How did they get away with constantly sexualizing prepubescent rodents?

How did they get away with constantly sexualizing prepubescent rodents?

what's the big deal with sexualizing cartoon children?
No one ever would become a real pedo going for real children after watching these.

it make my peepee HARD

Chipmunks live an average of 3 years. If they're mutant Siberian Chipmunks and away from the survival threats of the wild, they might live 10-15 years.

Brittany there is middle-aged, and her bio-clock is ticking.

i dont know, but sure i love these girls.

the girls aren't being sexy, they're just dancing like the current popular music artists of their time, which happens to be sexy.

Girls just want to have fun

youre The pedo for seeing it Sexy

Because they're rockstars.

But you're seeing it sexy.

Only that one scene was in any way sexy. You know the one.

They're supposed to be cute and sassy.

Dont flip this on me. I'm not seeing it sexy. OP is. I never looked at the chipmunks that way.

...

dancing and showing their panties.

It's supposed to be realistic. Little girls are whores.

>How did they get away with constantly sexualizing prepubescent rodents?

Simple: Everyone involved with the production of this film was a pedophile.

they are cute in these outfits.

Several answers, but among them "Times were different back then, this was pre-Political Correctness that became cancer in the 90s." Also, this is non-mainstream animation (not Warner or Disney). It's from Bagdasarian. Lastly, technically the Chipmunks and Chipettes age is never firmly defined. Their cartoon series ranged from being nearly in kindergarten to being in late high school, depending on what the episode wanted.

Regardless, times were good back then.

The way they're portrayed is definitely unusual, but it's subtle enough that you look like a weirdo if you mention it to a normie

Maybe the laid off Disney guys had a lot of pent up perversion built up after working on such squeaky-clean films for so long , and were taking advantage of being less micromanaged

Does Jeanette have any upskirt pics?

Anyone that doubts the chipettes were sexualized should take a look at the model sheets

yes, in this movie.

que?

Keep your winky in your pants.

...

>winky
>peepee

What are you, 12? (If you are, be careful, this is a pedo bait thread.)

>12
Those are words that 5 year olds and deranged 40+ year old pedophiles would use.

Why don't you post them then?

I don't see it.

its no different in the modern live action movies either

DanSchneider.jpg

Just be thankful its not european

Europe is a mistake.

You wouldn't rape a chipmunk, would you?

I would all 3.

>redents

>cartoon characters can't be sassy without pedo neckbeards wanting to fuck them

It's one of the immutable laws of the universe.

me? no

A drunk Dave? probably

Hello, police?

>that bottom one
NOT SEXUALISED AT ALL

Would you a mermaid Jeanette?

Because they were obnoxious and had really annoying voices, clearly their presence was a gimmick to attract young girl demographic.
Nobody can convince me heterosexual boys watched them as children and were genuinely attracted to them and not repulsed.

Well you see, this was back before weeaboos started jerking to panty shots and thinking it was hard core pornography.

Well maybe if these cartoon lolis weren't so fucking hot, everyone wouldn't be having the hots for them right now.

No it wasn't, you faggot. Fanservice dates back to even the most refined old animu.

why are the chipettes so lewd?

>Little Chipmunk Girl with Boobs

Bump

...

The Chippettes in this movie have always made me uncomfortable. I don't think it happens for any other movie than this one.

These "chipmunks" have no animal features besides the nose.

I keep forgetting how the animation in this movie is just awesome

why are pratically teenagers in little body.

bump

Bad user.