Why do liberals hate guns so much?

Why do liberals hate guns so much?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ko9A3ZbN8ZU
m.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0
rense.com/general76/univ.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=1GifS4zwggE
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Guns don't belong to citizen's hands.

Then get out of my country and be a citizen somewhere else.
Now were both happy

...

But our constitution made it a high priority, the second most important thing actually

I have that shirt

This.

You literally don't need a gun.
It is just your hobby, dangerous to society.

Yup. First freedom of speech and press and second the right to defend those freedoms.
Liberals get fucked

No actually the citizens have a responsibility to be armed so that the government can’t impose tyranny

Because, in the literal sense, they are pro-life.

...

small brained mammals hate things they fear

you know that the government has drones, tanks and swat teams?

and things they don't understand

Top fucking kek i’m using this from now on

Yea and almost all of the operators for those are 2nd amendment fanatics. I would know

Liberals fear guns. Guns represent autonomy, and liberals do not want autonomous citizens. Citizens who think for themselves are not easily controlled.

Rich people also tend to be liberals. Rich people fear armed autonomous citizens, because they know that rich people will be the first against the fucking wall when shit hits the fan.

Thats a good assessment actually. Holy shit

citizens have a responsibility to be informed voters who don't elect populist leader figures prone to becoming a dictator so that the government can't impose tyranny

this is literally textbook stuff. Hitler, Mussolini, Erdogan, Putin

...

because people kill others with them

And? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

That's not the discussion at hand.

If you’re a gun owner these days 9 times out of 10 you’re probably more of an informed voter than libcucks

You gotta name a leader we don't like. Moron.

Doctors kill people with opioids

Yup, thats why i think citizens should be allowed to have rpg’s, hand grenades and 50 caliber full automatic heavy machine guns.

A tragic flaw in liberal logic that is used to argue against private gun ownership can be used to defeat their position.

Liberals claim that the fathers of our country (note that women didn’t write it because they are stupid cunts) only wrote that we have the right to bear arms because they only knew of the weaponry at that time that was available to the public. Sense then guns have increased thier killing capacity thanks to technologica advances. Yet, private gun ownership was brandished to the citizens to protect themselves from a tyrannica government which also just so happens to have increased it’s killing capacity thanks to techonologocal advances.
We should all have our own tanks and rpg’s if we can afford them in my honest opnion.

If you don’t like it go live in a socilaist shit hole you dirty commie faggot

Trump is President. You were saying?

So you’re saying we should have voted for Hillary?

You just reinforced his position if anything

Trump is literally better in every way than Hillary Clinton.

Yup and thats why he won.
Because more informed voters voted
Get fucked

everything, it's a global economy.

Nobody ever talks about how the ultra rich are scared shitless of an armed America. I'm not talking about the 1%, I'm talking about the .001%. They are all for radical gun control.

you know you couldn't shoot a school up with a musket?

face it, the dangers of everyone having semi-auto riflesnfar outweighs some tinfoil theories and weird scenarios like defending your family from niggers at night. Buy a better lock. At least your kid won't blow his brain out with it.

Why can't I be liberal and enjoy guns?

I like guns, I don't like you.

People back then typically had a better sense of morality and honor than people now. The problem isn’t the gun, its the immorality of society and liberalism

Also Hollywood can all go fuck themselves, they’re the last ones who can talk about gun violence because they’re complicit in this shit

You can, but you also have to realize that your support of a party that hates guns will lead to a much more difficult time in the future.

...

To be quite honest I could care less if a couple kids die a year due to psychos who would kill people with bombs if guns were outlawed.

I’m not concerned with niggers eitheir.

Guns are brandished to citizens to defend themselves from the possible uprise of a tyrannical government thats the priamry and sole purpose and it outwieghs the unfortunate reality that a few people will be killed by psychos every year
If you were so concerned about childrens lives maybe you wouldn’t have gotten 4 abortions last year katie

She came. Try to beat that with your vegan ice cream, soyboy. Protip: you can't.

