Is race-mixing inevitable?

Entropy:
a : the degradation of the matter and energy in the universe to an ultimate state of inert uniformity
b : a process of degradation or running down or a trend to disorder

Does the universal constant of entropy mean that the white race will eventually become part of one single mixed race?

Other urls found in this thread:

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2625893
newobserveronline.com/otzi-stumps-out-of-africa-theory/
nytimes.com/2016/09/22/science/ancient-dna-human-history.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1559480/
actionbioscience.org/evolution/johanson.html
bbc.com/news/science-environment-34531861
carefreedental.com/resources/21-dental-technology/168-fossilized-teeth-could-finally-reveal-the-story-of-our-species
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/8227204/Did-the-first-humans-come-out-of-Middle-East.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

WE

No one is forcing you to fuck black people

Entropy only works in closed systems

Earth isn't one.

WUZ

My friend had a black dad and he looks white AF.

WHITE

Singularity will happen long before this is a concern. Genetically engineered babies are only a few years away.

Not quite true. The reason entropy doesn't necessarily increase in an open system, is because of the matter entering/exiting the boundary. Thus the increase of entropy over time does indeed apply to the whole universe.

I think OP doesn't realize how deep his data can be understood.

Consider the following:
>black + something ALWAYS results in something darker and melanine-rich
>maybe... MAYBE you can whitewash somebody's lineage over the course of generations, i.e. by having just a black great-grandfather and a shitload of white people in all the other branches
>but as far as immediate offspring is concerned, black always prevail

All these thing said, the intrinsic idealistic nature of something such as "white race" becomes apparent.

That is, no way something such as "white race" could have existed without a repeated and constant endogamic effort.

This literally means that if you're white you are the result of a social project lasted for millennia, in which people have systematically tried to bend the rules of evolution to their favour -- instead of allowing for fucking randomness.

The existence of whites is a testimony to the attempt to make "culture" and "social/group choices" drive evolution and not the other way around (e.g. innate instincts taking the lead).

Literally: mind over matter.

Not a conscious, organized effort. Literally just geographic isolation/distance.

This. Mixed people are not dark black.

>days are still shorter in the north
>black skin isn't good for converting vitamin D

No, and even if we are all completely wiped away in a tide of darkness (unlikely), we would re-emerge due to selection pressure.

Mother nature is not merciful to the unnatural.

What does that last one even mean?

...

No. It doesn't. Life itself is an affront to entropy. What's inevitable is a change over time. What happens in our history and what is best suited to thrive in the world determines what ultimately happens.

Still.plenty fucking stupid. And they always identify black. Always.

Pic related

High quality post
But couldn't you say the same thing about the Roman Empire or the Colossus of Rhodes? Concentrated effort, that eventually gave way to a general trend to disorder?

It's not which survives the best. It's what reproduces the most. Survival is just a way t facilitate that.

have a (you)

Actually it IS what survives best on a long time scale. Breeding like a rabbit isn't a guaranteed win, Google r/K selection theory to see why.

>implying googles drink milk

BTW it takes modernity to extract and fortify things with vitamins.

What the fuck, why did my comment disappear?

Did anyone else see that?

Bleached

Ugly. Mixed people looks even worse than natural black

Ending welfare states will end race mixing.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2625893

>This study finds that 92% of biracial children with African American fathers are born out of wedlock and 82% end up on government assistance.

No white woman will want to mix with a nog if she knows her kids will go hungry just like Apefricans.

Mulatto and quadroon who don't look like quite sub-saharan usually look like arabs and/or puerto ricans

Googles are worthless beings.

Becasue this is how they were built in the first place?
That's the future of mankind

Luckily for us in Australia Abos have recessive genes. Tried to breed them out of existence once upon a time.

This "out of africa"/"all races came from niggers" kikeshit is ridiculous. And, even if true, that'd mean that niggers are less evolved than white people.

They really are fucking retarded.

Race mixing is inevitable.

It's not gonna have a very noticeable effect because designer genes will be available incredibly soon.

Not really because people became white because the only ones who would survive in colder weathers were the ones with less melanine so they would not die from lack of vitamin D.

Did someone said Entropy?

"Less evolved" means nothing. Evolution is not any kind of drive to perfection.

Evolution is how species change to adapt to new environments, or changes in old environments.

White people are just black people adapted to a European, rather than African, climate.

Look I agree, it's just that every single white woman I've been with are just not what I am looking for.

Been cheated on twice by white women, never once by the three Asian women I've dated

Has our white societies fucked us over, absolutely! the fault lays by the jew however, media has and continues to fuck us over

Her kids look like they're from Kuwait, UAE or Saudi Arabia

Aren't white genes more dominant?

All races were Google at one point, or so they claim

You think making white designer babies will be considered racist?

It's a case by case thing, but light eyes are recessive. Most other visually-evident features (hair, skin, face) are co-dominant.

>White people are just black people adapted to a European, rather than African, climate.

That's like saying black people are just homo erectus who adapted to a specific envirenment.

Aren't blonde and red hair are recessive as well?

