Untitled

hows it fail?

Attached: EE4DD9A4-90D1-4446-B697-D308855CF801.jpg (640x633, 204K)

Take 2

Attached: Untitled157_20200202011841.png (680x673, 668K)

easy

Attached: 1580626970254~2.jpg (680x673, 176K)

no heat to house 3

Attached: 20200202_072241.jpg (680x672, 357K)

stop overthinking it

Attached: easy.png (681x673, 654K)

No water to house 1.
This really is for retards.

K(3,3) is non-planar.

First winner.

>Kek

you crossed water and gas dumbass

Attached: Autism.png (680x673, 609K)

no shit idiot

this

>can't believe im refreshing this shit

Attached: ezpz.jpg (1011x677, 259K)

retard

Attached: owned.jpg (751x569, 94K)

Trick is to install water collectors with steam generators.

Attached: 158062697025469.jpg (680x673, 224K)

Attached: 1415436822931-2.jpg (1024x1013, 473K)

Also...

Attached: 1388859512693.jpg (1143x1133, 660K)

Hardly a challenge

Attached: 20200202_025005.jpg (680x672, 371K)

nether is ur mum m8

Attached: 1580626970254.jpg (680x673, 232K)

Kek

This is one of the best threads I have ever seen. Cheers boys.

Attached: autism.png (679x673, 609K)

fuck I have autism 3rd house isn't powered fuck

For those interested why this cant be solved. Its about planar graphs and the K3,3 problem is unsolvable.

youtu.be/xBkTIp6ajAg

Attached: 20200202_091338.jpg (680x672, 356K)

House one is for the Jew. Of course the gas is hooked up to the water line.

Attached: sketch-1580631956387.png (1091x1080, 1.34M)

It wasnt that hard. Just use terminals, or conduits to help.

Attached: not on spectrum but maybe.png (640x634, 570K)

youtube.com/watch?v=B6JoLbXfGtY&feature=youtu.be&t=269

Autist detected

Attached: o-great-binoculars-19985337.png (500x400, 72K)

Attached: 20200202_022857.jpg (714x714, 372K)

more like 300 IQ

Attached: water, electricity and gas.jpg (680x673, 221K)

Attached: water electricity gas.jpg (680x673, 221K)

Attached: solution1.png (680x673, 650K)

Third house has no gas, tard

level-up

Attached: 1566951735251.jpg (1140x1528, 835K)

Attached: test1.png (250x247, 91K)

looks like the clear winner

ok

Attached: Autism Chapter 2.png (696x935, 1.08M)

fuck this is good

Attached: 1qaz.jpg (680x673, 370K)

I remain a god
fuck all of you plebs

you missed a lot of doorways

Sometimes you have to think outside of the box

guttersnipe

Attached: Disdain.jpg (281x325, 14K)

rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrofl

you supplied water with gas

ez yo

Attached: autism.png (375x298, 86K)

plebs mean nothing

who is that faggot anyway? cinquenareus says you're a fraud

you gassed 3 twice
2 has no gas

this is unsolvable without using cheats/workarounds.

Parthian scum

bring your legions you dress wearer

Attached: oo0.png (629x512, 93K)

I'll buy someone a game on Steam of their choice if they can post a REAL solution.

He got it

nope the houses and the symbols count as lines

meh, he ran the electricity through the water and shorted out power & water for the whole city.

gg

Attached: Untitled368_20200202051445.png (680x673, 691K)

Says the pseudo man who lays with goats.
I will see to it that I snuff you last

anyone have a difficult puzzle?

Attached: 1.jpg (680x673, 223K)

reach down and touch your toes OP. Hard but possible!

Fuck you, I win.

Attached: Untitled.jpg (412x300, 38K)

>WITHOUT CROSSING ANY LINES

Attached: 1580626970254.jpg (680x673, 172K)

We have a winner

wow you are dumb

which lines crossed you autist?

this is the best one that actually works for sure. guy should get his steam game

>this is the one anyone with an iq of 105 or higher could flippantly pump out.

