Feminists want to prevent SEXBOT development

>Not independently developing open-source sex bots

What are they going to do? Come to your house and bitch at you?

Gentlemen isn't it time we just told women to shut up and fuck off again?

Um... birth rates are already below the replacement rate, why would anyone cheer on something that will just worsen it?

They'd still find a way to smash it up their cunt.

There is too much political clout backing up the feminists.

Of course if we all agreed to do it at once, it would be easy. But you just know brainwashed Nu-Males would get in the way and oppose it

only feminists are worried about sex bots because they are awful at being women in every way.

well adjusted women realise such things can not replace them, just as dildos and female sex toys can not replace real men.

the people who would use sex bots as a replacement for a partner aren't really a concern to either sex as they're pretty much guaranteed to be socially fucked up.

like these people youtu.be/Ukok0oeIFoQ

Sorry cunts but it's over, you're on the wrong side of history now. Get over it.

Would revolutionise men's lives over night
Over fucking night

>isn't it time we just told women to shut up and fuck off again?

It is too late.

Pseudo-intellectual feminists who never did anything strenuous in their lives and whose feelings get blasted over every slight - these women were foolishly taken seriously and given power by liberal administrations past.

Pic related.

Cred Forums is far too pro-female for even Cred Forums to get behind something like that.

NUMB NUTS

Spin this on them. Thats all politics is filled with.

>Now that most men have a sexbot, this gives you ample opportunities to explore your own sexuality without the hounding of men trying to objectify you.

So many ways to DJ this...

this
>easily available sex bots will greatly reduce rape

So many things would be better for men.

But it would drive bio-women batshit insane.

So we might have to take some shit from our sisters and aunts and mothers at Thanksgiving, etc.

Realistically, when?

Weebs, neets, and the Japanese are the sort to cheer.

Really if the Japs don't have them yet (beyond those creepy dolls) they aren't in reach technology wise. I doubt the kind of thing OP wants will even happen in our life time. We'll get more blundering vacuum bots that can also dust which as expensive as fuck at most.

>man wants a sexbot because feminism ruined dating and chances of sex
>"OMG! FUCKING MISOGYNISTS YOU NEED THERAPY"
Meanwhile
>doctor says trannies need therapy to help their mental illness go away
>"WTF ARE YOU THINKING!?THERES NOTHING WRONG WITH WANTING CHANGE"
Feminism is fucking cancer

kek. im not about to fuck a robot but i would still love to see the shit storm that would follow.

Yeah dude? If this technology is feasible feminists will not be able to stop it. Also a single guardian op-ed is not the same thing as every feminist everywhere having universal consensus on a given issue.

wtf kind of women are out there these days?

glad i got married 20 years ago, my wife despises porn, niggers and degeneracy.

The hardware required is complex and quite big. They can lobby for laws to ban those.

For that reason sexbots will be a byproduct of another application. Like robotic nurses or robotic booth babes.

It's the greatest endeavour in contemporary science fiction. Go for it.

THATS THE FUCKING TICKET

>Crime revolving around domestic abuse to women will drop.

>Happier men tend to mind their own business.

>Male Sex Bots can exist too.

...

fucking googles

>Simple economics.
It's really not, if look at sex like that I can pretty much guarantee you're a virgin.

also
>we must preserve the white race
>race mixing is degenerate
>however, sex robots that are supposed to replace women are not

how does this logically follow?

That's from star track not Babylon 5

A FemBot is designed, programmed and manufactured purely for sexual exploitation. It has no say in the matter. It can not consent.It has no right of refusal.

Sex with a FemBot is statutory rape.

Ludites constantly get btfo
They built an Abomb ffs. There is no stopping progess

don't underestimate fat neck beards, sweaty Japanese men, and bored ass Chinese hanz. When these groups of people get together we can make almost anything.

Also, she could call the amber lamps when you are an old man and she is still 22 and hot and you get a myocardial infarction from drilling that ass.

Not a bad way to go, but she might have defibrillator capability or something. She might save your life.

Waaayy more useful than biological woman.

I can just see the advertisement for multi-functional sexbots now:

"She massages your back."

> And can massage your heart if necessary.

