STOP AND FRISK

> attetion grabbin
yeah,but what it is? what animal is this shit? a nigger?

Maybe you forgot we're kind of in a time of war? We've redefined how we start wars lately since we're not directly fighting a country itself, but in wartime it's been way worse. Usually there are intern camps for suspected defectors and incredibly rigorous treason laws.

This country has been living a pipe dream, thinking we can bomb other countries and march soldiers without worrying about retaliation and home-grown defectors.

Damaged hoof / the inside.

I think it's a hoof. Except it doesn't have the hoof.

Is horse kill?!?!

Last time I checked, niggers didn't have hooves. At least as far as I know...

We've been at war almost every year of my life. When does it stop? Does it ever stop? And what kind of excuse is that, to give up all privacy, liberty, and a slippery slope away from our freedom, for a thin veil of "security"?

I do recall one American who had something very pertinent to say about this matter...

I was in favor until I looked it up and saw there was literally no compelling evidence that stop-and-frisk had a significant effect on reducing violent crime in NYC.

>We've been at war almost every year of my life. When does it stop? Does it ever stop? And what kind of excuse is that, to give up all privacy, liberty, and a slippery slope away from our freedom, for a thin veil of "security"?
How young are you? I remember peace-time, and George fucking Bush ruined it after 9/11. We declared war against an idea. So fucking stupid. Now we bomb with impunity and never leave the world stage for respite. Trump is the only one who understands it. Hillary wants to enter into more conflicts.

Where are our American POW camps? Guantanamo is not a good example.

So a nigger, then.

Agree w/ OP on this one. I would never consent to being randomly stopped a patted down on the street by the cops. How they got away with that shit in NYC for so long w/out it going to court boggles my brain. At a minimum, the ACLU should have been all over that shit.

Thats when the hard part of a horses hoof schloffs off

its extremely painful and you have to put it down when this happens

Xcept its already dead in this pic IIRC

Just write an autostream script for your droid, aim the video output at a non-JewS based streaming service, or your own media server, and keybind it to a quickly accessible combination of physical buttons on the phone.

Fire the sucker up the moment a pig starts giving you shit, if he chimps and goes for your phone silently provoke him off camera, facial expressions, middle finger, malicious compliance, anything to make him incriminate himself on video / audio.

Once you're out for doing literally nothing, assuming you aren't a nigger, retrieve the uploaded material, make copies and physically secure them, and finally proceed to ruin the pig's life by either pressing charges if there's grounds to do so, or alternatively blasting the video anonymously to social media and any tabloid you can think of.

Really simple shit my dude, just takes a bit of the old huwyte man's agency to set up.

I'm 27 and though I don't remember it because I was still a baby, we were just getting out of the Cold War and Desert Storm. While I agree that Trump is much better suited for the job than that old bitch, turning this country into a police state because of a bunch of unruly niggers isn't going to help people's dispositions either.

At least Nixon had the balls to call the National Guard to exterminate filthy hippie scum.

fuck you anyone who starts a thread with "up until x i was a trump supporter but now x happened and im not" is a ctr shill

go burn in an oven kike

Nice try CTR.
Incoming redpill:
Because it drastically reduced crime.
From (((Politifact))):
The violent crime rate dropped by 56 percent during the eight years he served as mayor. Murder, down nearly two-thirds. Robbery, down 67 percent. Aggravated assault, down 28 percent.

The thing about the weird era we're in now is that people are afraid to report their muslim acquaintances due to the liberal culture of being named "offensive" and "racist". You used to be able to report communists and nazis among you, but now you are ridiculed for suspecting radicalism or anti-americans.

If we can't feel safe talking about our peers activities, then we will always be doing damage control AFTER we're attacked by the ones that are correct. Hell, the recent bombing was by someone who actually was reported, but Obama wants to give potentially radical Muslims kid gloves.

yes it is

Eat shit, fucko. You worship the ground the guy walks on and the second someone says something contrary to one facet of his entire campaign, "HAHAHA FUCK YOU CTR" when any true blooded American would not stand for this shit, its not fucking justifiable and you goddamn well know it. Go fuck off to Jew York City and see how much you like dealing with NYPD if you were ever so unlucky enough to have a less than friendly interaction with one.

>Uses the (((())))
>Still quotes the statistics because it still fits their narrative

U wot m8? You can't say it's coming from unreliable Jewish sources but it's still honest fact

All of the trumpfags are so eager to suck his dick and defend him that they forget about the fucking 4th amendment. If you use the 2nd amendment as a basic argument against gun control, or the 1st as an argument against "hate speech laws" how can you support blatant disregard for the 4th?

