Free helicopter rides for rapists.
Free helicopter rides for rapists
I don't think he was convicted, so not really a rapist.
Uhhhhh he was black so....
Touche'...
Low quality bait
The women who accused him got death threats and years of harassment and abuse from Kobe's fan base. Gotta be such a middle finger to get raped by the guy then everyone tells you how great he is after he dies in a helicopter crash.
Come on. Where the fuck are the Kobe memes?
>If you kill somebody and don't get convicted, you aren't a murderer
That's not how it works
maybe he didnt do it, I mean he is the first millionaire/pro athlete to be accused of rapping someone. Oh wait? Lol
OJ
Someone calling you a rapist doesn't make you a rapist. You have to prove it. It was not proven, therefore, not a rapist.
Lost
You're a rapist
there's nothing wrong with rape. hell, our president is a rapist.
No u.
Now you are the rapist.
You can catch a rapist in the act of raping, but as far as liberals are concerned the rape never occured unless you can prove it with facts and logic. Eye witness testimony doesn't suffice anymore, because apparently everyone picks the black guy during police line-ups.
He admitted that everything she said was true, but he thought she wanted it
If he didn't pay her off, that admission in court would've had him convicted
Is a murderer
I was just rough sex. And by rough sex I mean rape.
You're a rapist, I seen you do it, now go to jail.
Maybe she just wanted money after she had rough sex with a dude. Unless you actually prove something, it's just speculation.
If I am wrongfully accused of a rape and given the death penalty, then I consider myself a hero who died for this country so that the rest of humanity could live without fear of rape.
There will always be rape and there's nothing you can do about it. You live in the EU, don't you?
That's really noble, user
Maybe he did it
Your logic is bad, you assume he simply didn't do it. Its fair to make assumptions in the lack of evidence (even tho he admitted to the rape on record while settling)... But a lack of evidence is NOT evidence of a lack.
Truth is like cancer, even if noone notices or proves it, its still there and it can kill you whether you acknowledge it or not. Saying there is no proof doesn't change reality, and requiring proof about an event you have absolutely no experience or insight in is fucking pathetic unless you are in a court of law.
Maybe he did. Point is ya don't know for sure.
I know what he admitted to doing
This guy raped me. He said nothing makes him rapier than the fact that noone would believe he is a rapist because of his stance on rape.
Unfortunately, you are correct. Rape is extremely prevalent. The best we can do is try to erase deviancy from the human collective genome through euthanasia or selective breeding. I am not from the EU.
I'm not saying he did or didn't, I'm saying you can't just deem someone a rapist if it can't be proven. You have no idea, you only know what you've heard, you're just an ignorant little faggot on the subject.
You're a rapist. Now, go turn yourself in to jail, we don't need proof and I said it was a reality. I was there, I seen you do it, you dirty rapist.
Go to jail, do not pass go, do not collect two hundred dollars.
*how to literally prove someone else's point
you should write a how to, user
People admit to shit they didn't do all the time. I did it, I flew the plane into the twin towers.
See? You retard.
There is no "rape" gene, you idiot.
Bruh. Same exact logic problem, AGAIN. Truth is truth whether you can prove it or not. Hindsight may be 20-20 (in this case Kobe is objectively a rapist by his own admission).
Im calling you stupid for INSISTING on guilt/innocence regardless of evidence, outside a courtroom. You don't know the difference between his dick and the bleeding b-hole it came from in real life, so where do you get off deciding his guilt?\
It's kinda like how you are retarded, even if I cant convince you of the fact. Lack of proof youll believe doesnt make you any less mentally chanllenged.
Are you retarded? Like 70% of nogs have that gene, and 100% of shitskin muslim goatfuckers are rapists and pedos, it's in their DNA
Thats very different to being formally accused of crashing the towers and THEN admitting it
+1 point for this guy.
nice example, dindu, next you should claim to have died in other events to prove you think you have a point.
My point is you don't KNOW the truth, so saying that you do makes you retarded. My literal point is that if you can't prove it one way or the other, you really don't know shit.
Fucking idiot.
I'll get my friend to formally accuse me and then admit it. Suuuper hard to do, you almost had me there.