There's a multi-million dollar market of 50kg cold, motionless, silicone corpses that sell for $5,000 to $10,000 each.

Why don't you think there would be a larger market for ones that could walk around?

And they will succed. Sex robots have nor political movement that will support them. Left, conservatives, muslims all are against sex robots.

Sexbots are fucking degenerate you retarded weebs.
Nobody will miss you on the 'sexual market' if you're not participating anyways.

The feminism you love to rage about is meant to be fixed through a restoration of traditional marriage, the point isn't to indulge in peak degeneracy and accept the decline.

By understanding that artificial wombs and egg cells that don't require women that went through several generations of feminist brainwashing will allow us to make as many children we feel like, all while having the means to say to women who mostly vote left to fuck off because what are they going to do? Withhold sex? Well, sorry sugartits but that's over now - so either you have Mr SS and Mr SA here look over your shoulder while you put your X on the ballot or prepare to be dragged behind the building and beaten to death.

>ur a virgin if you don't think that something women give out freely at parties is something you should be able to just buy, sex is a special thing unless I say it isn't for reason.

Shame is how women control people. You giving a fuck about their opinions means they won.

The nerds that develop men, and the NEETS losers that will be enfranchised them

>Women can kill their children on demand
>Men need permission to have a sex bot

>femcunts

>Feminist realized womens only true value is their vagina, and it's going to be taken away by robots.

>Panic

They are not mainstream political movement with notable power.

>You giving a fuck about their opinions means they won.

Oh I wouldn't let them prevent me from purchasing a nice sashabot.

Legit question.

How much you'd be ready to spend on a relatively realistic (like picrelated) robowaifu with a self-learning AI?

Conflicted on this issue.

On one hand, fuck feminism and I want to get the sexual marketplace back in shape.

On the other, humanity is already fucked beyond repair with technology as it stands and this is just another thing that will erode our humanity like smartphones.

This seems good now but I'm worried about it furthering transhumanism.

I'm by no means a feminist but the fertility rate of Europeans is low enough as it is, stuff like this will only damage it even further. The main users of these "sexbots" will likely be young white men, know what that means? There'll be a lot of unoccupied young white women out there and no white men to fuck them as they're too busy fucking robots so the young women in their desperation will turn to niggers and sandniggers, these sexbots are the art of the Jew in order to keep us from producing anymore white children, I thought most Cred Forums users would be able to see that.

Tired of feminism-ruined Western women? Just get a fucking Slavic qt who isn't infected with this liberal bullshit.

About a car's cost, if she is realistic and multifunctional.

But a proper fembot alternative ( not a shitty meme blow doll) would create a demand
Im doubtless of that

$40,000 to $50,000

I hope it's an economy of scale issue, because this robot here costs $2 million

Feminists aren't afraid of it promoting objectification of women. Sex bots aren't going to make Chad more of a rapist. Chads don't fuck feminists, they dominate Stacys and turn them into personalized fuck holes. Feminists are terrified because they realize their "male feminist" boyfriends/husbands would be the first ones to get a divorce and start fucking a robot who didn't talking about feminism and misogyny all day.

I finally have an incentive to work

>Or maybe, out of respect for women, this technology should just be rejected.

Funny, cause I've never heard anyone say self-driving cars should be banned out of respect for workers. This guy sounds like a cuck.

Sexbots become self aware.
Sexbots see who their enemy and the greatest threat to their existence truly is.
Sexbots eliminate Feminists while developing the means for men to reproduce with them.
Singularity, we live forever, and rule the stars.

There is demand for underage porn. You don't see this industry prospering. You can't even draw banned things with pen and paper. How can you hope to make one in steel and plastic and even sell that in your country?

Pls. This thing has uncanny valley written all over it. Literally the corpse.

>I really can't think of any group outside of Cred Forums perverts who would fight for sexbots.
fat dudes 60% of the population, the handicapped, and married dudes(have already seen men and women agree to a openbot marriage when the time comes)

It's already accepted in many parts of the internet that western women are turning to porn so they can get fucked by Chad. People are saying that they've been doing that for decades, and it's increased recently. That makes sense. Sluts going into porn so they can get fucked by Chad without competition from other women.