It is but guns are easier to regulate than morality

Tell that to Charles Whitman.

kek, the ultra-rich don't give a fuck about few rednecks with guns. They have professional security, high walls with barbed wire and personal helicopters.

You know what is the difference between you people and "the system"? You couldn't cooperate in the slightest, there is no anti-government militia able to resist an organized attack. FBI already reads you emails and if somebody tried to found a secret organization, they would go down so fast you couldn't even imagine.

Good thing we live in a democracy and intelligent people trust the system.

what if this citizen is in a tyrannical country?

Thats why Christianity exists

I don't believe 17 children should die because I want to shoot my ar-15

No I don't, officially I'm unenrolled because both the GOP and DNC are center right corporate puppets. Dems and Republicans don't do anything they can't make a buck off.

Are people like you really this dumb?

>republic*

GET fucked

To own arms not anyone you want, if I lived next to you and had a fucking nuclear arsenal would you want me to have that?

Do you own or drive a car? Because those kill way more people than guns.

is that shooting a 50BMG?

lucky for you, this "tyranny" was overthrown in the american revolution.


please give me a scenario where the american government would turn so tyrannycal you'd need to start an armed revolution?

I do

Man, the FBI couldn't stop a 19 year old when they were handed him on a silver platter. The only explanations are (1) the FBI is incompetent or (2) the FBI/CIA/etc orchestrated it.

The ultra-rich can certainly fuck off to another country and no gun will stop them. But the question remains. Why do they all hate guns?

Kinda looks like it but its probably some odd hippo caliber.

why do people post and show off they have guns.

that not .44

Armed police going door-to-door to force people into giving up their arms.

Why not?

Just like they had napalm, hueys and a navy and airforce in Vietnam and we won that hands dow....

Oh wait

Why are almost all mass killers on some kind of psych meds? That's the better question.

It's a Tankgewehr so it's a 13.2mm round

youtube.com/watch?v=ko9A3ZbN8ZU

To make liberals cry

Kek.
Koch brothers are in the top 5 of the top 100 forbes richest and they’re libertarian.

the fbi probably has thousands of tip-offs because there are thousands of armed violent fucked-up brainlets

I know.

I think more accurately they stopped taking their meds suddenly.

I'm a liberal, I don't hate guns

Why are liberals suicidal so often?

I want that T-shirt!
Wearin' it to my next Antifa rally, just to piss 'em off even more.

How then do citizens protect themselves?

Do it broski

>probably
I guess you're going with "incompetent".

I'm a far leftist and I own several firearms. Mine are dope though, not that faggot tacticool shit you homos bust your soft chubs over.

They dont silly. They let rich politicians organise their protection FOR them.

It is literally the duty and obligation of every American to rely on themselves for protection!
m.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0

the smart ones don't but there isn't very many smart people left in this world.

>without and natural or unnatural forces effecting breeding, evolution simply favors those that breed more.

with knives

It's really quite simple-
The self proclaimed 'Liberals', along with the majority of people that have any degree of power/authorita in govt., doesn't want an armed populace.
Now, I wonder why that would be?
Surely such things have no historical precedent?

I'll keep my arsenal, *ahems*, firearms, tyvm.
I trust my training and skills far more than dialing '911', to get my ass/those I care about, out of imminent danger.

Feel free to cower and bleat all ya like, OP.

Sheep never understand self-defense. Your only option is running away.

And I bet any round fired from a firearm is faster than you.

how do poor niggers easily obtain guns to commit crime?

There are much more instances of gun-related crime than a citizen using his gun to stop crime.

You do the math.

Either a fail troll faggot or truly believes only police should be armed. Either was what a paste eater.

Because they're faggots who have never shot a gun in their lives

Because we don't live in the socialist republic of wherever and don't have to hide the fact we own them. That's why liberal try hard.

holy shit you guys are still alive

...

So what do you do in that situation?

nice SB tactical brace. I can send you a link for a AR platform 9mm lower receiver

Because the people who tend to become mass murderers are typically psychotic.

