Let's see who here can do basic math

Let's see who here can do basic math

Attached: image.png (600x422, 19K)

48

42

Assuming single-boot and single-horseshoe are each half of double-boot and double-horseshoe respectively, and not distinct variables: 21

Attached: c649a905906d7ed2411ce8989f43dda3.jpg (648x972, 86K)

this

17 easy, give a hard one next time

42. Not that hard OP!

So that'll make it 22 you dumb fuck

You're all retards the answer is: 21

My working:
3HORSES=30 so HORSE=10
HORSE(10)+2GOLD+2GOLD=18
2GOLD+2GOLD=8
4GOLD=8
1GOLD=2
2GOLD-2BOOT=2
2BOOT=2
1BOOT=1

1B+(1H*1G)= 21

22

This

from my calculations... OP is a faggot

Attached: 1450445881580.gif (150x148, 930K)

48? Do we get stars?!

Attached: 59594.jpg (600x892, 97K)

42 pussy nigga

u got that shit wrong faggot. no stars at all

What??

Horse it 10. 18 - 10 = 8
2 horseshoe is 8, so 1 is 4.
4 - x = 2, so shoe is 2

2 + (10*4) = 2+ 40 = 42

HEY LOOK AT THESE RETARDS

pemdas faggot

That's a lot of unnecessary math just to remind people that you always add and subtract after multiplication and division.

FUCK! my dad is gonna beat me with a toaster if i get an F!

Attached: 65445.jpg (776x1478, 255K)

youre a retard. 42 is correct.

4 horseshoes are 8
8/4=2

2 horsehoes = 2
1 single horsehoe is 1

PEMDAS?! fuck.

fight back! fight back you coward!

>2 horseshoe is 8

Are you retarded?

Also the answer is 21. Fact.

Haha triggered

x + x + x = 30 -> x = 10
x + 2*y +2*y = 10 + 4*y = 18 -> y = 2 & 2*y = 4
2*y - 2*z = 4 - 2*z = 2 -> z = 1 & 2*z = 2

z + x * y = 1 + 10 * 2 = 1 + 20 = 21

1 shoe = a
1 horseshoe = b
Horse = 10
So the answer is 10b + a

It's 44 ya bitch ass pussy fags

Got it!

Attached: 1582032064106.jpg (600x422, 56K)

Like this?~

Attached: 3727366.jpg (600x506, 70K)

The answer is 21 you absolute cucks. i already answered () but let me give a clear fucking explanation.

1 Horse + 1 Horse + 1 Horse = 30
SO 3 Horses = 30 SO 1 Horse = 10

1 Horse = 10

1 horse + Pair of gold fags + Pair of gold fags = 18
1 horse - 18 = 8
2 pairs of gold fags = 8
1 pair of gold fags = 4
1 single gold fag = 2

1 paid of gold fags - 1 pair of boots = 2
1 pair of boots = 2
1 single boot = 1


1 single boot +(1 horse*1 single gold fag) =

1 + (10*2) = 21

thanks for the lulz

Attached: 1512253059030.gif (273x253, 1.99M)

Winner! Only person with basic math skills in here.

22

no with your mind.

26

samefag

A horse = 10
2 horseshoes together = 4
2 boots together = 2
1 lone horseshoe = 2
1 lone boot = 1

The answer is 21. This is not up for debate.

Yeah, fuck PEMDAS. The answer is 21 because I deem it so.

I am using pemdas you stupid cunt. Multiply the horse by the one horseshoe and get 20. Add the boot after. 21. Are you a faggot?

Second

Samefag

I got my math mixed up

Second

Are you saying to get better at math? That's too haaaaaarrrdd..~

Attached: 38474.jpg (600x560, 51K)

Samefag

Second

20.9999999994

48 I believe

Samefag

horseshoe is 4 you brainiac

Attached: Giuseppe_Colarusso_4.jpg (610x406, 35K)

I was tripped into it as well... pay attention to the image. Look closely the data.

Two horseshoes together is 4. One alone is 2. Look at the second line you mongoloid

Horse =10
Double horseshoe=4
Single horseshoe=2
Double boot=2
Single boot=1
So the equation is 1+10×2
Given pemdas which is simple as fuck m, we treat it as
1+(10x2), and do the 10×2 first
So its 1+20
Or 21

Round 2
21 is correct

Attached: image.jpg (616x498, 31K)

Raw mathematics, these are obviously nonsense, but in terms of pattern, 52.

1+(10x2)=21

40

96

40 works for a different pattern too.

21

21
Yall are a buncha retards

looks like youre the retard

19
the other ones were solved by a retard

96
(you multiply [the second number + 1] by the first number.)

no u

89

96

all the wrong answers are to be ignored, because they cannot be equal, eg
1+4=5
2+5=/=12
3+6=/=21
you cannot apply patterns to equal signs, because 2+5 is never equal 12 just like 3+6 is never equal 21. 2*(5+1) being equal to 12 is just not right when talking about the picture

There are two valid patterns. Could be either 96 or 40.

also the answer is obviously 19

These all work. First is a+(n)*b where n is the number of the equation from top to bottom.
Second is n+a+b where n is the answer of the previous equation.
Third is a*(b+1).
There may be more patterns I haven't seen yet.

The pattern in seeing is
(Number 2 × Number 1) + Number 1
So
(4×1)+1=5
(5×2)+2=12
(6×3)+3=21
So following this pattern
(11×8)+8=96
So 96 is my answer

21

In terms of math, yes. In terms of patterns, no. In terms of patterns, the + and = are essentially meaningless except as static dividers for the real patterns.