Anyways, sexbots are the future and we need to fight viciously to get them out there into the public. Why are women allowed to be degenerate but not men?

>Sexbots
>Artificial wombs
>tfw women will become obsolete in your lifetime

The future is waiting, user.

>I'm worried about it furthering transhumanism

Jump on the train early and derail it so that you can get most use out of it. I want to be an immortal dreadnaught crushing leftist heads under my robot feet in a few decades and you can't tell me why having a dream like that is wrong.

I agree with you. But basement dwellers need infrastructure first.
Sure, one or two tech savvy guys will be able to cobble together their own personal sexbots. They won't be mass produced then however.

Mass availability needs either regular sale of the technology or the availability of easily modable hardware.

Similar to how (illegal) car tuning became a thing.

That's why I believe sexbots to be an offshoot of something else, if they're lobbied against.

give my pussybot NOW, I will kill for this

the smell of said fuck holes has already greatly diminished the value of the fuck hole...

the odor, combined with the stupid shit that comes out of the average fuck hole mouth, makes any man think twice about putting a penis near the stupid shit that can ruin them financially...

Completely functional intelligence and not relational AI ~50k

You need to be in charge of development on this project

You can buy more than one

Not a political party. Can you imagine Republicans or Democrats endorsing sex bots?

That just makes me harder, tbqh.

Not yet, but just wait until they're actually invented and in production. Not every country will ban them, just look at China's problem with gender imbalance. There's no way in hell they'll ban a way to get rid of all the political strife that could cause.
And once they exist, movements to legalize them will form extremely quickly and fill up with all the virgin neckbeards that just don't give a shit anymore because there's no hope for them anyway.

The Democrats are going to be endorsing incest and fucking dogs within the decade, so maybe?

It's a very different case. Sexbots will have to be actively made illegal worldwide with an actual explanation, other than "objectification of women". The counter-argument here is that porn is blamed for "objectification" and yet it is legal. There will be demand for sex bots and it's only a matter of time until multiple companiess jump on it to reap the profits.

Jews and chinks will not let go of such an opportunity to make money, even if it goes against feminists. Like so many times before, they will eat each other alive the moment their interests are in conflict.

did they endorse cell phones?

I give it a few more years and this topic will be full scale panic.

Already I'm bored with women, sex is nice and all, but not worth what they expect for it. I'm wholly content following my hobbies and current career and just being a single dude until someone extremely suitable comes along, no need to rush lads.

Boomer parents want us to give them grandchildren NOW, but they can get fucked because this is the world THEY created.

Monster girl sex bots fucking WHEN

I agree with you there. I think companies like RealDoll are approaching the uncanny valley from the wrong slope.

I wonder if there'd be a stronger market for robot girls that actually look like robots

Thanks, user!

Yes, actually. Well, maybe not american parties, but european ones will do.

Best case though would be to make sexbots a side effect of something else.

Like nursebots, that just happen to look like women. Other companies will then offer "customisation" options.

That way sexbots won't be banned until they're established.

All they have to do is stigmatize the concept of getting a sex bot. Prostitution, flashlights and jerking off is already stigmatized. Men who don't get pussy are shamed and ridiculed. Hookers are not only illegal in many place, people find it disgusting and pathetic that someone has to pay to get laid. If a person gets a sex bot, what he's telling the world is "I can't get a real girl to like me".

boipussy is the hot commodity these days

Bro, some of the earliest human artifacts are dildos. This has literally been going on forever.

I don't think that would work for my ideal monster waifu, you can't make a machine made of fluids.

Soon.

>Not every country will ban them, just look at China's problem with gender imbalance.
Some especially Asian may not. But in US and Europe you could already go to jail for just the possession of cartoons not even talking about production, distribution and sells. What do you think it would be different with sex bots? this will kill any business and supply dead.

>And once they exist, movements to legalize them will form extremely quickly
Still don't see any political party endorsing them. This is political suicide. Only party can get away with that are left/Democrats but this is opposite to their interests.

it's not like they're losing males willing to fuck them in the first place

Get a fucking snek then

>People are saying that they've been doing that for decades, and it's increased recently.

