s/fur
Attached: b48a55de5cd5a9c6a40633297d018a37.png (956x1575, 1.61M)
S/fur
James Richardson
s/fur
Other urls found in this thread:
Nicholas Foster
Nathan Bailey
Jose Green
Matthew Torres
Carter Edwards
Stronk!
Cooper Wood
Evan Jenkins
Robert Williams
David Sullivan
Julian Cox
Since we letting bi/fur in here now...
Eli Flores
Daniel Thompson
Camden Mitchell
Only if there's a female involved. Don't play stupid, user.
Chase Richardson
Jaxon Wood
oh god it's that weirdo
Anthony Gomez
Draka has been here for like 6 years now. Some of the moderate muscle girls are nice as I definitely love muscles, but the hyper shit doesn't appeal to even myself.
Dominic Wright
It just seems kinda gay to me - which is fine but I find it strange. It's like a mascular dude that happens to have a vagina.
James Myers
Owen Cook
but that's not s/fur, that's bi/fur
Ryan Phillips
We are? Sweet.
Nathan Morgan
Cooper Perez
Seven exactly. I came here in January 2013.
Caleb Green
Jason Howard
There are no girls on the internet. Solo female and male/female is straight to men, bi if male/female and someone of either gender, gfur if male solo. It doesn't make you funny or trolling or amusing in any way to post guys in sfur, and this is coming from a bisexual guy. It just makes you look boring and lame because "haha I'm posting guys in thread for straight guys for the 0.1% of females who come to these threads!"
Okay
Eli Green
Robert Foster
You know, it's 2020. It's about time we acknowledge there ARE women on the internet. I'm one of them.
Adam Perez
You've never provided tits and a timestamp, therefore you are lying until proven otherwise
Jaxon Watson
Lincoln Rodriguez
Alexander Perez
Levi Gonzalez
Jace Kelly
I wish that were me on the bottom. I want Buxbi to sit on my face.
David Morales
Tits or it didn't happen!
Benjamin Walker
Leo Young
I can get down with that muscled broad.
Samuel Jones
Levi Martin
I'd *go* down on her. I want those thicc thighs to suffocate me.
That's pretty cute.
Robert Walker
You're lucky I'm into snuff, then.
Jack Parker
Hunter Brown
Jason Flores
Nathaniel Young
Daniel Ramirez
Xavier King
Legs up 7up
Jace Baker
David Cooper
Nicholas Perez
.
Thomas Gomez
?
Joshua Adams
Jordan Anderson
Anthony Richardson
Brody Richardson
Levi Rogers
Levi Brooks
Jackson Flores
Justin Bailey
Judy
Kayden Roberts
Lucas Martin
Charles Clark
Austin Gutierrez
Jason Price
Matthew Morales
Christopher Reed
Eli Thomas
Blake Rogers
Hudson Martinez
Furries
Ayden Campbell
Lincoln Phillips
Jose Anderson
Carson Parker
Gavin Long
Liam Bailey
Thomas Roberts
Kayden Miller
Nathaniel Rodriguez
Aaron Bennett
Caleb Cooper
Kayden Brooks
Austin Harris
Adrian Adams
William Sanders
Thomas Russell
Adam Martinez
Dominic Adams
Thomas Martin
Easton Clark
Mason Anderson
Isaac Taylor
Michael Ortiz
Thomas Lewis
isn't this technically b/fur?
Blake Scott
Bisexual is still straight
Zachary Sanders
This thread was sfur then turned bfur.
Thomas Fisher
And? If there is a female involved, it's still straight. I just happened to have some bisexual images I saved back in 2013 which was posted last thread, continued to this one, and at least one other person decided to post it as well. Not sure why that matters.
Leo Russell
Jaxon Harris
nigga are you retarded
A guy banging a girl is straight. That's it. As soon as another guy comes in and starts pounding the first guy in the ass at the same time, it's no longer straight. Just because there's still dick in vagoo does not mean it's still "straight". You've moved beyond that. How is this difficult to understand
Liam Bell
Do you have any idea what the prefix 'bi-' means, user? 'Bi-' means "both." In this scenario it is referring to both male and female, or heterosexual and homosexual. Bisexual literally means "both straight and gay," because it's subjective to the perspective of whichever party is involved. A threesome will always, always be both straight and gay. By your logic, enjoying any porn with a male involved is gay because you're looking at a dude fucking a woman.
William Hernandez
And in case you aren't aware, women look at the same porn men do. Women who prefer men will focus less on the other woman involved, and more on the man. This is not hard to follow, user. Does that make them gay if they watch male/female porn?
Christian Evans
It's... the gay sex.... between two guys that makes it gay. Not the giy and woman.
Jeremiah Robinson
Well unless it's strictly homosexual, but if both males and females are involved, regardless of whichever the third may be, it is straight and gay.
Okay so why focus on the man fucking the man in the middle when you can focus on the one in the middle fucking the woman?
