Why don't atheists have kids?

Why don't atheists have kids?

Attached: 150402130756-chart-projected-religion-growth-exlarge-169.jpg (780x438, 38K)

because they don't believe in creation

Attached: 1264832170793.jpg (386x359, 21K)

we're smart enough not to mindlessly breed like rabbits

But, they literally do, they just don't believe a God/s was the creator.

But, not smart enough to create a sustainable population?

goddammit user i was making a quality joke, why are you like this?

Attached: 1267672565230.jpg (368x440, 27K)

Not necessarily. If science arrives at the conclusion that there was a creation then they would tend to believe it. But atm there is no concrete evidence of it. The Big Bang theory posits that the universe 'as we know it' began as an exploding singularity, but what came before is still currently a mystery. If it turns out that reality is infinite but just changes forms, then there is no need for a creation point.

Because jokes are not funny, unless they are factually correct.

Attached: 1538781023278.png (500x481, 398K)

But, that would mean that the big bang was the creation point, at least as far back a creation point is needed.

You can smell the assburgers on this guy.

Still not funny.

Isn't it obvious? They're all literally like pic related

Attached: tumblr_mllsroMWoa1qklvzfo4_500.png (500x559, 276K)

what a shit taste in humor :D
well.. to each their own i guess

Nice strawman.

Good luck to you!

>Why won't women sleep with me?

Attached: UBYe0Dl.png (532x450, 297K)

Attached: YZr57Pd.jpg (500x638, 42K)

I appreciate it! You too!

Attached: ypT5XoW.jpg (789x444, 60K)

Why the fuck would any sensible person have fucking kids? Jeesh!

Strawman. I'm looking for a serious answer.

Attached: tumblr_mwsjtk4t5A1t3xg5ro1_500.png (500x375, 229K)

My your days be long, and your life be prosperous!

Maybe they don't draw their population graphs as straight lines over several decades.

We dont believe in children

Attached: s8I5Sxk.jpg (780x564, 72K)

We don't believe in children

Attached: r6aIlhO.png (461x514, 598K)

Only for the matter-energy style of universe we have atm. According to multiple credible theories there is a strong possibility that the big bang was just a changing point for the laws of physics and allowed matter to form in the way we see it. Not so much a creation, more so a transition.

Attached: not-so-nice-guys-dont-message-me-for-friendzone.jpg (600x931, 74K)

Its not a straight line, it bends slightly near the middle. But, compared to most groups, atheists either are in decline, or are barely stable.

Do not go gentle into that good night, friend!

I'm sure that has nothing to do with those religions promoting procreation.

Attached: Gt+new+atheist+fedora+wielding+faggot+gt+calling+me+cringe+_19acbd1cca8a9b2a20ae6034007894a0.jpg (480x637, 67K)

So you think the natural level of procreation is below replacement rate? Fucking idiot doesn't even understand biology.

Attached: Cringe_d91e62_5488602.jpg (730x700, 102K)

Attached: cDlWp5B.png (541x684, 252K)

But, that would imply that no physical matter existed before the big bang. Or, at least, that all physical matter from a previous big bang was destroyed/transformed into the matter we have now. Wouldn't that effectively mean that the big bang was the beginning?

Attached: Cringe_879b08_5500381.jpg (474x436, 65K)

Nither you! Good friend!

Attached: c5962d21ba22bae3700dad41c1e63964.jpg (745x625, 61K)

Attached: be7b92f56d0a67e0687415526809564a.jpg (500x344, 39K)

sUStaInABle pOPulATIon
We literally do not need this many people on earth.

Attached: a-multiply-disabled-transgender-atheist-jew-and-i-am-autistic-4645208.png (500x466, 133K)

Atheists are literally well below replacement rate. That's not a sustainable population, idiot

criminally underrated

Attached: 9HgDAh5.jpg (1374x761, 188K)

Yes, people just play mental gymnastics when it comes to the "when is creation" question. Life/minerals and all that shit came after the big bang (allegedly) and that seeded life on the planet

Attached: 94d1533ef71de2df25d6e5b44b207305--meme-shirts-khakis.jpg (719x960, 97K)

Why does anyone?

They're responsible

Attached: 834eac1a858af94dbbe58598fdd6ccda.jpg (625x833, 103K)

Probably something that correlates with their psyche. Depressed know nothing children tend not to get laid. Not saying I believe in any kind of god or whatever, but if you claim to be "atheist" you lack any nuanced thought, imagination and/or creativity.