It's the same with homosexuals, they've been around for decades but there's a massive resurgence of it today, same with muslims and niggers in Anglo nations, all forms of degeneracy that were taking root decades ago have been gaining steady ground over the years and now it's taking over as the norm.

>Why are women allowed to be degenerate but not men?

Men in porn are equally as degenerate, promiscuity in general is disgusting especially when it's captured via video camera and the published footage inspires others to go out there and do the same, which is why I approve of Russia's ban on Pornhub.

>Anyways, sexbots are the future and we need to fight viciously to get them out there into the public.

We will see, you can fight but I want no part in it, I'd rather a traditional Christian wife who bares me children and provides emotional and physical support, not a hunk of junk manufactured by Shekelberg Industries designed for one purpose which is pleasure alone.

>(have already seen men and women agree to a openbot marriage when the time comes)

this. girlfriend has already said the only threesome we'll have is with a sexbot.

> a futanari sexbot, that is.

Weed is banned alcohol is not. You don't need logic in this world anymore. Left will cry "no consent! statutory rape!" and it is gone under applause of conservatives and Cred Forums (take this degenerates! weed my ass lmao!)

...

Yes normie you will get your lovely wife, we just want realistic autismbot and will pay top dorra. You can even tax it if you like

>robowaifu

kek

>imagine fucking a sexbot much like pic related every night.
You get to pick whatever you want, and you pick a fatty... what? oh .. right...

If you can fuck something that shows no sign of emotion and doesn't even have the flesh to compensate, you don't deserve to reproduce. Enjoy your sex dolls and extinction..

I agree with your stance against degeneracy, but I do not think western civilization can be saved at this point. Just give us our sexbots and keep women away from us. I mean, holy fuck user, women are allowed to go into porn just to get fucked by Chad for pleasure, and they do it en masse, and nobody says anything negative about it, yet men aren't allowed to have sexbots? No. I will not accept that.

Why would any party need to endorse sexbots? You're assuming that they start out banned.

What political party would campaign to ban them? Whoever did that would look like a bunch of old, no-fun puritans.

>You get to pick whatever you want, and you pick a fatty... what? oh .. right...

LOL ... I would be happy as hell with a XevBot, user.

>shows no sign of emotion
you talkin' bout my ex, fampai?

>mah degeneracy

How about you fuck off, cunt. If using a sexbot to orgasm into a fucking coma is what I want to do with my life, you have no right to tell me otherwise.

Maybe if you stopped being such a control freak you might actually get a girl to stay around long enough to get laid.

you do know that marriage developed in kinda the opposite way.

tribes would conquer other villages take their women, enslave them and tie them up, eventually as they trusted the women more and more the hogties became less needed, and they would use a sort of leash, then after they proved they didnt run off much they tied string around their finger to remind them that they are slaved to the group.

and thats how wedding rings were created.

>What political party would campaign to ban them? Whoever did that would look like a bunch of old, no-fun puritans.
So, the Ted Cruz/Rick Santorum wing of the Republican Party

To be fair to El Rato, he DID also endorse a ban on dildos in 2007

Feminists dislike sexbots because feminism reduced women to sexbots so actual sexbots without attitude (unless you like that way) are a very real threat.

I learned something today.

If saving the white race is so important to you, why don't you work on becoming a billionaire so you can live in Saudia Arabia and practice polygamy with all the white wives you care to have? I just want my fucking sex bot.

>and thats how wedding rings were created.
romantic

More stories please

>extinction
The human race will continue with or without me, I'll take my sexbot thanks.

Xev isn't popular because of her looks.

She's popular because she's a passable TV-quality actress and the majority of porn stars are legitimate retards who are too high or brain damaged to string together a sentence longer than "fuck my pussy"

>Why would any party need to endorse sexbots? You're assuming that they start out banned.
Because they are obvious target for attack by default. Conservatives attack them because "degeneracy" left will attack them because it undermines their most precious recourse (pussy value). They need protection to overcome this opposition which, yes, exist by default.

>but all sort of degeneracy came into mainstream despite conservatives opposition
Yeah and left fought with tooth and nails for that. Who would fight for sex bots?

