Are we witnessing a media revolution?

Something I was wondering about recently;
what would this election be like without the internet?
If I had to rely upon (((German mass media))) exclusively for news and reports about the candidates, I have no doubt that I would be a Trump-hater. I would have to rely upon the leftist TV stations, mostly cucked newspapers and maybe radio. My circle of people I discuss politics and social matters would definitely be much smaller, and those I would discuss such stuff with would also be indoctrinated.
Pretty much no chance for me to get in touch with, e.g. real Americans to discuss what's really going on. I would have to rely on CNN Europe.

But things have changed: Donald has the entire establishment against him; his expenses for his election are a fraction of those Hitlery gets from ((((((her backers)))))). The media are trying their tactics they have used for the past maybe hundreds of years, but it doesn't appear to work this time. Trust in mass media is plummeting constantly irrespective of party affiliation (pic related).

Now, in the past, mass media had an oligopoly in society; organizing and funding a team of reporters, paying for the printing presses, all the technicians working on technical editing of videos etc. was something that required a huge investment and regular payments.
But today? Today, you are able to voice your opinion via media sites like (((JewTube))), write a blog without almost any costs in comparison to print newspapers.

Are we currently witnessing the demise of the media oligopolies around the world?
How on earth can the major TV stations or newspapers regain the trust of their target audiences trust after all the lies they tried to feed the people everywhere, and after the broad public has become aware of it?

Just look at this: you are reading my post on a discussion forum that started out with zero institutional mone, and which focussed on anime related stuff.
Yet here we, having made Hitlery declare war on "Pepe the Frog".
WTF???

Other urls found in this thread:

gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx
charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-mainstream-media-bet-farm-on.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Hillary can't win because only smart people support her.

Hillary is the elitist counter-culture candidate. Bernie and Drumpf are the pleb-tier candidates with inferior, low-IQ subhuman trash supporters.

You support Trump because smart people make you uncomfortable and hurt your ego and you'd much rather be surrounded by other shitcunts, because being surrounded by subhuman illiterate retards makes you feel as though everyone else is dumb and uneducated just like you, and that makes you comfy.

Supporting Hillary is difficult because it's a humbling process that constantly exposes you to complex opinions from people who are smarter than you, and that hurts your ego. It's much less stressful and challenging to be surrounded by subhuman low-IQ genetic waste like Bernie and Drumpf supporters.

Without internet, we'll be seeing a lot more chimpouts, by whites too this time
Cred Forums is a containment board and the internet is too, to some extent

>Gallup Poll: Americans' Trust in Mass Media Sinks to New Low

gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx

>>(((89215411)))

Into my gas chamber you go

click two items lower instead

Is there a critical threshold for a happening?

What if trust reaches, e.g., 15%?

Projecting: the post.

Let's hear your credentials, leaf.

>college degree
>smart

plz

Anyone who shells out $$ for a degree that isn't oil-industry geared, is being duped

Never change, leaf.

What happened in 2004?

>smart people
"Smart people" on average like what's safe. If this were always the case there would still be monarchies ruling us.

>What happened in 2004

A presidential election year, just like 2008, 2012 and 2016.

People turn on their televisions and hear the media's fawning about how great Obama is, or how terrible Bush/McCain/Romney/Trump are, and they just get sick of it.

People who get degrees like to vote democrat. You think it is because they are more intelligent, I think it is because they've had a four year exposure to the most severe daily leftist propaganda you can imagine. No shit, the people who have experienced the worst of the leftist propaganda are leftists, imagine that. Most of my professors were dipshits who basically just talked about race, class, and gender. I had good grades so most of my tuition was paid for, otherwise I would have dropped out. Even though if you are impervious to the constant shilling, it helps you get a good understanding of the enemy and how they operate and pervert young minds.

TV, and the largest media company websites, are shooting themselves in the foot this year.
People can get opinion pieces from blogs, social media, etc. If 'slow' media like TV, print, etc. can't provide 'less-biased' news, or at least appear to, they won't be viewed.
Think about it this way: if CNN broadcasts anti-Trump 24/7, people who aren't brainless won't watch it, because it is a waste of time, and people who are drones for the left probably won't watch it either, because it is boring to them. They'll still get lots of views, but the viewership decline for TV news has begun. Advertisement $$ soon to drop thereafter.
They did this to themselves, throwing away an industry that could have hung on for a few more decades. And all (probably) for a few well-placed millions, or favors exchanged.

charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-mainstream-media-bet-farm-on.html

Off the top of my head?
Chechens taking people hostage,
Iraq atracks
Giving interim control to the Iraq government
The terrorist attacks in Spain
Probably other stuff I forget

I literally hate my countrymen

So, is the establishment media just following in the footsteps of the porn industry?

and this grade of reprehensible rhetoric is all we ever have, or will, get from the hillary supporters - hillary is not intelligent, she's merely been cunning up to this point.

donald trump has a certified IQ of 156 and more intelligent people support him than support hillary.

the vast majority of hillaries voters are on welfare. they're brown, and they're genetically unfit.

meanwhile, in the trump camp, we constantly see, over and over, masses of intelligent, healthy, attractive white people.

it's basically the unfit vs the fit, this election, and the fit have chosen trump - look at the DNC; it was literal retards, disabled people, mentally ill people, constant pandering about being nice.

the RNC was about winning.

and we can say this honestly - the truth is that donald trump has won and won legitimately and fairly. he has won through the best practice of democracy where the best a nation has to offer comes forward to be counted and do what is right.

and people like this leaf here are not long for this world. this leaf is not smart. he is a failed person with a slow, low grade mind that can't comprehend anything longer than a sound bite.

MAGA.

This is more or less why I don't support neo-liberalism. Not because you are right, because you are appallingly incorrect... The fact that you can have your ego so easily stroked by an unsourced info graphic that you found on the Internet proves that you are a vain fool, an idiot and are easily manipulated.

And when you state your opinions, holy shit buddies, watch out... Because you are never going to hear anything new.

I know two guys that are neo-liberal in person. They're both fat nerds that believe they are a lot smarter than they are, spewing the same buzzwords and anti-intellectual nonsense that you.

You don't impress anyone. You are just a fucking faggot, bro.

>you're just a fucking faggot, bro.

this. he really is just a braindead faggot. he hasn't had an original thought run through his head in his entire life.

>"smart"
smug, elitist and actually pretty ignorant on most issues since "I already know it all" means they don't delve deeper into matters.

but he votes like the news tells him too! that means he's smart.

>this is literally his argument

The main propaganda channels will rebrand just like Blackwater and keep chugging along.

Yeah but that shows 04 having a huge dip that other election years didn't

My IQ is 130 sir

It was an absolute culture shock for me.

I was writing essays on feminism my first week in college.

AND THIS WAS IN 1998.

Colleges produce liberals.

>hillary is counter culture
Fucking kek, you tards really are scraping the bottom of the barrel here arent you

>Drumpf
>low-IQ

Thank you for:

CORRECTING THE RECORD
O
R
R
E
C
T
I
N
G

T
H
E

R
E
C
O
R
D

Candidate CLINTON
and the
C.T.R. Initiative
have deposited 2 Shekels into your account.
PLUS
L
U
S
You've earned a chance at a BONUS*
(((BONUS ROUND)))
*IF
D U B S: Lord KEK breeds the autism out of your line.

T R I P S: You never existed.

Q U A D S or Higher: Hillary strokes out after 1st debate.