De Niro vs Eastwood

Eastwood never did Rocky and Bullwinkle

>acting matures into who is the better director

You are literally retarded.

In fairness, Eastwood hasn't had the cartoonish lows that DeNiro has had either. Consistency counts.

20th century Rober De Niro > Clint Eastwood >>>> 21st century Robert De Niro

>every notable actor has eventually tried directing
>from chaplin to brando to hanks to oldman
>"t-that's just dum! XDDDD"

Literally kys my man

Still eastwoods best don't come close to de niros best

Batman solo film is gonna be legit capekino

it doesnt make sense
but i agree

humpf

is he die?

Directing ability has nothing to do with acting ability. They're not even remotely the same. You are stupid and you should stop stating your opinions publicly out of shame for your mental deficiency.

But can you call someone a good actor who spikes massively between DeNiro's heights and his horrendous garbage lows that even the Raspies ignore out of concentrated shame for what he's become? Eastwood might not have the 10/10's of DeNiro, but he's had plenty of 7's and 8's and stays fairly consistent up there.

The question wasn't who has a better track record for choosing good projects. The question was who is a better actor. De Niro is the better actor by a mile, period.

The one who is not a nigger faggot.

Leone said it best, De Niro is a great actor with range, Eastwood had 2 expressions: with and without the hat.

Right. The massive prevalence of actor turned directors is pure coincidence. Directing couldn't possibly be just a broadening of the specific craft of acting, some natural progression where you channel those creative talents of adopting a role to adopting the scene and the players themselves.

Seriously, I told you to go kys. I don't care how you do it, just get it done.

>midnight cowboy
de niro wasn't in that... the hell you talking about?

>midnight cowboy
That's Dustin Hoffman you mong.

Only if you think consistency doesn't count. If I pick a random Eastwood movie and a random DeNiro movie, I have a much better chance of the Eastwood movie being good than the DeNiro movie. It doesn't matter of DeNiro has hit higher heights when he's just playing a numbers game of one excellent performance to five shitty ones.

What disease does the guy on bottom right have?

De Niro is WAY better actor. Clint only have that mean face.

Acting is not the problem in the bad De Niro movies so it's irrelevant.

DeNiro by far

Eastwood since he was great in that movie where he helps the immigrant kid.

Meanwhile De Niro is one fucking shit movie after another.

>midnight cowboy
You almost got me sire.

I tried that out. I pulled three random titles each. For DeNiro I got: Little Fockers, Shark Tale and The Fan. None of his greats, but I actually really liked The Fan.

Eastwood got: Magnum Force, Million Dollar Baby and Escape From Alcatraz. None of his best either, but all three really good entries.

Eastwood is an average actor, he barely has any range, same facial expressions in every fucking movie. Still a Great director though

>all the mad kids saying Eastwood

I like him but he is nowhere near DeNiro when it comes to talent

Clint is very much die

>Escape From Alcatraz
That's a good movie. I'm actually going to go watch it now.

I wonder how many people Eastwood is better are honestly saying that because of acting talent or because of the trump video and his family. Everyone knows de Niro is the better actor, no Eastwood performance comes close to any of de Niros best

This

I don't really give two fucks about the politics of either. DeNiro's been coasting since the 70's and Eastwood's released almost no bad movies in the same time. I think Eastwood is the better, more consistent actor. I would think the same of a boxer who regularly won over one who had a couple of spectacular fights early in his career and has since otherwise been a painful embarrassment to himself with loss after humiliating loss.

Fair enough

Acting skill is determined through acting, not appearing in good movies.

Nignog

Stop talking about consistency you fucking braindead retard. De Niro has at least 15 movies where he gives a brilliant performance, who gives a shit if he was in some bad movies? Eastwood doesn't have 1 movie where he gives a great acting performance, let alone brilliant. Keep repeating the same shit though, and compare art to sports some more

De Niro by fucking far

Can you say he acted well in those shitty movies though? Go rewatch Bad Grampa.

He doesn't try in those movies, and that's bad acting.

Because he has more bad movies than good ones. Eastwood has more good movies than bad ones. It's not complicated to do that math.