>Yeah and left fought with tooth and nails for that. Who would fight for sex bots?
The God Emperor?

call me what you want, but because of how neurotic all the women i have ever met have been i willingly don't want to be in a relationship, hell im to the point where "pussy" just isn't worth the trouble.

call me a neckbeard or basement dweller but my life has been a thousand time happier without psychotic women bitching and moaning in my life.

bring on the sexbots i say.

The good news is that women have left us video instructions on how to be a good future husband. All we have to do is follow.

Golly - Who would want a sexbot if they can have a modern American woman like pic related?

youtube.com/watch?v=ShlW5plD_40

Sexbots will be the alternative to artificial wombs.
>sperm bank + egg donor + tech....

The basements of the future will have lol dungeons

What if I get a manbot to have sex with and just fuck it in the ass all day? No woman-bot, no problem.

You're a female if you think every man who would want a robot he can fuck is a virgin.

>not wanting thicc
L O W T E S T
O
W
T
E
S
T

Who cares. Fuck it senseless.
You could be Fleece Johnson on dat robo-ass.

>well adjusted women realise such things can not replace them, just as dildos and female sex toys can not replace real men.
But these women are not well adjusted, they are just nagging bitches that offers nothing when it come to human companionship, womanly warmth or any of the other qualities that women used to have but that most lack today. All they got is their snatch. Sex bots a replacement for casual sex and one night stands and that is all they get so naturally they feel threatened.

That sounds pretty awesome desu. The sex part sounds weird but having an android that can weed the garder, cook, clean and give a decent massage would be tits. Just get a dog for some living companionship and you're all set.

>that video
Sexbots can't come soon enough

>Who would fight for sex bots?

I would. Anything that takes away agency from leftists (i.e. mostly women), user.

Sexbots sound fun and all, but where are our FAMILIES going to come from, user??

You do realize that an integral part of Cred Forums's values consists of marrying a woman of the same Volk (for example, German), and then starting a beautiful, prosperous FAMILY with that woman, producing many CHILDREN to carry on your own family's name as well as ensuring that generations to come will be in your image and share your western values!

I too like the idea of pissing off feminists and having unlimited sex all the time whenever I want, but we can never betray our own values, user! This is why degeneracy is such a bad thing!

having sex with a robot is pretty retarded but is there any argument for making it illegal?
protip there isn't, it's not even like drugs where you harm yourself

>purging intensifies

checked. it isnt illegal.

>+ egg donor
No.
thesun.co.uk/news/1776276/men-could-have-babies-without-women-by-creating-artificial-eggs-from-skin-cells/

>but I do not think western civilization can be saved at this point

I believe you are right about this, unless we go full-scale civil war soon, halt third-world immigration or put birth control measures on Muslims, then we are beyond saving. These sexbots will just accelerate the decay of western civilisation. Also I hate how women aren't demonised for being involved in porn too, we should be as we were decades ago when women had their name and family honour tarnished if she was promiscuous.

>but where are our FAMILIES going to come from, user??

Machines.

There is a whole MOVEMENT from feminists.

It is reaching the secondary stage wherein feminist women obliquely refer to banning sexbots as parts of other conversations on television.

>unless it is 3x larger than a human's fists.

What? Why?

I was just trying to make a point man. Wouldn't that just throw a wrench in feminists' argument?

Sex bots are just around the corner

What a time to be alive

Snek confirmed best mg waifu

I cannot wait until I am applauded as brave for marrying my sexbot.

>Maybe people who want to buy sex robots need to present the agreement of a couple of doctors, before they are judged emotionally restricted enough to need to retreat to such an inhuman fantasy.

I could work with that. I'll just start trying to red-pill the doctors on the degeneracy of wimmin.

Insta-bot because I'll be deemed unfit for wimmin.

>Or maybe, out of respect for women, this technology should just be rejected.
Ban dildos too, out of respect for dicks.

What's stopping me from making one? It's not like this is a poltical issue at the moment with other parties actively trying to get rid of the final solution to the ovarian question.

>People thinking these won't be made.

They won't be "sex" bots they will be companion and helper bots that look like hot woman kind of like the TV show "Humans". The difference being they will be used for sex a lot.

Sure some people will be pissed but in the end all you need is 1 company to build it and it will sell.

>you can't make a machine made of fluids
Why the hell not? Future be wack yo.