Lincoln Hughes
Hudson Perez
So you are retarded
Let me spell this out.
Straight: man + woman
Bisexual: man + both, or woman + both
Gay: man + man, woman + woman
If your art or scene or whatever has a man and woman getting it on, it's straight. If the man gets up, walks over to another man and starts gobbling his knob, while the woman sits there diddling herself or whatever the fuck, you don't get to say it's still straight just because there's a woman in the scene. The theme has clearly moved beyond simply "straight", into bisexual or outright gay
>why focus on the man
That's like saying why focus on the corpse on the bed when there's a perfectly good live couple right there
People aren't attracted to certain things. If those unattractive bits are front and center, you're going to notice it. Some people handle it better than others
Get it together, nigga
Christopher Baker
I'll put it in simple math terms. A + B + A = ABA and A + B + B = ABB. Both have A + B, but the third party is interchangeable. Regardless of what the outcome is, there is still A + B, and in this scenario that is "straight." Changing the third party from B to A does not magically change the equation from gay to straight because it's still straight *and* gay. Even a MFF threesome is more gay, if you're a woman watching it, but it's still straight as well because there's always going to be a factor that leans towards more gay no matter who is viewing it. I feel like anyone who has a problem with bisexual pornography also mistakenly believes that a woman pegging a man with a strap-on is somehow gay too.
Logan Davis
No it doesn't, retard. You clearly don't understand algebra. A threesome that involves both sexes will always be more gay than straight. Stop trying to warp math to fit your perspective, that's not how shit works my guy.
Daniel Mitchell
>Dr Comet
my man
Kevin Evans
If you choose to focus on the A + A in this scenario, while blatantly ignoring the A + B, then you're clearly mentally deficient. There is literally no way to deny the mathematics of bisexuality considering 'bi-' means "both." Math doesn't change just because you choose to focus on one side of the equation.
Adam Gutierrez
Elijah Clark
First, whether a threesome is more gay than straight has to do with how the individuals are interacting with each other. Is it two girls ganging up on a guy? Two guys going after each other while the girl awkwardly works her way in? One girl getting spitroasted?
Second, it's almost entirely irrelevant. Know why? Bisexual. Third category. Fuck off with your bullshit logic
Jack Baker
>if you choose to focus on the scat in this scenario, while blatantly ignoring the paizuri, then you're clearly mentally deficient
See how this doesn't work?
Kevin Sullivan
>I literally have no way to defend my illogical argument, so I'm going to say "no u" and tell you to fuck off
Owen Bell
That's... not an argument. At all.
Andrew Perez
s/fur
come for the porn
stay for the arguments
Eli Rodriguez
And if a man fucking a man eating out a woman is "almost entirely irrelevant" then why did you start an argument about it when you can ignore the gay sex entirely?
Alexander Taylor
Associative properties, in a furry thread? I wonder.
You've just contradicted your argument by saying that you cannot ignore A+B. You are doing what you say others are forbidden to do: ignore the "mathematics" of bisexuality. The "math" doesn't change because you choose to focus on one part of the sentence. A bisexual act requires both homosexual and heterosexual interaction to be present. You have called it bisexual: you have conceded its nature before you've even made the case against it.
It's your argument with new paint. Dash, you typed it. You're at "DH3"... against yourself.
Josiah Hughes
It's really not even an argument because there's absolutely nothing logical about saying a threesome is somehow not straight
Juan Mitchell
>A bisexual act requires both homosexual and heterosexual interaction to be present. You have called it bisexual: you have conceded its nature before you've even made the case against it.
Yes, that was my assertion to begin with. I'm not sure why you're trying to argue when we're on the same page.
Christian Adams
nigga I just explained this
It doesn't matter whether a MMF or MFF threesome is more gay than straight because it falls under bisexual
Yes it is. You're saying that people just should focus on one thing and ignore another. All I did was swap out gay and straight for different shit, and used your own argument. It's not about choosing to focus on one thing over another. Like I already said, if there's some element of the porn you're looking at that's not attractive, most people aren't going to be able to just ignore it. If you don't like scat, and a girl's getting shit on while she's waxing some dude's pole with her tits, you wouldn't say "just ignore the scat, faggot"
Nicholas Reyes
Okay but bisexual literally means "both heterosexual and homosexual" so why does the homosexual part matter when you can ignore it, and focus on the heterosexual aspect?
Jordan King
Dylan Nelson
The point is bisexual =/= straight
Dude
What part of "you can't just ignore shit you find unattractive in porn" are you missing here?
Henry Ortiz
And once again, watching a male and female fuck is *literally* gay because you, as the observer, are viewing a male in the equation. You're trying to remove something that isn't possible to remove. If you aren't gay, then why do you enjoy males in porn at all? If you're so straight, wouldn't you only enjoy solo female or lesbians?