>A Bronx Tale
Watched this a few weeks ago and it was straight up bad.
The acting especially was fucking horrible.

Well DeNiro is a wop and none of them are any good at anything except stealing and beating their wives

t. Nigger

Is this thread about good movies or good actors? Are you fucking retarded?

I haven't seen it in like 10 years, maybe I'm just remembering it with rose-colored glasses.

Spooks and wops are cut from the same cloth.

They aren't even of the same generation. Eastwood is a Traditionalist and De Niro is a borderline Baby Boomer.

who fuckign cares you nignog
De Niro is the better actor

De Niro is a faggot useless wog piece of shit

Because OP's picture is making dumb implications

Eastwood played the same character in every movie.

When I say good movies, I mean movies that were well-acted in.

DeNiro's phoned in performance in Machete was shit acting compared to Eastwood's in Gran Torino, though they were released around the same time. Moving back to the 90's where DeNiro actually had a good movie or two, there was his shit performance in "Wag the Dog" compared to Eastwood's... what? Bridges of Madison County? Absolute Power? His weakest movies were far better. Half the time his strongest movies were better too. And the times when DeNiro was great, Eastwood wasn't that far behind. Taxi Driver released against The Outlaw Josey Wales, one of the highest rated westerns and actually went into the National Film Registry.

The fact that you autists can't think of movies outside Dirty Harry and the Leone trilogy doesn't mean he hasn't turned in excellent performances. Just because you can't remember any movies that DeNiro did outside Goodfellas, Taxi Driver and Godfather II doesn't mean he hasn't done a lot of shit performances.

The answer? Watch more movies. If Eastwood is in something, he's giving 110% and the movie benefits from it. If DeNiro is in it, you have about an 80% chance it's phoned in DeNiro fattin' around and not trying.

>all this autism
And yet you're wrong. De Niro's a better actor, nothing you say can change that. Now you're comparing his top performances with Eastwood grunting and playing a cowboy, this is getting embarrassing

>weep ya hooo cowboy! :D

fuck off

I've never watched an Eastwood performance and thought "Wow! What a great actor!" afterwards.

See? Neither of you has seen Josey Wales, he wasn't a cowboy in the movie. Talking out of a place of pure ignorance.

who is this fag trying so hard to look like his papa?

You got BTFO very early in the thread. You're just a sad fuck who can't get this old guy's cock out of his mouth, and your taste in art is very poor, I feel sorry for you

mother fucker the point is his acting is the same in everything he does. even his modern stuff he still play grimacing grunting cowboy. do you get it now?

>get caught having never seen movies you're talking shit about
>"y-yeah, well, you got btfo becuz ur gay!"

DeNiro fans.

I think we can just /thread this. Eastwood won.

Go home everyone.

DeNiro, obviously. Eastwood is way more based as a human being though.

Like when he played that astronaut in Space Cowboys? Or where he played the ladies man photographer in Bridges of Madison County? How about the calculating intelligent criminal in Escape from Alcatraz? The USMC Gunny in Heartbreak Ridge?

Wait, no, you saw him sneer and growl in Gran Torino, and that, plus TGTB&TU are the only Eastwood movies you ever saw. Must be the only role he can play, amirite? XDDDD

yer an idjit ecks dee

Eastwood is not even on the same level. Just look at the acting game of De Niro in this scene.

Don't forget the multiple musicals that Eastwood has done. Or the comedy movies where he's a bareknuckle boxer with a pet Orangutan. Or the thriller where he's a secret service agent.

Man, this guy needs to get away from cowboy roles, srsly.

The only movie of DeNiro I ever saw were the Meet the Focker movies.

He's a pretty shit actor, honestly. I don't even know how this is a question.

This. Eastwood is the man's man we'd all wish to be in his charismatic roles. But almost none of them were as reliant on actual performance talent as DeNiro's at his height. I could easily see prime DeNiro taking over an Eastwood role and succeeding. Same can't really be said about Eastwood when it comes to DeNiro.
With that said, Eastwood is at a much better place career wise these days, but people are quick to forget that he's had some embarrassing roles and dry spells as well.

