>Donald Trump doesn't run for president. >Major contenders are Rand Paul versus Jeb Bush >Rand destroys Jeb and moves on to Clinton >Bernie still gets frauded >Leaks come out >News can't call Rand a racist because he has no racial past >News can't call him a misogynist because he's for individual freedoms >News can't use the anti-marijuana attack on him because he believes in state rights >He is anti-Surveillance >He is anti-War/anti-interventionist >Clinton Leaks get spammed >News can't do anything besides whine that Hillary has a vagina >Literally 71% the popular vote >Possibly every state besides Washington and California
America fucked up.
>News can't call Rand a racist because he has no racial past
yes, yes they would cry racist because they always do
Hell, the media called Bill and Hillary racists 8 years ago
He's a libertarian.
They'd either get him on guns ("what?? you don't want to ban these scary ASSAULT rifles? You enable mass shootings you monster!!11") or try to link him with white supremacy because of not raising the minimum wage or some bullshit like that,
>Rand destroys Jeb and moves on to Clinton
I know we make fun of Jeb but this wouldn't happen. And even if it did Rubio would have took his place.
Rand could never win, he's too libertarian.
Now that being said, I preferred him to Trump initially.
rand doesn't have the personality or charisma to defeat jeb unfortunately, not with the money jeb had being pumped into his campaign.
>can't call Rand a racist
Of course they'd call him a racist, he's a FUCKING WHITE MALE!
Rand wouldn't have gotten the nomination. He wasn't aggressive enough.
>News can't call Rand a racist because he has no racial past so naive
>You mean you DON'T want war with Iran? >You mean you DON'T want nuclear war with Russia? >You mean you DON'T support the Islamic clit-cutters...err, we mean, 'le moderate rebels' in their bid to overthrow the eeeeeeevil Assad?
All sides would have gone full neo-con propaganda mode. Hillary landslide.
>news can't call him
yes they can. And would. Any republican would be smeared with the same tactics they're using on Trump.
The media would destroy this guy based on his father's record and past.
I like Rand better personally, but we need trump to clean up first.
Trump 2016, Rand 2024. He's very young, he'll be able to run again.
Trump is the bulldozer. Rand is the crop farmer.
>News can't call Rand a racist they will invent racism and project it all the same
>News can't call him a misogynist some shit he said once taken out of context, and then goes the headlines.
If he dont have shit on him, they would shamelessly invent it.
Yep. Good times ahead, britfriend
Do we still have hope?
He would destroy anyone trying to call him out on guns
>can't call him a racist He's against the private sector portion of the civil rights act.
>News can't call Rand a racist because he has no racial past >News can't call him a misogynist because he's for individual freedoms
>Implying they wouldn't anyway
How much you win by doesn't matter so long as you get to become President. Trump has a solid chance of winning.
a fucking leaf
jeb would fucking crush rand
Jeb would probably have beaten Rand by taking the isolationist/not-a-warhawk angle. The voters in Republican primaries love that shit.
I really think the Pauls would have a better shot running as Democrats. Would be easier to teach liberals economics than break the conservatives' militarism
They'd say he's racist because of his supposed desire to repeal the Civil Rights Act, and old memes about libertarians being racist Confederates