Time to weed out the retards

>BODMAS

It's the same thing.

6÷2(1+2)=
3(1+2)=
33=33

Easy peasy

for me it's the mcchicken

6%2(1+2)
6%2(3)
6%6
1

Actually 6% of 6 would be less than one you troglodyte

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

Retards.

Bump.

why the fuck would would you do multiplication first?
you do the parenthesis first, the rest is done left to right, LIKE EVERYTHING.

its 9

heres a better diagram for your obvious lack of intelligence

Attached: PEMDAS.jpg (625x187, 25K)

This is correct

>9 or 1
>stale pasta is stale

it's a baited question. no matter which one you choose you'll be "wrong"

1

1 if op says 9 then he's dumb af

Yes

However you are ignoring the other function and multiplying first before completing it. If we even rearrange the sum you can maybe see the error:

2 / 6 (1+2)

For what you and others have done to get 1 this time you would get 18 which is strange and inconsistent. 9 however remains the answer permanently by separating the sums and completing them in order which is correct. There is no reason to think that you or others are stupid for not understanding

2 / 6 (x) (1+2)

3 (x) (3) = 9

1

No. It can only be one.

36 not 18

You mean pemdas.

Where the fuck are you getting the multiplication sign

the answer is 1

y’all are fucking retarted it’s like y’all got dropped on your head when u were a baby

6/2 = 3
1+2 = 3
The 3(3) means 3x(3). They still got it wrong im just clarifying. The actual answer is one

The correct answer is 9. Put it in a calculator if you disagree

The calculator automatically puts brackets around the 6÷2 >.> calculator is incorrect

f for you it is not confusing, then you do not know math enough, because to remove the confusion in that sort of expression, there is a rule that apply to in-line math expression :
"Always add parentheses to delineate compound denominator"

So here the first thing to say is that "that expression do not follow the rule for in-line math, so It can't be solved using the order of operation; It has to be corrected first"

And the problem is that it seems that a lot of people do not know that rule, so they give the result corresponding to one interpretation or the other ... making it viral
Should all of those people go back to school ?
Or should only the one that wrote that ambiguous expression go back to school?

won

>BEDMAS
>PEMDAS
So Brackets, Exponents, Division/Multiplication, Addition/Subtraction.
Brackets/Parenthesis:
6 / 2(1+2)
6 / 2(3)
Now Division/Multiplication:
6/2(3)
3(3)
9

How did you get one retard?

If for you it is not confusing, then you do not know math enough, because to remove the confusion in that sort of expression, there is a rule that apply to in-line math expression :
"Always add parentheses to delineate compound denominator"

So here the first thing to say is that "that expression do not follow the rule for in-line math, so It can't be solved using the order of operation; It has to be corrected first"

And the problem is that it seems that a lot of people do not know that rule, so they give the result corresponding to one interpretation or the other ... making it viral
Should all of those people go back to school ?
Or should only the one that wrote that ambiguous expression go back to school ?

you are a young person stop talking

shut up bitch

Source? Let's see academic references that backs up your quotes.

A = 6
B = 1
C = 2
f(x) = 2*x

A / f(B+C) =
A / (2*(B+C) =
6 / (2*(1+2)) =
6 / (2*3) =
6 / 6 =
1

>1

PEDMAS:
(1+2)=3
6÷2=3
3×3=9

Are you both retarded? It wouldn't be 18 or 36, it'd be 1/9.

If it were done the way they suggested with
2 / 6 (1+2)
That would be 2 / 6 (3) = 2 / 18 = 1 / 9
If you're going with the method applied to achieve 1 as the answer to the original problem

You are wrong with everything that you have written. I guess you are an ethnic

6/f(1+2) =

retards:
6/f(1+2) = 6/f(3) = 6/f*3 = 18/f (WTF?!)

people with brains:
6/f(1+2) = 6/(f(3))

here f(x)=2*x:
retards:
18/f = 18/(2*x) = 9/x (hurr...)
total retards:
18/f = 18/2*x = 9*x (durr...)
people with brains:
6/(f(3)) = 6/(2*3) = 6/6 = 1

lol

MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION ARE EQUAL JUST LIKE ADDITION AND DEDUCTION ARE EQUAL. IT IS 9 100% YOU FUCKING BRAINDEAD RETARDS UNEDUCATED AMERIMUTTS DIE PLEASE

