How did they get away with this?

Man, this decade was fucked up...

youtube.com/watch?v=3TRBwKFfJv4

Jason is 20 years older than Rosie, does mean that I can get a 15 year old gf when I'm 35?

If it was 1976 I'd say you would be ok.

in 2016 thinking you will spend a lot of time in jail.

even if I look like this? this guy is 37 and teenage girls love him

You could start a thread about "Movies Hollywood will never remake" with this

what the fuck do i know?

I guess pedos exist today

why do you need my permission?

No.

Unless you go to a third world country and are rich or something.

>15
>pedo

just interested in an user's opinion

Lots of films feature nude children, as long as it's not just fapbait it's usually fine.

The thread is getting Cred Forums like.
Any other movies Hollywood could never remake?

Why not?

No clue, but my dick thanks them for it.

>you can buy a house in NY area for $20,000

Boomers had it so easy.

Thought it was legal in US. You got an uncensored DVD release iirc

Because child sexual exploitation is the biggest unpunished open secret in human civilization and Hollywood "secretly" presents it as such.

I need more hints.

Malodolenze or some shit like that

any way to watch it online? im to lazy to download

stop sucking NY cock and the price will go down

It's really true user

>mfw you'll never own a house because of gentrification assholes

you could literally go to jail for watching it. are you retarded?

is a garbage bag can be art then anything can

Yeah. I can't imagine such lewd acts happening today

youtube.com/watch?v=_3Z3zxsbJFw

Maladoloscenza is not exactly an obscure film user

as long as no one find out. people tried to start shit about david bowie fucking that 15/16 year old but bill murray and others come out to defend him. I guess its depends on where you are and what the social climate is. overall I would say that even if you could, its not worth it unless you are a type of guy who want to try everything once

I doubt you could find a stream but don't let the trolls fool you, it's not illegal to own. I remember seeing it available for rent in a Hollywood Video circa 2002, in their 8-foot foreign section. That's how fucking obscure it is.

>on google newspapers browsing random old articles
>british article from the 1950s about a father who killed his 14 year old daughter's 20-something boyfriend
>yeah, that age diff...
>it was actually because the boyfriend was fucking the man's wife

Different times.

Nice knowing you user. I was being vague because there were several people banned for discussing it yesterday. I wasn't implying it was obscure.

They got a global rule 1 vacation for 30 days.

why? is it more explicit than b

its on netflix uk

Only if you move to Brazil user. Last I checked the AOC was 14.

I hope the fucking mods ban me for discussing a film. I think it would be hilarious.

Then I could go do something productive.

>implying today there are not tons of 15 year olds with 18 and 20 year old boyfriends

I am reliably informed that it is in fact banned in America though.

kek.
>for once instead of shitposting user decides to talk about film on Cred Forums
>gets banned

It has a topless 13 year old. I think Eva Lonesco (sp?) was 11 or something. There's no sex or explicit genital shots. It's not cp. it's a fim about kids who are sometimes nude.

also the dude in the movie is such a moron.

>>you can buy a house in NY area for $20,000
Doesn't understand inflation: the post.

She was a virgin until 21 because her psyche couldn't handle being constantly sexualized.

From the wiki:
>Controversy

>"Maladolescenza" is known primarily for its use of a young actor and two 12-year-old pubescent actresses in scenes involving both nudity and simulated sex. It's largely unseen in all but a few countries primarily for this reason.

>In Germany, although released uncut in cinemas at 91 minutes in 1977, public outcry caused for several scenes to be removed on its home video releases, namely all instances of nudity, sexuality and death involving children, bringing the running time down to 77 minutes.

>In 2004, a German cult DVD distributor, restored these cuts in a re-mastered version running at 91 minutes. This version was later banned in a German court on 28 July 2006, condemning the material as child pornography, successfully withdrawing all copies from distribution.

>In 2010, a Dutch court ruled that the movie qualifies as child pornography because it depicts the sexual exploitation of children.[1]

>Its worldwide circulation is largely unknown to this day, including in Italy and France where seemingly no DVD or home video releases have ever been made available.

so less risqué than looking up nudists on google