Adventurers! Your cunning is required to save the spirit fox princess from the notorious replica trooper.
Use your knowledge of video games to defeat the replica trooper and/or save the princess!
Adventurers! Your cunning is required to save the spirit fox princess from the notorious replica trooper
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
princessbooru.booru.org
twitter.com
This one.. is weird.
Also, is the Spirit Fox a shapeshifter?
Replica you say?
Anyone have the archive of shopkeeper thread porn?
That archive got nuked.
Your coomer brain causes your weenus peenus to throb in public! You are helpless before a strong woman!
if you want it to be, sure
riot shield time... it blocks everything
>can't upload files because ip range ban
fuck I spent a lot of time working on it
Put it on your phone and post from there
sadly I'm banned from posting images both on phone and PC
link imgur then
naw dog get got
good idea
imgur.com/a/9Ih37X1
Some just draw the princess as obese already plz, i need to fap
Actually a nice pic.
Mind if I upload it here for you, m8?
I touch BOTH fluffy tails at the same time
thanks
not at all, that'd be cool
What do you guys use to make these? I want to start contributing to the fun.
Cool.
If you have a steady mouse hand, you can just use Paint.
Paint.net. But I haven't made one ITT yet cause I gotta go sadly.
Does the trooper have abs? This will influence my decision.
Yes (yes).
gentlemen allow me to make some improvements
>YOU ACHIEVED TO DEFEAT THE EVIL REPLICA AND SAVE PRINCESS LOLI FOX!
nice
whats next
With how tall the trooper is, I'd rather marry her.
Thats funny and neat
Gimme a moment
make some more replica with her
hes going to rob n' kill the fox too because he needs more darkside points.
put troll in bag
I want the one with the gun.
Great! now we can hold ha-
...wait, what the hell is that.
Fuck off fag.
you can not put a troll in a bag
cute!
Oh no. Here we go
damn
where did those milkers come from
ah theres nothing to worry about, some green dude saved her from it.
Direct action is not always the best way. It is a far greater victory to make another see through your eyes than to close theirs forever.
There we go
oh yeah yahoo!
meanwhile in the waking world
Foxgirl cock is the best
Just saying
baby looks a bit weird
let's just skip it to the pron
with who user?
>tfw no little fox brother to dote on
I hope the Princess is fireproof
Maybe
That's PAWdry.
haha
Can't wait for the Jario appearance.
I will now buy your game.
so this is the power of furfag autism
I fuck the fox.
I'm sorry i didn't hear you correctly, did you say jump across?
To the drawfag who bullied the licorice witch. Fuck you.
Continue
no tits means no saving
based
>t. pussy that uses riot shield
OH NOW I'M A PUSSY- WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO USE
UNATCO policy, no negotiations
gep gun
gep gun
gep gun
>BY FUCKING THE LOLI FOX YOU UNLOCK:
>1 EXTRA LIFE
>NEW ENEMY TYPE: "THE ROASTY HUMAN REPLICA"
>NEW ENEMY TYPE: "THE FBI REPLICA"
fuck off furry trash
i've got nerves of steel
i'm not big into fap bait threads
Should I keep going with this shit
1/3
Most excellent. I will disarm her by licking the abs.
2/3
That's cute, just what I was expecting from this.
3/3
It's a bayonetta reference
based
Barter but it's tf2 soldier
gep gun
gep gun
i like to make a silent takedown
why you gotta do tong like that, man?
gep gun
bravery is not a function of firepower
BABY SHARK DO DO DO DO DO DO
*loud crunching sounds*
I see an op bonus of 1000 credits in your future
we really do live in a world of terror
JAY CEE
THE FURRIES GAVE ME THE GRAY DEATH
you inspired me sir
/thread.
Best in thread
Noice
How will this duel turn out?
You are awesome man
>deleted abs
mods are fags
lmao beautiful
Are her ears floppy or firm?
do they look floppy to you?
Wait a minute. I don't understand.
Hard to say with that helmet on. Could just be the tips. Honestly, only touching them can solve this.
>Seduce [Replica Trooper].
Too many gay furries on Cred Forums picking the replica trooper.
>tall
>mysterious
>washboard abs
>uniform
>titties
vs
>think in an oversized tshirt
To me, the eyes are the most beautiful part of the body, but I like eye coverings too
Oh I'm sorry gay fur, did you expect people to go for your femboy fantasy? Don't you have some starfox threads to bawl in?
>tall
>washboard abs
>menacing masculine grimace
These aren't positive things for straight men.
that's why we like them on women
>t.
>He doesn't like making grumpy-looking girls smile
It's just not the same if they aren't naturally scowly, user.
