You see this faggot? Bernie Sanders will be the death of America...

You see this faggot? Bernie Sanders will be the death of America. He'll be the next Stalin if you idiots vote him into the presidency! Socialists are so insanely jealous of the productive and successful that they want to kill them and steal everything they own. Look at Maoist China, the Khmer Rouge, or any other socialist regime! A vote for Bernie Sanders is a vote for the death of millions of your fellow Americans in violent socialist purges and the inevitable starvation when the infrastructure and economy collapse.. Don't vote for the death of America, don't vote for Bernie Sanders.

Attached: v.jpg (624x624, 97K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=JX2VatQp6fc
m.youtube.com/watch?v=9axMgCdVrOk
projects.propublica.org/bailout/
m.youtube.com/watch?v=PheA4BPXQzg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass–Steagall_legislation
usnews.com/opinion/articles/2017-10-31/taxes-werent-more-progressive-in-the-1950s
youtube.com/watch?v=RY0R0NpIdQQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Whoa there champ! Reel it in a bit. We're just talking about enacting policies that have been shown to work in other countries.

Don't fall for the GOP boogeyman.

True, but not for the reason the trolls would have us believe.

Attached: corporate welfare.jpg (600x750, 64K)

Attached: image.jpg (625x325, 113K)

>admits on JRE that 99.99 percent of gun owners have no intention of killing people
>still wants to ban guns

i mean i really you have to be a special retard to think this way

And capitalism is working so great...For the ultra rich..

So what? He won't make it to the WH. Why bother.

Attached: v4j.jpg (1080x1080, 117K)

>socialism an inherently flawed system doomed to fail
>the CIA still spends billions overthrowing democratically elected socialist governments in South America for some reason

Makes ya think

Attached: unnamed (2).jpg (460x319, 51K)

Faggot liberal trying to destroy America

Nigger you went full retard beliveing that bullshit works

>Doesnt know the difference between democratic socialism and authoritarian communism

But it's not like I can blame you for being uneducated when the system purposefully keeps you ignorant.

see:

Attached: 2341234.jpg (1441x1800, 83K)

> STALIN
> INSANE
> KILL
> STEAL
> DEATH
> VIOLENT PURGES
> STARVATION
> COLLAPSE

What a hysterical idiot you are.

Don't you have a reddit sub to infect?

Attached: TheGamePlan.jpg (379x482, 37K)

yeah it's weird how socialism always fails when undermined by the biggest oligarchy on the planet

Socialism is the way and Communism is the goal. Nothing to do with democracy or authoritarism.

Attached: image.jpg (640x640, 259K)

>Bernie Sanders will be the death of America.
Amerifags vote for Bernie now

Attached: 88039989_3450889191594933_3774670624140558336_n.jpg (720x569, 54K)

Just leave. EU is way better anyway.

Attached: Italian-EU-Citizenship.jpg (1227x1073, 341K)

Dude, relax. This old fudge packer doesn't stand a chance lol Trump's going to win, save you energy for when the time comes to make fun of the Bernie homos, again.

Attached: betsy needs.jpg (1208x795, 149K)

You Bernie Sanders voters have no god damn idea how stupid you are for thinking your lives aren't going to be unimaginably awful once the Mexican border is dissolved. YOUR LIVES WILL BE OVER LITERALLY. LITERALLY.

You Bernie Sanders voters have no god damn idea how stupid you are for thinking your lives aren't going to be unimaginably awful once the Mexican border is dissolved. YOUR LIVES WILL BE OVER LITERALLY. LITERALLY.

You Bernie Sanders voters have no god damn idea how stupid you are for thinking your lives aren't going to be unimaginably awful once the Mexican border is dissolved. YOUR LIVES WILL BE OVER LITERALLY. LITERALLY.

You Bernie Sanders voters have no god damn idea how stupid you are for thinking your lives aren't going to be unimaginably awful once the Mexican border is dissolved. YOUR LIVES WILL BE OVER LITERALLY. LITERALLY.

You Bernie Sanders voters have no god damn idea how stupid you are for thinking your lives aren't going to be unimaginably awful once the Mexican border is dissolved. YOUR LIVES WILL BE OVER LITERALLY. LITERALLY.

>boogeyman's death of americans
>about the man that wants a medicare for all plan that will save a projected 68k lives and $450billion a year

So only one armed conflict in 20 years against a murderous communist regime, got it.

>cuba has a higher literacy and mortality rate than the US
>LOL MUH COMMUNISM

user, I hate to burst your bubble.

I'M VOTING FOR BERNIE! FUCK ALL YOU HATERS.

Attached: 1582768308236.jpg (933x563, 259K)

oh god, all this salt makes me want to change my vote to sanders now

Here's a thought. Use facts to back up your reasoning instead of typing buzzwords based on nothing factual.

Bernie has my vote, seems like the only decent person who's running.

Attached: x34269182mi41.png (1080x1080, 1.65M)

Most of you retards here are manipulated by the US government. Bernie Sanders isn't even socialist, He is a Capitalist. But I bet none of you understand how one of the most basic features of Communism such as equal pay works thinking it is too literal extreme.

Attached: HakimYT.jpg (900x900, 35K)

> imagine voting for this retard

Attached: image.jpg (620x264, 146K)

Where could I pick up all my free shit when he wins?

Attached: image.jpg (960x1200, 289K)

Attached: image.jpg (600x600, 143K)

>Bernie is a literal millionaire
>Cred Forumsniggers somehow still think he's a juden spy

enjoy american justin trudeau communism is satanism

Attached: Democratic Socialism.png (978x1198, 1.29M)

Agreed, he's authentic. The guy has barely changed his stance or anything since the 1980's. We know exactly what we're getting with him, no surprises.