How are Gran Torino and Good, Bad, Ugly the same performances? He was a smarmy cocksure gunslinger in one, and an irritable racist polack in the other.

If you haven't seen DeNiro's best movies you can't really speak to how good of an actor he is.

Is that fucking shopped?

DeNirofags were already caught having never seen Eastwood movies and talking shit:

>The only movie of DeNiro I ever saw were the Meet the Focker movies.
>He's a pretty shit actor,

You share a film board with this kind of people

The Family was pure De Niro Kino

Better performances means better actor you stupid fucking piece of shit. Has Eastwood ever gave an acting performance as good as De Niro has in Mean Streets, Godfather 2, Raging Bull or Taxi Driver. No, you know he hasn't, but you keep talking about their late careers as if that has any importance

>DeNiro said some mean things about my boyfriend trump
>ill show him
>furiously types shitpost implying clint eastwood is even in the conversation of actors better than deniro
I love Clint Eastwood and he's had some great roles. He's shown a bit of range in things like Gran Torino and Unforgiven.

But better than DeNiro? Why not just make the post you wanted to make and bash him outright for what he said about Trump?

go watch the mission

So does De Niro

Why are you guys sucking De Niro's dick so hard? This guy has explained up and down and six ways to Sunday how Eastwood consistently delivers great performances and De Niro delivers a fair amount of shit along side a few spectacular performances, and all you is call him names and say "B-b-but he was jus a cowboy" despite being proven wrong again and again.

No. It's some new DeNigro style comedy.

Never seen Dirty Harry?

Redditbabies on sucide watch

>how Eastwood consistently delivers great performances and De Niro delivers a fair amount of shit along side a few spectacular performances,
So the guy who gives spectacular performances is better than the guy who gives great performances right? No, fuck that whole "logic" thing, Eastwood is better

Eastwood gives better performances. Has DeNiro ever sang on film like Eastwood did with Honkytonk Man? No because DeNiro only has his angry criminal persona. While Eastwood was out there slaying it in romance movies like Bridges of Madison County, DeNiro was playing an angry criminal. When Eastwood was making us laugh in his Any Which Way movies, cry in his Milliondollar dramas and live out male fantasies in his Dirty Harry action roles, DeNiro was doing angry criminal.

I mean, look at every movie you listed. Mean Streets, where he plays an angry Italian criminal. Godfather 2 where he plays an angry Italian criminal. Raging Bull where he plays an angry Italian boxer... criminal. Taxi Driver where he shows his true range of a paranoid criminal.

Wew. People want to criticize Eastwood because the only movies they know about him are westerns when DeNiro objectively can play only one role. Y'know his next two huge roles that everyone remembers him for?

Casino and Goodfellas. What do you notice about those movies too?

Good Bad and the Ugly, Dirty Harry, Escape From Alcatraz, Million Dollar Baby, Gran Torino. Eastwood is film De Niro is flick

Kill yourself

Not the guy you're talking to but you're obviously being petty over DeNiro's political comments. If you weren't so blatantly transparent, maybe someone might consider what you're saying seriously. This entire thread is a fucking joke.

Yes, DeNiro has phoned in a lot of shit recently. So has Pacino. Does that somehow discredit their brilliance at the height of their careers? Fuck no.

Why do people consider Marlon Brando one of the greatest actors of all time when he's done shit like the Island of Dr Moreau? Because of his performances in fucking Streetcar, in Waterfront, in the Wild One.

DeNiro and Pacino reached a level of performance that Eastwood has never approached. It doesn't matter if he's been more consistent. By that logic, fucking Donald Sutherland is the greatest actor of all time. ?It's infantile as fuck, so much that I can't even believe I'm patronizing you with a reply.

You can take the nigger dick out of your mouth any time

Name a good DeNiro movie where he doesn't portray a criminal. Seriously, I'll wait.

BTFO redditbaby

Name a movie where he isn't playing a tough guy criminal, or a pseudo tough guy like the Fockers, or just full retard like that Grandpa shit?

kek
>these guys have never seen The Deer Hunter
E X P O S E D
X
P
O
S
E
D

Marlon had much, much, MUCH less bad movies than DeNiro. Granted, he only had about a decade to phone it in, while DeNiro has been phoning it in his whole career.

