Hello!

...Why?

Attached: uncomfortable chihuahua.jpg (1024x958, 76K)

>reward or the promise of reward, and (c) manipulative tactics like the use of peanut butter.
Why are these wrong?

As a moralistic fail-safe, confirmation that the dog does in fact want the interaction to be happening.

Everyday with this bullshit.

Yep!

I have never seen a zoofag with such great morals
If someone fallows these rules I'd be pretty ok with the idea of some freak living out their fetish
>no harm done
Although I believe that a situation where all the rules are met would be pretty rare, you ever had the "luck" OP? I'm genuinely curious

>you ever had the "luck" OP? I'm genuinely curious
Yeah, if you have a dog and simply oblige his or her advances, it's pretty easy to follow all of those rules simultaneously

Are you a girl or guy?

I'm a male. Why?

Looking for teen beastiality porn Sites. Who can help me out?

Nope. Didn't see it yesterday and the last one I saw died quickly because nobody except other dog fuckers give a shit about how sad and lonely OP is.

MasterCard started placing restrictions on what they will and will not allow transactions for and zoo porn sites have been dropping like flies because of it.
BeastForum (and all of its affiliates like GayBeast and BarnLove), gone. ZooVille, struggling. 8/zoo/, gone. PrnScum, frozen. PrnSocket, frozen. PetLust (and all its affiliates), long gone. All those professional zoo sites, despite how shitty their content was, gone.
Basically, it's all either going or gone.

Good.

>Nope. Didn't see it yesterday
I only post this thread once a day, at differing times.
>and the last one I saw died quickly because nobody except other dog fuckers give a shit about how sad and lonely OP is.
Some of the threads die quickly. Some die with no responses. Some, like the one I posted a few days ago, literally last all day. There's no correlation.

You say that, until the restrictions grow tighter and tighter until there's no fun allowed on the internet at all.

Attached: 18e.jpg (623x457, 45K)

Yes, fuck me please.

Attached: 1554097540522.png (351x351, 141K)

don't forget the soles

ZooVille is doing OK, there's always bitcoin

Here's the problem with this logic.
The dogs wants you to be happy.
It can tell what is happening makes you happy.
Even if this is something they dont want to happen, they can tell you do.
Therefore they go along with it.

The reward is you being happy; you dont have to be offering a toy or treat for the dog to be viewing this situation as something they are doing for a reward.

Human Analogy:
Youre a drunk horny man; coming home from the bar to his wife who wants to be left alone. But she goes along with it and does what you want because its not like its hard to let you do what you want.
This does not mean they want this interaction to happen.

NOT SHOWING DISTRESS IS NOT THE SAME THING AS DESIRE.
THEM INITIATING ACTIVITIES BECAUSE THEY KNOW IT IS WHAT YOU WANT *IS* COERCION.

You are sick sub human degenerate. Animals will not make “advances” on any other species because it’s not natural, and anything you perceive as an “advance” is your sick delusional mind making up shit. Unironically kill your self.

The thing is that most of the time, a dog's humping of people, objects or other dogs is met with an obvious unpleasant reaction and the dog does it anyway, despite being encouraged time and time again to stop.
People even go far enough as modifying their dogs' bodies in an attempt to curb their sex drive (without the dog's consent, of course).
It's not like dogs strictly try to have sex for the sole purpose of pleasing whatever they're having sex with. They have their own feelings, independent of their owners'.

STFU asshole

>Animals will not make “advances” on any other species because it’s not natural,
OK, but that's not true at all. Animals make advances on other species, not just humans, all the time. Monkeys fucking deer, dogs knotting chickens, all this going on without any human interaction whatsoever. It's just not true.
>and anything you perceive as an “advance” is your sick delusional mind making up shit.
Again, no. Dogs are masters of body language; that's HOW we've survived alongside them for so long. They tell you exactly what they want, how they're feeling and what they're thinking, and they have no ulterior motives.
If a dog wants to play, you'll know. If a dog is hungry, angry, sad, tired or hurt, you'll know. Sex is no different.
>Unironically kill your self.
No, thanks.

>t. literally never been around an unfixed dog
i grew up with a dog that literally tried to fuck anything that moves and a few things that don't. tried to hump me incessantly, even though i would scold him and tell him "no" very sternly. didn't stop him at all. zoophilia is gross, but, i mean, come on

Does the dog pussy gets wet

Humping in dogs is a behavior linked to assertion of dominance.
Just because a dog is humping does not mean they have any interest in any sort of sexual activities.

I will immidiatly concede that yes, sometimes, a dog is humping something for sexual reasons; and you could argue that there is nothing moralistcly wrong with getting involved at that point; but youre setting a dangerous precedent, because dogs arent as smart as humans.
When you start responding to that behavior with positive encourgement, you are teaching them what you desire, and their goal switches from 'im horny lets hump this' to 'my human will be happy if i hump this'.