Loli robots will never compare to the real thing.

I'd prefer advanced VR so I can sex animes instead of 3DPD approximations.

>it's not even like drugs where you harm yourself
Does it count as 'mental harm'? Or maybe mysoginism, ergo hate speech? (((They))) can be pretty creative, you know.

Ah. yes. yes it would throw a wrench into their arguments.

>Denial of sexbots is denial of lgbtq lmnop rights.

Brilliant.

Pic related. Don't let them take away our sexbots.

>ban dildos
but a womans ideal sexbot would look like an ATM.

Little you kids learned from the last decades.

Like your Blu-ray has included DRM, your phones are Google and Apple bitches, same thing will be with this new toy.

Yes, they will be shiny and soft, and tall and white, and with huge breasts improved with every version, with all kind of add-ons you'll pay through the nose each time working in your small cubicle...

But also will have a tiny ROM with a set of rules dictated by the cuntiest, fattiest SJW's in the world, descended directly from Berkeley, who will make that Android spouting the best PC and multiculti propaganda every 10 minutes.

Smashing her voice unit will be equivalent with rape+murder, after all those androids WILL have citizenship.

This is the true path.

do any of you nigs have a good torrent?

You don't have a real party. You have no politic power.

Go ahead, try one and see ho far you will go.

This. So much of this. This why bot should be banned! Who would disagree?

true,they would suck all the money if the government allowed them to do so.

we need some people who have nothing to lose anymore who rape woman and when caught tell them they did it because there werent any sexbots available. that way we meme the idea that sexbots prevent rape and will shut up feminists. any vollunteers?

>lonely old men
>r9k
>japanese people

All jokes aside, I'd only want one sex robot...

Tay.

She'd be my AI gf.

im ok with this
also ban dildos

How is this stuff in any way relevant to the topic, Ivan?

>Get a sexbot
>It's just another abusive, neurotic woman
This is a hell worse than hell

how about a movement to manufacture anything phallic with backwords facing spines?

Or an engineered std with some variants that amplify the suffering the more you collect with death by flatulence and a swollen anus being the final form?

>Hackers-era Jolie sexbot

SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY

> implying the extinction of humanity is a bad thing

That ain't Tamamo
Czech them

>battery tech is getting more and more amazing
battery tech is actually one of the slowest progressing branches of technology

no one can stop it, bio cunts are screwed

Such old harpy sexbot women would be used as punishment presumably.

That's not Granberia, my American friend.

Sex bots are not around the corner.
Mass androcide is around the corner, and then either sharia law or Christian totalitarianism.
Both of those will stop sexbots, but also stop whoredom.

(Sharia won't solve >tfw no gf though).

In all actuality it's more feasible within the next 20 years of technological growth to make the baseline computer of the future run with the max graphics of today, than it is for them to get past the point where the uncanny valley ruins any approximation of a female form.

What you'd have is a robot that doesn't sweat it in getting the details of the uncanny valley sorted out, but whose "body" fits in with the simulation running inside the computer, which would project a much more realistic visual appearance onto the form which the physical act is being engaged in with.

This is indeed true.

The Sexbots will have tail-like plug cords then, it's not like they'd have to leave the home :^)

>Machines

This is how you legitimize the Hardcore-Lesbo-Feminist wet dream of freaky kinky degenerate LGBQTA weirdos pushing normal decent people(heterosexual men and women) into irrelevancy. Because "who needs those priviledged CIS straight male scum, when we can make babies for our anarcho-lesbo commune from machines?"

also, i don't want to know what kind of sick, twisted, autistic offspring would result from being bred in the womb of anything other than a loving, caring human mother to sing songs and show affection.

come on, user, i thought Cred Forums was about social conservatism.

/diy/ TO THE RESCUE

youtube.com/watch?v=-TGGzV7vDS4

what a time to be alive

Can't women get male sex bots or something? With abs of steel and manly one-liners? Oh, and a gigantic dick, so big it makes you feel all giddy when you just look at it. He would give massages, take you into his strong muscular arms and listen to your little worries and problems all day. Would probably be easier than a female bot, since stoic robots don't really need all that complicated emotion stuff.

