ITT we define 'intelligence' in humans. How do we determine who is more intelligent than whom? What does it mean...

ITT we define 'intelligence' in humans. How do we determine who is more intelligent than whom? What does it mean? Let's brainstorm.

Attached: 1559382622746.jpg (374x452, 18K)

muh dick

Attached: niggerchicken.jpg (442x630, 127K)

If you got to Cred Forums after 04 im smarter than you

You have an addiction.
I came here in 2010. Define "smarter".

Attached: 1555774664240.jpg (126x122, 5K)

My brain > your brain

In what way?

Attached: 1555776591963.jpg (3024x4032, 1.15M)

Every way

Being smart is being woke so being woke is being smart

If you disagree with a womxn you're an misoginetics self hating incel wich is the opposite of woke
Then your dumb.

If you disagree with an african american your racist and white suprematic wich is also the opposite of woke
Then your also dumb.

If you disagree with people in the transitioning sexual spectrum or your a straight male transpeople as an example your a closeted homossexual that has been supessed by the heteronormatives so that's also bad

If your not femxnist your also very dumb because feminism fight for everyone's rights, so your basically fighting against xself, tben ur dumb

Attached: images - 2020-01-27T192403.802.jpg (532x576, 36K)

Humans are genetically programmed to like certain experiences and dislike other experiences. The better you are at providing yourself with pleasant/pleasurable experiences and avoiding unpleasant ones, the more intelligent you are.

Or, the better you are a both setting and accomplishing appropriate goals, the more intelligent you are.

Same thing.

Ok crackhead

As far as i can tell intelligence is mostly how fast your brain can process external stimuli and react to it effectively

I think addicts of all varieties disprove your point pretty handily.

OP here.

Attached: 1577676426581.jpg (550x633, 34K)

Same question has been troubling me today, bumping for interest. Btw great thread user, better than all that degeneracy and porn that has filled this board.

Floyd Mayweather can dodge a punch from a professional boxer. This must be done almost instantaneously. He also cannot read well.
Bill Gates cannot dodge a punch from a professional boxer. The things he are known for do not require a near instantaneous reaction from the brain and body.
Using your definition Mayweather is more intelligent than Gates.

in what way specifically? i've met a lot of addicts, and trust me they are not good at avoiding unpleasant experiences at all

My definition was too broad but I do agree that Floyd Mayweather is more intelligent than Bill Gates
But also maybe if Bill Gates had trained to be a boxer he would have been better than Floyd Mayweather.

Then youre not smart, like at all. Dumbass.
Feeling good from the thing then also feeling bad from the thing =/= pleasurable

lets go and meassure specific capabilities. like identifying patterns, abstractions like words, tactics like finding a way out of a labyrinth, orienting in 3 dimensions, control over digesting system (yes nigger, I call everyone an idiot who cannot hold his farts) ... we need to consider EVERYTHING that is related to brain functions and not just math.

Attached: 1579713482222.jpg (540x923, 70K)

Well we aren't considering "just math". Currently we are debating Mayweather vs Gates.

Mayweather had a retarded faggot son, so gates is smarter.

It’s a bit of a broad question. Intelligence can mean many things at once. Your reaction speed, your working memory capacity, and your problem solving skills are only some of the things people think of when they hear the word.

Personally, I have faith that most humans, given adequate nutrition and a stimulating upbringing, are capable of learning anything and doing anything. As long as their brain is healthy, nothing should stop them from learning.

Does Bill Gates even have any kids?

>Intelligence can mean many things at once.
That's what we are trying to narrow down. For me I think it is a combination of processing external stimuli, memorization, understanding the consequences of your actions, ability to learn, and empathy.

Attached: gimli-294x300.jpg (294x300, 16K)

I think there are different types of intelligence, some people are very charismatic and socially aware which i would argue is a form of intelligence as they have the ability to pick up on subtle things that enable them to interpret the social situation.
Then there are people who are very academically capable but may not be able to function aswell in a social situation.

just a thought idk

i think he has a daughter

>and empathy.
How does that relate towards Intelligence?
Most psychopaths are considered intelligent

Attached: 1579801857784.jpg (942x938, 166K)

I looked it up and he has three kids. I guess he really is more intelligent than Floyd Mayweather.

Intelligence is your ability to perceive the world. Most people learn through trial and error and memorizing their error to hopefully not do it again. An example of rare intelligence is someone who can analyze a situation they are put in for the first time in their life and determine the result without the trial. Intelligence of this nature can be used in mathematics and abstract. Once being introduced to abstract and higher forms of human knowledge it can quickly be understood and applied. I guess efficiency is an easy breakdown of intelligence

>How does that relate towards Intelligence?
Most psychopaths are considered intelligent
Most psychopaths also are not very successful in the world. I added empathy because it shows you have the ability to understand something from another person's point of view. This is something only humans are capable of and is one reason we are differentiated from animals. Consider one person who is not empathetic at all vs one who is. Who would you consider more intelligent?
Also, it's just one part of my definition. I think intelligence is a combination of all those traits.
>Intelligence is your ability to perceive the world.
For this I would go back to the Floyd Mayweather vs Bill Gates.

i wishe a fishe

>Most psychopaths also are not very successful in the world.
Success is subjective
Im pretty sure they got what they wanted

>Psychopaths aren't successful opinions opinions idk what I'm talking abt

Opinion discarded.
Psychopaths are MUCH more successful relatively to normal retards

Spot a psychotard

Attached: 1579540661539.gif (404x416, 180K)

There are so many difference ways to gauge intelligence, that you can spend an eternity arguing who is "smarter".

Do you have any proof of that? I would say estimate how much of the population is a diagnosed psychopath first. Then take the percentage of that group that is successful and compare it to the percentage of the group of "normal retards" aka non psychopaths that are successful. I'll let you go ahead and do that research.

Yes I think we all know that. Did you also know the grass is green and the sky is blue?

Attached: 1556399938744.jpg (1024x753, 72K)