This again?
6/2x(2+1) = 6/2x3 = 6/6 = 1

shut the fuck up yellow teeth

if there is nothing between a number and a bracket its fucking multiplication did you not learn this faggit

how dare you call me a britfag

Attached: 1580471643506s.jpg (125x125, 2K)

1

Please excuse my dear aunt Sally

The answer is 9

multiplication is not above division. they are equal and should be done in order

6÷2×(1+2)=X
6÷2×3=X
3×3=X
9=X

Has common core finally made everyone retarded?

brackets come first
then you go from left to right because division and multiplication have the same precedence
6/2(1+3) = 6/2(3) = 3(3) = 9

That is the only right answer, when operations have the same precedence you evaluate from left to right

6 / 2 (1+2)

P-step:
Add the 1 and 2 in parentheses to get "6 / 2 (3)"

E-step:
nonexistent

M and D step:
Resolve all instances of multiplication and division in order, moving from left to right. Note that "a (b)" is multiplication. So first we divide 6 by 2 to get "3 (3)". Then we multiply those together to get "9".

A and S step:
We already resolved everything. It's 9. Pay attention.

Attached: pemdas.jpg (625x187, 28K)

youtube.com/watch?v=URcUvFIUIhQ

>be complete retard
>completely fuck up this simple, elementary school equation
>give retarded answer like "1"
>call others retarded for not getting your answer, even though your answer is fucking stupid and incorrect

its not fucking 1, its 9. first you do brackets, then division, then multiply the two answers. why is this so fucking hard for you? honestly i feel bad for you. your mother probably took nigger dick and had you by accident, and you probably inherited the nigger's low iq genes. kys

The answer is 9.

The only way to get 1 is 6/(2(1+2)) which would be 6 over 2(1+2)

Anyone that says 1 is a retard that needs to go back to the first grade.

when this meme was relevant like 10 fucking years ago I asked my professor and most of them said "its not phrased properly" or something along those lines, so basically there is no real right/wrong answer, the question itself shouldnt be asked in such a way.

3(3) put it in a calculator math fag.

Attached: 1580394188800.png (623x733, 780K)

6 / 2 (1+2) = 6 / 2 * (1+2) = 6 / 2 * 3 = 3 * 3 = 9
1. obviously 2(1+2) =2*(1+2)
2. parentheses first
3. left to right
however;
6/(2*(1+2))=1
sage this shit

the reason americans are retarded is because they are taught this "pemdas" or "pedmas" shit which prioritises division over multiplication and subtraction over addition specifically, which is unnecessary, since subtracting a number is just adding its inverse, and dividing by a number is just multiplying with its inverse
your school system is fucked from the ground and even though your rules work they are too overcomplicated to guarantee an error free calculation for a human user

6 / 2(3)
6 / 6
or 3/3
=1

Attached: 1570126489235.jpg (320x320, 21K)

another alternative:
6 / (2 + 4)

by distributing the 2 into the parenthesis

1 you fucking faggots

wrong and retarded
this would mean:
3*3 = 3*1*3 = 3*6/2*3*3 = 3* 6/2*6 = 3*6/12 =3*0.5=1.5

but 3 times 3 is not 1.5
and your maths is endgame wrong
which is illegal since
6/2 = 6* 0.5
there is an active brainlet in the building

>retarted
>calling other people retarded

Soon middle school will be over, champ. You’ll get through it.

you're clearly not familliar with numbers
the 111 means he is right

>3*3 = 3*1*3 = 3*6/2*3*3

you can't turn 1 into 6/(2*3) then move the 3 to the numerator faggot

Try going outside once in a while friend

6/2*(1+2)=6/2*3=3*3=9
if it was 6/[2*(1+2)]
then it would be equal to 1

according to anons fucktard logic I can, because 6/(2*3)=6/2*3

>6/2*(1+2)=6/2*3=3*3=9

if the 6 was only divided by the 2 it would be written 6/2*(2+1)

this is a solid logical argument, however, this is not standard notation. Obviously, OP has build the equation exactly to make us argue about it, and we all fell for this bait

Attached: 9YN7MPr.jpg (771x581, 110K)

>because 6/(2*3)=6/2*3

no. you can divide by either the 2 or 3 first but you have to keep the 2 or 3 in the denominator, moving either out means you're multiplying 6 for no reason

hey retard, knock knock, I know, I am completely aware of this, I am simply replicating the faulty logic of user in my maths to point out his mistake
read things you reply to

>6 / 2(3)
>6 / 6
>or 3/3
>=1

show me when that happened then.