Attached: Communism (1).jpg (1200x719, 276K)

You're not getting any free shit.

>>admits on JRE that 99.99 percent of gun owners have no intention of killing people
>>still wants to ban guns

>wants to ban guns =/= will ban guns

He's said before he knows it's not possible and a ban or a buyback isn't possible at this point with the amount of guns.. My favorite thing about people who post shit like this is you start by saying
>YOU'LL NEVER TAKE MY GUNS
>I'LL RIOT
>CIVIL WAR
>COME AND TAKE EM
>DON'T TREAD ON ME
>OUT OF MY COLD DEAD HANDS

but these types of posts are always with a subtle acknowledgement that you probably would just let them take your guns if it was happening otherwise it wouldn't bother you .. lol pussy.

Attached: Communism (6).jpg (680x414, 23K)

How exactly is it satanism to take care of your neighbor? Or do you mean satanism as in the opposite of supply side Jesus.

Fine by me. Bernie has my vote.

Trips checked. He was wrong about the stock market, let's hope he's right about everything- oh wait - I just remembered who I'm talking about.

Still better than every other option despite this. I mean ever president is a rich person who believes in some sort of Capitalistic idea.

Attached: Socialism - Capitalism.jpg (515x617, 37K)

trump bot detected

Not who you're talking to but the idea that someone not wanting to have the government try and take their property means they don't feel confident in their ability to defend it is illogical. Just because they can defend themselves doesn't make being attacked a desirable outcome. I could probably beat up my neighbor cuz he's a midget but he's still going to leave my kneecaps in ruins before I do.

>hurdurr muh reductive reasoning

>Fly in legally, don't leave
>Take a boat, never leave
>Use a drug tunnel, never leave
>Climb Trumps 30ft tall waste of money with a $4 rope ladder, never leave
>cross the border legally, never leave

Why is it so hard for you to understand that you're never going to stop illegal immigration? The only way to curb the ramifications is to encourage illegals to come forward with pathways for citizenship. If you get these people paying taxes and participating in the economy you're doing everyone a favor.. more american people means more american money not less..

>WETBACKS DON'T WORK THEY HAVE 27 KIDS AND JUST WANT WELFARE

Tell that to the leeches who were born here legally and still do that shit anyway.. two separate issues with two completely different solutions. Lastly, Bernie doesn't want open borders in the first place, you heard that from some faggot spewing talking points and never bothered to find out if it was true.

lmao what a fucking moron

>be Trump
>BAN bump stocks
>SIGN FEDERAL LAW for stronger background checks
>SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
What part of this are you perfectly OK with? The founding fathers knew that the Second Amendment can NOT have ANY holes poked in the dam. Ever. Now there are holes poked. It has begun with Trump. Our grandfathers would be rolling in their fucking graves had they seen this. This is the shit they died for. But it's all OK because Trump did it amirite? Apparently it should be altered to read "Shall not be infringed by a Liberal, otherwise it's OK".
You're a fucking hypocrite. And worse your brainwashed into thinking what Trump was no big deal. And even worse you'd rather keep someone in office who has PROVEN he will do this over someone you might suspect will do this. Retard.

Attached: 6218bbf0a7.jpg (350x335, 46K)

Trump is going to use the coronavirus vaccine to weaponize autism and finally destroy al Qaeda once and for all.

Attached: socialism apud debs.jpg (402x504, 67K)

>more american people means more american money not less
You're ignoring that these red hats are frothing racists and don't want to be outnumbered by brown people.

>having a midget for a neighbor
Damn something about that seems really lucky.

Regardless, it's not actually what's going to happen. I only put it within the context to rustle jimmies. The real essence of the post is bernies not coming for their guns

Attached: f0f6123842b756bb66fb43fb2734e87b--political-cartoons-matt.jpg (500x417, 62K)

That would be the most hilarious thing in the history of the world. I would consider voting for Trump if I knew this would happen with 100% certainty.

>But hes a dictator!
If only there was some way to transition to socialism without a violent revolution and constant assassination attempts from foreign powers.

Walk with me a bit user.
What in this image describes the utter stupidity of the left?

>tfw want free healthcare but hate non-white immigrants and non-whites in general
too bad my hatred is stronger

I'm assuming this post wasn't actually directed at me or if it was ????? but..

The founding fathers also lived at a time when niggers were property and guns fired 1 bullet every 45 seconds.. times change, laws change, that's why they didn't write at the end of the constitution "By the way all of this is set in stone and if you change a single fucking thing you're going to destroy the country." Like for fucks sake the power to change the constitution is in the fucking constitution... Regardless of my political stance on guns and the changes Trump has made (which is irrelevant to the true conversation and what should be done for the country) there is a measured response that can be made to do better at making sure new gun owners are better gun owners.. you'll never stop everyone but fuck if you can prevent a few mass shootings it's worth an extra few pieces of paper work at a gun store..

Fuck off retard, the founders wanted people to be armed enough to take out a tyrannical government. They explicitly stated this repeatedly.