Brayden Sanchez
Because, if you're a male, there's still at least one dick no matter what, dumbfuck. You have a dick, you're looking at someone, with a dick. I could make the argument that all porn is bisexual because, by technicality, you're observing the same sex having intercourse with the opposite sex.
Isaiah Clark
When you view porn, most of the time you imagine yourself in the male position, you wouldn't imagine yourself in gay porn. Unless you're a cuck.
Juan Gomez
I don't enjoy males on their own. Straight is about the male and female TOGETHER. That's what makes it straight. God damn, son
Nicholas White
So why imagine getting fucked in the ass when you can choose to imagine fucking or eating out the woman?
>I don't enjoy males on their own.
So you enjoy it together? Isn't that pretty gay, user?
Jose Lee
Kayden Jones
I'm not attracted to dicks in porn. But I AM attracted to women taking dicks.
Because I'm straight.
Because that's what happens in straight sex.
And because this is going to go over your head again, I'll say it a little slower. Looking at a dick doesn't get me hot and bothered. Seeing a GIRL get blasted by a dick does
It would be gay if I was.attracted to the dicks themselves
James Jackson
But you're arguing with the user and yourself. We're not on the same page, because your idea is that the act and the atmosphere would be straight, if you were to pound another man while a woman watches from the corner of the room.
It's a homosexual act. It's not even a threesome. If you're not getting pleasure from the presence of the woman in any way, forgetting the fact that she's not actively involved in the sex act, it's only homosexual. It's bisexual if there are actually three participants, and there's an overlap of homosexual and heterosexual activity. What you seem to be doing is atomizing the homosexual or the heterosexual from the whole, which is what bisexuality is. Both. Not one or the other. You need both things to be happening for it to be bisexual. You can't ignore one or the other, you can't pick which one it is. It's both. When something is bisexual, it's both. If one is missing, it's not bisexual. That's what's being contested, made simple.
You're electing to isolate the one instance where something straight happens, and insisting that because there's some element of straightness, it's all straight. And not bisexual. You've worked hard to imply that the mere presence of the opposite sex somehow makes something bisexual. Which... is wrong. Especially in terms of mathematics, however you want to stretch that.
All of this is because you've done something very... furry.
Dash, stop while you're ahead. Bisexual literally means "both heterosexual and homosexual", so why on earth would you ignore the homosexual part? It's literally both heterosexual and homosexual. You can't have this thing, bisexuality, with only heterosexuality or homosexuality.
Blake Butler
Watching male/female porn makes you a bisexual cuck because you're watching two people have sex and enjoying it. You're only straight if you strictly enjoy porn of the opposite sex. Prove me wrong.
>protip: you can't
Wyatt Sanchez
So.... you like looking at dicks. Sounds pretty gay to me my dude.
Jose Watson
You've proven yourself wrong...
Daniel Gomez
It ain't my girl, so no, it's not cuckery.
"looking at a dick doesn't get me hot and bothered"
>you like dicks
You were so close
Adam Allen
So if you were to take a typical pornography scenario, a male and a female fucking, place it into the real world, you would be the observer who is getting off to a dick penetrating a vagina. Porn, in and off itself, is bisexual because you're viewing the same sex no matter what. My point is, a MMF threesome is no gayer than male/female porn because the observer is always included. Can't ignore that now, can you?
Nolan Price
>It ain't my girl
And these fake furry women are? Top fucking kek bro.
Carter Peterson
dude what
Alexander Morgan
Oh are you feralfag?
Noah Davis
That's what the fuck I'm asking right now. How the fuck can someone be upset that there's two dudes and a chick fucking when, including the observer, regular is LITERALLY a dude watching a dude fuck a chick? There's still 2+ dicks no matter what.
Nathan Murphy
>you would be the observer who is getting off to a dick penetrating a vagina
Yes. Because that is also what I see when I penetrate a woman. Dash, you're still arguing with yourself at this point. Moments ago, you were making the case that it was heterosexual if the man pounding the man was kissing a woman at the same time. And some other things.
I'm not sure if you really know what you're saying at this point. Porn isn't bisexual. Per your logic, that would make the porn of strictly the opposite sex, bisexual... which doesn't make any sense, because there are no men in that lesbian porno flick. Your point is all over the place. You strayed so far from what you were originally saying.
>Can't ignore that now
Anyone can ignore that. You're doing some incredibly furry things that make it seem like you rank in the double-digits.
Matthew Baker
Zachary Lewis
Use associative properties again, Dash.
Camden Hughes
I wish max file upload was 5mb - this 2mb shit is annoying af
Brandon Torres
You know what really makes you look retarded right now? Thinking I give a fuck and that I'm not laughing my ass off about how stupid all of this is in general. Stroking your dick while looking at another dick is inherently bisexual because you're enjoying it.
Okay. Observer A + participant A + participant B = bisexual because both A's are enjoying it.
Angel Gray
>Thinking I give a fuck
>Stroking your dick while looking at another dick is inherently bisexual because you're enjoying it
Well, it looks like you still want to make this new argument... which has already failed because you've only included a penis and a penis and called it bisexual.
