Look. Lets be real

Look. Lets be real.
Asians, and particularly the Japanese, have objectively superior genetics and higher IQs. Children from caucasians with genetic deficiencies and Asians show that they have many good dominant genes.
There are studies which are very easy to sn order broadly: Asians > (other races)
So there is therefore a superiority of race, despite the claims from certain media influencers you see referenced in Wikipedia saying race doesn't exist at all

Also,traditionalists are basically right about women.
They have periods which make them act irrationally while basically making them cripples once a month until old age, have a tendency to be "scatter brained" and not have much motivation to accomplish "big" things and have too much vicarious empathy. They also feel nothing when lying, and because of the empathy issue, they tend to bandwagon.

But I think what's most important here is that women are not naturally inclined to monogamy, but rather go against the human condition to desire the alpha male and admire the alpha female, whi they effectively dorm what you could call a "pack" with because of their tendency to blind bonding through excessive caring. They might not actively notice this depending on there own situation, but basically all women are like this.
They also desire a protector and provider and what we consider "bad" things that men do besides actual outright rape (more complicated issue under my views won't get into it for brevity) really
But it doesn't work well for humankind's nature for one person to hog the women. This is why monogamy has endeared and why it should be the MAN who decides which women to take. If it doesn't work out, than there's that and all that should be illegal, but men are the primary deciders, as they can protect woman themselves or if not, they might have friends that can. If the woman and man are not working out, then the man will likely want to break this off or the law can step in.
(1/2)

Attached: 838942a09741644343136df3b89675ef.jpg (798x1200, 82K)

Other urls found in this thread:

imgur.com/zlFEh0G
youtube.com/playlist?list=PL848F2368C90DDC3D
youtube.com/user/fringeelements/videos
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Nice bait, but everything you said is scientifically incorrect, and baseless opinion.
Good day.

(2/2)
There's no reason for her to get incolved.; He already has too much power over her and there's not much that can be done about things which happen behind closed doors. Anger can also be worked out generally and doesn't warrant someone becoming ostracized from society they should instead go to therapy because it is almost akin to self-harm.

Getting a female or male should not be difficult, but women make it difficult by going after their "ideal" man, so that even well above average men lose to men who can pull the most immediate strings and distract them this way with their ability to warm up quickly.
Men don't have such inclinations; they seek what is before them and will often proffer sexual advances which alert other males that the female is not to be taken by them, which, under a more sane sanity run by males, would not be an issue for the vast majority, as their are plenty of options to find a woman when they are reeled in and provided safety from themselves and the expectations society places on them to become something other than a housewife.
Presently, men can't flirt effectively; they can't stroke her knee, compliment her body or anything like that due to a layered progression of cultural change involving puritanism and feminism.
Feminism never addresses the issue of men caring for pregnant women. The reality is there's a tier: children are cared for by women, women are cared for by men. Naturally, the father is the leader, as he leads the woman and makes all the decisions while leaving her to the child while she is not herself evolved to make decisions on her own.
In other words, women should generally be obedient. This is the truth that BDSM masks (women are FAR more likely to be subs)
Japanese are basically obedient. They grow up in a culture where you say little and are raised shy.

Anyway, that's my thesis in why Cred Forums should give me a japanese gf rn before I slip into far-right hatred and/or financial submission to Asians.

P-please?

Then actually refute it tho

I mean really if you don't do that, then like... You see how that's a problem when people are faced with actual...
Like you don't just fucking dismiss it and act like yeah this is fine.
Whether or not it's a troll doesn't really matter much.
Just saying.....

OP here.
Quick bump since rapid decent on Cred Forums. More to say, but first off
>Women feel nothing [I meant little, actually]
Look up the Wonder woman lie detector test for one and think about the results coming to your won conclusion instead of the meme conclusion that women don't lie.

IQ... like I said, this is also easy to search. Broadly, Asians DO seem to have higher IQ than Caucasians. There's a few potential reasons for that I guess.

When I talked about "big" things what I should've said was the motivation to do things like go into engineering.

Look Norwegian Paradox.

Japanese can look very attractive, to my Westerner eyes. However, I do not believe that any particular racial or ethnic group is objectively superior to another. These groups are merely well-suited to their traditional habitats, or similar ones, such as fair-skinned people inhabiting temperate climates, or dark-skinned people living in hotter regions, for the benefits to their health and Vitamin D. Japanese people typically look like they are well-suited for living in regions anywhere between temperate and tropical, which gives them a slight climate advantage, compared to most Europeans, due to their slightly more melanin-infused complexions, if not necessarily darker skin, as many Japanese and other East Asians are pale, too.

As for
>But I think what's most important here is that women are not naturally inclined to monogamy, but rather go against the human condition to desire the alpha male and admire the alpha female, whi[ch] they effectively [f]orm what you could call a "pack" with because of their tendency to blind[ly] [bond] through excessive caring. They might not actively notice this depending on [their] own situation, but basically all women are like this.

Yeah, that sort of is my pure opinion (my own conclusion), I guess.
But I don't think it's a stretch. You hear about it a lot in psych texts and stuff that women have this scatter-brained emotional thing, though I am missing the material which sucks. Though I'd like to see someone this is not the case, what they would rather say, if they would refute this since I don't know that it's much of a stretch.

Even Wikipedia now says that gender roles were thought to be social constructs, but some of these things are now shown to be biological/biochemical differences.
Transgenders can tell you as much. Of course, for transgenders the difference is temporary I'd they don't keep taking hormones.

It's not a stretch women would want one particular man among others: they have a higher incidence of homosexuality, and more notably, bisexuality. I can try to look for something more concrete I guess (can't remember everything now. Forgot this would be controversial somehow) but biologically and mathematically alone, it makes sense they would. Human beings are not purely pair-bonders or random sex freaks, but somewhere in-between; cheating can occur in relationships, and some people choose to be single, at least for a while. It is biologically efficient and common for makes to breed with multiple females. Epic of Gilgamesh shows that yeah men even back then wanted multiple partners I'd they were dicks.