I wonder if vietnamese use zalgo text to write their language
Anthony Davis
...
Landon Rogers
>join us
Brandon Parker
I think her being a reptilian is more likely
Nathaniel Clark
is she CGI?
Ethan Harris
...
Kayden Morgan
IT'S JUST THE SCREEN GLITCHING DON'T MAKE US LOOK RETARDED. BACK TO INFOWARS.
Adrian King
>shill containment thread
Cameron Sullivan
how could the packetloss keep the background behind Hillary intact though? Isn't that basically impossible unless she moved out of the frame recently in the video?
Connor Perez
If it was just the glitching and her disappearing for, I might be able to accept packet loss + poor encoding. But that combined with the fact every single phone recording in the audience had the same picture, but didn't match what we could see.
There's no way this is real
Michael Green
>didn't match what we could see.
Well yeah...
Julian Campbell
The telephoto flattens the entire room, the people filming were actually way farther from Hillary then it looked.
Owen Young
youtube.com/watch?v=eXZp2LZucP0 Look at 6:30 and 8:30 there are two different men that appear in the lower left corner. Based on the side of their head relative to clinton it is impossible for the flag to be so far away as pictured
Tyler Cook
It's actually completely possible if you knew anything about lens distortion.
Pic related shows 300mm, this event was likely filmed with over 400mm.
there was a vid of a guy analyzing it before at around 21:12 mark she completely dissappears with background still intact for a frame
David Jenkins
>was likely filmed with over 400mm
Or it was not, got any prove for your claim?
Justin Lee
3D space BTFO What focal-thingie does the human eye have? I think we can 'see' depth good, but there are probably other animals like owls or something that might be better.
Chase Brown
>*****KEK MAKES PRESENCE KNOWN AGAIN****
Brayden Jackson
This picture is of two completely different areas and angles. This picture still escalates the entirety of the subjects
this does not explain how we do not see a single recognizable feature in the phone viewports as again that would mean the user is seeing the same screen and unable to track what they are filming unless you are saying they were filming the wall on purpose.
They would have to see Hillary in their viewport to make a proper recording of her
Evan Ross
Yeah no one has yet to address this in ANY thread so far. the background is COMPLETELY intact like its on a different layer or some shit.
Even if it artifacted, it should take the flag in the back with it, but the flag is 100 percent perfectly in line.
Julian Cox
Holy shit. If I had 400mm lenses in my glasses, I could see like jesus!
Aiden Reed
The human eyes focal length is around 17mm.
No.....it's just how telephotos work, to shoot something from really far away you need a long lens. For example sport events use gigantic ones like pic related. A rally the size of a gym would probably be best shot with 300-600 if the camera was in the back of the room.
Anyone I tried my best to explain but I guess I failed, bye.
Jackson Miller
This is the best post I've seen all day. I had no idea.
Hunter Gray
>No.....it's just how telephotos work,
So you got no prove, you got nothing
Xavier Jenkins
wtf I hate cameras now
Ethan Miller
It's a continuous vertical background. I'm all for sending to crook to prison but let's focus on real crimes.
Luke Williams
I'm pretty sure she is dead. This was their plan all along.A nice hologram president. Oh Orwell...you knew it was coming
Easton Allen
Sorry m8 the lines would not stay straight If it was a compression algorithm glitching over the podium and Hillary.
Jordan Lee
>What focal-thingie does the human eye have? Not possible to calculate
Liam Young
>shill damage control containment thread
How does perspective distortion explain this?
Landon Sullivan
The backround is a series of vertical bars.
If the glitch is that one or more lines from the tops of the image are being repeated down the screen then it would cause this effect.
At times when it glitches it also catches the top of her head or more of her and this is repeated down the screen as well.
Gavin Murphy
The glitch duplicated the top of her head to where her torso is. The flag you see is a duplicate part from above her head.
Jeremiah Moore
Are you stupid on purpose?
The user is simply giving his idea on why it is. He provided instances that support his claim. The instances are not specifically from the rally considering they probably weren't there.