And 75 posts came first, roughly a third. You poor dumb bastards

lul u mad u couldn't figure it out without using cheats. low iq knuckledragging mongoloid neanderthal mouth breathing cuck

Attached: 2.jpg (211x239, 5K)

How?
A raised overpass still crosses the street beneath it
A bridge still crosses the river
You win nothing samefag

then technically everything in the entire universe crosses everything else in the entire universe since you can't pick out 2 points and be unable to draw a line between them. Fucking elementary kids in here tonight or what?

NPCs can't post content.

Not at all
You're being silly because you don't get free game

k tell me 2 things in the universe that, by your definition outlined above, do not cross.

Maybe if those "things could be considered lines, then from the right observable perspective, you could say they cross.
But only from a specific perspective in a specific context, so what you said is retarded

>nope you lose anyway
>nope you're wrong

jews are getting really fucking lazy

you're literally arguing for my side, then calling me retarded. mfw

2 stationary cups don't cross each other
Do you even know what the word means?

dont waste apostrophes on these morons user

Saying certain things in certain situations could be considered to cross, is in no way arguing that everything everywhere is crossing everything everywhere
You're dumb
Stop posting

Samefag

Just do it in 3D

Attached: Untitled369_20200202054818.png (768x768, 157K)

k so you say a line that's at depth 10 feet and a line that's at depth 30 feet are crossing. how are two lines that are a billion light years away from each other not crossing? and where's the cutoff point for something crossing and not crossing?

>when you say things, your mouth moves and you breathe air, you're dumb.

Biiiig maaan.

it's hard. i mean i get it, Cred Forums and all, but this is some really autistic shit

Figured that out did you?

Thats not everything that exists crossing everything that exists, and as said, they would only be considered to cross from a certain perspective
In the context of the image posted, they can't be considered not to be crossing

Don't sidetalk with me like we are special either. You obviously dont get it.

>I mean, I know it's piss ocean, but it REALLY smells like ammonia

Yeah, no one false advertised. Call fag, post more.

Sorry, I didn't realize you were legitimately retarded

>my entire existence is finding creative ways to say "nuh uh!"

Its okay big guy.

do i win

Attached: 1580626970254.jpg (680x673, 215K)

perspective doesn't matter. is the sun not still a star without being perceived at all? what a literal 70 iq argument you're making.

You're arguing that you can draw 2 dots on a page, draw a line from for to for, and somehow that means the 2 dots are crossing each other
That doesn't make any sense

Ha this is great! How come no one ever thought of this bef

Attached: 05-57-08-Mashrum-cloud-explosion.jpg (1140x969, 85K)

>perspective doesn't matter in regards to whether something can cross another
Doubling down on the retardation

you still haven't answered any of the retorts, your only response is "ur dumb" "retarrrrrd" "so stuuuupid"

Well I'm sorry, you may have a learning disorder. Would you like it explained or is "No you're dumb" just your top effort?

there are no doors those are just lines faggot

they keep a pretty solid pattern, definitely not cocket science

You win.

This can't be resolved

If you can't accept that and keep trying then you are autist

Test solved

it already has been solved but the trogs can't wrap their head around how

Nuh uh! Actually what's happening is X!

Yeesh.

Explain how drawing a line between 2 objects means the 2 object cross?

Put a pen in your hand in 3d space, now put another pen in your other hand. Now, move them around and note their position relative to each other. Now since perspective is so important to you imagine that you are floating "above" the pen in your right hand at any given moment, position yourself in such a way that you see points on pen A crossing points on pen B now use your little primordial brain and try to imagine that even without your eyes to see the points crossing, that they're ALWAYS crossing, no matter where the 2 pens are in space or how much distance is between them. fucking simpleton.

What retorts?
Drawing a line between things means those things cross?
Thats not in anyway correct, or even logical
Perspective doesn't matter?
Perspective is LITERALLY the determining factor in whether one thing can be considered to cross another

They are the only 2 points made, and both have been addressed
You are arguing for the sake of arguing

K tell me 2 things that cross each other, then tell me 2 things that are not crossing each other.

gey

since the original test is a 2d picture, and the way the original text is written, there is no way to solve this without applying some extra parameters (3d, below ground passage, portals, etc) not mentioned in the original text.