People often cite rate of fire of conventional weapons as "not being what the founders intended" but dude. Muskets fired slugs biggers than a .50 and it at the very least maimed anyone they hit if not full on blowing off limbs. The founders understood the savagery of musket warfare as many were vets of the French and Indian war. They fully understood and respected the raw power of a gun. Trying to recontextualize the shit they lived in order to support neutering 2A is fucking retarded and only party worshiping faggot would consider it acceptable.

no need cuckservative jews already did it for us.

i rather be speaking german

So you and your AR15 is gonna stop the government with Nuclear weapons, super sonic jets, millions of pounds of bombs, 100 years of biological and chemical weapons research information, unmanned drones, and trillions of dollars of military infrastructure.. ok. The founding fathers lived in a different world..you can pretend all you want but you just flat out wrong. Just because "THEY'D BE ROLLING IN THEIR GRAVES IF THEY SAW X , Y , OR Z." Yeah, they'd roll over niggers having freedom, niggers having rights, women having rights, child labor laws, the way we talk, the way we dress, and a million other things... none of this is done as a disrespect to those who fought for America and what it stands for. This isn't your grandfathers America anymore.. and it's not the founding fathers America... those rules don't apply in the same ways that they once did and as said before.

no they didnt moron.

Except the ruling class. Which all the retarded "socialist Burnie" supporters think they will be a part of.

This idiot would be way worse than Obama. Letting shitskins legal and otherwise off the hook for crimes. My god you are a fucking imbecile if you're voting for this idiot.

an anarcho capitalist who wishes nothing more than to squash thw working class.

go ahead you crazy commie at this point i hate those conservative jew lovers more and as for conservatives bring anti socialism BULLSHIT.

the military , social security ect this are major socialist policies but according to cuckservatives the military is the only socialism that works.


go you bernie bros ACCELERATE

The rate of fire was the most irrelevant part of what's being said in what I wrote. It has nothing to do with the types of weapons we have but the context is still fucking important.. the world was very different in 1776 than it is today and if you don't think alterations to gun laws to at least lessen mass shootings isn't important well we can talk again when that tragedy touches someone you love... the point is that gun laws don't mean the end of the 2nd amendment..

>people are voting for a socialist because they both believe in and think they will be part of a ruling class
what a brainlet take

I don't understand how this is somehow a convincing counter argument against the private citizenry being well armed

>well the government would probably beat you anyway so naturally you should give that same government your sole means of personal defense

Shh. Your other bullshit posts barely got any attention either, you wailing little faggot.

How does a cost of 52 trillion dollars over 10 years save us money?

>the left hates guns!
>every leftist revolution is pic related

Attached: file-20180828-75990-hdb839.jpg (496x367, 34K)

And Trump shit all over the Second. Next point?

If education got republicans votes it would be free.

>the government will nuke its own land
Whats it like being this retarded?
>Yeah, they'd roll over niggers having freedom, niggers having rights, women having rights, child labor laws, the way we talk, the way we dress, and a million other things
yes and they'd be equally as right
Yes they did.

>>hurr durr-buMpsTOck bAn Is guN conTrol

Jesus Christ, what a retard.

but can he defend a podium?!

Attached: Q0hxFC.gif (320x166, 1.74M)

this isnt what a POTUS does... your argument is shit

>vote for someone who hates white people and wants to take away your rights and give subhumans free shit because DRUMPF
Yeah no, nigger.

Oh, gosh. You actually believe the main stream narrative that liberals don't own guns. How unfortunate for you...

You should see the things Christian's do to people. History is full of it.

Social security is a program funded by a capitalistic driven economy.

It's literally legislating how you can use your privately owned fire arms. That's the texbook definition of gun control you big gay idiot

>Bernie
>Socialist
Hah. This is like the GOP calling themselves conservative.

Attached: 1568689636964.jpg (550x550, 16K)

It isn't because that's not what the conversation even is.. gun laws doesn't = the end of the 2nd amendment.. no one is saying you can't have guns or that you can have specific type of guns or arms.. I don't care if you have 10,000 guns, a tank, a cannon, and a fucking jet if you're an upstanding member of society. Why is it so unreasonable to make getting those types of weapons a more involved process so that you filter some of the filth? Sure, checks and balances don't stop everyone, a criminal will get a gun and break the law regardless... I get that.. but the other choice is just letting every mentally ill faggot with a grudge get their hands on as many weapons as readily as they want with low effort..

You're perfectly OK with Trump shitting on your precious Second Amendment. That's exactly what you're saying.

You're 2nd is being eroded by Trump and you're perfectly fine with it. CUCK.

Attached: deal with it.gif (325x230, 1018K)

MR. PRESIDENT BERNIE SANDERS!!!!!!!!!

What's funny is his stupidity doesn't really approach Trump's on the political buffon scale

I swear by 100's of my mothers that if Trump thought he could swindle more money out of the US with Bernie's policies we'd all be calling each other comrade.

>why wont you just accept more gun control!
you leftist nigger lovers dont even use what you already have, suck a dick.

the NY safe act has 4% compliance, isnt enforced in 99% of the state, and doesnt even have agencies in charge of enforcing large swathes of it.

niggers constantly get felony gun charges for possessing firearms illegally and walk with nothing more than probation.

So, you DO believe you'll be part of the 1% ruling class after the revolution comrade?

Yeah you're right the civil war in america the government just sat back and let the people figure it out right? Plenty of governments who want control of their people have dropped weapons on their own countries.. Nukes is an obvious hyperbole followed by a list of a million other weapons systems that would absolutely fuck any civilian resistance up so why ignore the fact that there is no overthrowing a tyrannical US government with modern military tech..?

Bernie did nothing wrong
Unlike Hitler or Marx he will succeed

Why would you expect anybody to believe that? Socialism isn't a yearning for capital gains its a yearning for the distribution of wealth

That's a shit graphic user.

Yessssssss. I love conservative tears so much. Let the hate flow through you, conservacuck.

Equal pay is only beneficial if everyone’s working equally. You also have to have a economy to support everyone who works. Bernie is an admitted Communist who is on video supporting Communist regime’s and their leaders. Bernie policies like the Green New Deal would cripple our economy and would give overwhelming power and control to the government. The cost would be around 90 trillion dollars. The country as we know it would be unrecognizable.