Dylan Lopez
did the podium really disappear? this is important did the podium really disappear? this is important did the podium really disappear? this is important
Michael Davis
it was SHUNPO
Aiden Brooks
Yes, the podium disappeared.
John Clark
you don't need to see the glitch to kno0w it's green screen. anyone with a brain knows what a green screen outline looks like.
Evan King
ROFL YES
HOLY SHIT
Elijah Gomez
image reminds me of that metal gear poster
Josiah Jenkins
this doesn't explain the podium perfectly disappearing as well, the podium has horizontal width
Joseph Rogers
The corrupt video aside, look at what she does at the end of her speech:
She points and waves at the screen! As if supporters are behind her!!!
Benjamin Jenkins
I hate this warmonger too, but this is pure autism.
Jackson Nguyen
Wew. I guess that *could* be the codec interpolating missing data, but if so it's really bizarre how sharp and clean it is. H.264 and H.265 both work in terms of rectangular block regions in complex ways, this is like babby's first compression algorithm that simply assumes a whole vertical line of pixels must be the same.
This is going to amp the "she died on 9/11 and you're seeing a body double now" conspiracy theories up to 11.
Noah Howard
Yes it does.
If an entire row(s) of pixels across the top of the screen are being repeated down the screen, and the background is a series of vertical bars, then everything would seem to disappear, including the podium.
Sometimes it is not just rows of pixels which inlcude only a part of the vertical bars being repeated and you can see the top of her head or whatever being smeared down the screen as well.
Wyatt James
it's a greenscreen, there's your explanation
Connor Russell
ALL MOTHERFUCKING DAY, GUYS. THE BEST POST THIS FUCKING WHORE HAS SEEN ALL GOD DAMN DAY!
>it's 8 am on a Sunday
Wyatt Clark
the lightning on the top part of the flag would then be copied to the lower parts in segments you'd be able to see then
But this doesn't happen. The flag doesn't change at all. The lightning stays the same. EVERYTHING stays the same but Hillary and the fucking podium disappear.
Joseph Reed
Yep. 21:14 in OPs video as per the comments.
Juan Butler
You're right. It's much more logical to assume this is just a hologram of Hillary Clinton and the real Hillary died last week. Also the podium was a hologram too just for kicks.
Benjamin Johnson
that is really weird. packet loss should not cause that, as the podium was static.
is this photo allegedly from the same rally? have a higher res version of that? that is interesting
William Butler
woops wrong post
meant this one
Alexander Lee
lLook at these areas while she's giving her speech
Luis Morgan
We can stop assuming at green screen. We don't know why it's a green screen.
Christian Hall
>yfw she was an Ad all along
Dominic Young
>HAYAI!
Jaxon Watson
>I didn't understand what was happening in the first place but let me explain to you what would happen if it were happening
Get the fuck out already.
Josiah Long
They green screen the bitch because her health is horrible and cant travel and the podium was the only consistent object in front of her and was apart of the scene where ever she was filming and keyed in with the same layer as Hillary hence it drops out when she does
the perfectly straight stipe lines in the space that Hillary and the podium disappears is the smoking gun
Hudson Foster
Not enough niggers. If she were a commercial she'd be black.
Camden Brown
This is when it isn't only catching the uniform part at the top of the screen.
Michael Wood
if yhis was compression issues or packet loss, the background would have lost color and teared as well.
Leo Cook
this seems fair
Matthew Green
Yup.
>b-b-but
Nope
Hudson Sanchez
Relax everyone, it's just the red pill kicking in. the fun doesn't happen untill everyone wakes
Jace Reed
>an error occurred. Please try again later.
Fucking jews at it again
Caleb Ramirez
Hillary Clinton First Presidential Candidate Proposing to Abolish U.S. Borders
CTR trying to make Hillary opponent look retarded. With some success apparently.
Zachary Howard
it's the people to the side of the flag. stop shilling with this shit you fucking faggot
Isaiah Roberts
This is a valid point. I just ignore the cunt, because I truly wish she were dead, so I just pretend like she is. I'm happier that way.
Colton Allen
There is literally nothing wrong with supporting Hillary Clinton.
