Does anybody even fucking care?

Looks like a fun movie tbhfamsenpaidesu. Lack of reviews are concerning, though.

They early previews had me very curious. The more commercials I see, the more that it appears to be just another of the same kind of thing that every other movie is. At this point I don't care much any more.

No, but i wanna fuck the ginger.

I do enjoy Kelsey Grammer's voice work.

I lost interest when I found out Kelsey Grammer was not the lead.

Why does the baby has pink hair?

The same reason other babies were shown with purple, blue, green, and other shades of hair.

If anything that makes me want to watch it more. There's gotta be something more to it they aren't showing. Either way I think we should just wait for the reviews. Anything with babies as a central plot is always hit or miss.

God Shrek 3 was an akward pile of shit

it looks like the most promising CG movie of the year so far, assuming you don't count the stop motion of Kubo

The babies in Shrek were hideous, the babies in Storks look cute.

I want to fuck the bird

Meh...it's looks like "Nut Job" Tier, kiddie movies to the fukken max, mate. The toddlercan/newborn pedophiles will be...concerning.

ME TOO

When I saw it I was interested and actually found the designs cute

Now seeing those lips in closeup detail actually puts me off and I don't know why

I saw it early.
I thought it was gonna be terrible, another minions cash grab.
But there was a lot of sincerity in the movie. It seemed like the people who made it really cared about it you know?
I mean it's still childish and stupid, but it's funny enough and the movie never drags out elements for too long.
It's got my recommendation.

I might have to go to another board for a few months.

>larval humans
Nope. There is nothing that could possibly make me see this in theaters.
I wouldn't even watch it on netflix out of curiosity/boredom

Maybe because their mouths look 2D?

I kinda do.

It reminds me of that Looney Tunes short with Daffy and Porky. Loved that one.

Except this looks nothing like LT and even comparing the two is fucking retarded.
One is a good series of shorts, and another is bland CGI film.

This studio seems so intellectually sterile.

There's nothing wrong with what they make, in fact it's probably fun to watch, but it just feels so very unthoughtfully churned out

Like, extremely safe and marketable ideas filled with unobjectionable humor and a vaguely heartwarming ending.

I don't even know what I'm complaining about, but there is rarely a movie that i feel this militantly ambivalent about.

Not if you know what short I'm referring to.

This guy does

The bird isn't even a stork, it's a fucking seagull.

To be fair they are ogre babies and the ogres of the Shrek movies are meant to be butt-fucking ugly.

But it didn't help Shrek 3 and 4 were pieces of shit.

Can the mods make a promise to ban these people when they start popping up so we don't have to deal with them?

wait, is the baby girl or boy?

because i read a poster in my local cinema and it says it's a girl, but the kid wanted a "baby brother".

soo.. wtf?

what about Angry Birds?

it's going to be funny and that's it, we already have best looking CGI movie with animals already.

youtube.com/watch?v=qgXaqlUXVIc

Why doesn't the dad just fuck the mom already if the son wants a baby brother so bad?

I thought the baby's gender was purposefully made to look ambiguous.But if it's a girl and the kid wanted a boy, then not everybody ends up with a baby that's the gender they wanted anyway.

It'd be pretty funny if after the whole movie, the baby arrives and the kid says "no I don't want this baby. I wanted a brother" and they switch gears to making him get over it before he learns a very valuable lesson bout acceptance.

>Warner Animation Group
>intellectually sterile

Sure, I would agree with you if you were talking about 90s to early 00s era Warner Bros who churned out only the most marketable of ideas (rip offs of Disney and beloved animated characters meet biggest basketball star).

But you're talking about the Warner Bors of today, the same company which made the subversive, clever Lego Movie, a movie only safe in what it was marketing and automatically disqualified you from calling the modern Warner Animation Group safe. Maybe they will become safe and all their ideas sound safe on paper but their executions are always suprisingly clever and subversive (as of now).

If you want to rant on safeness and marketability, do it on Illumination, a company that does play it too safe.

I'm seeing it pretty much for Katie Crown's character. An energetic redhead played by her gives me all kinds of Izzy vibes and she was always my favorite Total Drama character. Plus the story of Katie going from recording replacement lines to actually getting the part among all those bigger names in the cast is pretty cool too.

He is a trans stork.

Calling it now, it's the ginger's baby. She just doesn't realize it until the end of the movie.

Did anybody know any single kids who actually wanted siblings as a kid? It always seemed like a hollywood myth.

I'm an only child and I've always wanted a brother.