Telling people they can't have an accessory is now gun control? Jesus, your the kind of morons that live in those crazy compunds back in the woods "cause da goberment is out at git me!"
Right?

So you're saying that the laws passed aren't being enforced and because they're not enforced they're ineffective which means all gun laws are ineffective? lolwut. I'm not asking you to accept gun control.. it's not about finding a tangible way to reduce odds of a murderous faggot from getting one and shooting up a school or a mall.. There's a million different ways to attack it and smarter people than anyone in this thread can do the studies to find what systems can help to cull the spread of mass shootings and illegal guns activity but the complete dismissal of any action taken to guns because of MUH 2ND AMENDMENT is just willingly and ignorantly misrepresenting the issue.

Attached: 9F7C9902-710D-40C1-92B3-852A4B18AE68.jpg (618x410, 21K)

Being this self righteous

Did Trump default on his loans from Russia?
It looks like they turned all their Trump poster bots into Bernie posters.

Attached: 1586290539151.jpg (480x360, 12K)

Lol. I will have to give you an extra dollar for that when I see you on the side of the street tomorrow.

Clinton banning high capacity magazines was screamed about as gubmint overreach so yeah. It is.

you're trying too hard, Ivan

m.youtube.com/watch?v=JX2VatQp6fc

Cred Forums needs to just die. Of course, these paid fags will just move their shitposting elsewhere so not like it'll matter much.

Take a deep breath. Look away from the monitor. And then read this:
>it's not infringement if a republican does it
Are you listening to yourself?

>socialism
>2008 bailouts
>biggest socialist move by any government ever
>George w bush
>republican

Russia is playing both sides, Like the rich has done with wars since the creation of banks. The internet has given any sophisticated propaganda producer the means to shape thought in any country on any issue and we have a general public so poorly educated they can't tell the difference between opinion. fact, bias, or comprehend the true depth of political issues. People literally voted for Trump because he wasn't Hilary and they liked him. Not his policies, not his plans, not the substance of his character.. just him. The same can be said for every other politician it's not just trump and nor is that all trumps votes but the point still stands.. we're at an impasse in human history that most are duly unprepared to deal with.

this makes zero sense.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=9axMgCdVrOk

>Paid fags
>The government isn't paid fags
>Lobbyist aren't paid fags
>The media aren't paid fags
>Facebook isn't filled bots
>Twitter
>(insert social media site here)

The hole is a whole lot deeper than some shilling on Cred Forums my friend. This is barely the tip of the fat cock of 21st cold war propaganda.

I'm guessing you're paid well by the Russian government, by Moscow standards. But have you thought about maybe moving to another country Sasha, see the world. You could probably find a better paying job in Oslo.

Faggot, you are democratic SOCIALISTS. It's in your fucking name you walnut.

projects.propublica.org/bailout/

Bailouts are repaid and turning a profit.

"Hey! That bully is picking on me! Maybe I should let down my guard, surely someone else will come to my rescue!"

Because you don't believe in the massive amount of suffering your so called "Socialism" will cause and you fail to realize that whenever true socialism is ever implemented it always leads to communism. No one that ever supported this type of government expected to be part of the 99% that had to live under the brutal conditions so the 1% could live like the elite God's they perceived themselves to be.

Attached: 1575778132465.jpg.jpg (652x883, 91K)

>All opinions about (insert political view I disagree with) are paid shills

The bots are winning vs you user. Check yourself.

and yet I'm still gonna vote for Bernie

What do you think the "social" in social security means, user?

By replacing a cost of 65 trillion.

Terribly analogy. More like "Hey, we live in a vastly different society than we did 250 years ago maybe we should figure out how to adjust to these new circumstances correctly"

Lmao you fucking retard.

>true socialism

But that's not what der juden Bernie wants. Democratic socialism is a form of socialism that exists within a capitalist framework.

Why? More mass shootings are a good thing. More dead yanks makes everyone happy.

IT MEANS GOD GUNS AND WHATEVER THAT OTHER G WORD IS! HERE TAKE MY TAXES AND GIVE IT ALL TO APPLE, WALMART, EXXON-MOBIL AND AMAZON! THEY NEED IT MORE THAN I DO

Attached: image.jpg (500x500, 45K)

Dude, as far as I'm concerned, you should be allowed to have any gun you want, including full autos and even a fucking pocket nuke if you want one and can keep it safe. But just because someone says you can't have a red carbon fiber stock doesn't make it gun control.

What about medicare? Fuck it, fuck your grandparents, they don't need help paying their medical bills.. better cut all the funding to that to? Oh right, republicans love doing that. Carry on. What about the vets? Would be super socialist and disgusting if we took care of them after they fought for our freedoms better not use any of the peoples tax money for that shit either.

Pretty easy to think democratic socialism and authoritarian communism is the same thing when the only “news” sources you trust are a tangerine on twitter and a couple bumbling retards on Cred Forums

Smokeless gunpowder wouldn't be invented for another 100 years. All the founding fathers were dead by then. They had no idea of what guns could become.
Aspects of modern firearms might have existed at their time, but it is the combination of these things and what it creates is something they could not understand.

There were guns that could quickly reload back then and even earlier. lorenzoni pistol for example. But all of these were incredibly expensive. You could never field an army armed with these.
Black Powder is shit. The invention of Smokeless doubled effective range overnight. Black Powder also leave residue everywhere, making self loading actions almost imposible. Revolvers were a way to get around Black Powders limitations while increasing capacity.
Self contained cartridges were sort of around, but not mass produced, and with black powder single shots were about the best you could hope for.

