This thread is a thinking contest. Go!!!

Attached: 1579284129895.jpg (480x1965, 115K)

Not much, actually. Mostly I'd just live like a normal billionaire, but I'd be able to have sex with any woman I wanted at any time.

why are they called threads if they are composed of posts? should not a thread be called a fence, or perhaps a post be called a fiber?

Attached: WALFART ASS.jpg (1080x1350, 214K)

Oh, and I'd never have to urinate or defecate again.

Ok. Go ahead!

are traps actually really gay?

Ok. Go ahead!
Make your dreams come true, godliness!

So stop eating!
Just drink when u need to

What if god is real?

Bro you're on that good shit

Attached: BDD1DEE2-A8E5-472A-95A1-AF71739E5A5D.jpg (852x854, 145K)

No, I would eat and drink whatever I wanted. I just wouldn't have to use the bathroom.

what if we all actually already posses that power and it is all truly in our heads. we each individually build our own universes that we inhabit. but dwell on the same plain simultaneously

That would mean we're ruled over by an evil god ,our perception of good might really be the inter-god-multiversal bad

Who in this thread will be remembered in the next century? Do our lives matter?

What if everything you are thinking is a product of what people before you have thought and there are no original thoughts left?

Käften

Nah, good and bad is subjective. Humans often crave things that are bad for them and detest thing that are best.

What if our shitty existence isn't meaningless and when we die we use our failures in this life to better our next and being that most of us are super fucked up it leads to us being metaphoric and maybe literal kings in the next life.

Attached: 6F9CC92A-B3E0-4744-81C7-78D4578B32BE.jpg (500x590, 101K)

Then puke!

Peter is going to beat u down

Attached: 22BC227B-547A-42F9-83BE-A66381918B6F.png (828x1792, 112K)

that old adage has been around the saying there is nothing new under the sun. but if you take in the fact that knowledge is infinite then knowing and have done everything is literally impossible.

You'll destroy us all in no time with your very first thought.

Just because something is an amalgamation doesn't mean it's unoriginal. Corn was always around but when someone heated it up and let it pop it became delicious. Potatoes were being eaten whole and then someone cut them up and made fries. Fries were there and then someone trolled and cut them super thin and made potato chips.

What the fuck.

What if our evil god has taken objectivity from us and given us subjectivity to muddy the waters and not see our universe for what it really is , a sad cruel lonely joke.

Then what does that say for right and wrong?

Snipe me idiot
Say my name

He said that because he was confused

Who the fuck is peter and why is he trying to catch these hands

Attached: 820114C0-5D5C-4723-964B-1A151D5EEA63.jpg (540x960, 62K)

MODS!!! CP

Thinking is overrated. Literally anyone can do it, even a retard. The real challenge is watching the mind with the mind. Being aware of what the mind is doing, and understanding it's true nature.

Attached: 869ada681e99f6205f5cebebe45eef47.jpg (640x640, 226K)

Is that Lisa Ann, 13 years old and butt naked?
What the fuck mods!!!
So firm boobs

Mods!!! CP
Don't worry we are angels of god

WHy would you do that why would you ruin a perfectly good original thread TIRED OF YOU GOD DAMNN RETARDS STINKING UP THE PLACE KILL YOUR SELF MY MAN

good job

Miracle!!!

How do we know if a nigger farts or just smells like a nigga? Farts are nasty

Equally subjective, however the things that are constant are what constitutes the standards.

the mind is the only object in the universe that can study itself

of maybe this whole thing is an illusion that was always gonna happen like this
If you did a thing a certain way is there any way to do it any other way or were you always meant to do it that way, believe you have a choice but then make me write this and stirr questions in your mind just to be dismissed or not dismissed?

if something is remembered or forgotten does that lessen the impact of meaning? just because something is remembered doesn't make it meaningful.

so basically you are describing nirvana. thinking of no thoughts. is that actually possible or just some hippie bullshit?

There you go! I fucking love it! I almost had a brain orgasm reading this. This is some Socratic circle shit.

Don't focus on connotations despite the obvious bait. Answer wih your own grame of reference. Or else it devoles into is Lamaism right or wrong.

It's an illusion but not the way you describe it. The truth is that the mind isn't us. In fact, there is no "us" to be found anywhere. We aren't the body, we aren't the mind, and there is nothing that we can point to and say "this is what I am." We only exist conventionally, but ultimately everything is empty of "I, me, or mine."