Either tell me how I'm wrong or eat a dick faggot. We both know you're going to go with eating a dick though.
Some people believe we should torture rapists to set an example for other rapists. I believe that is barbaric. Other options include rehabilitation, chemical castration, solitary confinement, imprisonment, or euthanasia.
I'm sorry, the entire human collective knowledge on genetics can't prove or disprove that. All we know is that shit is way the fuck more complicated than we ever guessed... So drop a source or drop the argument...
Convictions don't require truth, or proof
An admission should be convincing beyond reasonable doubt, which is all that's required to convict
So at least one of you will be criminally charged
Great plan dickhead
i had to wear gloves responding to this comment, it's so edgey
lol
the girl showed up with 7 different types of semen in her panties
> whore wanted money from kobe
> whore got money from kobe
he's adulterous, not a rapist
Same point here, except I'm on the side that he did in fact rape a chick. Which he did, which he admitted in court on record. You can't pull the Schrodinger hypothetical reality argument on an event THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN RESOLVED.
You have literally been implying it might not have ever happened because he was never convicted, as if that proves there is no evidence.
If you want to argue the corona virus may or may not be a human engineered disease released intentionally, then the "we don't know what happened" argument still works... But were talking about something that has been resolved, awhile ago.
Context matters, dumbass, saying "we cant know for sure, hurr durr" doesn't actually apply to shit we actually know already...
The burden of proof isn't on me, you can't prove a negative. Unless you feel like proving God doesn't exist too while you're at it.
I mean, I'd just put a gun to the back of their head and kill them. No point in wasting more money than you have to, ya know?
Like I said earlier, I flew the plane into the twin towers. Does my admission make it true?
Doesn't change the point I was making, dumb ass.
I'm not the one making claims in absolute terms, you are. And when YOU make a claim, the burden of proof is in fact yours to prove (assuming you expect anyone to take you seriously at all).
And while it is true you cant prove an absence you CAN determine every function in a closed system. I may not be able to prove a wristwatch DOESN'T have consciousness, but I can determine every facet and function of its operation, and I can determine it to be a clockwork device which DEFINITELY doesn't exhibit consciousness.
The human genome is like an insanely complicated clock, I never said it had or didn't have anything. YOU did. All i said is you cant fucking know that at all, because MUCH simpler issues which we KNOW are genetic still arent understood.
Like, dont even bring up science if you cant even perform critical thinking
You aren't making a point
You think.you are, but really you're just addicted to arguing on the internet
No, because you were not accused of it, and didn't not admit it under oath in court
More specifically, topfag goes to jail for insighting panic with terroristic claims (worse charges have been handed out for lesser claims made as a joke)
and bottomfag failed to point out those hijackers are known, identified, and dead... The claim has no validity because its details have been worked out already. Witness testimony is only needed when hard evidence is missing
Many adults do not know how to talk about sex. "Consent" is a modern concept. The woman consented to having sex with Kobe, but she did not consent to being choked or dominated. Some women are into that sort of kinky stuff. It's also possible Kobe straight up raped the woman, but I will never know definitively.
It is funny how the left and the right went full blown NPC on Kobe's death. The left was programmed to always believe women, but also that black men have been victims to white women making false accusations and being lynched by angry mobs. The right is programmed to hate race mixing but he played a great game, and that the me too shit went to far. So they all are like, no way he is innocent. And even if he admitted it, so what? Don't say anything now, it is to cringe this soon after his death. She had choke marks, left her blood at the scene, he winds up admitting "Well, maybe she didn't consent I guess."
Git outta here with insightful and valid points. Bitch, we aint here for facts, we here to bicker in a manner most petty
Agreed, I don't know the nigger, and i cant see myself caring EITHER way. IMHO if you care that much about someone youve never and will never meet, then you deserve every rustled jimmy you get. I've always been a bit confused by the hero worship I see everyone doing all over the place, maybe im just weird, or maybe everyone else is...
Honest questions: does user admire someone they've never met? Who and why if so? Does it seem weird that you care now that you are thinking about it?
he's black so he's automatically guilty