The Economist has caught wind of the lord and savior. What does your "repulsive behavior" have to say for itself?
You could have stopped this
Other urls found in this thread:
thefreethoughtproject.com
twitter.com
...
...
We're all going to die
...
...
LOL, next time we will make The Economist talk about Moonman
>(((Rothschild))) owned magazine
>"They're making jokes about things that I don't like!"
>"w-what l-larks!"
Wtf I thought the Economist was legit.
You also could have stopped sexualizing Hillary Clinton
Now he wont stop. Drawing that is.
>article on alt-right
>doesn't mention Mencius Moldbug
This clearly spent like an hour tops reasearching this
>"Journalists" desperately trying to comprehend memes and shitposting
A glorious time
>repulsive
Go fuck yourselves journalists. May your first born have zika
>Mentions white genocide
>Can't disprove it
Remembering that news where they celebrated Mais Médicos, I fell myself avenged with that.
I'm going to tell my grandchildren about this election one day. This is glorious.
really activates those almonds
KEK SHALL SLAY THEM
(((the economist)))
Why is the left wing obsessed with homosexuality?
DA DA DA DUM DADA DUM DADA
>how 2 refute 'alt right politics'
>post a description of alt right politiks
>stick an adjective in frunt of all policies
Exemple: the alt right have the DISGUSTING belief that whites shuold stick up 4 each other
Now u know how 2 criticise the alt right
Please like and subscribe
The newspaper is run by the group owned by Lynne de Rothschild, Hillarys 'Loyal adoring pal':
thefreethoughtproject.com
You may as well read Viz magazine if you want realistic coverage of the election race.