Liberals dont hate guns

Eeeeyyyeeeaaahhhhhhh

>thinks guns make you a man
good luck with your tiny peen

That's not the question you should be asking. The question you should be asking is "if they're taking guns by force of arms, what else are they confiscating?"

I'm not really a liberal, but I love having my rifles and hand guns. I don't think it should be easy to get them though if say you're insane. Also I don't think anyone needs automatic weapons. I guess I'm a rarity though I don't fall in line with the two dumbass extremes.

All the one's I know sure do. Tell me user are you not a gun hater?

I'm more left leaning, but I actually advocate for gun rights. Might as well arm all the toddlers with Desert Eagles with AE and get throgh this natural selection thing that we're experiencing in school shootings.

Not bad

coming from a soyboy who's shoulder would probably get broken by the recoil

So what do you do in that situation?

They would have to stop more then every single crime to change that though

>tiny peen
They always go for the small dick insult. Why is that I wonder?

Liberals don't hate guns when police have them.
I love guns

Violence and mass shootings have nothing to do with weapons. Weapons are the means. The motive is that we as a society have abandoned these people completely. This is what happens when people have nothing to live for, nothing to lose, nothing but hate

and as long as we keep it up, this is how it will be. Societal decay, friends.

>soyboy
confirmed for microdick

In my experience most gun nuts (not to be confused with normal gun owners for hunting etc.) are usually people that didn't serve and never really grew up. It's the adult version of playing army.

ST PETERSBURG, Fla. - The headlines are misleading.

Many news outlets reported that Wednesday's tragedy in Parkland is the country's 18th school shooting this year.

The number comes from Everytown For Gun Safety, a non-profit that uses research to reduce gun violence and is known for their school shooting tally.

But their number isn't indicative of how school shootings are typically defined.

Some examples from their map:

A bullet hit a window and file cabinet at a Seattle high school. No shooter was found and no one was injured.
A school resource officer in Minnesota was talking to a group of third graders while sitting on a bench when one of the students pulled the trigger of his gun, which was in the holster. No one was injured.

When taking away instances where no one was hurt, there's eight examples.

But when excluding incidents with intentional injuries, including suicides and shootings not involving students (following a Washington Post article challenging their inclusion of a suicide outside a closed Michigan school, the group reduced their number to 17), there's four left:

A student in Texas aimed at one student, but ended up hitting another.
Two Maryland teenagers were arguing in a parking lot when shots were fired.
In Kentucky, a 15-year-old opened fire on other students, killing two and injuring several.
Wednesday's shooting in Parkland, Fla.

Maybe because you'd be lost without your big metal phallus.

Agreed. Fox news makes it seem like they do, but as someone on a bery liberal college campus there is a vast majority of people who think a gun ban is absolutely retarded. But thats just my personal experience.

What do you do when they are going door to door and arresting blacks and Hispanics?

>nothing to worry about until the deaths reach double digits.

My dick is fine. How's your masculinity fairing?

As a member of the military, i fully agree. We are here to protect the civilians from real threats, petty crimes can be dealt with by non-lethal options.

I'm not an ammosexual. Its all good.

So what do you do in that situation?

This is normal in the US.. Why the fuck can;t you people understand that? In the past before the media this was only reported in the newspaper of the town it happened in. Other states or towns never heard about it. Now that the world is wired everyone hears about what is just normal day to day life for the Americans involved.

>we twisted the facts and statistics to make our side look better but don't mind that it's still a problem

Are you dense?

Trumptards would join the storm troopers in a second if their dear leader ordered it. None of you fuckers has ever even come close to fighting tyranny, and you never will.

You shouldn't be in the military.

Posse Comitatus Act, nigger.

Found the Fed.