I'm an only child and I remember sometimes I felt lonely and wished I had someone to play with

I still just want to see porn of these two, that's all I'm interested in.

Can't be. The Ginger's never been off the Stork Island Base. She's an undelivered baby.

I remember as a kid that I got really lonely and wished I had a sibling to hang out with. (but I hate babies, so not completely.)

Im not
Im cautiously hype for that boss baby movie i forget the name of though.

The name is literally "the boss baby" and I think it's a bad concept with no potential.

Toddlercon pandering: the movie

Well he's got his iconic long neck folded in so its easier to animate.

Metal gear!?

Mildly interested in a "I hope they show that on Tv on a Sunday when I'm bored" way.

It's because lips protrude slightly from the opening in your face. These lips essentially look exactly the way they would when cutting a hole in a doll where a mouth should be.

I'm legitimately excited for this. If WAG can make another good movie after the lego movie, then that would put them in direct competition with Illumination, Sony and Blue sky, and the more pressure on those three to up their game the better.

also, I got a solid laugh or two from the trailers, so I'm somewhat hopeful.

Chicken Little?

Birds don't usually have dicks. Don't know about storks, but ducks have this absurdly long curly macaroni thing.

This isn't Rugrats, dude.

>Brogulls

If all else fails, he could always drill his beak up her anus. There might just be fanart of this somewhere.

And basically keep going back to "Shrek hates his life and wants to go back to the old ways"

Birds mate by cloaca kissing, yeah that's an actual term, so bird sex is a lot like lesbian sex without any toys

No wonder lesbians are disgusting degenerates

>Lesbians
>Disgusting
Oh user, we all know that you crank your dick dry to their porn.

not him, but it's actually really boring

Is it.looney tuneish

The wolves look like the best par of the movie

Yeah Sideshow Bobs gonna be great in this film.

That's what I'm thinking. WAG's definitely the best of the B tier CG studios and might even have potential to match Dreamworks

i want them to eventually knock off the smile of disney's face.

Disney smile or do you mean the Dreamworks smirk? That one face with a half smile and a brow raised.

>Disney has a princess musical coming out soon
don't hold your breath

Worth the 5 minutes.

i dont mean this year, i said "eventually" , they're getting too cocky.

Wife saw it at an early preview screening.

She loved it, thought it was adorable. That said, she said something about it was weird, but wanted me to see it myself first.

Because animators can't draw anything but sexualised doll women and have to distinguish between characters somehow

Why would they? The kids the movie is aimed at probably already know how babies are born.

Very baby fuck please

i agree. Still everyone I ask says they aren't into it. Like that movie Norman of the north.

They know Santa isn't the one that gives them Christmas presents too but that doesn't stop anybody from making Christmas movies.

Exactly.

This movie is as stupid and pointless as that one movie where Russel Brand voiced an Easter Bunny.

Most of it looks by the numbers, but damn the wolves look hilarious.

yeah. same here.

Reminder that WB's been slowly developing a series of Bone movies.

WAAAAAAAUUUUUGGGHHHH!!!!!!

is that how she got the job? I've been wondering how she got a role in a big movie like this. Neat!

Please don't be in 3D.

I just want Warner Brothers to come back and bring some much needed compitition.

Storks looks kinda lame but The Lego Movie was ducking ace so who knows.

maybe it's just a warm up?

OUR NEW PHONE

>She's an undelivered baby.

>The baby has pink hair

I'm getting real sick of tumblr's shit. I'm surprised it doesn't have Game of Throne's tattoos and piercings already.

I would the mom

But moms are probably the target audience because it seems like their brain and maturity units get siphoned out of her when the baby comes out.

Mom's a shit. Mom likes everything that sucks. Anything she can plaster on her Facebook and draw attention to herself using her kids.

I had a highschool/college friend who was like that. He said he loved Fullmetal Alchemist because he never had a brother. I kept telling him he had no idea how lucky he was because he was soooo spoiled and his parents helped him out all the way, in any way they could.

With siblings it's like being in the government where you're fighting other departments for limited grant money. And you get nothing but excuses while your parents don't meet your basic needs because they're dividing everything into "equal" parts.

>mom has blue eyes
>dad has blue eyes
>son has brown eyes
Very subtle, Jews.

Blue eyes is a recessive gene and brown a dominant gene. It's possible for a family that all has brown eyes to give birth to a blue eyed baby.
Just replaces brown and yellow peas with blue and brown eyes and it's the same thing. C'mon, this is basic science we're talking about.