Attached: 1580626970254.jpg (680x673, 227K)

So NOW perspective matters?
Hi already said from specific perspectives certain things could be considered to be crossing
But that means from every other perspective they are not
Crossing in this context is subjective, not objective, so everything cannot be crossing everything, only certain things for certain observers
It's irrelevant though, because in this context, the perspective means that the lines drawn in the image do in fact cross

Try not to let it keep you up tonight when your trying to sleep and you're still cranky about your internet fight

The third house is missing electricity you retards

Attached: Schadenfreude.gif (360x270, 1.63M)

/thread

Put 2 coffee mugs on a table
Are they crossing each other?

It's crossing whether you're looking at it or not. I have no perspective at all on the Golden Gate bridge from where I sit and yet somehow I still know it's crossing the Golden Gate how is that possible! Everything I just posted that you quoted is precisely why perspective DOESN'T matter. So you are now showing you're incapable of simple reading comprehension.

Pro Tip: torus

>K tell me 2 things that cross each other, then tell me 2 things that are not crossing each other.

You may ask questions later.

>autism test: positive

kek

Poo Poo Pee Pee.
You gay.

Attached: Harry.jpg (916x280, 96K)

by this idiotic logic since perspective dictates whether something is crossing or not, you could dig out the earth around the homes so that all of the lines were exposed then position yourself about 15 feet down and back a distance and you'd see no lines crossing from your perspective, therefore they are not crossed. absolute fucking mongoloid logic

>Yeah! the thread isn't stopping because I'm retarded. I WANTED it to stop!

wow lol

In that context yes, those 2 stationary objects do cross each other.
That does not mean that everything that exists crosses everything that exists, which is what was stated

Yes, that is why it's subjective
But the context here is a 2 dimensional image, hence the perspective is fixed, so subjectivity is removed
You're getting desperate now

Still waiting for you to explain to me how any 2 things aren't crossing in 3d space, since you can draw a line between any 2 things that are crossing and you can also draw a line between any 2 things that are NOT crossing (according to you, not crossing) so tell me 2 things that aren't crossing and how they are different from 2 things that are. Distance is the only possible difference, so I'll wait for your to explain.

Explain how anything in the universe can be on a different plane then something else.

But you won't. Lets watch.

Do it without hitting the houses.

Attached: sketch-1513081237802.png (729x720, 464K)

it's not subjective any more than trying to explain how water would still be water even if humans didn't or never existed. it's actually easier to illustrate in 2d space how every point crosses every other point, so once you can point out for me 2 points on that original image that i'm unable to connect with a straight line we can talk.

Thats literally the retarded argument that he made in this post You're right, the user that posted it is dumb as fuck

No one's perspective is fixed. You just think you can say it is the same way you're "telling" user he is getting desperate. Rather desperate than delusional

Being able to draw a line between 2 things doesn't mean those 2 things cross
You must be trolling

Perspective in a static 2 dimensional image is 100% fixed
You cannot argue this

K what means they cross then? since seeing things "cross" is simply drawing a straight line out from your eye, through object 1 at a point where it is obscuring object 2.

Attached: 07-08-40-1577697207245.png (1082x1440, 1.66M)

Did I do it?
Do I win autism?

you have to go through the words it takes hours

Until someone looks at it. You aren't psychic and cannot limit a persons thought process because you "know".

K

Attached: 1580626970254.jpg (680x673, 233K)

Passed.

Still perspective doesn't matter. Parallel lines are crossed, just not from your perspective, your perspective doesn't change the fact that they are crossed. From your perspective no stars or planets exist a hundred million light years away, but your perspective is devoid of the necessary information on the topic that could lead to any meaningful conclusion.

No, that is true for objects that have direction or movement.
What you're saying is not 2 objects crossing. Crossing requires a directional component
Imagine an elevated train line above a road following the exact path.
The train line cannot be considered to be crossing the road as they are parallel to each other

shut up adults are talking

Lay off the drugs user

K

what you're describing is intersection, not crossing.