Something like an AR-15 that can be mass produced. supplied with that much ammo. with an effective range past 300 yards. Insanely reliable compared to muskets. With fast follow up shots. and quick simple reloads, could not be even conceived of back when the constitution was written.
Any war they fought in pales in comparison to the kind of wars we can fight now.
I don't know why this argument keeps being made.

They probably still would've passed the second amendment, as the intent is to be well equipped enough that any foreign army, tyrannical government, or group of crazed revolutionaries would think twice about an attack. But I doubt they would be opposed to limits on types of firearms, or who can have them.

Social security is an absolute shit system. Work your whole life, pay into it with your own money, get a tiny buttfucking check each month that barely pays the cost of the shitty retirement home you'll die in. Fuck socialism and the utopian delusion that you fags spout off about because it will never work.

america today would more likely elect hoover than fdr; the biggest difference from then to now is that the corporate class has indoctrinated moral people into voting against their economic best interest

Ask a Chilean or Honduran if they preferred living under their socialism or under the freedom that followed the US coups that dismantled their democracy; injecting a tepid dribble of socialism into your capitalist government doesn't lead to communism, it leads historically to the CIA paying you a visit.

>No one that ever supported this type of government expected to be part of the 99% that had to live under the brutal conditions so the 1% could live like the elite God's they perceived themselves to be.

Are you talking socialism, or the oligarchy of the United States right now?

That's good, vote for Bernie if he's your guy. And I'd even encourage you to continue to support snd vote for him if you like him.

The heathcare and insurance industries have been fleecing tax payer money for decades and should absolutely be regulated out the ass. Unfortunately that's considered "commie talk" even though your taxes are already paying for it anyway.

>Lmao you fucking retard.

AKA - Shit, I don't wanna engage in a substantive conversation about real ways to change the laws for the better without infringing on the 2nd. Better call him a retard, that'll show him! Great job, glad we had this conversation.

And yet he still wants redistribution of wealth. Not democratic socialist. Communist.

Essentially because the existing cost to the US is greater than $52 trillion over 10 years.
>Even after accounting for the increased costs of coverage expansion, our data-driven base case includes:
>$59 billion savings on hospital care
>$23 billion on physician and clinical services
>$217 billion on overheads
>$177 billion on prescription drugs
>Consequently, annual expenditure per capita would decrease from $10,739 to $9,330, equivalent to a 13·1% reduction.
Source is The Lancet's report from a few days ago

It's just buzzwords and flowery language from a poorly educated public who are easily manipulated by talking heads. The sad reality is there's a portion of the population who are easily bent politically both left or right and they're the ones in the end who can make the greatest difference when it comes time to vote.. controlling those morons is a trillion dollar industry and we're seeing it play out more than ever thanks to the internet.

FUCK OFF back to Cred Forums nigger. I do not give a shit about the dog and pony act that is US politics one iota. I have important log threads to attend to..

Attached: 1523960222122 (1).jpg (343x500, 61K)

Social security was an adequate safety net before wages stagnated, property taxes increased, medical expenses increased, etc. It's a shit system because a small group of people chose to fuck you over after you spent your entire life working hard and somehow, you don't want to hold those people accountable. You want to attack your fellow working poor.

Would you be saying the same if Bernie did it instead of Donny?

Bernie is trolling you HARD faggot!! Have a great night! And don’t forget to

COPE
O
P
E

I should add that no one in that bottom percentile being manipulated believes they're part of that percentage.. dunning kruger tells us that.

Oh yeah, I forgot how like Russia America is now, virtual twins. My eyes have been opened, thanks user! DEATH TO AMERICA!

Holy fuck those digits

Just like every other plan put forward by Sanders

At the time the average Honduran dirt farmer couldn't tell you the difference between governments. And the average Chilean wasn't much better. Both countries lived under brutal dictatorships and both deserved to be destroyed.

The NRA started out helping develop the most effective ways to keep guns in the hands of decent citizens, now it's just a manufactuers advertising agency

Yep.

Moral people believe in people keeping what's theirs but also paying their fair share, it's almost exclusively a dem attitude these days.

>the average person couldn't tell the difference between Allende and Pinochet
You what fella

And back then the corporate tax rate wasn't retarded.

Like most good things do they start with good intentions.. but it doesn't take long for that to change. The issue we have as a society is that what is often "good" or "right" is most easily abused by those who want to do "bad" or "wrong". We trust that our neighbor wont just pull their handgun out and blast your kid away but the reality is he can choose to do it whenever the fuck he wants. I don't have all the answers user but I wish more people were determined to find them rather than tow party talking points.

That'd be just as dumb as someone not knowing the difference between Chile and Honduras.

Capitalism! We settled for the bad intentions.

And almost as dumb as not being able to read beyond the first sentence of a three sentence post.
>And the average Chilean wasn't much better

Ever heard of the Pucket Gun, retard? Google it, you're talking out of your ass.

You think you're gonna get these retards to calm down and think? XD

Keep watching Fox news you moron. Everything you say is incorrect

fuck off to /pol vlad

Yes. I see the faggot. OP. He's a shill and a retard and a MASSIVE fucking faggot who should consider suicide.

Completely irrelevant to the point made.. the rate of fire and all that isn't the only fucking difference between guns in 1776 and guns now. The omission of every minor detail doesn't suddenly imply a lack of understanding.. if I have to sit here and cite every fucking difference to please you we'd be here till the grave.

Attached: 1580257720715.jpg (563x432, 53K)

Ok Ivan.

Attached: 1564747356207.jpg (960x960, 121K)

awww, you're confused and sad.
That's cute. Now, go back to bed, kid.
It will all be ok. Let the adults work it out.