Gavin Lee
I certainly hope somebody downloaded this video
Greenscreen technology has existed for decades. only question is in the UNC event like, I would love to see more images like this: with the high-res that you get in a modern cellphone
I am certainly not saying that we should run to the press with this - especially not this press
Christopher Barnes
...
Colton Campbell
It's thought our eyes have roughly a 21mm field of view but we only have the center in focus which is something comparable to a 40-45mm focal length. This is why "standard" lenses for most cameras are 35mm or 50mm
Tyler Nelson
see
Bentley Morales
GO Cred Forums GO
YOU ARE ONTO IT
YOU ARE GETTING CLOSER
NEED MOAR TECH-SAVVY Cred Forums ANONS IN HERE NOW
Landon Baker
I agree this is pretty retarded.
Justin Miller
>nearly dies as a presidential candidate >make it about no monies for medicine
Tyler Ward
getting barraged with shills that have no idea how video codec or video streaming work at all, the glitches in the video are way too much of a coincidence for packet loss/bitrate errors
Nathan Martinez
...
Hudson Morris
All I'm seeing is this part of the screen being repeated and CTR shills trying to make it into a retarded conspiracy.
Nathaniel Ward
that's what you get for using VLC instead of MPC
Adrian Young
...
Carter Robinson
Awesome, but question the mark needs work
Hudson Adams
Alternative explanation : perhaps meme magic is erasing her from our universe? Pic related
SHIIIEEEEEET the hologram projector must be malfunctioning.
WILL BE FIXED SHORTLY.
Lucas Sanchez
Around 23:05 a cameraman also disappears during a glitch.
Daniel Cook
*teleports behind u*
Luis Gomez
Then why are we able to see what people are recording on their phones?
Jackson Parker
She's a high energy hologram
Cameron Cox
Clearly swamp gas.
Dylan Richardson
Can anyone explain her not being on the cell phones?
Levi White
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW
Cooper Ward
You aren't understanding. She turns around and points at people behind her. There are no people behind her, as this 100% authentic video of Hillory Clontin indicates.
Anthony Long
*unzips diazepam*
Parker James
>Citing snopes for anything political Snopes is a fat ugly catlady and her beta husband, as you would expect they are extremely pro-democrat / Shillary.
Mason Cooper
Also, jews
Evan Morris
>I... crowd cheers >will be crowd goes wild >fighting crowd goes nuts >for you heads explode
How the fuck would you know? Did you see them on the camera? You stupid fucking cunt.
Easton Cooper
>have headphones on full blast >start playing this video >eardrums explode
ouch
Lincoln Lee
she is pointing at the wall m8 this shit is over.
Justin Gomez
You do see them earlier when it zooms out. They're in a grandstand.
Joshua Peterson
Post pic then
Benjamin Turner
colors don't even match, there's no fucking repeating bars anywhere. FIND ME WHERE THEY ARE
David Williams
If this really is legit what's going to happen when hillary and trump do a face to face debate? If she doesn't show up it means she will have surely lost right?
Isaac Brown
yes they are on camera. right after she puts her arm down and walks off the stage, theres women standing behind her. not directly behind her but still
Tyler Jackson
She's not pointing to a "grandstand".
You realize that one day we are going to deliver justice to you and your family, right? You will get no mercy, we will grant no quarter.
Colton Roberts
The shadow is from the youtube interface you literal retard
the angle she is pointing and waving at would have her profile visible this shit is becoming obvious and its got the shills scared like fuck.
Nathan Sanders
Oh didn't know that actually. I didn't sample the color from there though. I still can't find where the block repeats. It doesn't look like it does, and if it does its so fucking clean that its impossible to tell which SHOULDN'T happen
Ayden Allen
Watch top right of this video. You can see the shadow moving back and forth in the feed.
Chase Sanchez
Checked and keked
Zachary James
not a shill, trying to be objective. i'm going with it is a green screen
America in charge of knowing youtube overlays a black gradient on the edge to make the white text more visible
Adam Moore
So she's alive and functioning?