>oh shit im wrong....yeah um, well you do drugs!

You're gonna go far, kid.

>what you're describing is crossing, not crossing

kek

2 parallel lines cross at infinite points in space, but intersect at none. simple concept sorry your tiny brain can't comprehend

Hey what's the symbol for an intersection called? I forget.

I"ll give someone a nobel prize if they can post the REAL solution

Parallel lines can never cross. That's an inherent fact of things being parallel
It seems you have a misunderstanding of what crossing actually means and your entire argument is based around that misunderstanding

someone already did. simple, elegant and perfect.

Yes, but not in the way you think
2 objects in motion have direction, and when their paths intersect, they can be considered to be crossing.
Without motion or direction, 2 separate objects can't be considered crossing just because they are on a linear path from where you happen to be looking at them

A static 2 dimensional image has a fixed perspective.
We aren't talking about an emotional or artistic perspective here, we're talking about the angle/direction in which the portrayed image has been represented
That is fixed

Point at infinity, ackshully

Also cross, meet, touch, intersect all mean the same thing in this case

You believing they cross doesn't mean they do
They don't, by definition of being parallel

literally everything is in motion at all times, you just can't tell because you're stationary relative to the ground you're standing on. also see here how this bridge is crossing, but not intersecting this river.

Attached: 4.jpg (998x754, 49K)

we are talking about a person altering the image, not the image sitting alone on a table. I thought you were already absolutely sure you were right?

and just like imaginary numbers there is a mathmatical concept for when they do cross, even if it isn't able to be comprehended by some.

Up is down, long is short, and right is wrong

The bridge has met the river. They intersect. Where do you cross the bridge? Where it intersects the river.

yes parallel lines do intersect at infinity which means they are intersecting at all times due to infinity being infinite, in both directions. to say there's any point where parallel lines aren't intersecting is to reject the idea of infinity and to adopt the fallacious idea that the line must have a starting point.

That bridge doesn't cross the river as it does not lead from one side to the other
It runs parralel to the river

Mathematics say parallel lines must cross
You have crossed the level of retardation into something else entirely

wrong. to put in layman's terms intersection is "going through" but at no point does the bridge go through the water, it simply crosses it.

It does both. Don't overheat.

not even sure how to respond to this level of idiocy.

>there is a mathmatical concept for when they do cross
If only you were smart enough to understand how fucking stupid that was to say
Please dont stop

They converge, parallel, then diverge
At no point do they cross

wrong.

and that's why you're the idiot here

Actual retard or master troll
I don't know anymore

well gee engineers all over the world will love to know that they can tear down all bridges that cross waterways in a parallel fashion since they're not needed because the bridge isn't crossing the water thus preventing you from falling into it. holy shit.

It doesn't though

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_at_infinity#Geometric_formulation

and you spelled it parralel. come on my guy.

*slow clap*

They wouldn't build a bridge that runs parallel over a river and starts and ends on the same side of the river

oh gosh dude fam pay it forward

They aren't needed
Explain why the bridge you drew would ever be built

oh ok so 2 points don't need to meet at the same coordinate in space to be considered intersecting? or 2 points need to meet at the same coordinate in space to be considered crossing? so the bridge crossing the river isn't really crossing it, because they're not meeting at a point in space..my man.

>when threatened, resorts to word schemantics

That'd be a troll. I dunno if I'd suck his dick hard enough to say "master" but definitely a patterned low iq shitposter

where in the rules does it say that?

It's not crossing
It does intersect, but it doesn't cross
You don't understand the definitions of the words you are using
Its hilarious, but also saddening

there's a giant mountain to the left and to the right of the bridge and a natural crevice approx 100 ft wide has been opened up through the mountains that happens to be right over a river. it's either build a 1000 ft bridge that crosses that river, or divert traffic 200 miles around the mountains or cut another giant tunnel through the mtns for no reason since one already exists. pick.