>Observer A + participant A + participant B
Observers, in the context you refer to, are not part of the sex act.
Parker Cox
And? Do you really think I give a fuck? I'm comfortable enough with my sexuality to admit that I enjoy looking at dicks, but apparently others aren't.
Ian Edwards
"Hurr it's not my dick I'm looking at, therefore I'm totally NOT gay!!!"
Josiah Turner
Very interesting.
Matthew Lopez
You really can't wrap your head around it, can you
I don't really know how else to say this. When I stroke my dick, I'm not doing it BECAUSE of the dick in the picture, movie, whatever. That's not how it works if you don't like dicks
You give enough of a fuck to stay invested in the argument
Jace Smith
>Do you really think I give a fuck
Yes, because you're upset.
Adam Rogers
Dude, I'm only arguing because this is so fucking hilarious that people can't admit they enjoy looking at dicks. Only when there's a third dick involved, oh, I don't want to see TWO dicks in my porn, only ONE dick!
>upset
Kek, fucking what. I'm laughing my ass off that people are taking me seriously, you retard.
William Campbell
>I'm laughing my ass off that people are taking me seriously
You're doing a lot of laughing with that aggressive protesting of yours...
Nolan Wright
>I was only pretending to be retarded!
Michael Stewart
I am, and you feel stupid as fuck because I shattered your illusion with jokes. The fact that people care so much about sex that they can't admit they enjoy the same sex to conform to their ideals is so stupid to me.
I was pretending to be retarded the whole time, dumbass. Do you actually think I'm serious with this post?
Camden Cruz
Yiffie yiffie yay =]
Sebastian Harris
discord gg GVWX3X fur server
Nicholas Diaz
The entire underlying point of this entire argument is, who fucking cares? You're jerking off to both dudes and woman, get over yourselves.
Nathan Sullivan
I remember when a certain dumbass tried passing L/Fur.
Jonathan Ramirez
Christian Barnes
I love arguing about porn and sexuality. There's so many ways to swing the argument, and they all make me laugh because literally none of them matter. Pegging is straight btw.
Julian Nelson
Okay, now wait just a h-e-double fucking minute, bud.
Matthew Robinson
Idk sounds pretty gey to me
Jason Richardson
Why can't men admit they love looking at dicks? Doesn't matter if it's your own or someone else's, you still enjoy it.
Jackson Collins
>and you feel stupid as fuck because I shattered your illusion with jokes
No, no, Dash, don't project on me. We talked about this. Your diction matches the same beat and style of someone who doth protest too much. Did that really happen, or are you just saying that for some reason?
You can say it all you like, and maybe it'll be true for you. But last I checked, there were no jokes. I don't see any jokes. I just see how mad you're going.
And there's the part where you attempt to get out of the unnecessary hole you've dug for yourself- only to suddenly go back, even though there's been line after line of "I don't care, I'm not even mad, get over yourselves, I'm laughing so much right now".
Followed by the smokescreen.
Nathaniel Nguyen
ok retard
Lucas White
At least you're temporarily learning.
Adam Watson
Are you pedantfag? What's up man.
Jack Reed
You're such a fucking egotistical twat to think I give a fuck about any of this. You're taking this so god damn serious right now and I have no idea why. I don't give a fuck if people get pissy that I have bisexual fur in my folder because I enjoy looking at the tits and pussy just as much as I enjoy looking at the dick. Why does any of this matter? You can scroll past it or choose to ignore the dicks for fuck's sake but no, "I like seeing fat fucking COCKS penetrating women because I'm so comfortable in my sexuality!!!" Retard.
Carter Perry
Hey, is there a version of that image with a dick? I love seeing Rikki with a big dick so I can imagine her fucking girls. Totally not gay btw.
David Jackson
Glad I stopped in tonight. Now all I need is the get the popcorn ready for the daily drama for the next few threads
Lucas Fisher
Henry Hernandez
Strap in
Hudson Hall
Drama? I'm interested
Andrew Johnson
Well, Dash didn't play nice enough for me to tear into a litany of mathematical hell, so nothing particularly interesting. But, watching the hulabaloo orginalically sprout between some furries in the wild was a welcome piece of entertainment.
And then there's this special guy. An entire paragraph, after the genuinely intelligent and actually-made-me-laugh play of
>ok retard
What went wrong? Why is there now a paragraph? It should've been, "ok retard". That would've been amazing. No... this paragraph. Well, okay, let's read it.
And it's a lot of ranting that disparages pretty much every successive argument from the original, including the original, only reinforcing the tenuous, does-not-follow statement about bias and preference.
There's a comment about needing a chair and a whip.
Adrian Powell
I started this argument to see if people would take it seriously, and that image is me right now. Actually crying that people care so fucking much about porn they're willing to argue about it for almost two hours when I couldn't care less.