>movie where DeNiro joins an underground gambling circuit with russian roulette
>t-that's totally legal

Can't find a great movie where he wasn't a criminal, huh? I understand. How about just a good movie? Let's say a 6/10? Has even done a good movie where he's not a criminal?

New York, New York
The King of Comedy
The Deer Hunter
Novecento
Brazil
The Mission
Midnight Run
Silver Linings Playbook

Thr only movie he would be able to come up with is maybe Silver Linings Playbook, and that is just his channeling his rage over the fact his children are autistic niggers

Exception does not make the rule

>movie where DeNiro joins an underground gambling circuit with russian roulette
That's Christopher Walken, retard. DeNiro is forced to play by his captors as a P.O.W. and only returns to rescue Walken from himself.

Nice to know you Wikipedia'd the movie instead of watching it.

Sergio Leone already settled this argument.

>"Eastwood moves like a sleepwalker between explosions and hails of bullets, and he is always the same—a block of marble. Bobby first of all is an actor, Clint first of all is a star. Bobby suffers, Clint yawns."

De Niro doesn't have that many bad movies though.

I see you've seen the first half of the movie. Watch until the end.

I haven't even seen half of those movies so I can tell they're shit. The movies he gets praise for he plays the same character. Complete one note actor

Compare the "Do you feel lucky, punk?" to "Are you looking at me?" Eastwood has much more raw talent as an actor.

B T F O
T
F
O

where is that femdom pic from?

The Bridge of San Luis Rey
Godsend
New Year's Eve
Faithful
The Big Wedding
The Bag Man
Little Fockers
Killing Season
Dirty Grandpa
Hide and Seek
Bloody Mama
Righteous Kill
Arthur and the Invisibles
Killer Elite
Showtime
Heist
Analyze That
The Family
Red Lights
Stanley & Iris
Grudge Match
15 Minutes
Shark Tale
The Fan
Great Expectations
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Meet the Fockers

I could go on.

Awakenings. That performance alone, has more range than Eastwood's entire career. Even Eastwood himself would agree that De Niro is the superior actor, as would any sane person not butthurt because he said he wanted to punch your orange balding god

Damn, that's harsh.

Good Bad and the Ugly > Once Upon A Time in America

Average 5-6/10

Quality(Eastwood) > Quantity(De Niro)

Reminder that trump already lost the election

I feel that DeNiro has a more impressive range of roles he can play convincingly but Eastwood's fewer character types left a bigger impact on me.

t. Redditbaby

Eastwood never sunk so low he did a movie where he jacked off to BLACKED porn, making him objectively superior.

Killing Season, even though it was (largely) terrible. Only saving grace was that joke about the guy banging the chick he met through the war.

In fairness, he said that in 1984 right at the peak of DeNiro's career which afterward was a downhill spiral, and at the early beginning of Eastwood's ascent. Praise from Leone is cancer.

Only in the minds of redditbabies

>trumpcucks eternally and irreversibly BTFO
Feels good. Can't wait for Cred Forums's meltdown

>Eastwood posters in this thread can't separate the artist from his political comments
The true mark of a pleb. This is a tv and film board, please leave.

>the beginning of Eastwood's ascent

lol, no.

>eastwoodcucks have no arguments so they yell 'reddit'
Hilarious

Tough guy war vet instead of tough guy criminal. Such range. Travolta had more range in that movie than De Niro

He is already full damage control trumplerina
Your clown has 0 chances

Let's not shift goalposts. You said movies where he wasn't a tough guy criminal and you got one.

I wouldn't say his career spiraled after that. He put in quality roles for another 15 years afterwards.

>numale cucks eternally and irreversibly BTFO
Feels good. Can't wait for leddit's meltdown

Damage control? Like the redditbabies itt?

This is the dumbest picture I've seen in a while.
Hillary and Trump have very different styles of campaigning.
You can look at Hillary's 2000 NY senate campaign- the "listening tour" - as a model for most of her campaign rallies.
Small and personal. She isn't a riveting speaker so she just gets personal with voters and outworks her opponents.