The bridge crosses the river. You're just hung up on the definition of "Across" which is a different concept and subjective anyway.

Did i do it right? I'm blind so i cant see the thing i did.

Attached: myboyimnottalkingaboutthisorthisimtalkingaboutthis.png (680x673, 529K)

Fair enough
It still doesn't cross the river though
It intersects, runs parallel, then diverge
Things can intersect without crossing
Things cannot cross without intersecring

WHAT I CANT HEAR YOU

No, it does not cross the river

but it does literally a bridge being built over the water is the very definition of crossing it.

Im on one side of a river. I use the bridge to get to the other side, from where I am, without falling in.

Aha! I've crossed the river.

Go eat hummus

Thats not correct
Just because it goes above the water does not mean it is also crossing the water
I can climb on the roof of my house then climb down again at the same place
Nobody would say I crossed my house
Except you and you samefagging of course

I get in a boat and paddle down the river then exit my boat on the same.sode of the river I entered
AHA! I didn't cross the river did I?

that analogy makes 0 sense. you described a bridge to nowhere. once you've entered a bridge you would follow it to its terminus. never have i seen someone enter a bridge, back up off the bridge then proclaim they've crossed it..what the hell are you even talking about.

You're using it to cross the water. The same way you're using your roof to cross your house. Put a washcloth on your forehead if you need to

Ok then
I climb on the roof, take 2 steps to.the left then climb back down
Still didn't cross anything
Before you screech, I had someone paint a path with arrows going up doing a 180 and coming back down across the walls and roof, and that is the path I followed.

Hurts you that bad being wrong huh?

But neither of those examples are crossing
Your getting pretty silly if you're now saying that the example I gave is an example.of crossing my house

excellent

Attached: 10168180_1446806458896759_7962283264335520315_n.jpg (250x250, 16K)

/thread

It's right though
You know that by now, you just can't stop slamming that keyboard until you win your internet battle or 404 comes and you can believe you did

you're the only person making the argument that that's in any way considered crossing. did i say anything about stepping onto a bridge, seeing an xbox 360, saying nope, doing a 360 and walking back off of the bridge being crossing that bridge?

"No" isn't an argument.

"you're silly" isn't an observation

Tug your nuts princess

oh yeah, ok bud thanks

I followed the path though, I didn't reverse back.
Also, this idiot did say that would be crossing the house

I need to eat
Please keep screeching nonsense till I get back
Imagine raging this hard because you didn't get a steam game promised in a troll thread

your path led you back to your coordinate of origin and you can't cross over the bridge without changing your position in space. however, all points on your person are crossing WITH the bridge in space even if you both remain stationary.

Attached: 1576069354003.jpg (1024x1013, 483K)

Imagine giggling at your computer screen for how much people don't like you and convincing yourself that you're proud of it while you go to microwave pizza rolls.

LMFAO

Attached: 1526875210882.png (960x664, 313K)

kek

Imagine thinking converging and crossing mean the same thing
Imagine arguing over it for this long
No brakes on the tard train

>find word "converge"
>this post only

Something large nosed is going down...

Not the point of origin. Led to the same side of the house, but not the same position. Just like your bridge

He hasn't used the word because he uses the word crossing when he means converging
He doesn't understand there is a difference

A line is defined as something that extends infinitely in either direction but has no width and is one dimensional while a plane extends infinitely in two dimensions. point line plane coplanar collinear.

No comment

take this op!

Attached: FAGGOTOP.png (936x804, 633K)

Ok I admit it
The guy with the bridge is actually right
I've been wrong but afraid to admit it
Have a reputation to uphold, you know
My apologies to the bridge guy
Gotta sleep now but couldn't leave without admitting how wrong I was
Guilty conscience and all
I'm not that bright but I do like the debates
So thank you to the intelligent one for showing me the way

lol all good dude, glad you were man enough to admit defeat and how fucking retarded you are. hopefully your parents are rich and can get you an education. peace out.

so which one`?

speaking with ones self is a sign of schizoaffective disorder

...

gg

Attached: 1580626970254.jpg (680x673, 338K)

It's the retard samefagging since those arguing with him realized it was pointless to continue, but any newer people in the thread will see those posts he made and he can be happy thinking that anonymous strangers think he won something.
Truth is most people that get to that point will have already decided he was either retarded, stubborn, or outright insane

HOUSES not commieblocks FFS

noun, plural hous·es [hou-ziz] .
a building in which people live; residence for human beings.