Attached: 67ce98ff9cf54c98ae6a821bb298e9a4.jpg (924x918, 119K)

But, if they don't have kids, Atheism will likely die out as a popular institution, at least as we know it. Religions will become dominate again world-wide. Do you really want that?

Attached: 4wT3Hpl.jpg (957x508, 126K)

Good question. I knew I didn't want kids when I was a kid. Never had the desire.

Not at all. If you have some kind of makeover in your 20s does that mean that that's when you were created?

Attached: 1boZUll.jpg (326x360, 23K)

Attached: 1513129263638.jpg (540x817, 57K)

Attached: 1494297065991.png (852x940, 1.61M)

Looks like a weirdo I guess but he doesn't seem meme worthy in the least

Attached: 1509947055014.jpg (1280x1912, 177K)

No, but if physical matter didn't exist/was lost after the big bang, wouldn't it be impossible to prove that anything existed before hand? Of course, you could say theoretically that the big bang was simply an inevitable result of an always existing universe. But, without tangible proof, isn't that assumption as baseless as the idea of a God/s?

I hear it's because they like sticking bananas in their asses

Harder to connect for atheists because there is no common ideal. it's easier for religious people to find partners because they have like social proof of being decent human beings and are more normal.

>fedora
>black overcoat
>the "nice guy" but resentful
You kidding, right?

This is true

>isn't that assumption as baseless as the idea of a God/s?
Yes. What do people think "nothing" even was in the beginning. Empty space? That's still something.

I couldn't tell he was wearing a fedora. The only thing cringey about him is the need to make a bio about himself.

No, he was referring to the idea of universe that has always existed.

Attached: e230ce837854f0f3daa8bca93e6c71c9.png (594x716, 394K)

Attached: JnIi2c6.jpg (807x720, 75K)

Nice cope virgin

Strawman

Is it possible to wear a fedora now without people assuming you're an edgy atheist? I think they look nice

But is it a strawman if it's true?

Because religion fosters fertility, community, families. Atheism is lack of spirituality which will lead to nihilism and decadence and atomized individualism, consumerism and hedonism which lowers birthrates. In the Bible it says be fruitful and multiply, atheists are nihilistic consuumers.

I don't think you know what that word means

Yes, because it deflects the original question.

Attached: ddb.png (576x792, 449K)

Calling you a virgin because you're a virgin is not a straw man, dumbass.

This guy doesn't understand that demography is destiny. If religious people outbreed atheists, atheists will eventually be a minority and your children will get indoctrinated in school because all their friends and their teachers will be religious.

But, i'm not a virgin dipshit.

Then don't act like one

Attached: 1545062844800.png (510x459, 135K)

Yep, it would be pretty funny once their grand-kids all become hard-core Muslims. That is, if they have kids.

>Don't act like a virgin.
>Immediately acts like a virgin.
Dilate

And it's still not a straw man. Do you even know what a straw man is? Fucking virgins these days I swear

>Claims to not be a virgin
>Uses Dilate
Ah so you're a gay virgin

>Actually gay and proud.

Now, dilate and watch some steven universe.

No. Energy is always preserved. Matter may have existed in a different state, it could have been pure energy as well. The study of virtual particles and true vacuums have given us an idea of how it would be possible to transition inti

telling himself hes made a quality joke....

really really REALLY low bro

>By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate.

You didn't even begin to answer my question and instead used attacks instead of logic to defend your position.

>thinks i give a shit
>still uses dilate
You need better insults. Call me an astrophysics nigger with a faggoty mustache

But, that would still be impossible to measure. If something turns into pure energy, it cannot be traced back to its original form.

>shitty bait thread
>gold reply

Attached: integrity.jpg (616x478, 55K)

>Think I give a shit
Never said you gave a shit, just calling out your bullshit.
>You need better insults. Call me an astrophysics nigger with a faggoty mustache
>Uses "virgin" as an insulate
The irony is palpable.

post more fedora memes!!!!!

Attached: mua4DcfIobTDHYl2mFCI-Qr-_IHYhSf3cfir3T_DTXs.jpg (432x768, 101K)

No

>rancid swine
Holy fucking shit

That's an ad hominen, newfag. Did you just become an atheist this December?

No

By today's standards it would be impossible to measure(but a well constructed theory based on natural science is more of a base than 'god did it' so they are not equal in their ignorance). But through blossoming fields of physics we may have the tools needed in the future to describe this process ess with confidence. Just like how Aristotle did not know about base elemental atomic structures, but nonetheless knew that the universe was knowable, we do not yet know what we do not know. We do know that the god of the gaps argument is becoming less and less necessary every day.

We're getting close to not being sustainable you fucking mouth breather.