Christopher Perez
ok retard
James Harris
>I started this argument to see
I highly doubt this.
>Actually crying that people care so fucking much about porn
>I couldn't care less
This is why. There's also the way this whole thing seems to have started between you and the other furry, but since that's being conveniently memory-holed, there's no reason to mention it.
Now if you can do this instead of shrieking and projecting through text, you might just learn something.
Easton White
Austin Butler
>he still thinks I give a fuck that people don't get off to the things I get off to!
Xavier Gomez
Has it ever been settled, are traps gay?
Colton Campbell
I've argued about bisexuality and porn in these threads for literally 8 years, and it works every fucking time. It's the easiest bait ever, I absolutely love it.
Jeremiah Lopez
>God I love dicks! Look at how much I love dicks! Everyone secretly loves dicks as much as me!
you're a funny one dude
Christopher Clark
There you go.
And just like that, there it goes.
Jack Phillips
Thanks, user! Sometimes I try!
Ayden Miller
Noah Diaz
Because I don't know why you're still replying when I'm sure it's because you can't admit that I never gave a fuck about anyone's opinions of the porn I like.
>inb4 "just stop replying to me retard lmao"
You're trying to get the last word about something that bears no significance on my life, and it's genuinely pathetic that you take everything so serious. Pull the dick out of your ass bro- I mean stick.
Gabriel Bennett
If they fuck men they are. Otherwise I just call them crossdressers
Owen Fisher
Yes. The most logical choice.
Nicholas James
Isn't this guy from on of the Gundam series?
Anthony Williams
I identify as trans-lesbian therefore this image is actually straight to me
Christian Gutierrez
I sexually identify as an AMD Ryzen 3950X
Jackson Anderson
Who wants to be my chipset, we can interface
Luis Phillips
Can I buy you? I have been trying to get one of those for about a month now.
Lucas Young
>Because I don't know why you're still replying when I'm sure it's because you can't admit that I never gave a fuck about anyone's opinions of the porn I like
Hold the phone. Do what what with what? I can't admit that you never gave a fuck about anyone's opinions of the porn you like?
I can't admit something that only you could know about? What now? Dash, this is the genuine care that's screwing you over. You seem to have honestly thought what you just typed. There was an effort to make an argument. And in the same stroke, you're asking me to admit something that
>you
are feeling. I can't feel what you're feeling. That's not how that works. That's private to you. You can tell me things, but I can't admit something about your intrinsic experiences. Those are unique to you.
Very furry of you. And well, yeah. Stop replying to me. That's how that works. You just established why you're better off giving non-replies than digging in.
Aiden Diaz
Look.
>You're trying to get the last word about something that bears no significance on my life
Of everything you've said, this can't be true. If it bears no significance on your life, it wouldn't be intermixed with all of this passionate emoting through text. Look at how personal that accusation was, about me not being able to admit your feelings for things. Not only does that not make sense... it's so accusatory and aggressive. So aggressive. So retaliatory, as if someone is persecuting you for having opinions or feelings.
>and it's genuinely pathetic that you take everything so serious
Then there's "DH1", the part where you must debase someone in order to... I don't know. I could say it's to make you feel better, but in the end, it probably isn't worth diving into again and again. It's just very plain to see. This is a response, that is more like a reflex to some kind of perceived slight. It reliably, always is. It's the stock, standard reflex for the average person, let alone a furry.
>Pull the dick out of your ass bro- I mean stick
Then there's this. It's also fairly self-explanatory.
This is care. This is caring about whatever it is I respond to you with, Dash. It apparently has enough bearing on your life to compel you to respond.
Easton Gomez
New bread?
Zachary Cox
ye
Nathan Lewis
I believe that yes, traps are gay, and thus based on appearance, that Dash is gay because he's a trap.
John Evans
ok retard
Austin James
So why do you care what I believe anyway? Am I not allowed to believe something that is inherently true: that men enjoy looking at dicks, whether it be their own or another, and refuse to admit it? Explain to me how that's wrong because there's definitely a logical disconnection in enjoying viewing a man fuck a woman, but if a third man is thrown into the equation, suddenly, "nah man this shit is gross."
Noah Cook
>So why do you care what I believe anyway
You keep inserting these narratives about what's happening with everyone else. Dash, no.
No one is persecuting you. That never happened. Why are you back here, digging deep into it again? What is this? Why do you want me to explain something that's no one has ever caught issue with as it pertains to you? What is it, Dash?
Is this another "joke"?
Adam Turner
I'm asking why you care when people were trying to argue about something that's legitimately true. So I'll keep asking: why do you care?
Matthew Davis
It's not really a question I have to answer... but I've just demonstrated that you're operating with a significantly emotional capacity right now. Please pay attention to the last reply.
If you find no faults with it, you are at liberty to say so.
Ryder Brown
Okay then why do you keep replying? You're so fucking full of yourself I actually feel bad for you. Fuck off, I don't care what you have to say.
