This thread again

The obvious answer is B. Is this simple little scenario supposed to prove something about the way an economy or society should be run?

Download an additional 2 flutes.

"just share it, you three retarded little cunts, none of you will play it 24/7 anyways"

Child A: marxism
Child B: capitalism
Child C: (((progressive)))

If you're going to invoke "reason" then try employing some to the scenario you fucking retard.

Why did B create the flute? What was B's motivation?
Clearly B planned either to learn the flute, or more likely to sell it to A in exchange for some manner of sexual favours.

And why are we even being asked this question?
Most likely as a result of a ploy by A either to maintain her monopoly on flute-playing (she must presumably already have one if she's the only one who can play), or to avoid paying a fair price in cunnilingus for the instrument.
C, meanwhile, is simply opportunistically attempting to exploit the situation.

Therefore no "compromise" you could come up with is more "reasonable" than leaving B her property, fuckwit.

Attached: tutorial_speechbubbles.png (205x136, 44K)

child A gets the flute, and plays for the other two children. Encourage child C to learn to play the flute from child A and child B to make another flute so more of them can play.

Attached: unnamed.png (512x512, 259K)

Child : dumb retarded motherfuckerry

child B sells it to child A who in turns teaches child C to play.

Why kill them and sell a worthless flute? Kidnap them and whore them out to thirsty old men, become a financier. If they live long enough, sell them for organs.

>spotted the fascist

Oh.... i've never been a fascist till now.
I was a nazi and a pedo before.

how is this even a choice? it's not your flute it belongs to the middle kid, fuck are you doing giving away shit that doesn't belong to you

give the flute to whoever cums last when sticking the flute up their snatch, loser becomes your property

explain to me how I'm wrong, schlomo

Bernie Sanders will be the next President of the United States of America, and there is nothing you or the DNC can do to stop him.

We are witnessing in real time, not only the death of the Democratic Party as we know it, but more importantly the dismantling of the two-party system that has long crippled our nation's advancement.

Thank you to all Trump voters, whether you love or hate Bernie, for getting the revolution started. It is time for us to finish the job.

Attached: received_189924878744215.jpg (348x500, 13K)

nice larp, pedo

THIS.
/thread
Next question.

You didn't explain your bullshit, but ok.
You mix categories of different nature:
Marxism is a slang given name of Dialectical Materialism Theory.
Capitalism is a social order based on private property of means of production.
Progress is a process of evolution from simple to complex.

This is closest to communism:

you must be squidward because only squidward plays the flute.

it was addressed here

Cut the flute into 3 equally useless pieces and give one to each

>Nazism isn't fascist
I've never been a fruit till now.
I was a banana before

Child B is not capitalism. Capitalist take the fruit of other's labor rather than laboring themselves. They are in most respects no different from the socialists of the old USSR.

fuck b marry a kill c

Child B made the flute
It's her flute
She deserves the flute

Lotta commies in this thread...

How the fuck would giving the flute to child b install poor behavior and inflated self worth if she made the damned thing?
You know what, fuck it.
You gotta split your paycheck with me so you don't get an inflated sense of self worth

You saying you know what communism is if you dare to call others communists.
I bet you can give the correct definition of communism then.

Attached: Retro Pepe.png (800x800, 596K)

Yeah, and communists can't play the flute

The lad is not talking about how things work today, he is simply referring to ideas. Just as communism is supposed to work wonders and make the world a beautiful balanced place, capitalism forces justice above all. And of course nothing works wonders in this world.
Except...

ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ ANTZ

Shut the fuck up, commie.

exactly, you retarded cunts just keep avoiding getting educated, and can only talk retarded shit all the time, pathetic cunts, lol

> Child A: marxism
> Child B: capitalism
> Child C: (((progressive)))
Actually no. The way you solve the problem is your approach to wealth distribution. Marxism, capitalism and progressivism (it's more of a socialism which is a combination of the two) are outlined by who gets what. One can argue that marxism (from each according to his needs, from each according to his ability) would give the flute to child A because the abilities of Child A are playing the flute and the abilities of Child B are making it. Or, it could be argued that Marxism would give the flute to Child B because the product belongs to the worker:
> "The ultimate source of any profit is the surplus value [Mehrwert] of a product, which is usurped by the capitalist class and properly belongs to productive workers. This is the means whereby the capitalist class, and the capitalist system of production, exploits the working class, or proletariat."
A collective tax system is one answer to the problem. Child A purchases the flute from Child B and pays more than cost the materials and labor. Child B pays some taxes based on income as well as tax upon the materials of manufacturing. Child C is given a small amount of the revenue to modestly improve it's life. This idea is American. George Washington once led an army to confront a group who wouldn't pay their taxes.