In a time of war, those searches are reasonable. 4th says "unreasonable" searches. When there is a reasonable threat that enemies are infiltrating your people, is it not reasonable to search those people? How many terror attacks in the US have been done by white people?

>muh constitution
you think the founding fathers wrote it with the idea that non whites would be equals to whites? You think they wanted blacks to own fucking guns? Honestly you lolbertarians are fucking dumbasses.

FUCKING THANK YOU SIR.

YOU SEE THAT, FOLKS? THAT WAS THE ANSWER I WAS WAITING TO HEAR.

TITS

That's racial profiling and while I'd agree that you'd have to be a quart low tard to not see a connection between crime rates and niggers, if all is fair, that means that they can stop whoever the fuck they please.

No one would have any reason to tool around in my asshole because I'm not a criminal nor do I dress like one. You libshits want gun violence to go down? Stop and frisk fucking does that.

its obvious stop and frisk works .the only people mad are shitty looking spics and niggers that will be doing something illegal 9 times out of 10 when they get stopped and searched . i dont give a shit about getting stopped but i wouldlove to see the brown scumbags go to jail . if the police need to use it as an excuse i whole hearted agree on the basis that i just dont like niggers and loathe mexicans

Like the founding fathers had any idea of what kind of havoc one who was so inclined could cause with a modern weapon? I've heard plenty of libtards try to field that same argument against the second amendment, so guess again, turd.

What do you not get? It doesn't matter if you don't look like a criminal or dress like one, any cop can stop and frisk you FOR ANY REASON. And what's to say they cop stopping you and doing the frisking isn't someone with some racial motivations of their own, has a chip on their shoulder, and you just happen to catch them at a bad time? I've seen drugs being planted, it's not outside of the realm of possibility, or are the cops in your world not human beings like the ones we deal with in this world, day in, day out?

>people of the Muslim faith are generally not white
>those non-whites tend to have a frequency of radicalized terrorists
>it's profiling to accept that
Yeah, ok. Sure. I'm not saying profile brown muslims, but where are the white muslim terrorists?

We're at "war" with a bunch of Syrian hillbillies who are lucky to kill 100 of us each year. Is giving up civil liberties really worth a slight upperhand? Maybe not bombing their countries as much would be a better solution?

whether or not OP is a shill, you can't do stop and frisk

sorry bootlicking faggots

you care about the constitution when it comes to 2A and freedom of speech, you should care about it when it comes to search and seizure.

I agree we should tone down our bombings, since apparently we're incompetent enough to bomb the Syrian army. I'm speaking mostly about domestic radicalization. If I were a Muslim, I'd be very patriotic and never insinuate that I love ISIS, because that would be a sign that I might be a radical. ISIS is evil. They behead, drown, and shoot anyone who disagrees with them. If someone is sympathetic, they should be reported.

If there's a Stop and Frisk 2.0 it will most likely work exactly like the last one, which targeted HIGH CRIME neighborhoods. If they want to roll that kind of policing out on a national scale, it's going to be showing up in ghettos like Detroit and I'm all for it.

Is it ideal? No, it isn't. The estimated 2200 murders related to black-on-black crime in New York every year isn't ideal either though.

I concede you have a point about planted evidence; however, we as a nation have continued to push for bodycams, dash cams, and some people are even suggesting gun-mounted cams for officers now, I'm optimistically hoping for a huge uptick in police accountability across the next 5-10 years, and that may be a bit naive of me I understand, but the technology is definitely there now it's just a matter of rolling it out.

What do expect someone who is pro-NSA anti-4th Amendment?

You should look into McCarthyism. You'd dig it.

Ask and ye shall receive

Even if the guy is some sort of mutt, the average cop is also a certified geneticist? And what about in the winter time when you have 99% of your body covered because it's a frigid ass day? Still fine then?

Body cameras don't do shit, fuck, all those dumb motherfuckers had cameras during Tulsa and Charlotte and neither of them mitigated any of the blowback that has occurred from it. They still don't know if the guy in Tulsa had a goddamn book or a gun.

Very nice. My worldview is shattered because you found a white in the mideast

Do I really need to break this down to you?

Ok, well, lets say that your dumbass is waddling down the street and all of a sudden, a wild cop appears. "Ok, sir, stop and spread your legs for me please" and being the compliant little shitheel you are, do as you're told. Lo and behold though, you're carrying a book about I don't know... the Crusades perhaps? And the guy that is currently is searching you is... geez, I dunno, Muslim?

Do you see where a person's morality might become a little warped to where they may do questionable things because they simply can and that they don't like you?

I'm not into that degree of it. That's more akin to the label-calling Hillary brings. If you disagree with letting hundreds more unknown Muslims entering the country, you're a racist islamaphobe who isn't even American

hundreds of thousands, sorry

Google spotted.

