Why the comunism [COLAPSE] all the time?

[COLAPSE]
[COLAPSE]
[COLAPSE]
[COLAPSE]

Because human nature exists and human nature says people always wants the BEST for themselves, not the thing everybody gets.

Because (((communism))).

nice memes
poor Jews were commies, rich Jews not really (though some funded them cause they hated the Tsar)
besides almost every Jew leader was shot by Stalin (except Lazar Kaganovich)
from Stalin onwards, Jews were undesirables in USSR

Stalin got rid of the Jews, that's correct. But the prior to Stalin, the Jews (Bolsheviks) were in pretty much in control of Russia.

youtube.com/watch?v=j6p1zxKnDeM

>Unironically buying into WE WUZ COMMUNISM n SHIET

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism_in_20_years

>Communism in 20 years was a slogan put forth by Nikita Khrushchev at the 22nd Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1961.

>In his speech, Khrushchev promised that communism will be built "in the main" by 1980. His phrase "The current generation of Soviet people will live under communism" was the final phrase of the new Program of the CPSU adopted at the congress.

>The latter political slogan is attributed to Kremlin speechwriter Elizar Kuskov (Eлизap Кycкoв), who allegedly quipped "this slogan will survive centuries".

Bla bla bla shit and [COLAPSE]

because it's a failure ideology

not really, there were several Jews in high positions though

...

Besides, Tito's socialism is different from Stalinism, which in turn is different from Revolutionary Catalonia and so on.

It's a mental illness that only affects exceptionally ignorant and stupid people. That means people who end up running communist (actually socialists, communism hasn't been ever achieved thank god) systems are the most retarded people in the country. And they are given all keys: industry, agriculture, education and media are all in hands of them. That's why commies fail.

Bolshevism was a Jewish movement. There were more than ''several'' Jews. Watch the video.

youtube.com/watch?v=Yu36R_tfyUM

Solzhenytsin? The man who claimed 56-62 million died in the USSR?

Because it is run by communist, who are overwhelmingly upper class collectivists fucks who never worked a single day in their lives, but somehow they fashion themselves 'workers'.

Just want to point out the many different countries the anons in this thread are from.

Truth reigns all over the world

You don't think millions died by the (((Bolsheviks)))?

This MonteNegro is trying to tell us to learn about communism, but I learned in school that that's what Stalin did.

Millions died, but there's no proof 50 million, let alone 60 million died.

Because communism ignores scarcity, the first rule of economics

>The estimates of the number of non-combatants killed by these three regimes alone range from a low of 21 million to a high of 70 million.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes

Burn all commies.

Omg your believing ((( Wikipedia )))?

> Trust my source goy, it's not biased

Lololol got you there Shlomo.

> $0.05 has been added to your account

Alt right: 1
Tankies: 0

6 million jews are estimated to have been killed by nazis yet that's not proof right? Why should I believe that 60 million people were killed in the USSR anymore than I should believe 6 million jews were killed?

Read this book.

>Not taking a guy's word about 56-62 million being killed in the USSR means believing Wikipedia and being a kike

(((Wikipedia)))

Because the Jews profit from the Nazis killing 6 million Jews.
But the Jews don't profit from the (((Bolsheviks))) killing 60 million Christians.

The (((media))) always tells us to remember the 6 million Jews killed in the holocaust.
But the (((media))) never tells us to remember the 60 million Christians killed in Europe.

it'd work perfect if the racist-sexist-rightwing-stupid-lying-antisemitic-stinkybutt-corporate-white-businessman didn't keep sabotaging it!

That's a fallacy. That the jews profit off the Holocaust does not prove it's not true. What proves that the 6 million claim is unfounded is the lack of proof regarding such figure.
Oh, and what are some American documentaries where the Bolsheviks are portrayed in a good light ? And if the media doesn't repeat the 60 million claim, does that mean the media portrays Soviets as good guys?
Anyway, there's no more proof for 60 million killed by the Soviets than there is for the 6 million jews killed by nazis.

>it's not real communism because I said so
Literally, LITERALLY, kill yourself.

That's a fallacy. You keep believing the (((media))) telling you that the (((Bolsheviks)) dindu nuffin.

COSE NEED HUMAN CLONING PLANT. FUCKING SLUTS RUIN EVERETHING

Because human nature doesn't really like equality. Once you have equality, you can be sure someone else will try to have more stuff than you and a better social position.

Some people can't live without feeling better than others.

So all communist/socialist regimes degenerate into totalitarian dictatorships with shitty economies, in which the elite lives in spoiled conditions while the rest of the population barely survives.

>Why the comunism [COLAPSE] all the time?

Because comunism is a trick used by plutocrats to trick the proles into taking over the country for them, on the cheap.

Yes, dude, the media loves communism. The Red Scare is a myth by commies, History Channel documentaries always talk about how good communism is. In American tv shows, communism is totally not portrayed as totalitarian misery-ridden regimen. That "in Soviet Russia" comedian was shunned by the media. Oh, and those documentaries make no money, people don't profit off portraying communism in a bad light. If someone tells you the opposite, they probably have three parentheses by each side.

Why do we love this one so much?

Oh, and there's no proof for the Holocaust but nevermind that there's no proof of 60 million killed in the USSR. It has to be true because kikes. Right?

Me neither. I just think some anticommunists' logic is faulty and I prefer proper arguments.

Usually only works small scale. Or in order to be a success every citizen has to ha e the same mindset, which is very hard to do