> a few stray bullets around the kindergarden. no worries.

maybe because highschoolers are regularly mass murdered by other highschoolers or deranged mass murderers who easily get their hands on weapons that can murder many people within seconds

yeah, murder wasn't a problem when it could be swept under the rug

people finding out about things is bad

>suppressor
you should know that we shitlib gommunist traitor hippie faggot antifa ultra violent terrorist pacifist lesbian transniggergender cuck soyboys call those things "silencers".

you fucking shitlord, get a grip like doh!

>to let freedom ring

>ammosexual
Go back to HuffPo, shill. The Left still can't meme.

The NAZI party disarmed it's citizens. Just sayin

Keep crying turbovirgin. I know your mother is.

A very typical move for leftist political parties

That’s pretty good

It's a super clever joke, see?

no, there are more instances of gun-related crimes than citizens using their guns to stop crimes in which the use of the firearm resulted in a "justifiable homicide"
the number of uses of guns in any capacity to stop crimes varies depending on the source, but even the lowest estimates put it multiple times higher than gun crime rates

You think you can fight back one of the biggest and well equipped army in the world with your silly guns? We are not in 1700, musket and cannons are long gone you delusional retard.

Also Hitler was a vegan. So all vegans are NAZI socialist NAZIS!

The issue remains, the majority of the population are imbeciles and will elect populist leaders because they are stupid and do not know better. Those that do must be armed to stand against the tyranny.

Im an american with the right to own guns. I dont because i could not care less about them and see no need for personal ownership. That being said we should not ban guns, not for any statistic or for a tyrannical govt not because people need them for sport or hunting. We should not ban them because we need to stop banning everything. Its not a solution its an easy way not to look at real problems. Its an excuse to give a false sense of security. We should keep guns legal because we dont need more laws. More laws, more loopholes, more corruption

Cars are meant to transport people between A and B. Guns, especially of the semi-automatic variety, are weapons crafted specifically to bring harm and or kill either a person or an animal. Hunting with a semi-automatic weapon is preposterous and target shooting should be in a controlled environment.

Wrong

rense.com/general76/univ.htm

LOL U MAD

The military aren't robots. Guess what happens when D.C. orders the Army to shoot on civilians?

>bullet hits a filing cabinet in an office by accident >"SCHOOL SHOOTING MUH CHILDRAN"

If you could make it sound like a problem without lying about how bad it was I'd care. But you can't so I don't.

>no sense of an ironic photo
Hell, I don't even like Trump. I straight up am a fucking liberal. I just realize that it's worth it to protect ALL my civil rights, unlike you, who much like the conservative philosophy I despise, only believe in protecting the rights that make you feel all warm and cozy inside.

You realize that in the 1700's the british empire was the equivalent of modern america in terms of money, power, arms, etc, and still lost, right?

>my feelings and intentions matter more than the numbers
>let me just talk about shit I know nothing about and be more of an idiot

Didn't think you have an answer. Thanks for confirming.

Citizens protect themselves from the government with intelligent voting and research. They protect thenselves from crime with pepper spray, tasers, and small bludgeons.

Hang in there, buddy. The NRA has qualified instructors all over the country. Just ask, they'll help you reclaim your masculinity.

What part of 'rich people' did you not understand?

>Ok wigh gunshots at the school because people make it sound worse than it is
opinion discarded
>I straight up am a fucking liberal
sure kid.

kek

>thinks manhood comes from a gun
you will always be a manlet regardless how many ar15s you own.

There is an answer. Don't be mad you didn't get the one you were digging for. There'll be another thread in an hour or so, you can try there.

>implying

I didn't say "this is OK" I said that if you have to lie about the facts to present your case, then you don't really have a case. Sure, school shootings are a problem, but if you're going to cite an intentionally falsified source then I don't give a fuck about what you have to say.

Are you out here protecting your country? Because i am, and i swore to do whats right by our civilians. If you believe even for a second we would turn against the civilians under and order youre wrong.

Civilians do not need to worry about that.

Just gonna slip this under the door...