And again, GG

>New to thread

Yea but it's hard to stick around and argue in the face of actual facts and evidence like he was providing. All I'm seeing other people say is some stupid nonsensical gibberish about walking up a ladder and then back down. The guy tried to explain it so even little children could understand but smallbrain monkeys such as yourself can't comprehend real science.

Attached: 1580626970254.jpg (680x673, 213K)

>residence for human beings

>posts 35^2m flat commie block

the originality should be recognized. witnessed

Attached: 9BBB1008-580A-4F12-9484-B6C07ADCD98F.jpg (700x300, 108K)

Its about supplying houses with gas, water and electricity, why would the lines not go though houses...

>getting upset at the superior logic of others
Don't worry user I'm sure you gave it your best! You'll get it next time I'm sure :)

You really have to change your writing style if you're going to samefag like that

Cause they have autistic OCD mixed with lack of knowledge on how paralell vs serial connections work and many other types depending on the state or country and their laws and norms.

based

Vodka is liquid or solid state this time of the year in the shithole you live in?

this cuck still samefagging while accusing others of samefagging that's rich

I cant draw cuz im using a Phone!

>recieved insult
>activate ivan response

NPC in da houz

*a shit phone

if (ruskiBot = true)
{
cout

>Chad Aussie shitposter vs Virgin American newposter
Kek he only crumbled in 3 posts give him some credit

Attached: 4159E829-F48A-4A1D-9B3F-4B65A1F1170E.jpg (750x725, 130K)

some credit

Top notch post user! I will give you an A....no....A+!!! You earned it champ

Attached: 1580626970254.jpg (680x673, 372K)

Big if true

Attached: 23-41-46-1576816153632.jpg (341x533, 38K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagner's_theorem

Nice trick, split a vertex. I like.

But according to a clever user in this thread, paralell means they cross

I need you to try being even gayer.

I never saw any user say that. Sounds like a butthurt bias summary of a discussion you had.

Well that wasn't hard to find

I see you pulling what you want to read out of context of both of those posts. Sort of like you were ready to ridicule them no matter what they said

Medal for being a retard

I see it say "that cross waterways in a paralell fasion"
I poked a bit of fun at first, but when the claim of being able to chart a straight line between two objects means those objects cross, it seemed pointless to continue making fun

fuckin kek

Are you all retarded?
It only said you couldnt cross the lines, nothing about going through houses
Autism test indeed

Attached: 14723152425991.jpg (1140x1128, 629K)

"that cross waterways by running alonside of them"
A situation bound to occasionally occur
"parallel lines intersect at infinity"

Why don't they cross? You are aware you can always line up two points on a plane?

>8 hours in, after five people drew the same thing

oh wow man! genius, we are all so dumb..

There ya go. Its the surface of a Torus embedded into the 2D Plane. Its the only way to truly solve this puzzle. Its quite popular printed on coffeecups as they are topologically equivalent to a torus, thus allowing to solve it.

Attached: tismtest.jpg (680x673, 227K)

youtube.com/watch?v=Zb4kIUBKAck

done

Attached: complete.jpg (680x673, 191K)

LMAOO YOU'RE ALL RETARDED XDDDDDD
LATER RETARDS XDDDD

Attached: retards.jpg (680x673, 179K)

>You are aware you can always line up two points on a plane?
What are you trying to imply by saying that?
It makes no more sense now than it did when the idiot said it the first time
I mean it's a true statement, it's just completely irrelevant

All these years, I just noticed it says "trough".

Witnessed.
These are genuine autism.

If you like stuff like that, this is the topic in graph theory that relates to the puzzle en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planar_graph

Attached: 1571590697686.jpg (800x600, 142K)