Tyler Richardson
>Okay then why do you keep replying
That's the same question, but longer. I have to remind you that I was not the one who decided to come back and try to make a new, new argument, and become so invested in this endeavor that I miss an entire bushel of low-hanging fruit and thinly-veiled answers.
Dylan Jones
You still haven't answered my question. Why do you care? But I can probably guess you're going to reply with some pedantic bullshit like "I am not at liberty to answer your question" while pretending you're anything but an obnoxious fucking faggot who's only here to argue.
Gabriel Howard
Don't be a sealion.
Leo Watson
>You still haven't answered my question
Actually, Dash, I have. At least 3 times. And, even before, I've still answered the question a handful of times. You can probably guess.
So you shouldn't have to ask, yes? But you said you don't care what I have to say- but that reply directly follows you asking me a question, again, relentlessly, for reasons that don't need to be repeated. Dash, you care. Dash, you're mad. Dash, you came back. Nobody told you to come back to this thread. Nobody, no one. You're at liberty to do anything.
It's just a simple statement.
You really are at liberty to say what you want. No one can stop you. Probably not even you. Not that it's pedantic at all to say that... it's just frank. And if I was the one who's only here to argue...
What was the entire bottom half of this thread about? And why did you come back to talk shop about why your beliefs aren't dumb and you don't deserve to be treated that way and it's your right to believe these things and I need to explain to you how your personal beliefs are wrong and you need to stop believing them right this very second because insert something that doesn't make sense, again.
Tsk.
Cameron Walker
>You can probably guess
More bullshit. You only want to argue so you can feel better than everyone else like literally every other human on the planet
>inb4 1500 character reply as to why I'm projecting
Samuel Anderson
I had to look it up. You know, that does pretty well describe pedantfag. But I do find it entertaining.
John Hill
You're projecting?
Fursi, I haven't asked Dash for proof in a facetious manner in order to waste his time. He's actually suggested that this whole thing was his intentional attempt to waste people's time, for over 8 years. However you want to slice that.
Samuel Brooks
The irony is that he genuinely believes he's better than everyone else here because he types absurdly long winded replies that make even mine seem insignificant
Jason Cruz
Ah yes, proving exactly what I know you already think, so you turn it around with the thought of "well if I type it all out then he'll prove me right, so I'll just reply with 'You're projecting?'"
Landon Fisher
Well, no. I could have just given you another 2000 character response. But nothing you'd said really made it impossible to just acknowledge the idea that you're projecting. What else am I supposed to say? Yes... you're projecting. That's... it.
It's that or another dissertation. Either way... I don't understand what's not supposed to be happening. It's de facto projection. That specifically is the takeaway. This is the semi-moderate reply... because I'm not entirely sure what you were supposed to be proving wrong about what was happening.
I'm guessing I've really dialed one of your buttons tonight.
Mason Martin
Here's a question for you: have you ever considered the fact that maybe you're projecting? It seems to be your default argument because you have nothing better to do with your time which really makes me wonder why you're so obsessed with trying to argue about nothing for last, what, week or so?
Jason White
Hey, per our discussion the other night... The troll that just entered the active fur thread. I think that guy is actually one of the real closetfags.
Daniel Gonzalez
Actually, I didn't even bother to parse that fully. You put
>>You can probably guess
in greentext, and then started the sentence with
>More bullshit
So... what? Some part of your assumptions are correct. Which I acknowledge as correct by saying that you can actually probably guess, making you right about something, if the logic follows. But... me suggesting that you're right about only something you can guess, is bullshit.
See, that's the kind of thing I was talking about.
>have you ever considered the fact that maybe you're projecting
I have. I wish I could actually discuss with you, seriously, how I could and can't be. But I know beyond a reasonable doubt that I'm not projecting right now, and I know you don't have it in you to give me that fair shake. It's not even my default argument, Dash. My default argument is that you're saying a lot of crazy shit every now and again.
I'm here to watch the lions and the elephants. Sometimes I walk on stage with a chair and whip. Sometimes I just eat the popcorn.
I haven't even been here for a week. This territory is new. The furries are... well? But, I am here because this is how I chose to spend my time. Something happened, and so I came. Here I am, now that's explained. Am I not allowed to work through given counterstatements as the opposing party, Dash? Can I not chime in on a public imageboard? Very strange, that I'm not supposed to speak when spoken to. Surely, I am allowed to say, "no", without any prevailing pretext or ulterior reason for being.
It's possible, but I'm not entirely convinced yet.
Nolan King
>I know you don't have it in you to give me that fair shake
Now that's really projecting an underlying complex of inferiority, which you present with extremely long posts to blatantly appear superior when you're no better than anyone here.
>My default argument is that you're saying a lot of crazy shit every now and again.
Well I can easily answer that with the fact that I choose to because every day life is boring.
>Something happened, and so I came
So why is that?