Please don't comment about issues you don't know about and stick to movies.

Nah, like crying and bitching about the election being rigged

lol, yes.

The late 70s after he quit with Leone is where his career started to come together. His best westerns were put out then, the strongest Dirty Harry movies and he began to really branch out into different genres to critical acclaim, like Escape, Honkytonk and Heartbreak. While Clint was rising through the 80's and 90's, DeNiro was releasing flop after flop until he went crawling back to Scorsese asking for more gangster films.

Pretty sure De Niro was a war CRIMINAL in that movie

Will you be here after Trump loses by a 90% margin? Please be here and cry and bitch

Clint Eastwood has always been wooden and one dimensional. That's his schtick, which is fine. It's gotten him good roles as squinty tough guy cops and squinty tough guy cowboys.

Deniro has always had range. He acts circles around Eastwood. There's no real argument. It's like asking who's a better actor, Daniel Day Lewis or Arnold Swartzeneggar.

The whole argument about bad movies is a red herring. All of them have made absolutely shit movies, because famous hollywood actors get paid shittons to star in shitty movies. Bad scripts and bad directors have nothing to do with actual acting talent.

He did have good films, yes. But after Sergio paid him that compliment he started taking awful films in abundance. The early career for DeNiro was rock solid. His later career? Far less so.

N-no but reddit! Numales and memes

The Leone trilogy was the high water mark for Eastwood's films. People picture Eastwood, they picture him chomping on that cigar wearing the poncho. It's all been downhill from there for him as an actor. He got more fame as a ridiculously overrated director. Now he's a sad buffoon shitting in his adult diapers.

>all this hyper condensed ass pain

Voters would rather watch paint dry then listen to that shrill corrupt cunt for 15 minutes. Good luck getting peoole motivated to go to the polling booths. Remember, they don't like hillary, they only dislike Trump. Lot of salty cucks going to be staying home while a sea of Red washes over the booths.

>rigged the Primary against Sanders
>it's implausible that she would do the same in the General

Why are demokkkrats registering dead people en masse then?

as a hillary supporter even i can admit she is shit with people. i wouldn't say she is getting personal. more like attempting to minimize possible damage during public speaking

that being said i am electing the president not a public speaker

she may not be "exciting" but she communicates clearly and she is an effective administrator

she is a mother fucking wonk and i cant wait for her shit eating grin come the 9th

>11% chance to win the presidency

Will you be here after Klanton loses by a 90% margin? Please be here and cry and bitch

Robert De Niro has always been wooden and one dimensional. That's his schtick, which is fine. It's gotten him good roles as squinty tough guy criminals and squinty tough dad roles.

Eastwood has always had range. He acts circles around De Niro. There's no real argument. It's like asking who's a better actor, Daniel Day Lewis or Arnold Swartzeneggar.

The whole argument about bad movies is a red herring. All of them have made absolutely shit movies, because famous hollywood actors get paid shittons to star in shitty movies. Bad scripts and bad directors have nothing to do with actual acting talent.

>Clint Eastwood has always been wooden and one dimensional.
When you say shit like that, you just admit that you haven't seen Eastwood films. There's no need to read the rest of your argument.

>m-muh polls

Cries the nerd virgin

You are going to trigger the Cred Forumstards
They can't handle the truth, hence why they live in a world of their own

>until he went crawling back to Scorsese

Other way around actually

As someone who has met Hillary Clinton, I can tell you she is personable face to face.
Very good listener, and responsive.

de niro is literally the greatest actor ever you nigger. why are you comparing him to some average actor, eastwood is just a great director

People picture Eastwood, they picture Dirty Harry. No one is pointing their hand like a gun at one another going "You may run the risks, my friend, but I do the cutting. We cut down my percentage - uh, cigar? - liable to interfere with my aim." No, they're going "Do you feel lucky, punk?" or "Make my day." The fact that you can't identify his iconic character means you have no place in this discussion.

You're done kid. It's over, you lost, Trump lost because he is a loser. Losers lose and winners win, let's see how that plays out in November

t. Redditbaby

We all know you worship your so diverse loving and multicult actors. Here's the thing, Clints son will continue his Cinematic Legacy. De Niros half breed negroid mongrels will never be on movie screens.