>I didn't say "this is OK"
>I (just) don't give a fuck

KEK. Then stop trying to take my guns. Go read the constitution you swore to defend. You're not living up that. Acting like you're better than me because I'm a civilian, even such a nice, benevolent way, is exactly why we have a second amendment.

Being blindly afraid of firearms is what makes you unmanly. A gun is a tool. A person afraid of guns becomes a tool.

What purpose do you actually have for owning anything higher than a single shot rifle, shotgun, or a pistol?

Because of freedom

Two things. Semiauto's are fun to shoot, aaaaannd most importantly because I can.

I dont care what theyre for. Cars are more dangerous to us citizens than guns.

because you usually miss your first shot.

Theres a reason why nobody has been able to provide a reasonable response to that question. Take some time and think about why.

My deer rifle, my small game rifle and my duck/goose gun are all semi auto.

Same reason people show off what meal they bought at a restaurant

People show off

3 Gun, IPSC, USPSA, Defending myself.

Have you read the second amendment? It's very unambiguous that I have the RIGHT to have whatever I want. It doesn't matter what you FEEL about the reason. Just like you don't have to like what I'm saying, you can't force me to not say it, or to say something else.

Weakest strawman ever.

So I can keep my 82A1 then?

And you think that proves anything?

Your freedom permits innocent lives to be taken. While you may not be a psychotic person, there are plenty with access to the same weaponry you might own. Those people can then take their freedom and physically ensure countless others will lose theirs.

By you fighting for that very freedom, youre also fighting to allow innocents to die and to lose their own freedom.

Does that sit right in your heart?

The only good thing about gun rights is that you ameritards might actually extinguish yourselves and rides the resto of the world of your stupidity.

youtube.com/watch?v=1GifS4zwggE

Damn you must have a fucking awful shot

Because they're built for killing people. Better question is why do republicans love killing machines?

Yes. You don't care about lives, you care about guns.

Yes. That's on those people, not on me. Group punishment is unethical.

like drinking?

No guns = no revolution.

So is alcohol and sugar, but yet you dont bring those up do you?

If you miss your shot then maybe you should try again on a different animal. Just because you have the power to kill doesnt give you the right to take that life.

The second amendment was written in a time in which a militia could overturn an entire government, and was written by paranoia that a militia would be needed again.

What militia do you belong to?

What could you possibly need a 50. Cal Barret for?

You're an absolute idiot. If cars killed as many people as they did, BUT DIDNT PROVIDE THE FUNCTION THEY ARE DESIGNED FOR, then yes I would say that use of cars should be restricted.

I really really hope you are just trolling and not actually this stupid. Even the most pro-gun advocates don't try to push the parallel bewteen guns and cars. Anyone with simple reasoning skills can see how retarded that is.

Why are you not trying to ban them then?

The only good thing about Eurotards accepting ll the muslims into their faggot countries is they will out breed you and kill you off when you refuse to convert to their religion and you can stop pretending you are superior to the America.

squirrel hunting 'n such.

you do realize that neither trump or the nra care about your safety right?
there's money involved. people are getting rich at the cost of lives. you are fine criticizing drug cartels, isis, mafias, but your fucking government is doing the exact same thing and you calle it "rights"?

man, do people like you need a fucking reality check. you are just incredibly stupid.

Why do liberals want to keep abortion legal when it is killing babies,

Why don't you try to answer that question.

This isnt group punishment, this is democracy. This is doing whats right.

What makes you think that?

Their intended purpose is not to kill someone.

I don't necessarily hate guns themselves, I hate the jackasses that get behind them and fuck shit up for no reason ruining stuff for everyone else. Blame the person, not the guns.

That is overkill.

This is the saddest post I have read all day. It breaks my heart to see such a servant to their gov

>it is killing babies
MFW this nigger is killing millions of babies every night on his sock.

Yet they do at a much higher rate.

Abortion does not "kill babies." It removes an embryo from the uterus before it developes into a living being. Being against abortion is being against masturbation, and judging by the fact that youre on Cred Forums, youre not against masterbation.