Attached: 1582805806189.png (524x477, 411K)

>Happiest countries on earth
>top 7 all European with "socialist" polices
>Same 7 countries rated with highest overall standard of living

Nice comic user, really well informed.

he'll be dead before he could run again

Attached: 1568379372724.jpg (646x960, 157K)

You realize he has changed his opinion on this and acknowledged how ignorant he was at the time, yes?

Thought so.

Eurofag, but leftist.
Specification: Eurofag, and ofcourse leftist.
Someone make a bootleg version of those, I want one.
It's just too bad I'll never find a real man (right wing) that'll want to do me.. :(

Attached: Screenshot_20200214-204908_Facebook.jpg (1440x2960, 1.2M)

>trump acknowledging his ignorance
kek

Stock market looks good to him because he's obscenely rich. Duh!

>Rightwingmemes.jpg

Dude keep posting

fuck off back to /pol you boring cunt

The guy on the right wouldn't ever be there if he was truly antisocial corrupt and an evil genius psychopath like all of the other obscenely wealthy narcissists of the world.

Attached: 1566856341526.jpg (640x419, 77K)

Attached: 1582795258238.jpg (692x960, 87K)

Attached: 1564756742830.webm (1280x720, 1.87M)

user. Take a trip to India’s slums, or Cambodia.

You are ultra rich.

Oh man it's beautiful. All the trumpeters are losing their mind and are so distracted from Prez's reckless spending with their own tax dollars that they cope and say bernie will spend it worse. Keep crying

Attached: square.jpg (500x500, 139K)

this is some real adolf shit

or they sleeping in, damn cunt, chill the fuck out. its a sidewalk lol

Attached: 1570690728725.jpg (750x563, 91K)

Hi Lush Rimjob! You have something to say?

Name a policy of Sander’s that’s worked in other countries.

Hardcore mode: no screeching and rheeing about Donald Trump

Nightmare mode: don’t just mention European nations that are 90% white with a total population of less than 10 million and compare it to America.

have you guys seriously never heard of social democracy?

dont worry nigger, bernie wont win

>we're still sleeping
That's a great slogan user

Attached: 1564858302720.jpg (480x360, 31K)

Attached: 1568152528977.gif (435x250, 1.68M)

The ones where Niggers have legal immunity and claim welfare for being black?

because socialist countries are inherently against capitalism so they will not work with the US so we overthrow their governments to place some1 in power that will work with us. if socialists worked with capitalists on trade then there would be no need to overthrow them

lol what kind of a tardo thinks that adverts are a 1:1 reflection of reality?

Okay, it doesn't make this guy think, but i mean people WITH brains.

I agree. We shouldn’t have fought in World War 2. Hitler was Democratically elected. So no problems

Attached: 5HXZzd2.jpg (512x308, 25K)

>Actually believing this

AMERICA IS ALREADY SOCIALIST.

IT'S SOCIALISM FOR THE RICH.

Yeah, that's the one

Attached: 1571219982369.png (539x717, 574K)

Take your meds

>socialist countries are overrun with rapefugees and will make the country brown in 1 generation!
>socialist countries are actually almost entirely white

OK BlOOMbERg

>mooommm why don't white women want my penis?

Lefties, just relax. We all like bernie too, it's just really funny watching you guys shit your diapers.

Attached: RlHSpTW.jpg (960x616, 58K)

its the same reason we overthrew saddam, we claimed it was becasue of WMD but it was becasue he was going to sell his oil to europe instead. you work against us you get overthrown

This kind?

Attached: 1580771773921.jpg (506x500, 43K)

You don't know anything about socialism. Why not take the time to learn?
m.youtube.com/watch?v=PheA4BPXQzg

lol socialism good capitalism bad amirite hurr hurr really thinking hard there

Denmark and Norway and the other “democratic socialist” *gag* countries libdrools love to reference are still a majority white.

For now.

I think it's trying to communicate~

Attached: jXxSEn0.jpg (960x709, 122K)

that's not an advert, that was some dumbass trying to look tough on the internet, like how conservatives have their profile pics be selfies while wearing sunglasses and in their car/truck.

Be cause intelligent people won't reproduce if they don't think their offspring stands a chance of survival

Attached: 1581759452498.png (781x726, 570K)

Yea yea and I'm sure the country would be saved if they forced their women to breed with you so their kids come out with pasty skin.

>smart people are on Cred Forums
I know you just turned 18 but trust me, you don't have it all figured out yet.

If bernie sanders did a porno, at least 30% of the people who watch it for lulz will walk away converted.

yeah them insurance companies really dont want free healthcare

More like... socialistic policies are a great edition of a functioning capitalistic economy. You can do both. This false equivalence that people just ignore that somehow having social programs automatically makes you an entirely socialist country is some real brainlet shit.

Attached: aC7vVPZ.png (400x253, 61K)

>that's not an advert, that was some dumbass trying to look tough
Well, that's just like, .....your opinion man

Attached: 1564756959031.jpg (736x618, 87K)

"I mean, yeah i did go into it expecting to see a tired old man grimacing as his flaccid asshole accepted black cock, but i walked away thinking it really is quite reasonable for the ultra wealthy to pay their fair share. We bailed out the banks during the crash. It would only be fair they send my kids to college."

user, they get relatively less sunlight per year than many other European nations. It goes dark in Norway at like 2pm in winter.

They would have pale skin, yes. Its called evolution.

Yeah, they would HATE Bernie forcing everyone to be their customers

>don't have it figured out due to young age.
Word. The one thing that gets painfully clear when you get older.