...

>i understand political polling more than pulitzer prize winning journalists because these tweets and infographs say so
im going to need a dump truck to contain all of your tears

Either way. Without DeNiro, there's no Scorsese. Without Scorsese, DeNiro was a one-hit Coppola wonder.

agree with you there, i was speaking when she is dealing with large crowds.

compared to her husband she is not that great

then again she did a good job during the second debate moving toward and addressing the person asking the question.

that alone demonstrates her ability to take notes and improve her performance

>Here's the thing, Clints son will continue his Cinematic Legacy
What happened to trying? Come on

Why can't she walk down stairs?

Hillary is old, weak, no stamina. Same do nothing politician of the last 30 years. Stale, pale, and female. No thanks!

It's not politicking, it's understanding polls. Reuters doesn't hide their sample size, they just assume most people don't understand how sampling a huge portion of female voters shifts the view. Like yourself. Go look it up.

Not even you believe what you are saying
You need to improve your shitposting
2/10
Lurk a few more years before trying to shitpost newshit

>No thanks!
No one asked you.

I seem to remember comments like this four years ago

>Despite your arguments I will call you autistic, make no arguments of my own, and declare myself right

Literally end your life

>the guy worth $10 billion is a loser

Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha nerd virgin tears taste delicious

>I'm so fucking stupid I can't understand how polls can be skewed for desired results

Kys cuck

Samefag

>can't refute De Niros autistic nigger children will never be in movies and he effectively killed off his blood line

What happened to trying? Come on

>literally Cred Forums the post

but you forgot altrightfrog.jpg

Not even you believe what you are saying
You need to improve your shitposting
2/10
Lurk a few more years before trying to shitpost newshit

Tired of getting your ass handed to you? Your candidate of choice is a racist sexist war mongering establishment boot licking Wall St shill. Congrats you fucking retard

It's not a question of who's winning or not, it was a question of understanding the polls. The polls themselves are probably meaningless garbage. But when a poll shows a narrow Democrat lead and chose to take 70% female vote, that poll is just saying it's a Republican lead.

As to whether polls accurately predict shit or not, that's a different topic entirely.

I seem to remember comments like the ones itt only a couple months ago

While they were a tandem, as far as putting each other on the map, I think Scorsese has to thank De Niro more than vice versa. De Niro was cruising with De Palma before Scorsese and other directors were taking notice.

I do know that, as the polls sit right now, no one so far behind in them has ever come back to even get close to win an election.

Polls are useless. Compare rallies, you know, an easily examineable figure of how voters feel about their candidate?

Hill can't fill a highschool gym while Trump has been maxing out rallies between 15,000 and 30,000 in attendance for the past year all over the country. It's going to be a fucking land slide

"My" candidate will win though. That's what matters

But again, he's ahead in all those polls. They're just presenting the data in such a way that people who don't know how to correctly interpret them think he's behind.

"If you discount 68% of the male vote, Hillary is up 6 points according to this poll!"

>who is Ronald Reagan

Dumb shit

Your candidate will trt and steal the election and the transparent cunt will be caught. Or did you think you would get away with registering dead people and bussing illegals?

>polls are useless
>compare these rallies using an eyeball test and completely anecdotal evidence instead
If you believe these polls are skewed, was the polling also not skewed against Romney? Has the media/polling agencies only made a political shift this election to start slanting polling to their agenda?

Your argument destroys itself. Whether or not the polling is accurate, the fact that someone so far behind in the polls has never been elected president is a consistency that you cannot ignore. If the polls are wrong now, haven't they always been wrong?