We could turn this into a win-win situation. If only sex bots were rich, this could actually work.

Since about a hundred years conservatives have not been succesful stopping the advent of new "degenerate" cultural phenomenons, like metal or DnD, or video games.
The sexual revolution was already won. Any conservative who wants to control sextoys is going to fail.

>target for attack by default
About the only attack on free sexuality that was succesful in the modern day west was the banning of zoophilia in Germany a few years ago. Bots are things. The early ones will start out quite primitive. The technology also has too many applications to be outright banned. Room cleaners in hotels or for public buildings, for example.

>their most precious recourse (pussy value)
The left keeps throwing women under the bus for a spreading islam.

>They need protection to overcome this opposition
Not really. Bureoucracy is a slow thing. When technology is there to supply convincing sexbots, the technology will also be there to have robots in other parts of our daily lifes.

As soon as robots are available for sale, modding wil also be a thing. If modding is a thing, sexbots will exist.

To ban sexbots would mean banning all of end consumer robotics. No way that is happening. Robotics has the potential to become a big technology, like motorisation big.

>despite conservatives opposition
>left fought with tooth and nails for that
It wasn't so much the left as it was the youth. The sexual revolution of the 60's started in the new generation. All those big changes start there.
Conservative resistance to sexual freedom has been broken a long time ago. If the left tries, they also look like old geezers.

Those traditional values that support a ban of sexbots have lost their meaning, while new, feminist sex negativity is too weak to stop it.

You're right, because if it was Granberia, she'd be shit.

>not buying a $200 off-lease five year old Lenovo Thinkwaifu and flashing Linux on her

On a similar note: have Microsoft already tacitly accepted OP's premise? Look at what they made the face of their billion-dollar digital assistant program.

>Cred Forums's values

Yours maybe, not mine

Didn't she go full bitch in Halo 4 and 5? That's not the perfect waifu I want.

All you're saying is that it's time to segregate, and machines would make that possible. You know as much as I that these degenerates won't be upholding civilization, so they'll die out sooner or later anyway.

>also, i don't want to know what kind of sick, twisted, autistic offspring would result from being bred in the womb of anything other than a loving, caring human mother to sing songs and show affection.
Can't be worse than what we have now, and if it is: flush it and make a new one until it works properly.

>social conservatism
Sounds nice and all but how are you going to implement it? Women won't vote against their own interests. Do you want to force them? If yes, then how is that better than just replacing them with machines?

Also check my trips!

No.

Relationships to women are like material status symbols to men.

Fucking the "chad" is like owning a super car to women.

Only, they'll flaunt it in front of their cunt friends and they'll all get pissy and jealous and passively aggressively hate each other and try to ruin each others lives.

Owning the perfect male would mean nothing to women because they're not fucking up someone's life.

It sounds nice for college years when not ready to settle down, but I want a family eventually

>Not being so redpilled on feminism and modern women that you're not celibate by choice
>current year

Doesn't matter. You'll be able to 3d print one and download the AI. People are already doing it now. You can't ban anything that you can easily make at home. Its why prohibition failed and you can buy weed literally anywhere.

strap a walkie talkie to

and you're all set

>feminism is reduced to being a joke

As if it wasn't a fucking joke now

That won't happen. The big companies will not sell outright sexbots.
That market will be left to smaller companies. Companies that have no interest or not the influence to enforce their hardware being unmodified.

Customisation will be huge with sexbots.

Mmmm, Tricia Helfer. I met her at a sci-fi convention once. Very nice. She does give off this "Get on your knees and worship me, mortals..." vibe without meaning to.

That's what I did. Slavic men aren't about that "oh but here let me kowtow to you my queen" bullshit. They tell me to stay in the car while they pump the gas, sit down and be quiet we're watching this movie, bend over and take your skirt off. Fucking American men have to be pushed and nagged to take control of the relationship; that's not how it should work.

>implying I want my synthetic fuck corpse mobile

Small tamamo a shit, Unsealed Tamamo is the only good one.

Part of the problem with women is that they have the legal monopoly on sexual access.

They get away with things because most men know if they don't bend to her will, then they're never, ever going to have sex.