Too lazy to make a new one, have an old one instead.
what a clever joke
It is
I'm glad that you, at least, could figure out it was a joke. sometimes I'm not sure anymore whether people will take my comics as some form of side picking or as a form of denigration towards self-perceived enemies.
yeah it's pretty subtle with its unbiasedness
can someone post more templates.
Please, stop the complimenting. I am but an humble crafter of maymays.
Quick! Save the princess from the Striped Witch!
>tall
>bad
How else am I gonna wash out my manlet genes?
who gave Licorice Witch her hat back
>humans only
*yawn*
Sorry, user, it's an enterprise doomed to failure.
Steal the witch's staff and cast a weight gain spell on both of them.
We've been over this
MORE!
SHOT THROUGH THE HEART!!!
I have a cute and funny idea for this I hope the thread doesnt die before I might finish
Please tell me it involves weight gain.
Good luck.
Beautiful
BUT FIRST
Oh boy, I hope we get to "save those other princesses" from the ice cream shop and definetly not talk to the cashier
Guys, I'm not a furry or anything, but after masturbating for fifteen years, furry girls are starting to look kind of hot. Humans just aren't doing it for me anymore. Please don't tell anyone I said this it's a little embarrassing.
HEY GUY'S THIS GUY LIKES FURRY CHICKS!
>cute and funny
i will now buy your game
See? No one cares.
Nice fap.
Sorry, user, you can't say that first part anymore. Don't worry, it doesn't take a lot of time out of your day unless you want to get super weird about it.
Hypergrind was a good game.
It was a very silly game.
>spirit
NO user NO
BUT IF HE KILLS HIMSELF, SHE'LL BE SET FREE.
And then...
Whoo, GHOST BLOWJOB.
As long as you don't start dressing up in a suit it's fine, don't worry user.
t. never touched by a spirit
lol
Whoa there, user. You're approaching dangerous levels of based there.
But that's the spirit touching (You).
Nothing wrong with fapping to furry stuff now and again.
You know I give up trying to make my idea for this thread it wont work
>it wont work
why
I wanted to draw but I’m not into furry
Sauce?
Kill furry
Can draw on my huion tablet very well and something effy about my pen.
Idea wasn't that great of an idea anyway
breed furry
ftfy
AAAAAWWWWWHHHHH!!!! he is so shy guys...
Spill the idea, maybe someone with the confidence to use a mouse will do something about it.
manyuu hikenchou
Sorry for long post
It was gonna be a crossover between the princess.
After rescuing the spirit fox onYou get to use her as a Final Fantasy like summon for helping her.
Then to stop the Stripped Witch you summon her.
And she falls from the sky as a giant version of herself and lands on the evil Witch. With a half eaten Super mushroom from in one hand.
It was going to be cute but I suck so yeah.
>abs are not worksafe
mods confirmed for BIG GAY CHINKS
nice
Should have at least posted what you had.
You made my groin tingle.
im gonna try do it,
but who lands on the evil witch? the fox or the human? i don't get it
Would you get + or - honor for killing her?
very nice
The fox girl. Lands on the Witch.
Like a looney tunes/Tom and Jerry anvil. While everyone else got out of the way.
God I want to want to have a spirit fox gf and fuck it.
Sorry, user, you get a spirit fox wife and make love to it instead.
>tfw no big tiddie spirit gf
>mostly feral
cute
>bestiality
It's not bestiality if it can talk and consent.
Yes it is
By that definition sex between a human man and a human woman is bestiality.
>animal
This usually means "lower animal", and in this made-up scenario a talking fox spirit would be much more ambiguous given this classification given since it can show intellect.
If a piece of turd becomes sentient and able to talk and consent, that doesn't mean you aren't fucked in the head for wanting to sex it. Same with an animal.
i hate to break your hopes user but if that scenario were even remotely possible most people would be fucking much more than just turds that can consent desu
Not really. If it can talk and shows intellect but in every other way appears to be a fox, fucking it is still bestiality. Whether it'd be ethical is a different matter.
If we lived in a world where some animals were able to talk and shit like that, i'd imagine there'd be a whole lot of shit involving their ranks as citizens, if they even qualify as citizens. They'd probably be treated as second class citizens, as well as not getting benefits that human beans already get, then there's the issue with how other countries would see them as well. Then of course, you run the issue of wanting to marry them, which most people will see as bestiality, and you'll have a very vocal minority saying it's not.
Can anyone repost this? These abs need to be preserved.
Always nice to see.
What makes you say that? The deviancy of bestiality and pedophilia are based on agency and maturity.
Fucking a petite, young-looking woman who is willing and of age is not pedophilia regardless of her appearance: She has the wisdom and maturity to give meaningful consent.