Reagan was not as far behind as Trump is right now. He started down in the polls but his numbers rose dramatically as the election came closer.

and he also appealed to the center and made a deal with the religious right.

trump is bleeding the center and the religious right, along with white women and college educated men/women

he cant win an election on hs only educated white working men, not enough of them

>eyeball test
>anecdotal

You need neither an "eyeball test" or "anecdotal evidence" to see how bad Trumps campaign is raping hillary. If you need another example compare the Republican National Conventions success to the Democrat National Conventions complete and utter train wreck

Yes he was

Nice CNN propaganda

The polling was skewed with Romney too, yes. But as I said, and apparently have to reiterate for those of you with poor reading comprehension... polls don't necessarily indicate who's going to win. Just because they skew in favor of one candidate over another doesn't generally mean shit come election time.

where can i find the portal to your parallel world and how does it work

does everyone in wacko land have a goatee?

The corrupt Mainstream Porpagadanist are stacking the polls so when hillary inevitably tries to steal the election they can go LOOK AT MUH POLLS. Not going to work tho

Maybe. I figured they always fucked with the polls because it demoralizes voters. If you see information saying your candidate is going to lose anyway, why bother going out to vote?

The one where hillary isn't slowly dying and getting utterly ass ravaged in every way besides MUH POLLS

>The polling was skewed with Romney too

fucking nate silver was spot on when it comes to romney

the only skewed polls were the romney internals

It might have worked in the past, especially when both candidates were bought and the election was alread decided, like this one was going to be before Trump announced his presidency and Jeb faded into obscury

Trump wears a diaper because he has syphilis

Nate Sodium hasn't been right about a single thing this election

Hitlary wears a diaper because she has brain damage and Parkinsons

>why bother going out to vote
because its your civic fucking duty, its the bare minimum you as a citizen are supposed to do in a civilized fucking country

He's making the point the Mainstream Porpagadanist are trying to demoralize voters by making it seem the election has already been decided. Little do they know Trump is both David and Goliath

Ah, feels good BTFO redditbabies. Trump will win, and he will win BIGLY. Nothing can stop America from becoming Great Again

>that webm

Does Trump have high functioning autism?

if the weatherman says there is a 95% chance of clear sky, and it rains the weather man is not wrong

just because you are to stupid to understand statistics does not mean the rest of us are.

now go back to your trump rally and pretend he is going win, your tears come election day will be delicious

Isn't Clint married to a black chick?

Maybe. But more like a savant

>durrrrrrr i dont know what skewed polling data is even after it's been explained to me hurrr durrrrrrr

I will be drinking your tears. No need to vote, hill is polling so high she couldn't possibly lose right :^)

>Still a Great director though
He fucking stinks. What are you talking about? Just one middle of the road flop after another.

Does his son look like a half breed?

She's 3/4 European, 1/4 Puerto Rican.

of course she has the possibility to lose. he still has a path to 270

sure its highly unlikely but its possible, so yeah only an idiot would fail to vote

>sure its highly unlikely but its possible

Highly unlikely, yes that's a good word for it. The likelihood of her winning fairly is the same as Mainstream Porpagadanist deciding to be unbiased journalist and reporters

...

This. Just like those Hollywood kikes to parade a talentless dago in front of decent Americans.

...

...

i don't understand

when have the size of crowed ever been a measure for the success of a politician?

It's an easy measure of how motivated your voting base is to go out and vote for you

Did you watch the Rich Vos version?

...

At least we know why that fly kept landing on hills face during the second debate

really, so you have some data to back this up?

like a graph of the past 20 presidential runs average correlating crowed size to electoral votes.

you know something peer reviewed, like how statics and polling has been peer reviwed

>yfw everyone knows you're a corrupt full of shit politician, you're slowly dying, and will die behind bars

You mean the one he abandoned and refused to admit was his?

Don't you have something called eyes and common sense? I mean I know you're a squishy brained limp wristed libcuck, but c'mon.

>yfw you lost a Presidential Election because of a bunch of frog posters on a Taiwanese trading card forum

You mean Danney Williams?

>when your voters don't care you're a racist sexist war mongering establishment boot licking Wall St shill because your paid Propagandist in the Mainstream Media accuse your opposition of the exact same thing

>tfw Why don't he want me man?

botox and projection are a hell of a drug

Eastwood. The only good performances by De Niro were Taxi Driver and Raging Bull. Eastwood has a lifetime of amazing roles.

frankenstein was good though. Not great but good.

>Brazil
But he's a criminal

Eastwood > De Niro

(dry cough sound effect)