Facebook Skittles Analogy

So I have a really angry Jew liberal on facebook, someone who posts insanely long rants that you guys would eat up like brownies sprinkled with cocaine. He's been posting variants of this skittles analogy and various reactions to it, and I'd like to hear some of your ideas about it.

I'd just like to point out that in this text post itself, we can see the common liberal tactic of "overwhelming" the "enemy", i.e. not letting them fucking talk, treated in a very righteous way. That's besides the point that the thing that they conclude is really being said (my life is more important etc etc) isn't true or implied either way.

he's not wrong, you know

Endulge me, leaf. Why is he right?

Who the fuck would choose anybody elses live over his own. I mean I get it if it's your family but they're really just worthless sandniggers.

The fuck is this?

Don't waste your time answering, these guys will never get it.

If you're genuinely curious why what he says is bullshit, it's because the poisonous skittle doesn't just kill the one eating it. It will kill everyone, including the other skittles.

To the question, would I rather sacrifice a few thousands refugees or hundreds of millions european/american, the refugees die every time.

I still wouldn't eat them skittles,
let the Desert Goyim sort their own shit out!

Never mind that they're refugees, nevermind if you live in the first world or third world, we are our only selves, and until we die and any kind of world spiritualism can prove otherwise, this is the only go-around, our one mind and body is the conduit for life, and our chance to live and contribute to the human experience.

It's inherent to that very nature of our lives (and existence on a larger scale) to care for our own lives first. Even if you were the most charitable of left-leaning people, how could you expect to save anyone or influence the world, or both, were you dead? They think the goodwill undermines the skittles analogy, but it doesn't work both in terms of any kind of vague philosophical ramblings or in actual politics where we replace skittles with accepting refugees, especially these refugees, who we've seen behave terribly abroad.

It's an answer to the classic "the train is coming and you can choose to kill only one person or a group of people" problem that says "I'll just jump in front of the train myself (though this will not work)"

>Leftist constructing a massive strawman and arguing with themselves
This is the face of an unstable dogmatic zealot

Also all forms of the "skittle argument" is logically and philosophically incredibly shallow for the reasons the frog explained.
Also in regards to the refugee thing them leaving their home instead of fighting to make it better just leaves the place in ruins indefinitely for those who cannot escape and by letting these people in not only are you actively making the lives of everyone in the host nation worse you're forever leaving orders of magnitude more lives worse back home

Skittles are nasty, Id only eat one if it was poisoned