What was the evidence for CTR being here again? That one article saying Clinton paid them to shill normie sites...

>Its art
Why are women so shitty?

>This is what a Feminist looks like?

Cred Forums is a normie site now
especially Cred Forums

>Why are women so shitty?
Penis envy. They just can't accept that they will never have a dick, which is why everything from art, to comedy, to philosophy, to politics, always revolves around dicks and pussies and tits for them.

nice thigh gap on black shirt girl, would berry

I'd slice both of your legs open just behind the knee and leave you for the gators. If you feel anything but disgust for the enemy you should be eaten alive.

>CONTROL US ALREADY YOU PATHETIC WEAKLINGS! DON'T YOU SEE WE NEED TO BE PUT BACK ON THE LEASH?!?!??!

fuck off robot

>But also we know
there's that phrase again, over and over.
>we know
I'm starting to doubt anyone here has even basic familiarity with levels of certainty, or empircism, or rules of evidence, or even just basic critical thinking.

If we know CTR is here, we have evidence and some kind of logic that excludes other possible explanations for what we see. Otherwise, we're just deciding shit is true based on feelings. Is that what's going on here, just a bunch of paranoid people with their feelings?

I have seen the evidence.

You're too fucking lazy to look it up once, I'm too lazy to go search for it a second time. Gonna be hard to find now, most likely.

Take our word for it, research it yourself or fuck off.

Oh my lord, it must smell terrible in that room. Ughhh. Men's locker rooms are tame in comparison to this.

>sliding attempt at the word "nigger" into "google" to make board culture slightly less offensive while giving google free advertising
>posting lewds or cropped porn to subdue the /nofap/ or /noporn/ ascetics of this board back into kike control
>shilling dumb memes like the Tay AI will happen because kek willed it - yet I still see no generals on our learning algorithm and I want to fucking help program it
>self-hate, depression, defeatism threads

pretty much a slightly more advanced psyop that aims to steer us back to the narrative

just watch out for these kinds of things guys, psychology has come a long way and with enough funding you can use it to do some crazy shit

Is it time for another visit at CTR headquarters? Remember the spooked fucks behind the blinds?

The only CTR shills left now are the butthurt faggots trying to censor nigger and kike with Google and Skype.
Terribly desperate at this point

>I have seen the evidence
I've seen shit people claim is evidence, but looks like the kind of ruses Cred Forums is notorious for. Seeing documents that claim to be "leaked" but ome with no secondary way to verify, that's not "proof", that's being rused.
>You're too fucking lazy to look it up once
no, i've spent a decent number of hours searching here and 8pol, and i'm just finding echo chambers where people repeat mantras like "WE KNOW THAT CTR IS DOING X". Honestly, I'm just finding examples of the "big lie" where something gets repeated until most people think it's true.
>I'm too lazy to go search for it a second time
You were probably too lazy and happening-hyped to research it right the first time tbhfam.
>Take our word for it
That's what makes you a useful idiot, you take others word for it and you're lazy.
>research it yourself or fuck off
I'm thinking if I just get yelled at for asking, and no one shows me the smoking gun, it means it's a myth, and I'm doing everyone a service by pointing it out.
>Oh my lord, it must smell terrible in that room
that was my first thought too, like what would i do if i accidentally walked past that

this has been true for years
there is no denying it

Get that many unwashed females in a room and it usually smells of fish gone bad.

>true based on feelings
Are you fucking new? Have to be. There were shit tons of emails and pictures going around as definite proof. KYS cunt.

Biggest problem with the theory CTR is here:
>we are the opposite of Hillary's demographic, so how can they justify spending her money shilling people that are never going to vote for her?

I've never heard anyone here answer this obvious flaw in the theory.

>There were shit tons of emails and pictures going around as definite proof
Yeah, I just posted one. It's an obvious fake, but it was handed to me as "proof" when last I asked. Most of them are claimed leaks with no secondary way to verify, easily made in photoshop.

Not liek wikileaks where they actually verify where shit came from. How do you know you didn't get rused or whipped up to be paranoid by someone else? Do you know the phrase "trust but verify"? How do verify leaked documents and know they aren't fakes?

Can you imagine if men were half as obsessed with their cocks ass women are obsessed with their cunts?

>CTR buying Reddit accounts
Reddit is notoriously a normie liberal shithole, makes sense they'd shill there. Not here. Why would they shill stormfags and loli porn fanatics?

It's pretty safe to say, without verified proof, that you just wanted this to be true for some reason, maybe because it justifies your time here being a slacktivist. But for all you know, the mods made some ruses to increase board traffic, to maximize their shekels and pageviews. Few people on Cred Forums seem to know how to see through a ruse these days.

>normie
Kill yourself you pedo worshipping muzzie dune coon.

Good stuff. Kek bless that noble user.

Obvious save fagging, clear scripting, repeated and manufactured talking points across threads, denial or dismissal of materials harmful to Hillary's campaign, and none of it in an over the top trolltastic manner.

