Has Trickle down economic been the biggest failure for The middle class ?

Yet conservashits still try to pass this shit on like its a viable economic system

Friendly reminder that Conservashits vote against their own best economic interests

no government to enforce business investment, or hard tax them will lead to this garbage.

>m-muh free-market will fix everything!

Would have worked great without open borders and one sided trade deals... You think 500 billion a year trade deficit with China for over a decade had no effect? Trickle down works when money stays in the country, not when profits are concentrated at the top and sent overseas...

> thanks to republican economic policies

Keep thinking that buddy. Trump will definitely fix that lol :^)

In the UK it's been widely ridiculed for a while now. Only old school conservatives would dare speak those three words.

Shame that some working class American's still love Reagan after he fucked them in the ass.

It's Trump's saving grace that he's taken the right wing in the US away from corporate elitistm. I personally don't like him but fair play for fucking over some of the worse people in the world.

>Conservashits

Okay now put that graph against government spending... oh so, increasing government spending makes the top 1% richer? looks like we need more free market dumb fag

The 3 trillion dollars of debt in the worldwide economy are dwarfed by the 5 and a half trillion dollars of idle capital sitting in the pockets of the rich, the banks and the corporations. But no no, that's not enough capital that could be used for investment or stimulating the economy, they need to have more. Pls lower tax rates for the superrich, literally 70 people owning more than half of the world's wealth is still too many.

I don't entirely disagree with liberals on some of these issues but honestly who has the biggest share of wealth is irrelevant desu.
I want the system that will raise the bottom 20% as quickly as possible, for as long as possible. That's it. If the top 1% end up owning 60% of the wealth, meh.

>Open borders
Both parties
>Crooked FTAs
Both parties
>Watdo?
Vote them out
>Where go?
Third position.

Trump himself? No. That's why We The People need to storm DC in the millions if he and Congress don't do as was promised.

The wall will be built, complete with land, river, sea, air, and underground surveillance and detection.

The free trade agreements and the institutions that facilitate them will be audited.

Also
>My piece of the pie is getting smaller
The pie is also getting larger.

Indeed French socialism is much better!!! Nah

this

so much this. and i'm poor

>has the globalist, neoliberal agenda that Obama and Clinton push failed

obviously

the "pie" is getting bigger because debt growth is counted as (((GDP)))

honestly if you support neoliberalism and wall street so much why don't you just vote CLinton?

Not sure I still buy that the living standards of the lower class are sill improving though.

The second you import extra workers, the living standards will go down.

Middle Class was an anomaly in the first place. Pardon the all caps mode but STOP ASSUMING HAVING A LARGE-STRONG MIDDLE CLASS AS A NORM.

If anything it was an anomaly, created due to 1-USA being the only industrial country that was not damaged/least damaged by war 2-USA having tremendous amount of natural source 3-Socialistic policies of FDR 4-Ike's continuation and enforcement of socialistic policies enacted by FDR 5-Hardship of going global (no internet etc)

We are just going back to normal, middle class was always very small and its purchase power was always very miniscule. The norm is to have a very filthy rich with %70-80 of the population in poverty and maybe, just maybe %10-5 of the population being middle class.


You cannot create a strong and prosperous middle class without socialism.

Be aware there is a big push to pass the TPP during the lame-duck period between when Trump gets elected and his inauguration.

The TPP is trickle down economics at it's finest.

TPP 'benefits' to labor:

* "Increased income" - well not really, increased relative to the price of goods which will be cheaper because they cost less to make (because the cost of labor is reduced).

* "More jobs" - well projected based on the fact that capital holders will have more capital because they have to pay less money for labor, the obvious assumption to make is that they will hire more workers with that money. (Where have I heard that before).

If trickle down economics is a failure, vote Trump for the love of God.

>If trickle down economics is a failure, vote Trump for the love of God.
Trump is a free market capitalist that's the correct term to what leftists re-named trickle down economics