I'm not claiming you are doing something 'bad'; as long as you follow the rules from the first post the dog odviously isnt in distress; but its definitly a moral gray area.

inb4 moralfags citing "consent" but then happily eating meat from an animal that was raised, caged, and slaughtered

Bro; there is a line between 'not wanting to rape something and put them through extended periods of pain' and 'accepting that as an animal we must consume calories and an animal dying quickly and painlessly on a farm is better than the shitty slow death they would have had to a predator in the wild.'

If youre seriously going to say raping an animal and eating meat are equally morally bad, youre retarded.

>DOGS
*crops ears, docks tail, neuters*
>CANNOT
*kidnaps puppies from bio parents*
>CONSENT
*eats meat*

That's good my friend. Ok, i see you later

Attached: 71670598c66a9961ac1510971c04d919.jpg (1920x1080, 108K)

Ooooo. Tough guy. I'm shaking in my little space boots.

That's good my friend. Ok, i see you later

Attached: 71670598c66a9961ac1510971c04d919.jpg (1920x1080, 108K)

>Humping in dogs is a behavior linked to assertion of dominance.
Not true. Dogs don't actually have 'alphas' or 'betas', that's not really a thing. The guy who proposed that theory spent the rest of his life trying to retract it, but unfortunately, it caught on like wildfire and the rest is history.
>I will immidiatly concede that yes, sometimes, a dog is humping something for sexual reasons; and you could argue that there is nothing moralistcly wrong with getting involved at that point; but youre setting a dangerous precedent, because dogs arent as smart as humans.
Lots of people let their dogs take them and have no behavioral/dominance issues because of it. I'm skeptical of the claim that humping has anything to do with dominance.
Bestiality can be a positive experience for all involved.
>When you start responding to that behavior with positive encourgement, you are teaching them what you desire, and their goal switches from 'im horny lets hump this' to 'my human will be happy if i hump this'.
I'm not seeing what's wrong with this. If the dog enjoys it and the human enjoys it, there's not much of a problem there.
>I'm not claiming you are doing something 'bad'; as long as you follow the rules from the first post the dog odviously isnt in distress; but its definitly a moral gray area.
I'm not sure it's such a 'gray area,' though. But I can see where you're coming from.

I don't use a filter I use my fists I'm going to shatter your jaw when your caught offguard fucking one of your animals. Stop spamming this thread you fat friendless retard.

Oh, this thread again. All you outraged people against this should just quit replying and let it die. That will fuck OP over more than calling him a faggot and getting pissed. He's a "Zoo advocate." But I doubt he'd have the balls to advocate for this shit anywhere but here.

veganism is healthier than omnivorous eating habits, and better for the environment, so arguing that "well it's ok to kill animals because it's necessary" is kind of a faulty point. it's weird that giving your dog an orgasm is the ultimate sin but killing an animal for meat you don't really need is fine

>Stop spamming this thread you fat friendless retard.
No, I don't think I will.

I have advocated zoophilia multiple other places and been banned from the majority of those places.

aw sheit we gotta badass

Stop spamming this shit. It's not as bad as the nigger lovers and tranny faggots but enough already.

Well fuck;
damn concise response.
You got me on this one OP

Nope. Use the tools that are given to you every time you log onto the site.
If you'd like the thread to die, don't respond to it. By responding to it, you're only bumping it. Even if you sage your post, you're only inviting a response.

Thanks for understanding! Usually, people just push back no matter what. Have a good day.

At not point did I say it is ok to kill animals; I said it is not as moralistcly bad as raping them.

I agree that killing animals is bad. I'm not stating that eating vegan is less healthy.
I'm not stating meat is necessary.

All I'm having is it is DUMB to act like eating meat is as bad as rape. This is a thread having conversations about sexual contact with animals, youre trying to derail into a conversation about eating meat.

Multiple things are able to be bad, this isnt a competition. Just because you want to support making sure people have clean drinking water doesnt suddenly mean you arent allowed to care about other people being murdered.
Stick to the topic at hand; youre raising an ENTRIELY different discussion.

It is immensly sad to me that 99% of people have no intention of ever changing their opinion.

I look at the data presented to me and revalute what I think.
Why is it so hard for most people to do this?

Proof?

ok, sure, raping animals is bad, just like raping anyone is bad, but not all bestiality is rape though

I'd really rather not identify myself like that.

Why the fuck would you need proof of that?
It changes nothing; the argument is the same regardelss.

I personally agree with this, but:

>but not all bestiality is rape though

Is debateable; thus the point of this thread.

So you're probably lying.

Holy shit dude, why do you care?
I'm not OP, I'm just calling you out for being a retard.
Who the hell cares what other places they are having this discussion?

Why do you think dumbass?

I'd rather have you believe I'm lying than dox me.

Well played.

You're all nasty.

Attached: 1577935052779.webm (480x360, 1.58M)

Poor duck :(

If you cant figure out why I did you're the retarded one. Even he figured it out.

>non human animal

Wtf....