>implying McCarthy wasn't correct

that doesn't make any sense

Standard for a pat down is reasonable suspicion. The police have never needed probable cause for a frisk.

Their failed efficacy has more to do with cops just not turning them on, intentionally turning them off during confrontation, their inability to record audio (maybe this is only some models? Not really informed enough about the industry that creates them to say), and of course cops just accidentally "deleting" their archives. I very much understand there's a need for reform when it comes to oversight and accountability.

Even so, the risk of a crooked officer somewhere planting evidence on someone they don't like doesn't bother me, I'm pretty sure if they really wanted they could already pull that off during shit like traffic stops.

As far as I'm concerned, you can look at New York and see the good far outweighs the bad from a utilitarian standpoint. Although I'm for it from that point of view, I do find that my belief in constitutionalism supersedes utilitarianism; It's ultimately up to the courts to determine the constitutional legality of stop and frisk, but if it's given the go ahead then I'm in full support.

What's this new google meme I keep seeing? Are they shilling here now?

What a bullshit article. Oh, and cry more you little bitch.

We haven't had a functioning fourth amendment in the US since the bush years. Get with the times. Bush started dismantling the constitution (actually long before Bush but he made great strides), Obama has continued his legacy and Clinton will keep working towards our destruction. At least Trump isn't completely against us.

In a time of rampant gun crime and mass shootings we need to enact more laws to limit sales on ammo and ban all semi-automatic rifles and pistols. Pump action shotguns and revolvers are fine, with strict regulation. It's a matter of national security. With hatemongering on the internet turning into real life hate crimes and encouraging people to follow radical white supremicast ideologies and Islamic terrorism we need to limit all controversial speech that may be considered radical on the internet starting with Cred Forums.
See how easy that argument is? It's like all of the fags that are supporting Donald Trump are taking crazy pills and have forgotten what country they live in. Move to Russia if you don't like the constitution and want an authoritarian government so bad.

Christina vee in pic?

We do limit guns from people who commit treason and other felonies though. We don't limit those rights from all citizens. The job of government is to limit the reach, so that it can't be applied to everyone, like in totalitarian regimes. Hillary DOES want to apply these rules to all citizens, limiting gun ownership and rights, meanwhile bombing endless countries and taking money from monarchs in return.

You sound like a crazy person. Are you a crazy person? Trump isn't 100% right on everything but he'd take a lot less of our liberty than Clinton would. He'd at least think about it instead of just doing what his overlords told him to do. It's absolute evil (Clinton) vs a guy that's trying to find ways to MAGA (Trump).

>It's like all of the fags that are supporting Donald Trump are taking crazy pills
He is a cult personality, of course they are drinking the kool-aid. Then they defend him tooth and nail on his short comings most of the time rather than saying that he is a flawed person and doesn't do everything justice.

I fucking hate this picture and i dont even know why. Somethin just pissed me off when i see it.

Meanwhile Hillaryfags want a pay-for-play career corporate criminal in office who might die soon. What an improvement! Least we'll have HUMA fucking ABEDIN as secretary of state.

No matter who we choose, we become a police state. Choose the one that won't send you overseas to die for Jews.

In the comment above yours I just literally said that he isn't perfect but he's so much better than Clinton that it's a no brainer. Hillary (and Obama, and Bush) supporters haven't been drinking the blue kool-aid? Hillary will be yet another Bush. If you support Hillary then you support George W. Bush, you'd have to, they're two peas in a pod.

Probably neither but a far better chance with Trump.

No hooves?

Disgusting.

>Up till this point, I've been on the Trump Train

You never were, shill.

Into the oven you go.

Trump's bonus is that while he is obsessive about immigration, he leaves social stuff to congress and the courts. Mostly, I think he'll be negotiating trade deals and whatnot, but unless someone makes an aggressive move against the US, we'll continue our current policies, and then move away from interventionalism.

They are both bad candidates.

I don't like either of them. If you sit here supporting Trump talking about how he'd like to violate the constitution just because "Clinton would do worse" than what's even the point on having an opinion on anything other than a political party? You've fallen into the ZOG trap, maybe if Trump gets elected and you're not happy with his time in office you'll vote Democrat next year.

You would be correct, Hungarybro.

The alternative to Trump was hyper-Christian Cruz

The alternative to Hillary was hyper-Socialist Bernie

it makes my skin crawl. jesus christ

The logic of google = nigger, skype = kike is to fuck with the search algorithm.

So what is the option? Protest vote? Join a militia? Move to Canada? We're all stuck with these two as our choices. I'd definitely like to see what Trump would do with four years. Maybe he'll suck but I already know that Clinton would continue the Bush doctrine just like Obama has. What is your solution?