If the future of humankind is to look like North-Africans, it will be a very sad future indeed

Probably so, yeah.

But people will do it anyway. And I'm sure you'll see lots of "chimera" people with beneficial genes grabbed from ethnic groups all across the planet.

Child sex trafficking.

But black people and Homo erectus are hugely more separate than black people and white people

Wtf!!!
Why? Why is it always blacks doing this tribal shit?
What does that accomplish?

That's irrelevant, and the way you worded it is stupid. White people aren't black people. Asian people aren't white people, etc

Unnnnffff

Sure, but everyone is descended from black populations.

If you grab a random family from Nigeria and toss them in isolation in Sweden, 80,000 years later they'll look probably look like Europeans

why are Indians so damn brown?

And black people are descendent from Homo erectus. The moment enough mutations made people in Europe white they (obviously)ceased to be black. Golden Retrievers aren't wolves, but they're both Canis lupus

Also not sure if you're example is entirely accurate. Lighter skin genes would have to be selected again for the absobtion of vitamin D, and theres no guarantees lighter hair/eyes, smaller lips, noses, etc would appear again.

Also sub-saharan Africans have no Neanderthal DNA, which explains why they look so much different than just about every race

if we is frum afreakans den y is der stil afreakans? checkmate

It's much more likely that Europeans look like Neanderthals because they adapted to the same environmental conditions.

Europeans have around 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. Obviously, that's 1-4% that blacks don't have, but not an enormous difference.

Uniformity is inevitable. Race mixing isnt.

Apparently it was to make them unattractive to slavers, and eventually just developed into an actual culture even after slavery is over with in the west.

>White people are just black people adapted to a European, rather than African, climate
Not at all

Homo Sapiens did not look like a sub-saharan to begin with and Africa is not necessarily the cradle of humankind

" The “out of Africa” theory of the origin of mankind has been thrown into doubt once again"
" What this means is that the population of early Europe does not fit with the timeline proposed by the “out of Africa” theory, and that even now, scientists cannot say with any certainty that any of the proposed theories are completely accurate or not."
" The “out of Africa” theory has however become popular amongst the politically correct elite not because it is any more “accurate” than any other theory, but because it has served a political purpose in the “all races are the same” egalitarian ideology which underpins present-day liberalism."
newobserveronline.com/otzi-stumps-out-of-africa-theory/

nice source

nytimes.com/2016/09/22/science/ancient-dna-human-history.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1559480/
actionbioscience.org/evolution/johanson.html

What is science/

No, not at all.
It does meant that eventually we will all turn into dust though.

The system of building knowledge based on experimentation.

>Homo Sapiens did not look like a sub-saharan to begin with
That's actually a pretty good point. This guy saying white people are basically black people could also say we are all basically chimpanzees because we also have common ancestors who lived in Africa, the only difference being the amount of genetic difference. The people who lived in Africa 130k years ago probably aren't the same ones there right now

>If you grab a random family from Nigeria and toss them in isolation in Sweden, 80,000 years later they'll look probably look like Europeans
If you grab a random family form Nigeria and toss them in islolation in Sweden thousands years ago they'll die
All of them

" Fossil finds from China have shaken up the traditional narrative of humankind's dispersal from Africa."
" Prof Chris Stringer, from London's Natural History Museum said the new study was "a game-changer" in the debate about the spread of modern humans."
" "Many workers (often including me) have argued that the early dispersal of modern humans from Africa into the Levant recorded by the fossils from Skhul and Qafzeh at about 120,000 years ago was essentially a failed dispersal which went little or no further than Israel." "
" Dr Martinón-Torres said the study could also shed light on why it took Homo sapiens another 40,000 years to settle Europe."
bbc.com/news/science-environment-34531861

it means black women cheat a lot when with a nigger

>a leaf that can into bantz
RARE

I wish, that was actually the truth

>nice source
Very interesting indeed

" Discovery of teeth raises doubts about the ‘Out of Africa’ theory."
" It raises some interesting questions about the widely accepted theory that the first human populations spread outwards, from the horn of Africa, as part of one massive major migration."
" One of the most interesting discoveries made at this site in Siberia was the presence of several additional species. There were the three ‘new species,’ but there was also evidence of Neanderthal activity and visitations from early modern humans."
carefreedental.com/resources/21-dental-technology/168-fossilized-teeth-could-finally-reveal-the-story-of-our-species

" Modern man may have evolved in the Middle East rather than Africa, it has been claimed, after the discovery of remains said to be more than 400,000 years old."
" But in recent years discoveries in Spain and China have also questioned the theory that man originated in Africa."
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/8227204/Did-the-first-humans-come-out-of-Middle-East.html

India is a hot sweltering region?

Get over here, we got ourselves a new mascot.

All humans descend from Sub-Saharan Africans. Take your broscience/stormfag-psuedoscience elsewhere, kid.

>inb4 durr lefty we aint equal

Didn't say that, you dumb uneducated cucks. If anything the out of Africa theory PROVES Sub-Saharan Africans are proto-human. It PROVES racial differences but you uneducated peasants can't see that.