I wish I was that young. Thanks for the boost

Attached: 1568451210916.jpg (430x620, 89K)

The ultra rich have so extremely butt fucked the tax code that even if you are upper middle class you are making less money than you should be.

Basically, if you let the socialists eat the ultra rich, you get a cut too.

>If bernie sanders did a porno

Attached: 1580385510185.jpg (640x515, 32K)

We have the authoritarianism and the government spying on the citizenry already, why not go with the socialist side of economics instead of this Mussolini-inspired collusion of government and corporation to milk the commoners?

>We bailed out the banks during the crash. It would only be fair they send my kids to college."
Take it up with that nigger you elected user.

Attached: qy107.jpg (620x400, 73K)

You would all be much richer if the ultra rich didn't take all your parents productivity and put it in their pockets.

OH because the Donald isn't deregulation the banking system and isn't doing nearly everything they want?

Sounds like a (you) problem user

Attached: 1579982643178.jpg (190x265, 10K)

Attached: 1582601170933.jpg (600x522, 134K)

He's not even eating the rich.. he's fairly taxing earning like any of the highest economic growth cycles in American history.. his rates even for the highest earning billionaires still leave them with billions of dollars in net yearly... they're all mad because they won't get 95% net anymore thanks to all the loopholes.

Facts will never dissuade identity politics.

“If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.“

— President Lyndon B. Johnson

you are lacking

Attached: (tumblr_p0dbmcEl8C1wey45so1_1280.jpg (680x977, 282K)

And another thing, remember the housing crisis?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass–Steagall_legislation

Someone explain the pregnancy Biden meme please

imagine being a total idiot and not knowing it

>before wages stagnated
No you fucking idiot, it's before there were 2 workers for every retire. Back when people died before they could collect. When FDR installed that "temporary tax" there were 13 workers for every fucking retiree.
Socialism "works" in either homogeneous economically balanced countries (FRA, SWE, GER) or single party totalitarian states (China) as the balanced countries mostly consolidate through unions and are a bit less likely to nationalize them, but all to artificially stabilize costs. Single party states like China nationalize nearly everything, forbid most use of non-nationalized competition, and will buy stock in anything that sinks *cough* what China is literally doing right now to combat the drop in productivity since the Coronavirus started *cough*. Either way this form of government interference is more than I'd like, as I don't trust me government with it's already limited responsibilities, let alone having them single handedly hold reigns of the economy

These fuckers are mad because they believe that if bernie gives healthcare to you, it has to come from them. They have no fucking clue just how much wealth the ultra rich are hoarding.

Attached: c81ae369c3aefc757fcb71229f386505.jpg (720x382, 46K)

this, but replace work with us with allow us to steal their resources and use them as cheap labour

wondered how uneducated and retarded you have to be to post this.

>implying anyone paid those rates when they were 77%

Libdrools aye

>people are going to find loopholes so why even try
stellar form of governance

That advert was basically spot on for me, minus a sibling or two. It was a great life.

Unfortunately most of America is ready to vote for any functional adult over Trump.

Attached: grinch.gif (500x363, 424K)

Well, for one thing, you already pay through the ass for services for other people. You pay for the military, all the military contractors and their suppliers. Then you paid, or your parents paid to bail out the banks in 2008. They didn't pay you, or your parents to help get out from under those mortgage debts, no. The government paid the banks, but the banks then STILL made you pay the full amount you owed on your house. Then you paid to bail out GM. You paid to bail out Chrysler twice. Once in 1978 and again in 2008.

So you paid and paid and paid. meanwhile, the 1% put all their profits from those payments in offshore accounts so they wouldn't have to pay. Oh they paid a token, but not as much as you did on a percentage basis. Apple struck a deal with the government to allow then to bring foreign profits back home - all without having to pay locally. Amazon hasn't paid much ever at all, and yet they set up a system that guts local businesses, who then cannot pay and are forced to lay off workers when they close, who then also cannot pay, or who pay less.

My problem with Bernie is that he talks a lot, and never will any of it get done. Those who do not want to pay, or who can avoid having to pay will never let him.

Rock candy is oddly satisfying. I like how crunchy it is.

>Khmer Rouge
>socilaism
pick one
literally backed by the CIA

The government lobbyists and social media all need to die too.

Attached: 7FEBF461-6562-4A09-9996-7F62AEBC0735.jpg (900x638, 143K)

Why is “voting against your economic interests” irrational when conservatives do it but noble when rich and/or white and/or male liberals do it? Not everyone thinks a system of free shit is worth the costs

The productive are literally the working class. Without them no products could be made.

Based
T. Conservative

Nah it's the same socialism that made Denmark great again

Unironically asking if anyone here has the feel the burn logo but in stead of the Stars and stripes for eyes it's the Hammer and sickle

Attached: 1582621455983m.jpg (1024x682, 91K)

Hoooooooooooooooooorse!

literally go fuck yourself the middle and lower class is not ultra rich, fucking kill yourself. you really think if you lick the boot long enough youll get to wear it? wake up retard. the ultrarich are the billion dollar companies not paying a cent in taxes, writing our laws through bribery, and killing americans with exorbitant healthcare costs

Big brain post

It’s Puckle and they were extremely expensive, unreliable, and never adopted. Basically a prototype that is only noteworthy as a “gun rights” talking point. And user’s point about major unforeseen changes is still accurate.

Consider the following though:
1. The point of the second amendment is to give the public military technology in order to resist, and if necessary overthrow tyranny. It’s a pretty radical idea. Stands to reason the founders would want Americans to have AR-15s even if some people will misuse them.
(As an aside, in the 19th century many states regulated/banned handguns much more than military rifles. Consistent with that intent).
2. The framers may not have foreseen all the changes but don’t you think they would recognize technology would continue to improve? But they still wrote the constitution in broad language. By your logic why should the first amendment apply to the Internet or even newspapers printed with electricity?

