Falling Down: The Alt-Right Film

I wrote this in another thread and saw that it was blessed by kek after I wrote in after falling into a weird trance. So I repeat it here:

TEXT:
This movie makes an excellent point, really.

The main character has no ideology, has no friends, has no connections.

All he has is a work ethic and a "family man urge," both frustrated by the SJW-izing of society, symbolized by his loss of work as a defense contractor and his wife leaving him as he becomes more desperate.

At one point, a neo-Nazi tries to recruit him, and he refuses and ends up killing the neo-Nazi.

That part was not thrown in there to PC-ify the movie or make it easier for us to identifty with him. That bit was making an important point: neo-Nazis are loudmouthed fuckheads who can't help but attention whore, making them easy to watch and control, but people like the main character--competent, angry, educated, smart and adrift--are, in fact, MORE dangerous than neo-Nazis, because they are not looking for an ideology and are not "joiners." They are looking for a way to CONTRIBUTE to the society they worked to build and strengthen and defend.

When the rug of normalcy and decency is pulled far enough and fast enough out from under normal, hard-working people like Douglas' character, watch the fuck out...

The movie is a warning, whether it meant to be or not.

sounds like a good watch, OP

1st half of film: great

2nd half of film: dumb as shit as they backpedal and make Michael Douglas's character look crazy instead of society.

I'm D-Fens, the rest of you are just army surplus fags.

I thought rampage was interesting in a similar fashion, especially the ending.

Neo-Nazis are ***Cargo cult national socialists*** or FBI agents.

i remember this movie. I need to watch it again, i havent seen it in almost ten years.

and by interesting I mean the reactions of the townspeople. The women who cowered together next to an open window. The cops who were taken by surprise, the old people who didn't react.

>Alt-Right
*cringe*

its an amazing film OP

it should be destroyed by remaking it as to actually make Michael Douglas into le evil nazi who is actually harassing his family and assaulting his wife and daughter.

That or put a womyn POC in the main role, in a lesbian marriage, because nothing decent should be associated iwith a fucking white male.

Its like the amber lamps movie where the bus agitator who sat down and cried after one punch was recast as a neonazi mafia.

He dies in the end, no "victory" over anybody. It's been a while since I've seen the movie but if I remember correctly the "moral of the story" was that he was consumed by rage and in the end it got him killed. I still thought the movie overall was good but this is the type of "lesson" a liberal would try to teach people. "You need to be more tolerant and less hateful of people. Otherwise all that toxic hate will destroy you". So yeah, terrible analogy, go fuck yourself.

This feels to me like the "teleports behind u" of middle aged men. Lose their job, wife, but watch out! This goyim is angry at the world!!!

>rage will destroy you
he was pretty much already destroyed, he just decided to be violent rather than try and start over.

Maybe that is why buckets or crabs are violent.

Excellent theory

>That part was not thrown in there to PC-ify
It may have been:

1) They made the store owner mysogynistic homophobe who gets BTFO by Dfens for many reasons
2) the black guy being refused a bank loan for being black and receiving Dfens sympathy - if anything they give loans out too much to poor people

if it wasn't purely PC masquerading as anti-PC

I think there should be a "see women for what they are" aspect as well.

>le ebin alt-rite xD

>comic book character meets real life

The guy actually did have anger problems and repeatedly threatened his wife with violence.

She wasn't making it up.

Why did they make so many red pilled movies in the 80s?

It's like someone from 2016 Cred Forums went back in time and made "Falling Down", "They Live", "The Bonfire of the Vanities", etc.

they were parodies of reaganism

Comment from the shitty rotten tomatoes article:

>What a horseshit review. My God, did you feel proud of yourself writing this. I can almost picture you pleasuring yourself with a WiffleBall bat while reading it to yourself after you posted it. What a load of PC crap. The movie isn't in any way about any of what you try to make it. How are you allowed to write for Rotten Tomatoes? Go impress your friends with how "woke" you are and shut the fuck up.

The Network is '76 and it is all about fake media, globalism and the Saudis.

It is literally my favorite movie

>they were parodies
No they weren't. People genuinely had patriotism during the Reagan era. Once faggot ass Nirvana came around, everybody started being apathetic and whiny.

Don't forget RoboCop

>80s patriotism

>adding a "The" to Network
>favorite movie

Best Verhoeven after Total Recall

The is an article used to precede nouns.

Go fuck yourself in the butt.

...

you mean "Badass" ? I keep ignoring it on Netflix after I realized what it was based on, I bet that old man didn't even see a nickel from that

Its a 2 minute YouTube video made to fill 120 minutes.

>muh finding a stronk woman attractive after she says she wants to steal your job
>then dating her
>then yelling and drinking and being in despair to appear masculine so her "more masculine predicitions" have phony pushback from the buffoonish men.

It's feminist/communist trash and I didn't even get into the black panther bullshit.

But how many stars did you give it?

Fuck off Ebert and Roeper, no one cares about your fucking memelord movie reviews.

>He dies in the end

No, the meaning of the movie is that he dies at the beginning, killed by everything he believed in and was actually artificial. Once "dead" he becomes a logical animal, and the killing at the end is just the last social construct, the bitter one.

>alt-right

this

adding terminator 2

ya but the movie isn't called The Network, that's like calling waterworld, The Waterworld. Robert fuckin' Osborne doesn't get paid thousands a year to go on TMC and call it The Network. you probably think Bruce willis' character name in Die Hard is Die Hard

No way. The second half of the film is even better, as he's finally given up on society and decides to become destructive because he sees there is no going back

"Falling Down" came out in '93.

What if Zelda was a girl?

>The is an article used to precede nouns.
You really showed me, faggot

>that's like calling waterworld, The Waterworld
Good choice user

Great movie.

Appearing to be 100% pure redpill, it slyly delivers a bluepill *antidote* to Death Wish.

Viewers finish the movie seeing the world the way a rich liberal Jew sees Los Angeles.

Thus the goyish impulse to revolt in the face of their middle-class utopia declining into a degenerate dystopia - an inevitability in a system built on free trade and globalism - is made ugly and foolish, neatly subverted, and dissipated.

Yes, the ultimate redpill movie.

This is why I continue to pimp it on Cred Forums -- so that you Cred Forumslacks will finally learn the wisdom of Confucius: when rape becomes inevitable, relax, and learn to enjoy it.

"You're gonna like that, faggot. You're gonna like that you faggot fuck!"

Oh please, the whole concept behind the movie can be summed up by some of D-Fens last words "I'm the bad guy?"
Making all middle-class workers with dreams of a family the bad guys.
It is shit
GTFO kike

The black guy wasn't poor though, he was protesting whilst wearing a white collar shirt, probably worked in an office, reflecting what had happened to Dfens himself

I got to see this in the theater when it came out. Fucking loved the movie.

>alt right
>he literally kills the nazi

>le poor minorites subplot throughout this movie
>le man who works for defense agency goes nuts from being wound too tight because hes conservative

this movie is pure SJW garbage that was made by a pedophile homo director

(((Schumacher)))
(((Michael douglas)))