Jack Scott
>Now that's really projecting an underlying complex of inferiority
Dash, I would have a superiority complex, not an inferiority complex. Look at what I type.
That would be the realistic approach. If we could be honest for a moment, It's more likely that you have some kind of insecurity that drives you to behave this way. I mean, consider it. Really digest what just happened.
You say I have an inferiority complex. Okay. So, I have an inferiority complex, that's the story. I have an inferiority complex, and then it's also true that I make extremely long posts exclusively to appear superior, blatantly, when in reality it is fundamentally impossible for me to be better than anyone here. It's that word choice. "Better". Why better? Better, in what way, Dash? How might I be better? "Better".
The story is that I have an inferiority complex, but I make clearly long posts to appear superior, when really I can't be superior.
Dash, you're the one insisting that everyone must be on a level playing field here. Heck, you're the one insisting that someone or something is being superior when it's not. When was it that way? Why was it that way? That's just not sound. That's an unreasonable condition you're forcing on everyone by saying that. There can't be only one reason for all these extremely long posts. They have things in them, you know. I can't imagine you would just brush such a lovingly assembled reply away, and never consider what was said.
Thomas Fisher
When I read
>to blatantly appear superior when you're no better than anyone here
I get the immediate sense that you might be projecting. It's the last part of that sentence. That it's impossible for me to be better than everyone here. Not even that, but whenever you make this case, it's impossible for anyone who happens to get in some kind of row with you, that they could be any better than anyone here. And not even that, but at least better than you, if no one else.
You have to admit that reads a certain way. Without even getting into the meat and potatoes of why that could very well be, which, may I remind you, is all you. And it's enough that you'd suggest that you sit here and engage with me because every day life is boring, but I can't do it for any other reason than yours...
Why is that, indeed.
Ayden Ross
You fucking fags are still fighting? Nigga chill tf out this thread dead as hell. Let her rest in peace.
Jason Thompson
The fact that you didn't notice that I was intentionally projecting just to see how long it would take for you to reply was a test to prove how you feel superior because I knew you'd explain why it's wrong.
You believe you're better than others, particularly those who avoid logical arguments in favor of emotional responses. You (mistakenly) believe I'm always projecting, or attempting hide insecurity when I've never legitimately denied my insecurity, and actually choose to poke fun at people when I know I can do it on a similar playing field, and taking the piss out of what people reply with because attempting to outplay everyone in logic has grown very tiresome to me.
Why must one be on a level playing field? What do you accomplish by attempting to be on what I can only deduce as you believing you must be on a "higher" playing field?
That was merely a test to see how you would reply. The only answers are a) you genuinely feel superior to others, which is the more likely response, or b) you're insecure and in denial. While neither would give a straight answer because you avoid them like the plague, so as to evoke a response from you, I chose the less likely answer... because that's how I fuck with people and pretend to be retarded.
I'm not as stupid as I pretend to be because it's boring and tedious knowing I'm smarter than most people. I'd rather feel equal than have people call me pedantic, or waste 10 minutes on replies for no reason because, believe me, I've done it for years to the point it's exhausting.
Dylan Johnson
>Let her rest in peace.
We need an anthropomorphized thread goddess.
Eli Campbell
Massive honkers.
Thomas Rodriguez
>The fact that you didn't notice that I was intentionally projecting just to see how long it would take for you to reply was a test to prove how you feel superior because I knew you'd explain why it's wrong
That is an extremely, extremely convoluted excuse. This would be an example of an inferiority complex, Dash. "Aha! But I was only pretending to be retarded!"
Had I said nothing, the story would've been that you purposely did anything else that you were then charged with. It's happened before- I've said things that had no business to follow whatever argument I've made today, and you've taken them and insisted that that's what you were doing the whole time. Despite the fact that it sincerely wasn't something I even believed you were doing.
That alone.
>You believe you're better than others
Dash, it's not an impossibility. No 2 people are the same. There's a reason I'm able to refer to past replies and posts and still carry some cogent thread through them all. I don't even have to change the narrative I spin. I say it, and hours later, I've already said something that directly addresses something someone has decided to bring up that very moment. It's not magic. You can't genuinely believe that, of all the strangers on the internet, none of them might possess a talent or 2 that you simply don't. Perhaps something isn't your strong suit. Perhaps you're not good at a specific something. Perhaps you have bad habits. And? Perhaps that's just the reality.
There's no good reason why everyone must be as high or as low as you, Dash. It's nonsensical. If. If I were a man who toyed with logical argumentation in his free time, to an absurd point, that would make me a logical person by your standards. Perhaps obsessively so. So, let's run with that idea.