I agree homogeneity and culture are big differences. But why does population size matter? If a system can work for 10 million just scale it up for 100 or 300 million. Seems like a gay rebuttal

Why only the billionaire class now? Is it because Bernie is a millionaire?

That’s not his point. His point is that the nominal high rates pre Reagan are illusory so the argument that a new proposed tax hike is not so bad is a strawman.

Capitalism was great for the foundation of a country like America, but we've reached a point where growth needs to constantley happen to please some gambling investors. Growth no matter what which can end up ruining what made a company great like games or game services for instance.

I don't know if a sprinkle of socialism and higher taxes for corporations is the fix, but we atleast need to mix Capitalism and Socialism together into a sort of homuculous political system.

there's that myth again...

NOBODY ever paid 70/80/90% individual tax rates. there were so many exceptions, exclusions, loopholes and deductions that even in 1944 at the 94% peak individual tax rate, the effective rates were NOWHERE near that astronomical amount...

Attached: 1568570598000.jpg (750x563, 59K)

I always get a good laugh out of the " aR 15 aGaInsT nUkeS aNd TaNks" our active military has clearly stated they will stand with the law abiding gun owners. Your precious Bernie know how to drive a abrams tank? AOC qualified to fly an f-16? Pelosi gunna be blasting off on people with a Vulcan cannon? It's not like we haven't been able to defeat a bunch of goat fuckers in dresses for 20 years or anything either. Come on now pleb lol

Attached: 3ddz1n.jpg (750x500, 95K)

Your not radical enough, you need to post more socialist memes to be really radical. Clearly a lot of intellectuals here. Long live Anonymous, Long live operation Dorito dust.

I’ve heard this over and over and generally believe it. But do you have links to any actual details? For example, what were the actual average and marginal rates for the 1% in 1940, 1959, etc?

>functional adult
>bernie
pick one

Here's what bernie's gonna do. He's gonna steal all the money from the rich, and he's gonna pay you to blanket the united states with solar panels.

Are you a bad enough dude for this?

well al little googling and math will go a long way in your life.

for example...the average person making 10000 in 1940 paid ~15%

thats about 175k in todays money

no he won't
1) not getting elected
2) congress won't adopt his shit

The banks paid back their loans. Why can't students do the same thing?

Are you the same bitch who makes all the motherfucking far crazy right threads? The one who has no actual argument or plan or base or any vague understanding of what hes talking about and is just thoughtlessly vomiting hate?

... yes. How did you know?

There are lots of sources, just google "90% tax rate myth":

>"Statutory tax rates can be misleading for two reasons. First, they do not tell us the rate that top earners actually pay, which tends to be significantly lower due to a wide array of deductions, exemptions and other legal loopholes ...
>"in 1960 the statutory top marginal rate on filers reporting over $1 million in income sat at 91 percent. The actual effective tax rate paid for the same million-dollar bracket was just 46 percent due to the use of deductions and other legal techniques to reduce one's overall tax burden..."

usnews.com/opinion/articles/2017-10-31/taxes-werent-more-progressive-in-the-1950s

Attached: Average-Effective-Tax-Rate-on-the-Top-1-Percent-of-U.S.-Households.png (1300x928, 96K)

Bot been spamming anti-bernie threads all day. Are you really that scared of the old socialist jew?

Attached: le_bernie_poster.jpg (825x631, 67K)

People like op don't have the mental capacity for that user. Especially the trump followers.

How about top earners though? I really don’t know where 10,000 would fall socially. 175k for a family is obviously good money but it isn’t RICH by today’s standards

Rich guy here. Please don't vote for Bernie so I can keep more of my money. Kthxbye.

On the contrary
He will draw white conservative america against each of his submissions to globalism
whereas trump is taking them down the pit

This is helpful thanks. 46% effective tax rate is still WAY higher than our rates today. It’s even higher than our top marginal rate.

>46% effective tax rate is still WAY higher than our rates today.
Yes, however, that can also be misleading because we have a greater tax burden due to a wider array of overall taxes than existed historically.

In addition to that, as a country we are addicted to borrowing and spending money that we do not have.

We cannot BORROW and SPEND our way to prosperity.

No country in the history of the world has been able to BORROW indefinitely.

Bailing out failed banks seemed like the right thing to do at the time... but it's becoming apparent that nothing was "saved" and nothing was "solved"... we just kicked the can further down the road. yes we postponed a crisis and what surely would have followed - a large correction and recession. but we added a massive amount of long-term debt to bail out failing banks, all in a misguided effort to avoid short-term pain. we should have never done that...

Rather than trying to prevent recessions, the government needs to allow companies to fail and allow recession to happen (part of the natural economic cycle). stop quantitative easing (money printing), stop asset inflation, and allow interest rates to rise. Higher interest rates will discourage borrowing and spending, and encourage personal savings. We must restart non-debt financed capital investment in this country - the true engine of a productive, sustainable economy.

As time passes the distortions created by a centrally planned economy become more apparent, as assets continuously inflate and the country becomes mired in debt, it also becomes less and less competitive with the rest of the world. Additionally, the increased risk from our massively increased national debt calls into question the overall solvency of the currency, and we are already seeing other countries (our lenders) begin to move away from the US dollar as the world's reserve currency.

Once the crisis of confidence peaks, and the dollar loses its international reserve currency status... it's game over.

youtube.com/watch?v=RY0R0NpIdQQ

Attached: 1558302449904.png (1352x1883, 282K)