Attached: welfarestates2.gif (600x441, 69K)

Money isn't necessary. That's what Communism was about all the time. It's just a way to enforce power on others.

Which one will use it as a dildo while I watch?

>Calls me a commie for agreeing that child B who made the flute should sell it (*FOR MONEY*) to child A who wants it who can then use the flute in their own profession to teach child C
...this is literally just capitalism and standard education.
Kill yourself.

Just shut up, commie.

Attached: 1522945848839.png (354x462, 25K)

Look at America. It's full of unexploited working force and millions of drug addicts. The rich are propagating for empty promises which they never fulfill. Inequality is growing rapidly on a global scale. Ecosystems are collapsing and Greta Thunberg isn't doing anything to stop this. She just wants power and money, all of which she's getting.

Shhhhhhut up, commie.

Easy. Enter everyone who wants it into a lottery and leave it up to chance.

The National socialist party are socialist not facist, it's in the name you ugly antifa tranny.

Attached: 1579813030407.jpg (699x693, 109K)

>shut up ;_;
hahaha, pathetic

Attached: not gay.jpg (450x246, 66K)

Shut up, commie.

And, yes Nazism IS FASCIST.
I don't care if you realize I'm a samefag. Nazism is by definition, by what the word means, by the basic facts of history that many neo-nazi fucks would agree with even, Nazism is fucking fascist.
I'm not using it as some sort of bizarre slur, that's just what it is unless you can explain why it's not

Have you considered shutting up, commie?

Shut up, commie.

B it is then.

That's like saying all milk is sour inside of the cow

Go back to school
>take the fruit of other's labor rather than laboring themselves

False; laborers are paid a competitive salary for their efforts win/win

get a hobby

>SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP >_YOU MAKE MY BOYFRIEND CRY ;_;
why would I, if you are such a funny bitch :D

Attached: 1554605527227.gif (220x184, 8K)

good idea, lets do the same with your car.

if this post ends in 1-5 you keep it, otherwise please send me the keys with the signed title.

never child C

Shut up, commie.

Why do I even have it if kid B made it? Kid B should be selling it to kid A for a nominal fee since she can't even use it.

bitch :D

He fondled her!

Attached: donald-trump-ivanka-bed-kiss.jpg (873x491, 232K)

this is actually a good point
child d:
>my father gave me 10$. I use 1$ to buy wood, I paid B $1 to craft it. I then sold it to A for $5. When A missed their fifth $1 payment, I took back the flute. I now have $12 and the flute.
>C asked if he could have the pudding I wasn't eating, so I just started hitting him. what kind of fucking piece of shit faggot asks for a mans pudding. then I caught him trying to eat it out of the trash. holy shit Chester. I'm going to fucking kill you you fucking supercunt. I'll rape your mother's father you fucking thieving little shit. I'm going to tear down everything you love you little shit.
>also, gonna get B hooked on penny candies and keep her supplied to blow me
>god I love being kind of the lunch table.

Shut up, commie.

That's completely different. The scenario proposed in the OP was not about taking property from person A and giving it to person B. It was about deciding who should gain possession of currently unowned property. It's interesting to see that the right still can't into logic.

Shut up, commie.

Bids :DD:DDDDD:D

Attached: tenor (2).gif (220x364, 18K)

Meant to reply to

Shut up, commie.

Kid b is using it as a dildo, didn't you even read the thread?

See.

I like you because you dare to curse.

Attached: tenor (16).gif (498x235, 334K)

The scary part is that you will be surprised when child B stops making flutes, so you will make a law to force her.

