Im Westen haben wir dem Feind bewiesen:

Im Westen haben wir dem Feind bewiesen:

Wo wir dabei, da brach die stärkste Kraft!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/CkFkxIDcAqo
tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2015/02/cheating-at-statistics-10-liars-at-lisow.html
tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2014/10/cheating-at-statistics-9-art-imitates.html
tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2014/05/cheating-at-statistics-7-korner-conjurer.html
psywarrior.com/GermanWWIPSYOPcont.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Ob hoch die Berge, sumpfig auch die Wiesen,
Wir haben jedes Hindernis geschafft!

Wir rollen an, und ob wir opfern sollten

Ja.

Unser ist der Sieg, wo wir viel siegen wollten!

Voran! Voran! Panzer voran!

Voran! Voran!

So donnern die Motoren!

Voran! Voran!

Wir sind dem Sieg verschworen!

Uns drängt uns reißt,
Des Führers Geist!

|: Wir sind die Panzergruppe Kleist,
Die Panzergruppe Kleist! :|

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHH
DU SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONER

JAAAAAAA WEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSTERWAAALLLD, JA DER WESTERWALD

MUH HERITAGE!

SHART IN MART
H
A
R
T

I
N

M
A
R
T

*loud whistle intensifies*

So ein verdammter Scheissdreck. Ihr Burger macht mich krank.

PFEIFTER DER WIND SO KALT

How many of you cucks even know what this is?

youtu.be/CkFkxIDcAqo

Protip: your country needs to be a non cucked shithole to view this video probably

Why do you hate yourself? Did Panzergruppe Kleist not defend the Reich as valiantly as their supply and equipment allowed? You should be proud if their accomplishments.

Of*

wait what did he say?

"This is a god damn crap dirt. Your burger makes me sick"

Maybe if you could design a tank worth a shit you wouldnt have lost the goddamn war.

Panzer I-IV were a fucking joke before they even came out, compared to even the French tanks, and got roflstomped when the Russians unveiled the T34.

Your answer was to create a series of fucking juggernauts on tracks that ended up causing you more trouble than the enemy. This was of course because your dear leader had a fetish for cumbersome monstrosities instead of reliable war machines, mostly due to the fact that he hasnt seen much of the frontlines himself.

tl;dr German ''''''''tanks''''''''

i'm sure its a whole CULTURAL APPROPRIATION kind thing

it is weird to see foreigners likes this but at least we're assimilating

They were still better than Tommy cookers - just not as numerous.

...

>rofl stomped

Better check yourself before you panzershreck yourself faggot

SCHEIIIISEEEEEEEEEEEEE

...

PLAY WAR THUNDER FOR WAY BETTER IMMERSION!!!

Is that German for sinks?

Those numbers are taken from German sources, which used fake made up numbers for propaganda purposes.

Nazis were known to have faked numbers to cover up their failures. Even if they were losing the war IRL, they wanted to win the war on paper.

tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2015/02/cheating-at-statistics-10-liars-at-lisow.html
>battalion of 51 brand new King Tigers wiped out by a similar number of T-34s.
>nazis claimed they were attacked by IS-2 and AT guns and destroyed 60 enemy tanks
>IRL nazis only fought T-34s and only destroyed 20 of them.

tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2014/10/cheating-at-statistics-9-art-imitates.html
>Nazis claim their tigers totally destroyed enemies
>IRL tigers were nearly all wiped out with negligible Soviet losses.

tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2014/05/cheating-at-statistics-7-korner-conjurer.html
>18/APR/1945 Nazis claim 64 enemy tanks knocked out for loss of one tiger
>19/APR/1945 Nazis claim three tigers destroyed 100 T-34s
>later that afternoon the three tigers were attacked and destroyed another 30 T-34s
>total of 130 T-34s, a company of IS-2s, and over 64 unspecified tanks
>IRL the Soviets never even encountered any enemy tanks there at all

>not panzer corps or gary grigsby's

>nazis cover up their losses.

The brits and the americans were the ones most notorious for this. I'd first believe german sources than bongs or soviets.

Mes respects.

butthurped slavaboo detected

Lmao

When records of both sides are compared, you often find that Soviet forces claimed to be "totally destroyed" by Germans tend to not notice their total destruction at the hands of Germans, and continue pushing on. In those cases, the German units tends to clear out of the area of operations, usually with heavy losses.

Goebbels always said propaganda should always be truthful.


Here's an example of brit psyops in the first world war to distort facts they already knew:

>Unfortunately for Karl Goetz, he put the wrong date of sinking on the medal, an error he later attributed to an error in the newspaper account he had read. Instead of the correct date of 7 May, Goetz engraved 5 May, two days before the actual sinking of the Lusitania. This allowed the British to claim that the Germans had waited for the ship to leave port and committed wholesale premeditated murder. Goetz later corrected the date but it was too late by then.

psywarrior.com/GermanWWIPSYOPcont.html

Don't forget in wwii it was normally the germans who announced casualties for the brits, for their own people because the british propaganda never wanted to state the losses first, or always severly understated them.

Fuck off then

You know what is irony?

When Hitler and the General Staff work on the reports of frontline commanders about Soviet losses, and correctly compute that after taking such losses, Moscow couldn't be effectively defended

Tough look, the reports were utter bullshit. As are the postwar accounts of generals whitewashing themselves and blaming Hitler for everything.

Ministry of propaganda slashed frontline claims by 50% for their daily propaganda broadcasts. Fighter ace claims were utter bullshit, but probably the Americans take the gold in the Pacific.

Does anyone know the difference between schlachten and abschlachten?

>bleached nigger commie cunt sources
>poster is a fucking leaf
not surprised
im not surprised

Probably jidf demoralizing those who honor the defenders of the Reich.

Source? Who are the people who "found" the reports?

Dr. Shekelbergstein? Just like all those fake holocaust documents?