Carson Reyes
did it again without the gradient, you can still tell if I cut out any segment and repeat it down the video.
Nolan White
Notice in the artifact the top of her head is copied all the way down, now do the same using the top of the image, its not very noticeable because of the vertical symmetry but look how the flag goes from small imperfections to straight lines. That is exactly what happened.
Oliver Perez
If it's a 1 pixel segment there would be no noticeable pattern like that
Leo Ross
Interesting. We may need the expertise of Cred Forums - Autism (and possibly /gd/ ?) on this one, H.264 encoding is pretty complicated.
Adrian Powell
yes there would, it would be impossible for the bottom edge to be EXACTLY the same as the top edge and cascade down seamlessly.
Luke Torres
there would still be a repeating seam when she disappears, which there's not.
Jason Clark
checked.
Owen Jackson
These threads get deleted from Cred Forums because people start baiting, we'd need fabricate a different example somehow. Also, the camera feed to the TV station from the camera is almost certainly MPEG-2, not MPEG-4.
Error compensation in video is not as simple as copy pasting the same chunk over and over.
If the segment was only one pixel like he said, a seamless pattern would be the only possiblity. But macroblocks are larger than 1 pixel so it doesn't matter.
Jacob Adams
Can anyone enlighten me on perspective and focal depth of telephoto lenses. If the event was filmed from 20-30 metres (judging by perspective), shouldn't the people and the flag be less blured?
Samuel Lewis
Cred Forums here, I'm the undisputed master on codecs and proper video encoding (All hail Daiz PBUH).
It's just shitty encoding and bad java streams being REencoded to HTML5 for youtube's shitty platform.
Wait for the BD to come out and get ripped, it should get fixed then.
Carter Powell
I thought the estimated focal length for human eyes is ~50mm.
17mm seems quite wide
Jeremiah Carter
Kek
Joshua James
>EVERYONE WATCH THIS GIF EVERYONE WATCH THIS GIF >EVERYONE WATCH THIS GIF EVERYONE WATCH THIS GIF >EVERYONE WATCH THIS GIF
these threads are posted by CTR to confirm that the majority of users here have single-digit IQs
Jordan Moore
FUCK ITS NOT FAIR I WANT A HAPPENING
Xavier Perry
this
since the background is such a simple pattern with big solid colors, it looks like it would remain unaffected
if you look closely you can see some artifacts to the right of her
its like the tearing you see in gifs
Josiah Ross
Extremely long lenses have very shallow depth of field, it's not possible to have the background, the witch, and the crowd all in sharp focus at once with a lens that long.
I know you're shitposting, but it has nothing to do with Youtube. It's the source feed from the camera to the TV station where the error was.
You're close, the "~50mm" equivalent people like to talk about for human eyes is the zone of acceptable sharpness in the middle of your field of vision. The actual field of view is close to 170-180 degrees when you combine both eyes.
Aiden Jackson
It's not like they haven't greenscreen'ed politicians before. The tech is bretty good at this point, where only thorough discernment can tell it's going on.
The problem with this particular scenario, however, is that the entirety of the audience would have to be complicit on this somewhat grand conspiracy.
Tyler Howard
wtf trump materializing a few frames forward
Owen Reyes
Cred Forums in a nutshell
Nolan Hall
And CTR knows that.
They're using the fact that some of us want it very badly against us.
Matthew Martinez
>fucking 23 minutes
tell me the time marks i should look at you dumb fuck im not listening to this whore for more than 1 minute
Grayson Allen
THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GET AWAY WITH THIS
Jace Fisher
>I know you're shitposting, but it has nothing to do with Youtube. It's the source feed from the camera to the TV station where the error was.
I wasn't shitposting. It's clearly a digital encoding error.
Aaron Wilson
So the whole thread is trying to talk about a codec glitch while at least a few people, probably shills, are using it to act like we think Hillary was actually not doing a speech in front of people?
Easton Cook
Computer. Generate 100 self-aware Hillary Clintons hellbent on world domination. Disengage safety protocols.
