Prove with one scientific fact that AGW is real

Prove with one scientific fact that AGW is real.
protip: not one scientist has done it yet

Attached: 1572811472272.jpg (500x500, 41K)

Attached: 1578016424977.jpg (1280x1267, 110K)

Bill Nye the Libreal faggot

This is truth

No proof?

This fuckin homo

Attached: 1565862012753.jpg (1024x1011, 133K)

>hay silly

Attached: 1576553015617.jpg (187x128, 9K)

Attached: co2-temps.jpg (960x720, 87K)

Attached: NationalClimateAssesment.png (943x677, 507K)

Attached: Instrumental-Temperatures-World-10-Regions-1900-2010-Lansner-and-Pepke-Pedersen-2018.jpg (1486x788, 239K)

Attached: endenhofer.png (907x587, 414K)

Attached: NASA-US-1999-2019-1.gif (700x538, 87K)

Attached: AverageMaximumDailyTemperatureAtAllUSHCNStations_shadow.jpg (829x646, 102K)

Attached: co2-vs-wildfires.jpg (960x717, 81K)

Attached: USHCN-RAW-TMAX-Vs-Year-1895-2019-At-All-US-Historical-Climatology-Network-Stations-Red-Line-Is-5-Yea (1024x933, 195K)

Attached: NOAAlies.png (742x1146, 527K)

Still no proof? I can only assume it's bullshit. Faggots.

Attached: Arctic-Sea-ice-September-20-volume-2003_18.png (668x433, 27K)

Attached: Arctic-ice-volume-Kirye-2018-July.png (1128x758, 826K)

Weather =/= climate, you complete fucking retard

There is a very big difference between predicting acute weather patterns (which we have improved at predicting with much better accuracy contrary to your picture) and using data to extrapolate the long term consequences of the disposal of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

Think of it like this: it is easier to figure out the long term consequences of pointing a blow dryer at a glass of ice than it is to predict the which ice cube will melt first.

Using long term data can allow you to generally predict an effect in the future because by extending its logical consequences, but predicting a short term event can be more more difficult because there is not as much data to work with in that time frame to figure out minute details.

Going on Cred Forums is a waste of time.

Going on Cred Forums is a bigger waste of time.

Getting into debates on Cred Forums is a bigger waste of time.

Debating some random asshole about whether or not established (but complicated) science is real or some sort of insane global hoax on Cred Forums, where everything is ethereal and will dissolve in an hour and the person you're talking to is probably more motivated by making you mad than by giving the slightest fuck about the topic at hand is the biggest waste of time imaginable.

There are plenty of people who would be happy to walk you through the basics of climate science, OP. Just not here.

"weather" and "climate" are two different things you fucking retard

>I've never heard of a falmers almanac and don't realize we've been able to do this for over a millenia