It's harder to express the bestiality problem, but a congruent situation could be defined: Consider an immortal alien that is wiser and more mature than you: Under their moral system, it is immoral to have sex with a human because they lack the maturity and the agency of your alien peers. Present: 1 human that fulfills your species criteria of intelligence, will, and abstract thought. There should be no problem in that case.
Now simply shift that concept to the human level: An "animal" (or really anything) that demonstrates human levels of agency and consent should be fair game.
Any argument against necessarily must break the hypothetical or attack the union under moralistic grounds of "Unnaturality" or "Perversity"
I'll take the hit. Save it quick before it's gone.
Fucking trigger-happy jannies
Well its furfaggot shit after all
Did you say "Reploid"?
Pretty much what I had in mind great job user very cute
wonderful. thanks user
Because no one wants to pander to my fetish. I guess I have to put effort into it.
Good art, shit fetish
>jannies having a conniption over this
The best I can give you is a big everything spirit wife.
the jannie fears the BFC (big furry crop)
Hot
What a minute. What is this game? I've played it before. I need to know
Custom Robo for the Gamecube, user.
There you got i hope you like it i did what i could with my mouse :s
Underrated
If I had an ounce of artistic skill I'd have made an alteration of pic related
Cute paws
Truly, you are the hero that user deserves, user.
show paws
You keep assuming that all that matters in sexual reproduction is intelligence and consent under the premise of the act being morally acceptable when both conditions are met, but in reality there is far more to sex than just its ethical dimension. Such as the origins and implicancies of perversions / paraphilias and to which kind of personality, traumas or mental illnesses they correlate to. When someone wants to fuck something grotesque or hazardous (such as a turd), or a non-intelligent, possibly disease-carrying animal you can't have kids with, that's clearly indicative of the person's personality and possibly mental health. It'd be moronic to deny it.
I'm tired of seeing how almost every pedophile or beastiality apologizer in this website believes sexual attraction exists on a vaccuum or that it's solely determined by social norms. No, being attracted to lolis, diaper furries, scat, vore, ferals, gore or other paraphilias isn't fine or normal just because "it doesnt hurt nobody cuz it's just drawings". Liking all that shit still says stuff about you, no matter how much you try to convince yourself there is no correlation. Let me give you a real life example: would you, in all honesty, hand your dog to a neighboor you know is secretly a zoophile, or hire someone you know is sexually attracted to kids to take care of your daughter while you work? You probably wouldn't, because even if those people aren't directly hurting anyone with their attractions, it still makes them untrustable, grotesque. Those traits are undesirable, morality aside.
Nice. If you aren't already, there's an opportunity to make money on those paw drawing skills, you know
>ice cream princesses' tits got bigger
nice
You know how I said you had to play with the hypothetical?
You have presented a scenario without the qualifiers inherent to my hypothetical, and then asked me how I can present that initial premise.
Not to mention that your very premise defeats itself: You pose that they harm no-one.
Any expression of the undesirability of traits must be ethical or moral in nature.
In lieu of a more detailed argument, I present the converse: There is a pedophile who never harms a child throughout his or her entire life. Is he morally or ethically abhorant?
A+++
No i don't money doing art, I never tough about that, thanks for the advice
>There is a pedophile who never harms a child throughout his or her entire life. Is he morally or ethically abhorant?
Not the guy you are talking to but I'd like to add an even more complicated question. Pedophiles are horrible people because of their interest in children, which leads to them exposing them to sexuality in an inappropriate/too young age that can sometimes damage them for life, if not doing worse things, right? And then there's the ones who never act in real life but look at that kind of stuff online, then the argument is they aren't participating but they are "fueling the market" and creating demand for other pedophiles to do their own thing and record it.
However, we have reached a point where pretty much anyone has access to recording whatever they want from an early age. So if someone who's young just records it with absolutely no knowledge, posts it online then someone else with a fetish for that thing enjoys it, even though we have definite proof nobody was harmed at all in this, not even hypothetically, should this person still be hauled off to jail and have their lives ruined? If so, is it just because "well they shouldn't like that, it's wrong" or is there another good reason?
>STARMAN INTENSIFIES
youtube.com
Holyshit thats amazing even got the menus and her holding the mushroom and nice. Dat sowy was a nice touch so CUTE
All that with a mouse wow
Oh no, what have you done?
She's too powerful now!
As long as you fap to human on furry only and by jap artists, I think you'll be fine.
looks like it's time to go Postal
I'll get straight to the point: you're free to kill yourself, fap in a pool of diarrhea, fuck a decapitated animal's head you found on the forest, or fuck an hypothetical intelligent animal or turd, but there are concerning reasons as to why you would do any of those things. I don't see you acknowledging this at all - you only seem to care if the creature or thing in question is conscious or can consent, as if the background of a sexual act doesn't matter at all.