>using slash for division
>6/2(1+2)
> order of operations: parenthesis first
>6/(2+4)
> continue distribution into parenthesis
> division is multiplication by the reciprocal
>6(1/(2+4))
> parenthesis finally expanded
>(6/(12+24)
> Now inside parenthesis, next is division
>(2+4) = 6
Answer is 6.

The other way of writing it is

6
--- (1+2)
2

So the answer is objectively 9.

The beauty of math is you can reverse you answer.

Solve for x

6/x(1+2) =9

6/x(1+2)=1

only one of those gets the right answer

6/2*3=6/2*(3)=6/2(3)=6/6=6/(2*3)
=>
6/2*3=6/(2*3)
this makes the solution up to interpretation, which is why 6/2(3)=6/6 is not allowed
6/2(3) = 6 / 2 * 3 = 6 * 0.5 * 3 = 3 * 3 = 9

also this shit
which is why some mathtards insist on writing
6
--- (1+2)
2
but the notation for single-line maths is:
>6/2(1+2)=9
>6/(2(1+2))=1

>parenthesis first
is not the same as distributing, though either works in this case
>(6/(12+24))
wtf? you multiplied the whole thing by 1/6? you could multiply by 6/6 since x*1=x but not 1/6, thus (36/(12+24)) = 36/36
>(6/(12+24)
you dropped the last parenthesis, should be (6/(12+24)), well actually it should be (6/(2+4)), but adding extra parathesis on the outside is redundant

Attached: tenor.gif (492x342, 1.06M)

you replied to bait

could just say you don't think the (1+2) was in the denominator to begin with, now I see what you're talking about, which was already discussed,

(me)

I figured but I couldn't risk the slim chance it actually was a retard

Based and math pilled. Ignore me larst post user.

Attached: 1580380795770.gif (280x210, 1.41M)

yes, with me also, I respect your maths user

Attached: 1568876411707.png (500x337, 25K)

no, confirmed bait. there's only one retard here.

Underrated post

Attached: 1462944963581.jpg (484x382, 21K)

6/2(1+2) NB: only retards think this is the same that 6/(2(1+2))

=6/2(3)
=18/2
=9

SyntaxError

It's 9. Use PEMDAS.
I hope your mother hangs herself.

/thread

>6/2(1+2)

>solving brackets first
>6/2(3)
>6/2*3
>solving from left to right
>3*3
>9

its 6/6 which is 1.

real numbers distributive law.
2 * (2+1) = 2*1 + 2*2

also the same if 2(3), but im repeating myself like that

1 niggers.

if it was 6/(2(1+2)) and not 6/2(1+2)
I'd solve it
6/(2(1+2))
6/(2(3))
6/(6)
1

...

whoever wrote it like this is a fucking nigger

should either be

6
-------
2(1+2)

or

6
-- + (1 + 2)
2

Bump.

Retards.

Bump.

Retards.

someone didn't pay attention in math class, there is never a + only ever *

9 desu

Attached: 1577536177047.jpg (511x469, 42K)

1. Now go fuck off.

Prove it retard.

Bump.

Retards.

It’s 9 or 0

1

yes, the division sign never shows up in calculations anyway. its ambiguous since u get different results from doing brackets first and going left to right which never happens with fractions.
arguing whether its 1 or 9 is pointless.

Arthur is a sucky retard that eats his own cum

6÷2(1+2)= Nigger

>arguing whether its 1 or 9 is pointless.
only because there is never more than one correct answer in math, and the answer in this case is clearly 9.

Y’all fags didn’t get taught please excuse my dear aunt sally, and it shows.