is complicit in cuckoldry. There is no such thing as reverse cuckoldry.

For fuck's sake, are you serious? So now you're saying Marx was big proponent of genetic determinism?

>Not mentioned by Marx

First of all, he repeatedly stated that racist ideas are just a product of the economic system that is in place and that without it there would be 0 differences between negroes and europeans.

As a second point, you're right, Lenin was the tranny lover, not Marx.

Dubs>trips confirmed

ITT

>You're Getting Old
Holy shit that episode resonated so hard with me

>SES explains all of the variance between individuals.
>big proponent of genetic determinism.

can you only think in extremes, famm?
is it always -1 or +1 for you?

KIKES
I
K
E
S

I didn't write the mixed hypothesis because there's no point as he didn't think it to be true.

...

the right and left both raise good points but at the end of the day you both sound retarded.

...

I literally said I support some of what you say and you call me a jew.
>wew lad

...

You're a big kike

for u

...

>in one episode Sheila pays Chef for sex with Gerald's consent
>in another Sharon cheats on Randy with Tupac
really makes thinking

>marrying an unattractive ape and degrading your genetic heritage by producing mutt offspring
>"""cucking""" anyone but yourself

>Yes I have, that's why I said mestizos and blacks.

so you wouldn't mind your country full of asians and arabs?

so you're saying instead of your people be extinct by meztizos and blacks, you want it to be destroyed by asians and arabs?

isn't that the samething?

get real man, at the end of the day, it's not culture that matters, it's race, because without your race(or in other words your people) then what is the point of culture?

>so you wouldn't mind your country full of asians and arabs?

Yes I would mind.

TOP
O
P

KUCK
E
K

came here to post that

>they claim to be marxists
Which is just as disingenuous as calling Trump Hitler, I don't remember any Marxist teachings about micro-aggressions and other fucking gay shit they come out with, and I'm fairly certain they don't want a dictatorship of the proletariat because that would inevitably end badly for their very elitist mindset. It's more like Stalinism if it was really fucking gay and obsessed with minorities