He's being a good little subject

Keep telling yourself that.
Also keep telling yourself that you aren't fat and out of shape.
And keep pretending your jacked up truck would help you run over all the liberals.

You guys are literally children still. You would fall and your ass if you were ever mugged, much less pull a pistol.

A real civil war would be a massacre.

we got some nasty squirrels round these parts.

What's retarded about it?

Compare accidental numbers for guns to accidental numbers for cars.

Then factor in intentional suicide with guns and intentional homicide for guns and still compare to just accidents with cars.

Cars still kill more people.

But I don't see any of you faggots demanding more car control. Because it's not about deaths. Guns aren't functional for you, so you don't care. But they are for me, so I do care. And thus results the impasse.

No, it's what you want. There's a difference, hard as that can be to understand for some people.

Holding gun owners collectively guilty for the crimes of others is more than unfair.

You do know the people behind those drones, tanks, and swat teams are firm believers in the 2nd amendment right?

Who requires a weapon that would need to provide the ability to shoot multiple times? The exact type of person who is anticipating that they'll miss their shot.

Because it is easier to blame an inanimate object for society's problems than to find some real solution that would take real effort to address. Alcohol prohibition was the same idea. Blame a demon so you can pretend people aren't just fucked up

Yea I’m fine with that because our right to own and carry guns at least gives us a fighting chance to survive. There’s always going to be evil mother fuckers trying to inflict pain on someone else but taking away the right for a good person to have a gun will only compound the effect of mass shootings. I’m a lifelong NRA member and I don’t believe that mentally fucked people should have a gun but there’s no way in hell I’m giving up mine because I have a right to life, just like people who are in mass shootings

This meme was created for faggots like you.

>I'm so good I'll get it right perfectly the first time every time
said no competent shooter ever

>Guns don't belong to citizen's hands.
Poor bait. Worse grammar. Ivan detected.

Due to overconsumption.

Answer what question why i didnt mention those things? You are helping me prove my point. There is lots of things way more dangerous than guns. Why are you mentally ill liberals so focused on guns then and not those other things?

And if left to nature what would the embryo become? Don't soe liberals want to remove the ban on late term abortions? My son was born at 7.5 months and yet liberals want to make that still ok to abort.

2018 already February and you fat fucking American posts have had 30 mass shooting

Fucking 30.18 where mass school shootings holy fuck

1998 there have been 500,000 deaths in USA alone

That's more dead people than US soldiers in WW1 and WW2

The world truly laughs at you fucking mutts

Does it require its body to be torn to peices?

How well has that worked out in Afghanistan and Iraq?

Check out this nigger thinks he's going to overthrow the government from mom's basement.

As a populace, we should all feel a connection to one another, and treat each other with the kindness you would a neighbor. When something bad happens, we are all responsible to find a solution.

>said everyone who has ever hunted small game since the invention of the firearm

sometimes they blow up real good!

10% of the population is all thats required to over throw the government.

Dont give up all your guns. You could keep a few, such as single shot rifles or pistols. Even shotguns. But you do not need semi-automatic weapons for self protection.

Or just take another shot??

You can't stop killing, it's literally the natural order of things. You can't "preserve" life, it ends itself no matter what you do. We might as well stop eating meat, altho then you run into the conundrum of what to do with the millions of animals we breed to be slaughtered. You cant release them into the wild because the whole ecosystem will go to shit, so it's either that or mass slaughter. If you release them then predators will start overpopulating and making everything extinct unless we hunt them down, which won't happen because you don't want guns or "harming" anything. This world is run by violence, nothing you can say or feel will change this.

That number is basically fraudulent. The people in favor of gun control will take any incident involving a gun near a school and make it a school shooting.

Officer chucklefuck shoots his gun in the parking lot by accident?
>SCHOOL SHOOTIN MUH CHILDRUN

Tyrone and his buddies get into a turf war in an industrial area?
>four people got shot, muh mass shootun!

as for your "500,000", over 60% of those are suicides. If you want to look at actual global rates of suicide, that's a pretty expected number if you compare us to literally any other country in europe or asia.

