How accurate is this political compass, Cred Forums?

How accurate is this political compass, Cred Forums?
How would you improve it?

isn't green politics just social democracy/democratic socialism?

you should also consider distinguishing between neo conservatism and neo liberalism

These political compasses are retarded. A national socialist would fucking hate a marxist leninist because there is a scale missing here where they are diametrically opposed.

Yes, that's why it's below democratic socialism. Grassroots democracy and all that.
What exactly does neoconservatism does that deserves a different place? Interventionism alone?

Maybe, but the ns-ml thing makes sense.
>they are diametrically opposed
nice meme

Social democracy is much more centrist/centre-left than green politics. I would suggest that green politics be on the furthest to the left; its all anti-nuclear, rapefugees welcome, very, very big social welfare etc. Whereas social democracy is mildly socialist economically speaking yet, culturally more conservative (e.g on immigration).

That's my understanding anyway and the reality of the matter is that these terms are repeated and thrown together so often that they're just effectively buzzwords with no substance, bar the obvious; communism, facism, libertarianism.

you can't really measure that shit
people tend to focus on some aspects to make judgement
for example I would be called far-right IRL due to some stances but that test put me in Social Democrat category

this is more accurate

paleoconservative/classical liberal master race

The political spectrum is not a square, it's a line. Anarchy on the far right and totalitarianism on the far left. What determines an ideology's placement on that line is the amount of central government power vs individual freedom.

>all of politics can fit on one axis

It most certainly can.

>using any images of neo-Spongebob
under age cancer

If you want to talk about political views for ideologies political ideologies are hyper-dimensional.

The political compass test is shit. I intended to make a less biased test because of that.

Nice

Why not Libertarian?

>

It's improved by putting the true philosophy at the center, where it belongs.

Anarchism isn't an adjective, it's the western equivalent of Zen.

>neoliberalism

so the logical conclusion of liberalism... which is also fascism because it leads to corporate power and authoritarian bullshit

oh cool, a cartoon character!! tell us what 2 dimensional life is like!

I just found it like that m8

Except is hasn't, you fucking commie

HORSESHOE

Feels good being social/classical liberal.

Social Liberalism is mediocre
Horseshoe is a meme

South America is a mediocre meme.

Yes, except for Chile.

What is the "H" for?

Also, anarchism is either extremely competitive or extremely non-competitive based on what strain of it you're talking about. It's definitely not center.

>black on dark colors
>black on red
For fuck's sake.

You need more dimensions to properly convey this

H is for dirty fucking Hippies. Anarchists meet aggression with aggression, cooperation with cooperation, etc.

The political compass makes no sense. I am a islamist so I am for low taxes, not very egalitarian (muslims are better people and every group should have their own laws. Laws should largely be separated from the state, people group together and decide what they want to follow. The state mostly put the whole thing in a coherent system of what to do if a christian robs a muslim for example. This is how the early caliphate functioned.) and I am all for executing homosexuals and that sort of thing.

Still I generally always is put in the "Social Democracy" part because Sharia have a lot of rights that everyone should have like everyone should be provided housing if they somehow lack a roof over their head and so on. But islamism is not particularly leftist apart from having a minimum standard of living that everyone should be above.

I show up centrists on most compasses, I think a large part of that is because there is an axis missing.

It's not as close a fit, but it's pretty good.

Most people get put under social democracy if you use that stupid political compass site. That's because it's biased, and I plan on making an unbiased one.

This is good, but it only works for economic and structural functions, not social issues.

Social issues are though fairly hard to measure. If you just do an authoritarian vs. libertarian social axis then you get things like SJW's and actual Nazis next to each other. Maybe some sort of ethnocentrism or nationalism scale?

Not.
I'd delete it and not try to make it again.
Also, learn to use contrasting colors.

Yeah, but what would you change?
Nobody cares about colors anyways

...

That's awful, m8

>National Socialism not included in Alt-right

Can I physically remove Democrats and communists while believing in Anarcho-Caputalism?

I'd put NS to the left of nationalism rather than above it and also put fascism inbetween those two rather than to their right, pretty solid besides that desu

autism designed by the right to make themselves look good(i'm right wing btw) by your logic absolute monarchy/theocracy would be as leftist as communism. fuck off mate. economics, social policy and political system are all variables which determine the nature of an idealogy, not this idiotic axis of muh freedoms vs le evil authoritarianz.

Nationalism is not as authoritarian as either NS or fascism