Since I learned recently that HTTPS apparently works properly (unlike every other web technology ever) I feel a lot more comfortable making jokes in threads like these.
I feel like the amount of action implied in this picture would have kicked up a lot more sand. Like the moon lander, verisimilitude totally busted.
But for reals, debating about "traced" or otherwise utilizing real references for "photorealistic" porn is *really* close to being a fucking moot argument.
The tech already exists for neural network fuckery to make purely CG art photorealistic. Similarly, 3D modeled/posed porn can be made to look hand-drawn and completely indistinguishable from the real thing. I actually happen to know for a fact (and you definitely will too when they publish) about some data scientists releasing "live action" porn on Pornhub, which has fucking millions of views, which has never involved any real actors. You can't tell.
My point is that by the metrics of the current economic arguments against too-real lolicon or whatever, and the same economic arguments about surpressing real CP, these things are essentially ethical when manufactured entirely from imagination and digital tools. And that distinction is really close to actually disappearing in the public scope, so it's going to be interesting to see how that loop is closed and how the goalposts are moved.
Expecting it to be hypocritical as hell considering that, according to economic arguments, flooding the world with perfect simulated CP ought to completely devalue the production of the (indistinguishable) real thing?
Me too since it's my mind he's reading, as he knows.
I've been thinking all day about how I haven't used my university's 3D printers to make anything, and that I'd actually really like a model of the 03 machine to sit on my desk. Not the girl, just the machine.
>But for reals, debating about "traced" or otherwise utilizing real references He's retarded for thinking tracing and using references are the same thing and using that in place of the actual argument.
Jose Ortiz
I'm shit-posting when you are posting memes?
Hunter Edwards
image cap
Christian Barnes
>image limit always remember to spread lolicon propaganda wherever you go!
Nathan Howard
Pretty sure that has nothing to do with the definition of "loli"
Alexander Cox
I have no idea what you're talking about. Lol.
New thread tho.
Nicholas Cooper
I'm not sure if I want to put an arduino and LEDs and shit in it to make it actually operate. It seems like a great idea but also like too much effort that I will never complete when the reward is anybody who recognises the authenticity never talking to me again
Ryan Smith
...
Kayden Reyes
whatever that definition is is probably really unpopular no anime = no loli, no siscon, no imouto, no hentai
Juan Ward
I take your point, and I think it's a good one. I'd be fine if your takeaway was true, the level of tech reaching the point that manufactured loli was indistinguishable from real, making real loli porn valueless and undercutting the economic incentive of it. The problem then would be that it would reach the point of reality that normies would demand its banning, while those who were willing to pay for real porn wouldn't appreciate it any more because they would know that no real children were involved.
Lazy git.
Henry Smith
3dcg is on almost every loli board out there
Jonathan Baker
we don't see and we don't care lol i primarily use gelbooru and pixiv, sometimes twitter and saucenao no weeb ever post loli in that style even as a meme, no weeb ever recommend loli that way
yeah very unpopular because no one care maybe it got past filter and it should not have been there maybe show me meme of that style and i may give you the benefit of the doubt
Logan Ross
>not popular >33,000+ posts
Cameron Butler
there are only 12 post for that style, dont lie
Aiden Anderson
sorry my mistake, there are only 5 posts of that style but the tag is showing 12
again no one care or know about that definition sometimes the curation is not meticulous enough and it gets past filters showing me 5 results of that style will not change what is loli to a weeb
Henry Scott
>showing me thousands of that style ftfy
Austin Nguyen
3d plus loli tag is what you see in 3d.nico and vrchat which are completely loli but with rigging, not what was posted here don't bend the truth 3d cg which is what was relevant only has 5 results
Luke Taylor
anyway it's unpopular enough no weeb know about it to even make memes or share, so i rest my case i thought you were a cunny-rager only shitposting to frame lolicons a bad light