Easton Evans
not entirely, I thought it was a green screen error because of how seamless the repeat was but
shows that its possible for it to be that seamless and that the background flattens because of it.
but for the most part yeah that seems to be the case
Levi Fisher
I explained that. It has nothing at all to do with Youtube though.
Gavin Lopez
This is fake. Look at the times in the bottom left corner. The frames are more than a minute apart.
Anthony Evans
abc15 news just has shit equipment
Joshua Nguyen
She's bending space-time
Henry Diaz
only one of these dahnald memes I actually like. masterful .gif
the standard 40-50m is a standard because it's a middle ground between angle aberration from wide angle lenses and lack of depth of field from short angle teles, something that was needed for early photographic portraits. It has to do with style more than similarity to human eye.
Aaron Hall
underrated post
god the nostalgia
Evan Perez
The background is green screened and the feed from the camera pointing at Hillary was interrupted.
Robert Wilson
...
Nathan Lopez
this is why people dont take you guys seriously
Landon Powell
You could make a better chroma key with a phone camera nowadays, abc needs to get its shit together
Camden Gutierrez
Explain this then.
Why is the podium missing? Why is the background so sharp/clean?
Michael Fisher
kek
Charles Wright
this is the best explanation
Ethan Clark
More like a predictive frame failure on a video that wasn't compressed right.
Josiah King
Not quite >pic related Left side: non-repeating background Right side: $hillary's ugly-ass eyes and mouth
Just a modest correction: telephoto lenses can both have small and large depths of field. It all depends on which f/stop is set by the user. If the user wants the subject and all the crowd to be sharp, they will jack it up to around f/8 or higher. If the user wants the subject to be sharp and everything else to be blurred, they will ramp it down to f/4 to f/2.8 (or slightly lower). All lenses can shoot with a high f/stop, however only very expensive lenses can shoot at f/stops lower than f/2.8.
Evan Gray
>supporting people with autism well that was no surprise
Gavin Rodriguez
>16 year olds who have never had a playback error proclaiming Hillary is a hologram exposed by their pepe god
You are pathetic, Cred Forums
Robert Diaz
im not an expert on video encoding formats but if it is indeed interpolation & packet loss (which im sure it is), shouldn't the entire interpolated area as seen in be like pic related?
at worst you could compare the pixel values to another, non-interpolated row and see a difference
You're right about the mechanics of the lens but you still can't get an entire room in focus like that with huge telephotos even at f/16 which would then be too dark for an indoor event with poor lighting. A less extreme example of 200mm f/8 would have the focus reach only 1.5m in front of the subject, not enough to get the front row acceptably sharp. Realistically they're using something like 200-300mm on a 2/3" sensor to get a head and shoulders shot because the press pen is all the way at the back of the room.
Also, when she rifts over the warp like the fucking chaos minion she is, it sounds like a man's voice. The movie Simone comes to mind, her being an hologram and all...
Julian White
never seen this kind of thing on here before see image
Eli Wright
She's not alive and ok. If you want to know the truth go to this website. 82.221.129.208 just copy and paste and it will take you to a site that will show you EXACTLY what is happening now. Hillary was arrested on 9/11 the Hillary you see at south carolina is a COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE, cgi, it's what they do in hollywood and what they do when they want you to think planes hit the towers on 9/11. Go to th site and look at the photos.
Ian Reyes
did u edit this?
Austin Moore
My current job is LITERALLY doing greenscreens, this looks like a greenscreen
It's still unimportant as fuck, who the fuck cares. If the old lady is sick, let her lead the country from her deathbed It's the countless crimes and murders you should care about
Parker Collins
...
Kayden Nelson
At the very least we're looking at a digital backdrop, if you look at this screencap you can see how soft the background is compared to the foreground. Watch any bad movie with a bad greenscreen and you'll notice the same thing.
You can also see the greenscreen artifacts around some of the phones, a common mistake when dealing with greenscreen and chroma key.
Noah Thompson
watch the first seconds of the Video i've posted...
Cooper James
The technology used to hide her lizard form is causing an electrical interfrettance with the cameras. Look out for scales and tails.