Our homicide rate is a bit higher than average, but that can be clearly attributed to other non-gun factors.

But people are faggots and it's easier to blame scary black dick guns than to address the fact that our society is broken

K

This isnt nature, this is humanity, and if you cant tell nature doesnt play a role in us anymore.

Looks like we care what the world things huh. Why are people from other places so concerned about what we do here. Why dont you focus on making your place better instead of being jealous of mine.

Thats horrible.

yeah so we could form a militia and kill trump and his army, hurr durr

Because sometimes I miss my first shot at a flying bird. Because sometimes there are multiple predatory animals threatening the lives of my animals or family. Because sometimes charging bears or moose require more than one shot to take down. Because sometimes a person attacking you takes more than one shot to put down.

Only thing you're checking are my dubs, boy. Ever hear of guerilla warfare?

LMAO

overly sheltered fag

Because those other things provide practical uses to society, that without, would cause complete chaos and utter failure. By now I am getting the feeling that you are being 100% and really trying to say that because cars kill more people then guns, that they should be banned. Other pro-gun people of this thread, I know you agree with me on this subject, so can some of you talk to this retard.

lolno

Then strop trying to force me to accept what you want without regards for my opinion or feelings. Not likely, is it?

>t. a clueless faggot

>wants to live in afghanistan
go for it brainstem. youre gonna have to cut back on videogames and mountain dew tho.

What im saying is you dont need to repeatedly shoot a single animal. Doing so is overkill and cruel.

Dont argue with them m8, beta males will drag you down to their level of subservience and stupidity and beat you with a lifetime of experience.

It's not the car. You are completely missing the point. The argument is that liberals have a completely flawed view of humanity. If you blame the gun for the lunatic pulling the trigger it's no different than blaming the car for the drunk driver that annihilates the family in a minivan.

If he didn't have an AR-15 he would have had a shotgun or 2 pistols or pipe bombs laced with an anticoagulant. The point being he was hell bent on murder that day. He would have found a way.

The problem with blaming the vessel is the argument becomes body count not that someone died.

where's the simulation on that being run?

I like you

So when you gonna join the revolution fatboy?

I like you

I was born in vegas, living in the projects. Ive seen what goes down on mainstreet. I know how it happens. Dont tell me im sheltered without knowing who i am.

you could, you know, just have voted

Why are you not concerned about things that are more dangerous?

Funny that the founders of America felt strongly otherwise and put that right second only to free speech. When the 1st fails, the second is a backup. Simple as that.

The people who founded this country included that bit as a show of good faith. "If we fuck you over, you can fight back. We won't fuck you over." Was the idea, in the spirit of the revolution that birthed America. They were not hypocrites and were not fleeing tyranny to rule with tyranny.

Has my opinions or feelings killed anyone? Or ended up causing the deaths of anyone?

>some bullets are more dangerous than others
>some gun victims are more important than others

I like you

When the government becomes tyrinical and tries to forcefully take my guns. You aren't very bright are you?

Because they don't own guns

If you're actually in the military you deserve a fucking dishonorable discharge. You took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution you piece of shit.

Because those things provide a neccessary service to society. Do you seriously not understand that?

I like you, but use alcohol as a comparison, because the car argument doesnt work too well m8

morons have never read the law apparently, even if you had firearms and a tyrannical govt, there is law to stop you from destroying them lololololol

guns are pointless

30+ million people against a military for of less than 2 million.. Simple odds.

Because they are violent by nature. They look at a gun and see something they might pick up and use to hurt someone, but without any self-actualization. So they see a gun and think "this is a thing someone could pick up and hurt me with" because it's something THEY think about picking up and hurting someone with.