>child C
>no black face

disappointing

Shut up, commie.

B is the rightful owner
Give C something else
Tell A to get their own damn flute

It's pointless to give B or C the flute, because they cannot play it.

Give it to A.

>unowned property
So child B gets the materials for flute, then makes the flute but she does not own it?

the deranged mind of leftards is beyond salvation

Child C if he's telling the truth.

There isn't enough information to make a just decision. Child A could be wealthy and afford their own flute. Child B may have exploited Child C to produce the flute. To make the proper call you would need more information. From the framing however this seems like a pro-capitalism meme. And capitalism is never the answer it is always the problem.

Shut up, commie

Shut up, commie.

Attached: if-it-fits-i-sits.jpg (2510x1680, 1.56M)

America stop it.

Shut up, commie.

Child C is the only one to have anything to gain by having the flute. Child A obviously already has one since she can play. Child B can make her own anytime she wants. Child C, however, would learn to play the flute which would make one more person to accompany Child A in the orchestra.

Never, commie.

Shut up, commie.

I keep it for myself

>Saying Nazism is fascisim is the same as saying all milk is sour inside a cow
?... Okay, let's slow down and clarify some things.
I understand fasism to mean this
>Fascism definition is - a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
It is my understanding that this accurately describes the National Socialist system devised by Adolf Hitler. I don't know what else could be called National Socialism AKA Nazism except the system created and espoused by Adolf Hitler.
Which part or parts of this do you disagree with?

Shut up, commie.

birb trap :3

Fascism=\=National socialism

How can you make a flute, if you can't play it? Doesn't make sense.

It's possible alright!

Shut up, commie.

Bambi

Attached: tenor (1).gif (220x224, 187K)

Attached: Internet_Argument.jpg (315x466, 45K)

Okay, but what I'm asking is why is it not? I don't think that calling it fascist or calling it Nazism is what really matters. If we disagree that it is fascism, then let's disagree the reason for this disagreement.

>Let's disagree
Let's discuss*
I wish my desktop wasn't broken.

no I'm not, faggot

Break the flute, that will teach them a lesson :D

probably intended to be either a brainlet example of how socialism/communism don't work, or an really good example of how people jump to false equivalence fallacies when making arguments.

the answer is B.

When a product is created, the creator of the product is the owner and maintains full rights to that object, should they wish to gift or sell it is entirely their choice.

For the retards, Money is not a product, Healthcare is not a product, and Education is not a product, the knowledge of how to obtain clean drinking water and electricity are not product, but utilities (actually providing a system that generates electricity or clean water) ARE products.

Capitalism works best with free markets, communism works best only when considering the distribution of basic amenities (shelter, food, clothing).

Can't contribute? no luxury for you. Want to bitch about it? too fucking bad, if you genuinely can't contribute in ANY WAY then you're a parasite and should be happy with what society provides you through their taxes and the available civil services.

>health insurance
>credit
>loans

these are not products, they are designed to force you into debt and servitude.

I disagree. It might be tiring and you might not change people and it might waste time to go very far with it, but it's not as if it is impossible to influence someone's views nor is it unreasonable to think that some people might believe some of the shit some people post to Cred Forums.
Either way, discussion leads to better understanding.

Also, sometimes people don't change immediately, but once a person has considered something said on their own time, they may change their beliefs. The internet is kinda shit for discussion, but it's also disseminated among more people,so while I'd agree actually it's not the best way, it isn't pointless even if you're talking with trolls.

>in exchange for some manner of sexual favours.

fucking lost it. my sides, someone help me find them.

Kill Child C. Fucking gimmedat Nigger.

Attached: 1579195844578.jpg (640x622, 76K)

The only obvious answer is:
Let b sell the flute, let a buy the flute, keep a reasonable % of the transaction for yourself

Attached: Soviet Loli.jpg (188x250, 13K)

B obviously

Put all three of them in prison for fighting. We can't have aggressive behavior like that in a civil society.

Probably? It’s from the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. That guy was the leader of Singapore, the most economically free nation on earth, for decades. You are 100% correct that this is to shore up support for capitalism.