Also, if you're going to attempt to answer in-context, with actual math instead of pattern-recognition, you can't just ignore parts and say they're untrue. In the context of this challenge, you must accept that 2+5 DOES equal 12, and that 3+6 DOES equal 21. Otherwise you just get 19 and that's incredibly boring.

Round 3

Attached: image.jpg (554x554, 34K)

30?

21

7

3x = 30
x = 10

x + 4y = 18
10 + 4y = 18
4y = 18 - 10
y = 8/4
y = 2

2y - 2z = 2
4 - 2z = 2
-2z = -4
z = -4/-4
z = 1

z + x*y = ?
1 + 10*2 = ?
? = 21

that's the fucking joke
those wrong parts are wrong, period
by trying to give the wrong equasions meaning, you're saying that the + and = lose meaning, which is wrong
you can of course use equal signs incorrectly, but that does not change the fact that 2 + 3 is 5 and not something else

God I'm so high right now. Hope I'm right. 40

21

Apple=2
(2×2×2=8)
Purple thing=3
(2×2) or 4
4×3=12
Banana=4
3×4=12
So we have 3+2×4
Apply Pemdas so 3+(2×4)
So 3+8
So 11

2x2x2=8
2x2x3=12
3x(2+2)=12
3+(2x2)=7

7.

10

7

x^3 = 8 -> x = 2
x^2 * y = 4 * y = 12 -> y = 3
y * 2*z = 3 * 2*z = 12 -> 2*z = 4 & z = 2

x = 2
y = 3
z = 2

y + x * z = 3 + 2 * 2 = 3 + 4 = 7

Will he rape your sweet boi cheeks after be beats you? Or is ghat comforting to you.

7

A = horse
B = 2 horseshoes
C = 2 boots
D = 1 boot
E = 1 horseshoe.

Equations
A+A+A = 30; A = 10
A+B+B = 18; B = 9
B - C = 2; C = 7
D + A * E = nigger thread again, fuck out of here.

No, a single boot is not half of 2 boots, a single horseshoe is not half of two horseshoes.

it's two bananas in the third line
and one in the last

Two correct equations and 1 correct equation given as examples. The answer is twice as likely to be incorrect as correct then. Which means there's a 2/3 chance that it's literally any number except 19, and a 1/3 chance that it's 19.

>No, a single boot is not half of 2 boots, a single horseshoe is not half of two horseshoes.
explain yourself, retard

wrong, they're just wrong
stop giving them meaning

"Half of two is not one." Sounds like the Party has gotten to this one.

These are always undefined. There is nothing relating 2 of the symbols in the end equation to the rest of it. You can't assume it's half of its previously defined counterpart, they are different symbols and have not been stated explicitly to have a set relationship.

You can assume; you just have to note that you've made the assumption. It's a fairly reasonable assumption to make in context, and much scientific knowledge is based on such reasonable assumptions.

x*x*x = 8
x^3 = 8
x = 2

x*x*y = 12
2*2*y = 12
4y = 12
y = 12/4
y = 3

y*2z = 12
3*2z = 12
6z = 12
z = 12/6
z = 2

y + x*z = ?
3 + 2*2 = ?
3 + 4 = ?
? = 7

3x=30
x+2y=18
y-z=2

z+xy=?

That's a 21.

yea, caught it just as I clicked, dumb fuck I am. noticed it the first time, but not the second

What is there to explain?
Two different images that for no mathematical reason at all you choose to assign a relationship to. It's like being shown an 8 and thinking 0 is half of that.

Horse - x
Horseshoe - y
Shoe - z

1)
3x = 30 | (:3)
x = 10

2)
10 + 4y = 18
4y = 8
y = 2

3)
4 - 2z = 2
-2z = -2
z = 1

4)
z + x * y = ?
1 + 10 * 2 = 21

this is answer sir. thenks [im from india]

Tfw completely didn't notice there were singles and pairs of boots and horseshoes

7

48

you said "half of two things is not one thing"
but sadly 2 / 2 is 1

also, if we write two horseshoes as "2*1 horseshoe", everything works out

while you're right in pointing out that two horseshoes as depicted are not one horseshoe as depicted, you're wrong in saying that two shoes divided by two are not one

horse

Mooooooooods

We aren’t told that the boots and horse shoes can be separated without forming their own unique symbol and unit count.

definitely 42

we weren't told jack, we might as well just say it's 69 and call it a day


that's what I'm going to do have a nice day

Round 4
answer top left as A
Top right as B
bottom left as C
bottom right as D

Attached: image.png (478x478, 5K)

Not true, you’re told what other symbols are worth. But yeah, duck it, 69.

Horse= X =10
Horseshoe= Y = 4
Boot= Z = 2

2 + 10 × 4 = 48

Shit my bad Just skip to round 5 then

is that possible?!

Round 5
answer impossible because I'm a dumb ass
Answer same as round 4

Attached: image.jpg (605x507, 33K)

48

bump

A = 5
B = 3
C = 5
D = 3

Round 6

Attached: image.png (250x172, 2K)

Op here the thread is dead and I'm out

me 2 don't wanna think anymore
thanks for the bad bants

42

Answer is f=3

52 op you faggot give me something harder

It means: kick the horse until it loses its iron

Had the horse 4 shoes? Them horse has 4 shoes
Additional 1 shoe would be 5.
No single solution because of misleading symbols

Oh look, this thread again. And idiots arguing over an unanswerable problem. Again.

15 unless one boot != 1 and is a totally unless wn variable then the result would be unknown

41

1+10 x 2 = 22

46

This

Potato ...
Potato is always the answer

or 21

Attached: 0f1.jpg (600x597, 56K)

>unanswerable
lel


▲▲

A 3.5
B 4.5
C 9.5
D 3.5

22, you don't multiply first in the last line, you add and then multiply as there are no brackets.