Normies and conservatives just see pieces of metal and plastic.

based nignog man

I dont think thats what hes saying at all he doesnt want cars banned he wants people to focus on things that cause more deaths but dont make the news like our pharmaceutical companies being super corrupt or processed sugars and fast food killing people when regulating them would save more lives. Car wrecks is an extreme example yet still legit one regulations on how roads are built could save more lives then banning guns

So because i would protect the people of my country with my life i deserve to be dishonorably discharged?

You aren't allowed a nuclear arsenal retard. A "militia" is not a formal thing that requires documentation. Ever American citizen is a potential militia member in waiting, that's what that part of the 2nd refers to.

Why as soon as someone hates guns that automatically makes them a liberal? And remind me again how many mass shootings since 2010.

What law are you citing there fella?

Guns don’t point and shoot by themselves. Blaming guns, rather than disturbed people, for shootings is like blaming airplanes (instead of terrorists) for the 9/11 attacks or cars (instead of impaired drivers) for drunk driving deaths. The human element cannot be controlled — we simply cannot legislate evil away. We must reinforce accountability by blaming the criminal instead of the weapon.

Excuses. Go fight the power like a man mister guerrilla warfare. Otherwise stop trying to talk tough on Cred Forums.

Do you really think manpower means anything in a modern war with current technology? You're dust before you see your enemy.

I like how she slams the bolt on this longboi

I don't know. How many people have illegal aliens killed?

Almost unanimousy carried out by liberals.

Prevention is the proper way to handle this. We cannot repremand criminals and then ressurect the dead that they killed.

Because it is well known, that the british empire back in the day had tanks, helicopters, drones, smart bombs and today's tecnology... Yeah, try to fight that back with your "modded" ar-15, dumb faggot.

Hey, just so you know, the vast majority of the world disagrees with how you envisage society should be, so just curiously, what ratio of people telling you your wrong before you pull your head out your arse and realise how stuck in the 1800s you are?

You're at the fringe of the debate user. Neither party care about you. Just hate guns because they're loud and annoying and go back to knitting earmuffs.

are you kidding?

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

Perhaps you should look at Iraq and Afghanistan. Also the Military s mostly a right-wing organization so in a civil war there would be massive desertion, and those tanks and drones and arsenals would end up in the hands of the right.

Because one of the tenants of liberalism is externalizing responsibility and one of the tenants of conservatism is internalizing responsibility.

Guns represent the ultimate in responsibility.

Yes there are conservatives that want guns banned and liberals who don't but they're the infinitesimal minority.

>when you are going to try to overthrow the government but you can't because it's against the law
What are you smoking?

im sure they were visualizing people running around with ar15s when they were writing it

A question you yourself have to answer. I know mine haven't.

Yes, some bullets are more dangerous than others.

If you think people who commit suicide are victims of "gun violence" then you're fucking retarded.

If you think conflating gang violence between "consenting participants" with a random act of violence committed by a mentally disturbed individual against unsuspecting people going about their day and trying to apply the same policy "solution" to both is a good idea, you're doubly fucking retarded.

Yes, manpower does matter. You don't have a clue what you're talking about.

>ships
>cannons
>cavalry
>vastly more man power
>against men with muzzle loaders
>still lose

congrats on being denser than a rock.

This

For the same reason your average car goes well over 100mph even though the highest speed limit in the US that I’ve seen is 80mph. Because we always want more

If this was still the Vietnam era, they follow orders and shoot civilians

If you support the freedom to own any gun, then your beliefs have indeed harmed and killed.

I probably have had a thought that hurt someone, im not innocent, but i know that my stance on gun control is for the better of our populace.

are conservative morons law abiding? wouldn't this law prevent them from overthrowing anything because they're soooooo good?

Do you think the government's response to a civilian revolution on home soil would look anything like a small smale overseas war for oil?

Also if all of those helicopters and tanks and equiptment ended up in the hands of the people opposing the government then what need would they have for small arms civilian grade weaponry?

Yeah I know all about it. You gave the hypothetical of a "Tyrannical government". If we get to that point the laws are as empty as your liberal brain.

>DERP!

>"no way to prevent this"
says only nation where this happens