Basically it was CTR or legitimate hillary supporters who were going it for free, but I find it much more believable that the only people who support her are the ones who are paid too.

I am just using the OP's terminology lad

> implying raping defeated enemies isn't a long-established tradition in war

Some evidence I saw were people attempting to correct "wrong think" associated with Hillary. There was a ton of this happening after the video of her 9/11 collapse attempting to explain away her health issues from multiple IDs that all used similar talking points and articles as sources. It very much looked like a scripted response in order to suppress the video from spreading.

This also happened following the Haiti video, with people attempting to defend the clinton foundation. If that in of itself isn't evidence, I don't know what it. Not even my most turbo progressive friends will attempt to justify the clinton foundations actions, yet there will still posts trying to redirect and missinform following in those threads.

The sudden rise of National Socialism threads and how they kept going on about wanting to infiltrate all the Trump Generals.

Multiple identical posts from different IDs happening at the same time, and it wasn't even a meme response either. When the shill invasion was really bad half the catalog would consist of pointless shitposts, as a Canadian I think I'm qualified to identify those. There was that one user who claimed to be an ex-CTR shill who posted emails from the CTR about his pay and dismissal from the organization.

>not even timed with the bomb going off
shit desu

>Multiple identical posts from different IDs happening at the same time
sounds like more circumstantial evidence. How do you know it was CTR and not SA goons or others who commonly fuck with us?
>There was that one user who claimed to be an ex-CTR shill who posted emails from the CTR about his pay and dismissal from the organization
There were several of these like: Have you ever heard of Firebug or Developer Tools?

I wanna get my hands on the contract they have to sign to shill for hill and see what it says

lol Hello Froghurt. No, but seriously
>how they kept going on about wanting to infiltrate all the Trump Generals
It's interesting that you bring that up. If I wanted to frame one group, like the people making /nsg/ threads, I would go in there and start false-flagging something that would cause conflict, like "infiltrating" another general. That's obvious. How would you tell whether they legit wanted to "infiltrate" Trump generals, or it was just someone posting in there "LETS INFILTRATE TRUMP GENERALS"? You wouldn't, because it's all anonymous. You don't know who is posting what. I saw that thread, you jumped on it and started accusing them of being CTR -- but you have an agenda against them anyway, so you'll accuse them of anything. In fact, I recall most of them shouting that idea down, and the one user who suggested it having to apologize later.

Still not proof. In fact, makes it look more doubtful since known JIDF like you are using it to make accusations against your enemies with.

THAT would be closer to a smoking gun, but we'd need something independently to verify. Too often we've had 'FBI anons' and "NSA anons' and other really obvious shit that we wanted to believe as part of whatever roleplay people enjoy here. It's not proof, and it's too bad anons here don't know how to tell proof from hearsay. It makes us easy targets for manipulation.

>sounds like more circumstantial evidence. How do you know it was CTR and not SA goons or others who commonly fuck with us?
The same tactics and even the same verbatim posts have been popping up on other forums.

Also, SA goons are familiar with Cred Forums and how it works.

>as a Canadian
At least you admit to it

nice try CTR
disruption is the name of the game
throwing a wrench into the workings of one of the monolithicly pro Trump online communities
correcting the record and the narrative in favor of Clinton
kill yourself shill

>evidence?
One of the most solid pro Trump online communities overnight becomes polluted with anti Trump and pro Clinton sentiment, where literally the day before there was none

I'm writing a 65 page law review article that details various ways to prosecute CTR and corporate entities that do this in the future. I'm very curious how their contracts work in regard to employee/independent contractor status, how taxation works, and what rights are they signing away.

>The same tactics and even the same verbatim posts have been popping up on other forums
I know, but it could be multiple parties. One thing that sticks out if how it drives up the activity and traffic here. I've wondered if it was a ruse by the mods, to drive up traffic, or if there were other groups who wanted us cooped up here. Even CTR could have an interest keeping us tied up here, to keep us from interfering with them on normie sites. I just know there is no way they justify to their client shilling on a "stormfag" site, except to data mine or distract. But even then, what is there to learn here...there are no account names, no way to verify who is who. This is normally how shills are paid, by justifying who they are shilling to and what effect it has. Here they can't validate anything, everything is anonymous.
>nice try CTR
it's interesting how people who want to preserve the big lie keep it going. Just repeat things over and over. All i'm asking for is to see the smoking gun, and hear the logic about why nothing else explains the evidence we have. You just called me names, so it means you can't provide the simplest answers. You're more of a shill than i could ever be, huh?

prosecute them for what though? Seems like at best you could expect a civil suit, not a criminal one. Governments legally engage in forum shilling and sockpuppeting, why would you be able to prosecute CTR?

Toss a few hand-grenades into the middle of those SJW's Bitches. (I love this video) youtube.com/watch?v=y0ss6gCPNs4

I agree! She has sexy feet also!!

what did you mean by this?
it's "proof" amirite