If you really owned your body or mind, you would have control over it, but we can't tell the head to stop hurting, or the stomachs to stop digesting. We are a collection of fleshy organs that are all just doing what they do naturally. The mind is the same, it's just a co ditioned phenomenon that acts according to it's own nature.

What if we should read any book besides the bible?

So then what are we? Nothing? Primal beasts?

Why do bikers say loud pipes save lives but the fight to ride without a helmet?

Does absolute control define ownership?

Nibbana is possible yes, but it's not thinking no thoughts. Nibbana is the destruction of the roots of suffering, namely greed, hatred, and delusion. When we finally realize the true nature of the body, the mind, and the world, we see that there is literally nothing in this universe worth clinging to, and we can let go of all clinging completely. With the destruction of the roots of suffering, the cycle of birth and death is put to an end, and there is no more suffering.

>cycle of birth and death is destroyed
>implying we believe in that Hindu class system

>

Attached: 1264735936928.jpg (90x128, 4K)

You don't need to define what you are, just seeing the truth is enough. As soon as you begin to label and put things in boxes you aren't seeing reality.

Yes, and that's why the only thing g we truly "own" is our volitional actions. We are bound to what we do with intention, and we will eventually bear the fruits of these actions.

Ownership is a human concept. The universe doesn't give a fuck who claims to be owner of the atoms your body is made of.

N word

It doesn't matter what you believe. Birth and death is the nature of everything, even the universe itself. All that arises must fall.

I have to be honest. I don't see how "our volitional actions and consequences" is different from saying that you are you. We all understand that our actions have consequences. What do you gain by saying "you aren't you"? Are there some connotations you disagree with?

What isn't a human concept?

It sounds like you're just redefining the self rather than disproving it

Attached: D024AB75-CAA0-423C-8FCB-C782AF23B01A.jpg (828x510, 43K)

Whether you are defining or disproving is irrelevant. Knowing the nature of the body and mind is all that matters. When you fully understand, it doesn't matter what you call it or how to define it.

With the right combination of words in the right order, I could convinced you to kill yourself. Anyone could be convinced to do anything, if you know what they need to hear.

Why then would he or you say then that "you don't exist"?

I'm not saying that you don't exist, I'm saying that your existence isn't you.

>Anyone could be convinced to do anything, if you know what they need to hear
What are the words to convince a kid in a wheelchair to just stand up and walk?

if that is true then the same could occur with you.

Who am I?

And if you can answer who I am, isn't that my existence?

Pastor McTouchy could probably convince them to try. It's obviously constrained by physical limitations dumbdumb.

I am in fact a part of anyone, duh.

>Anyone could be convinced to do anything
>obviously constrained by physical limitations
>anyone
>anything
Chose your words more carefully, senpai. You could unintentionally convince the love of your life to kill herself.

Lucky for me, the love of my life is ignoring me! Slash, I'm unpopular.

Lost

symbolically represented, "If x then y" is " x ⊃ y"

so the premise "x ⊃ (y ⊃ (z ⊃( a ⊃ (b ⊃ ( c))))" is read "if x then if y then if z then if a then if b then if c"

lost

Now you're asking the right questions. However, like my first post said, thinking is overrated. If the thinking mind is your vehicle, you have to get out and walk the rest of the way. You only find your answer in the direct experience. It's not a matter of intellectualizing, it's about seeing for yourself. To see for yourself you have to experience deep states of meditaion for long periods of time, among other things.

>Anyone could be convinced to do anything, if you know what they need to hear.
>the love of my life is ignoring me
Try harder!

>vehicle
Ahhh, trying to convert me to buddishm! I should have guessed!

I'm not OP, just an unpopular guy stating his sad love life. Sorry for confusing things.

Maybe you're looking for the wrong girls?

If you want to argue semantics, you really aren't getting the point. Unless that's what you want and you've said the right things to put me in this pointless loop. In which case, you very much do get it.

You will never know it, because now I'm leaving this thread, going to bed and get some sleep. It's nearly midnight here.

That's deep, fam.

Meh, either way I'll chalk it up as a win.

I could care less what your religion is. It's not about identifying as this or that. You can see for yourself, you don't have to believe me. You just have to put in the effort.

God I loved logic in college.

I don't know about you, but i can have a very hard time controlling my thoughts.
Sometimes i might accidentally think about some very nasty of bad shit.

They aren't your thoughts, they are just thoughts. That's why you can't control them. If you don't identify with them they are irrelevant.

Sauce?

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

no