>blue eyes is a recessive gene
>this means for it to exist it has to be expressed as bb
>brown eyes is a dominant gene
>this means it is expressed as both BB and Bb since the dominant gene expresses instead of the recessive
>bb X bb can equal Bb
topkek, Schlomo

yeah, admittedly I should have looked closer instead of grabbing the first result off google images

But...brown is dominant.

It's not impossible--if both parents are heterozygous, it's about a 25% chance. But if even one of them is homozygous, it drops the odds even further.

not even a little bit.

Has long as it's not 0% it's still a possibility that can occur. I'm mean fuck, there's a guy who won the lottery like 3-4 different times.

It's not impossible. My mom's side of the family has guys with average dicks, and my dad's side of the family has guys on the smaller side, but my brother and I both ended up well-endowed. It's just a slim possibility of the kid having brown eyes, and it's more than likely just an artistic oversight rather than a grand Zionist scheme.

youngest of three
hate my siblings
we hate each other
don't talk much
I can never connect with the whole "sibling bond" shit in books, movies, and so on

I mean, I always was grateful that I had siblings growing up. Even when they were intolerable, I was glad I had them.

Guys, he was a stork delivery, his eyes can be any color

the storks only deliver nonliving things now, didn't you even watch the trailers for the movie?

Yes but how long have they been doing that? Before the kid was born?

What kind of family do you live in where you discuss your dick size amongst one another?
I am the third of four brothers and I have no idea what they're packing

This is exactly what I thought of when I first saw the poster, teebeehaitch

You don't go to hot springs, bath houses, and gyms with guys in your family? No one discusses dick size, other than as a passing joke.

Well, maybe if you're poor. My brother and I were both spoiled back when our parents had money.

I love sibling bond shit but it mostly makes me wish I had that relationship with my siblings than lets me relate to it.

There is not a single movie where the plot involves babies that was ever good.

Not one.

No one should care about it.
These kind of movies have a track record of being awful.

>My mom's side of the family has guys with average dicks, and my dad's side of the family has guys on the smaller side, but my brother and I both ended up well-endowed

why do you hat baby's? are you a jap?

Does Lone Wolf and Cub count? I don't know if there's a movie version.

We were all pasty nerds growing up and then moved far away from one another after becoming legal so no, I have never done any one of those things with them.
I took baths at home with my younger brother when we were pre-pubescent but that's all
I am fairly certain I have never seen my older brothers' beins

>There is not a single movie where the plot involves babies that was ever good.
Alien technically proves you wrong.

I'm in it for the wolves. Them turning into a submarine sold me on the whole movie.

...

>I want to find my parents
I'm getting fed up of this.

I can understand that, then. My grandfathers were sharecroppers, my dad was a lumberjack while his brother inherited by grandpa's farm, and my uncle works in construction. We all go hunting every year and growing up we had Boy Scouts stuff and we try to go camping every now and then. It's kinda impossible to NOT see each others' dicks when your doing outdoorsmanship, so I guess that's why I don't find it awkward as all hell.

Yeah, dead/missing parent-related plotlines in general are played the fuck out in animation and family entertainment in general.
Don't think it will ever go away (after all there will always be a new generation of kids who aren't as familiar with such tropes) but I totally feel your pain and I find it becomes hard to care or have any emotional investment when it's so cliched. Kubo managed to work regardless due to the craft involved had me crying the first couple of minutes but there's gotta be some less blantantly lazy way for these more mainstream/generic movies to insert "feels"

>the same company which made the subversive, clever Lego Movie
Miller and Lord are who made that movie work, not fucking WAG who probably would have been happy with a shitty commercial if it made them money.

I would the dad
Total dilf

This

You're talking out of your ass, which I don't understand how; this stuff is like the most basic understanding of genetics. They teach middle schoolers this shit. Two parents both with a recessive trait can't magically make a child that expresses the dominant trait.

>Ducking
In what context would anyone want to type this word? Why is it so hard for smartphones to grasp that curse words exist?

Just for the record, let me quickly revise your failed attempt at ninth-grade biology.

Eye colour in humans is a complex trait determined by multiple alleles, so it's completely possible that, say, there is some other heterozygous dominant trait in both parents that represses the ability to produce pigment in the iris despite having the right gene for it. Then you get a 25% chance that the offspring won't produce that repressor and the iris will have pigment, and be brown.

That's just a hypothetical example and I have no idea if this actually is very common in determining eye colour, but it's one example I know of to illustrate how human appearance is more genetically complicated than one allele.

you ever read the book boi

This honestly. Things are catered towards a male audience.