In the case of an hypothetical intelligent animal, there's still the fact that 1) it's not a human, we may be hardwired to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex of our own species and anyone who defies the norm is a weird unpredictable case, 2) it's still an animal with a different body and it may not be fully "human" in terms of mind, values, habits or worldviews, and you show to be okay with that, 3) you can't form a family with it, which shows you have no desire of continuing your lineage and thus lack the basic human impulse of wanting to have offspring (unless you support poligamy and have a human partner as well, but your lack of compromise would be undesirable as well), and other reasons that probably can't be verbalized easily. All in all, just because the act "doesn't hurt anyone" doesn't mean it's immune to criticism.
Not that guy but I can tell you're a pedophile just from this post
what program/app lets you draw like that? with the pencil-looking effects
literally windows paint
It's just MSPaint, my man. It's a binary technique with the default pencil tool
are you honkeys just really good with kbm? I always assumed this shit was using a drawpad.
im just using it's brush tool and my horriblle laptop's pad
your head shapes are impressive
I'm not, and I don't know what made you conclude that when I'm clearly arguing against the blind tolerance of paraphilias. Which includes pedophilia.
I'd like to think I'm decent enough with Paint using only my mouse. Just go slowly and pay attention for the most part. I used to use it for art assets in my silly RPGmaker games.
Why does she wear the plunger?
Huh. Think I've seen your stuff around somewhere before.
Think the Pathfinder guys will be getting a few miles out of this one.
She's a big girl.
and a shithead toilet paper mummy
Possibly, but I've only ever posted a character concept on Cred Forums once before.
Gut feeling.
BASED
Not him, but
>appeals to the norm but wants to avoid explaining the core reason for such a norm
>psychological reason that is intentionally vague and partly at odds with the original assumption the organism can consent (and thereby communicate freely)
>an appeal to nature that is largely contentious and a common topic for debate, even in the current era
really makes you think
I cast enthicken on the guard and then ask her if she wants to go out while we get a baby sitter for her princess.
Now the Liquorice Witch has powered up the Ice Cream Princess too!
>Cred Forums
Well okay then.
Guess this thread is destined to die.
What are they going to do now?
Alright, go ahead and post the actual porn now. I'd appreciate if we could finish the fat reposts and move on to the ice cream shop cashier now
To be fair, these threads are never actually vidya, its just people drawing random stuff as fat chicks
Blame the coomers that don't keep it vidya
Work together
hey guys where did this thread come from
What, not /trash/?
Cred Forums
Moderators are inconsistent. Some go by the old law of Cred Forums, some go by the new law of /trash/.
Some move stuff from /trash/ to /qa/.
thats cool, I played a game called' seige' when I was a kid, know it?
GOD I wish that were me.
Pretty sad considering it would probay get more participation in /trash/ desu
They're going to crush you like a bug.
I'm perfectly fine with this.
>Cred Forums
>not /trash/
Who unfroze the mod from 2010?
They had to after Abib's latest autism fit.
Need more giantess Fox princess.
Just saiyan.
Your guts are wrong this time.
With something as complex and innate as human sexuality is, what else do you want me to say? How do you figure out with 100% accuracy what's inherent, determined by culture or a combination of both? It's difficult. And it's not possible to verbalize everything, you probably can't even explain why you're attracted to the stuff you enjoy. It just is what it is. The fact remains that attraction to animals is despicable and will always be, whether some aspects of it can be explained with ease or not. You actually feel this way, too, but unlike you I actually acknowledge my instincts rather than pretending they don't exidt.
Literally who?
One of the mods who is infamous for doing whatever the fuck he wants.
oh i was too slow
But they'll bully you.
Might as well make porn before 404.
Nice paws
But its the best kind of bullying!
But they're being mean
If you don't finish anything just upload it to the booru.
If they’re cute and fat, its hot
Rocket jump and then Market Gardener
But they're giants
I'm not disagreeing with you when you say that attraction to animals is currently considered "wrong", but there's something to be said about the way that "animal" is defined at least in the made-up scenario that this argument started with.
Because there has been no other species to show the same level of thought and introspection as humans, much of the current philosophical ideas behind sexuality are basically human-centric. That's not inherently wrong since humans are currently the only organisms capable of this thought process. However, analysis of a situation like the one you provided would clearly not be supported by the current ethical arguments against human/non-human sexuality largely because it was made under the premise that consent was possible.
There are other arguments to be made in this case, but the point was to realize that the reasoning process for this scenario would bare a striking resemblance to that of the way we currently justify certain sexual concepts under human sexuality.
there's a booru?
Its a bit of a pity really. Besides being moved from Cred Forums there has been a lot of pointless rants, as well as derailment through fatposting from prior princess threads.
Otherwise there have been some nice contributions. Thanks for the effort!