How do you respond to this?

How do you respond to this?

Other urls found in this thread:

un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Brian Bi, more like Brian Gay

*farts*

With suppressive fire and maneuver.

Seriously at my limit with these fucking barbarians.

>Right to work
Haven't read that one in the bill of rights.
>Non-citizens enjoying any benefits citizenship
Nope
>Entitlement to become citizens because feels
Again nope

Not an argument.

If they followed the law and didn't go to the country illegally then maybe they'd get equal treatment.

That would be a fine argument if they did work and if those who do were not making thousands of people that are actual taxpayers unemployed.

Why must they be allowed to live off a society that they do not contribute to?
Its as if you refused to pay your share of the pizzas ordered and still demanded one for yourself.

>work is a right

Throw rocks.

It's obviously not unjustifiable if every justice system on earth already does it as punishment.

Entering and living in a country illegally is a crime in itself, but denying working rights to non-citizens is the prerogative of every sovereign nation.

there are no jobs in the west anymore so no reason to come here
t. 2 year unemployed cuck tired of wasting gas money on interviews

I didn't intend to respond with reason.

I meant to respond with lead. That's the only answer that matters when foreigners demand we cuck to them.

>gib free stuffs

No

>Raciss

So?

>We commin anyway

Ok I'll shoot

>Muh constitution

MY Constitution

*.50 caliber music*

Selling drugs and joining welfare lines isn't work

>PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES DO NOT HAVE AMERICAN RIGHTS
PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES DO NOT HAVE AMERICAN RIGHTS
>PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES DO NOT HAVE AMERICAN RIGHTS
PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES DO NOT HAVE AMERICAN RIGHTS
>PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES DO NOT HAVE AMERICAN RIGHTS

By filtering all leaf idiots.

they're not being deprived of their right to work. they can work all they want in their own country.

I think he would be quite upset when someone from Bangladesh took his job for 10 cents a day.

>right to work
spook.

He's asking why a social abstraction is not applicable to some people, who are residing within imaginary borders. What the fuck is there to respond to?

He's a fucking chinaman, what the hell does he know?

Fire up those internment camps!

Shouting "I'm ignoring you" at someone is not ignoring them, and the sooner you learn this, the better

the assumption is wrong
>im not allowed to work how inhumane

its no human right to be illegal in another country and expect to use the benefits of this countrys market and social standards.

if they need to work (to survive) they can go back.

Illegal immigrants actually end up being a slight net positive on taxpayers

>right to work
>inhumane or unjustifiable
already failed

Dis

>right to work
>right to work in any sovereign state I please
>fuck laws and shit

nip nong ching chong

>[citation needed]

...

You don't have the right to do something if it's against the law. End of story.

>right to work

top lel

Employment is at-will. Not a right.

By making use of welfare, demanding sanctuary cities, taking over jobs who would go to actual tax payer citizens and increasing crime?

LEGAL immigrants are a positive, ILLEGAL immigrants are nothing but negative and im not even mentioning the danger of terror and espionage and also the threat of an unknown force within your borders.

>Depriving someone of their right to work would be universally condemned....as a punishment for...crime
No it wouldnt?
Felons are immediately disqualified from doing a tremendous number of jobs.
You have no innate right to work of any kind.

you shouldnt have acess to local civil rights if youre not a local civilian

in other words, you dont owe anything to someone else just for existing

...

They're allowed to work in their own countries. So their basic rights are still in tact.

>right to work

How fucking spoiled is the current generation?

You're a fucking idiot.

>that id though

Because I would assume they are already citizens of another country and are said country's problem. Why should we clean up somebody else's mess?

>not even mentioning the danger of terror and espionage and also the threat of an unknown force within your borders
you just did
also,
>implying legal immigration deters these threats

There is no such thing as a 'right to work' in the Western word. The 'right to work' is typically only guaranteed in communist countries. I think it's actually in the Soviet constitution.

No i had not. Spies and terrorist line creators do not cause crime or steal jobs. They set up a base of operations so they can effectively supply tens of terrorist attacks before they are caught.

>implying legal immigration deters these threats

It does by allowing you to screen those people. Do you know how costly it is to put a spy trained for 10 years and heavily selected through security check when entering a country and having him detained and revealed?

Besides, muslim nations dont have the resources to spend on proper security exploitation.

Do you have any idea how intelligence works?

The right to swing your fist ends at my nose.
Illegal immigration devalues the labor market. This hurts legal citizens; there is a conflict of rights. Because illegal immigrants are in the country illegally, the rights of legal citizens wins.

This is just one of many reasons for being very tough on illegal immigration, but it is one that refutes nerdy chinkboy's shitty argument.

un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

>Article 23.
>(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

They actually put it in there, the absolute madmen.

There is no such thing as 'the right to work.' You can take the sovereign citizen approach to things, but that only goes so far. The reality of this untenable position - that is, accepting illegals - is that charity can and will be sought by those entering the country. Moreover, the illegals will depress low-skilled wages to such levels that the domestic population wouldn't reasonably work them, and you will make millions of citizens apply to welfare sooner than they could work the same jobs for better pay.

Communism.

lol holy shit you are thinking in hollywood land
do YOU have any idea how intelligence works?

retard

also, YES, you did mention the danger of terror and espionage. i greentexted it in my post. get your head out of your ass

Work is not a right, Muhamed.

>foreign nationals
>entitled to rights given to citizens
Also
>right to work

Because they're not accounted for, so that means they aren't upheld by the law so company's can take advantage of this fact and they can also take advantage of this fact

Rights are an illusion. Wake up sheeple!

Unfriend then kill myself for still using FB at 30.

>of the country they live in

That's a funny way of writing "of the country they squat in"

I know exactly how this works, faggot. Hollywood doesnt show fucking agents getting their cover blown after a single conversation while trying to get a bloody tourist visa in order to leave a nation.

Operatives are insanely heavily selected. You must overperform militarily, you must not have any health issues including a sight deficience of a negligible degree and you must go through the selection process that is the most difficult thing to enter in the history of existence and that is only the beginning.


You dont train operatives to throw them away, you can use locals for that. In fact the world has mastered using locals to carry out attacks and other actions.


A muslim operative for example, has to have his entire life reworked from within the whole electronic realm and the real realm. He needs to have alibies from every moment of his life and he must not show any affiliation to anyone related to terrorists whilst making sure that his pretend self has evidence of his involvement with people he never actually met.

And it all has to look clean whilst he is entering the country in order to create a network of resources for terror, which he will supply to radicalized local muslims.

By allowing him to just walk across the border and be effectively invisible, you're doing all the hard work for him. He has better chances crossing the border nowadays than he would have to actually pass into the country whilst in the system.

You might think im talking shit, but you're a faggot after all so fuck you.
Just know the risk is real and it has most surely already been exploited numerous times

Btw; he doesnt have to be a muslim.

A russian can smuggle manpads just the same, so can a chinese or an indian, or a bloody jew.

They can all do it and use as an intermediate the cover of islam to disrupt anything and cause any war they want and nobody would have a clue.

Youporn is probably one of the worst big name free porn sites