How do you ONLY do stop and frisk for felons without making them wear a blatant identifier for cops? Not to mention there's no way stop and frisk would be limited to felons and Arabs since that seems to be your primary concern.

>be fragile animal
>if your foot gets fucked or your leg breaks you die
>for some reason evolve to have your feet be so incredibly fucking densely packed with nerves that anything happening to the foot inside the hoof is incredibly painful

Why?

In the wild if they fucked up their foot they're guaranteed dead anyway. Why does it need such a strong pain reflex if its already too late by the time it hurts?

>If your whole foot was a nail and that nail was ripped off

Jesus Christ.

wtf i hate drumpft now

Dunno, having license plates of reported people in a registry, having people logged who've been reported. Hard to say. I didn't say Arabs were the concern at all. I said it just seems weird that most of these home-grown terror attacks aren't white people. That includes dozens of other races as possibilities, but doesn't fully disinclude whites.

I feel like there's a lot of assuming going on.

Stop and frisk is constitutional, shill.

When you are in public, you don't have privacy.

because the universe is a cold heartless place

You fool! If your image is too attention-grabbing, it becomes the topic of your thread. You fucked up.

>I will be come one of those "AM I BEING DETAINED" assholes in a second if this shit passes.

So you're going to end up as a dindu nuffin unarmed man who was shot dead? Worth it?

retards

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop

its already fucking everywhere

If you want to vote for Trump because that's what you think is best because you hate Clinton that much more then do it, but if everyone that supports Trump stands behind everything he says then there isn't even a point in him at least doubling down and saying "I didn't mean it like THAT" later on and not making it a focus of his. If his campaign thinks his supporters like the idea of stop and frisk on a nationwide scale they'll stick with it just like the wall, and the temporary ban on Muslim comment. I'll probably cast a "protest vote" even though I know it'll be pointless most likely. My solution, staying in the U.S. and going to a state like Vermont, Maine, Alaska or parts of Northern California with a very minor police presence or government interference but a lot of white people so you don't really have to deal with the government.

Hillary will do all of what Trump says and more, including selling American lives for profit. That's already established. She only pretends to have "liberal" values for the sake of the vote. That was proven by her Secretary of State term.

Why does this image make my dick hard

You have privacy on your person. You can be filmed when you're in public but that doesn't give someone the right to go through your pockets when you're in front of your house to film that.

>in private, if some one molests you with force it is battery.
>in public, if some one molests you with force it is constitutional.

Stop and Frisk works

>How many terror attacks in the US have been done by white people?
More than most people think.
The danger here is that such a policy would survive a Trump administration and continue on ad infitum. What if in 4 or 8 years Obama 2.0 uses stop and frisk on gatherings of conservatives (gun shows, tea party rallies, wtc.)?

>At least Trump isn't completely against us.
But he's the only one pushing for stop and frisk.

>When you are in public, you don't have privacy
When YOU'RE in public, you don't have a job or liquid cash, Greasefag. In America we have privacy of our person, cops have to ask to search unless given a reasonable suspicion.

We've tried sacrificing rights for "safety" and it hasn't worked well. All we got was long lines of getting felt up by TSA and our cell phones recorded. Stop and frisk will be abused, and not just against niggers. It'll be against you. Don't give up the 4th amendment.

It should only apply to non-whites.

>The danger here is that such a policy would survive a Trump administration and continue on ad infitum. What if in 4 or 8 years Obama 2.0 uses stop and frisk on gatherings of conservatives (gun shows, tea party rallies, wtc.)?
that's a fuckin joke. Obama's only issue is he demanded that the investigative agencies ignore Islam reports due to "racism". The only difference after Trump would be no more "fear" to report people building bombs and openly supporting our enemies.

I'm really optimistic about this election. Between people like yourself voting Johnson and a bunch of people disillusioned with Hillary voting Stein, this could be the election where alternative voices finally start gettng heard.

Hahaha all you dumb fucks. Fuck Trump. What are you nerds going to do when you are being stopped and frisked by Black and Latino cops with racist motivations. Trust me, it's coming, especially since half the police force in major cities is fucking minority now. Dumb bootlicking regards.

The whole Trump agenda being pushed so hard on pol is all part of the Merchants plan. The pollacks shilling for Trump the hardest are merchants in disguise. You disagree, they call you nigger or kike, CTR, shill. Whatever. Its all part of their playbook to get their candidate in. Trump is as controlled as Hillary. Simply playing their other side of the fence. The whole thing is a fucking farce, and pol has been extremely useful to the Merchants in fulfilling their agenda. You idiot Trump-bots are all pawns.

...