Christian Barnes
I'm big-brain Mr. Logic- or I believe I am. I target those who avoid logical arguments in favor of emotional responses. Dash, what does that mean? Think. I target those who avoid logical arguments in favor of emotional responses. Those who avoid logical arguments. Those who avoid logic. Think, Dash, think. Those people avoid logic- why do I go after them. You just implied exactly what you say isn't the reality. If I go after people who avoid logic, then there's already a disparity between me and them. It's not imagined, and it's not to be mean, but it's just the reality. Otherwise, they wouldn't avoid logic like the plague, right? Surely, there's some kind of reason for doing that. There's some kind of... logic, in that.
And that's assuming that you had completed the argument by concluding that I'm not actually Mr. Big Brain Logic, but I'm just setting myself up beside people who clearly don't stand a chance. That would have been very logical and cool of you. But, well, it isn't true, because I've definitely engaged with other denizens on Cred Forums who were clearly with it. I've even acknowledged that they were right on multiple occasions- because they were, and it's just the reality sometimes.
Let's move on to what else you've said.
I mistakenly believe that you're always projecting or trying to hide insecurity, when you've never legitimately denied your insecurity. Now, hold the phone. I'm accusing you of being insecure. You say that's wrong, because... you've confirmed that you're insecure.
What?
Dash, this is a serious problem. You keep doing this. You say someone's wrong for making a claim about you- and then you turn around and confirm that it's true... all while under the tone of denying that it's true. I don't understand why you keep doing that. You're actively acknowledging that there's definite cause for implying that you project or are insecure. What, then, is wrong? What was disproven? I don't see it.
Let's move on.
Jonathan Wood
You actually choose to poke fun at people when you know you can do it on a similar playing field. See, there's the thing. Why is it that you can do something when you know you can do it... but, I can't? Isn't that... I don't know... And that's not taking into account the disparity between us, given that you've both implied and confirmed things about the disparity between us. I'm not even sure you were conscious of having done that. If you take the piss out of what people reply with because outplaying everyone with logic is tiresome to you, why in the world would it mean that I'm inferior?
Dash? Hello? Help me understand why that makes sense.
>Why must one be on a level playing field
Yeah, that's... my question. It's never always like that. Sometimes it's obvious.
>What do you accomplish by attempting to be on what I can only deduce as you believing you must be on a "higher" playing field
This is a very unwieldy and convoluted sentence, whose intent I'm not entirely sure I can divine. I don't know what you were trying to say, I don't want to hazard the guess and make the better argument you might never be able to meaningfully articulate or care about for longer than a few replies. Just being honest.
>That was merely a test
I doubt that, Dash. You routinely trip over yourself when you try to make an extended attempt at making sense. The answers you've given me can't possibly be the only answers. What they should be, are answers that you'd say were most feasible. You've demonstrated that all the way back where you were making the incomplete argument of why I must feel superior. No one who makes so many missed connections can be purposefully doing any of this. It's genuinely mistake upon mistake... it shows, and I've baited you into helping me understand just where and when it takes form. You will say things, without examining them further to see if they make actual sense.
And when they make actual sense...
Cameron Sullivan
Woof. I mean, look at this.
>While neither would give a straight answer because you avoid them like the plague
This makes no sense. You've outlined what my answers would be. You have the only answers, the outcomes that you've forced. If these are the only things I could say, if I say one of them, how would I be avoiding them like the plague? How do you avoid an answer when you say an answer? What?
How can you choose a less likely answer, when you force the dichotomy like that? Dash.
That's actually very stupid.
>I'm not as stupid as I pretend to be because it's boring and tedious knowing I'm smarter than most people
This is just a springboard for going into what an inferiority complex entails, Dash. It's painful to read.
Wyatt Johnson
how old are you?
Cooper Lee
Did you strap in yet?
Kevin Wilson
Its all context. If the guy is fucking the other guy. Yeah. It's both guys are tapping the girl its straight.
Have you not even looked at the pictures they're arguing about?
Thomas Cook
I like the fact that you keep trying to pretend you're better by incessantly using my name to begin and end your statements; "Dash." The more I call you out, the more you do it. That, in and of itself, is a sign of a superiority complex. You try to question people and argue while playing a game of logic, as if you're a criminal investigator trying to interrogate a criminal. You're a textbook narcissist who's only purpose here is to argue and feel superior, yet you refuse to answer when I ask you why you're here to save face; to protect the fact that I know your game very well. If anyone mentions your underlying insecurities - that being you don't like when people show intelligence - you claim they're projecting because you don't want to feel inferior when it's actually you who is projecting. In your mind, you're better than everyone because you go so far out of your way to appear intelligent when most people don't have the time and patience for it. This is not about me which you obviously don't want to talk about, but about you, so you try to spin this onto me because you don't want to accept the fact that you're not better than everyone, and do everything in your power to maintain your perceived superiority. You like to play psychological games with people, and so do I. I've just gotten bored of it because I'm not a teenager anymore. I'm not replying again after your next text wall because I don't care, so mark this down on your internet argument chalkboard because you only see every single argument as a fight that you must win which is just pathetic when everyone loses, including hours and hours of your worthless life which will be forgotten when you die. You'll grow up eventually.