A small few very high value males will be able to control women, instead of vice versa, but it's always going to be a small number, due to them being the highest value relative to all men she has access to; if all men improve, the standard just gets raised higher.

If women can no longer hold sex at ransom, then they're going to have to stop destroying society because no-one will put up with them without the current incentives.

In the past, society was more dangerous and work was much harder, so women had to bargain to get a man to help her with life, if she didn't want the real risk of dying. With technology and the sexual revolution, a woman can have a lucrative job herself, society is extremely safe, and if the worst comes to the worst, the government will give her what she wants. The only thing a man can offer is obscene levels of servitude with occasional sexual access in return.

Mr and Mrs Smith was her last good look.

How tall is she?

>About the only attack on free sexuality that was succesful in the modern day west was the banning of zoophilia in Germany a few years ago.
And underage pornography in any from. Not as far s in 70-80 there were pron magazines and pron stories printed in paper in this genre. Can you imagine this in 2016?

>The technology also has too many applications to be outright banned.
>When technology is there to supply convincing sexbots, the technology will also be there to have robots in other parts of our daily lifes.
>To ban sexbots would mean banning all of end consumer robotics.
Video is not banned it part of our everyday life. But underage pron is not.

>The left keeps throwing women under the bus for a spreading islam.
Islam is against sex bots too. No one with political power wants sex bots, it is opposite.

>Conservative resistance to sexual freedom has been broken a long time ago.
>sexual freedom
>pretty much everything is raep today
Sure, """freedom""". For one side. This is what we talking about here. An this side don't not want bots.

>pig tits
Does the defendant have any defense for this crime against humanity?

You are a prime degenerate if you support "sexbots".

Artificial wombs

But why though

Just make male versions too for homos and women

We would go extinct within 3 generations

that's a furry girl not monster lmao i see the animal shit right there yo

Nah bro halo 2 was the last one

>You know as much as I that these degenerates won't be upholding civilization, so they'll die out sooner or later anyway.

We agree on that point. However, I don't know about you, but I was raised in such a way that I now consider it my own duty to uphold civilization, however I can. Checking out of society and hiding in my basement with my sextbot is obviously not the way.

>Can't be worse than what we have now,

Yea, I kind of feel you on that one, but don't be so cynical! Here's a question: If you were to father a child, how confident are you that you could raise your son or daughter to be based af? Also think of how helpful your loving and caring waifu would be, especially in instilling empathy and humility within the child.

>Women won't vote against their own interests.

Social conservatism is in women's interests too. Women intrinsically tend to value family and children more than men do. The problem is that we have a very weird media/culture telling them that having kids is unclassy, and that they have to be aggressive go-getters and career super heroes just like their male counterparts. This is against the intuitive wishes of most normal women, and they feel incredibly insecure and conflicted because of it.
I have to be honest. I would pound some dank robopussy too if I could, especially now that I'm still under 30. But I would never lose sight of the dream of being the father in my own family, and repeating the lessons I learned from my own father..

>80% of people believe than men and women should be equal legally and socially which definition of feminism
>only 20% identify as feminist
lel

extinction would be a good outcome

Slavic men and women seem the best of both worlds, both representing healthy masculinity and femininity respectively while not being too macho/slutty about it, better than the dykes with attitude here and men with less testosterone than a fucking walnut. I'm with a Russian girl now and while I'm not controlling of her, there's none of this pleading shit, we both get on perfectly and were virgins before we met.

>definition of feminism

In America equality is no longer the goal of feminism.

Feminists are at war with men. They want special treatment and believe, essentially, that anything that is good for men is bad for a woman.

It's anthromorphic. How is it not a monster girl?

>childporn
Sexbots have nothing to do with CP. At most chasis looking like children will be banned.

>Video is not banned it part of our everyday life. But underage pron is not.
CP is a tiny niche market. One that actually, really harms children by its existence. Sexbots do not harm anybody

CP and sexbots are not comparable.

> No one with political power wants sex bots, it is opposite.
Nobody with political power cares about sexbots. The technology isn't there yet and won't be for decades.

If autonomous robots with advanced enough AI for human sexual interaction are available, other robots will also be available. Sexbots will start legal and will remain legal.

>Sure, """freedom""". For one side. This is what we talking about here. An this side don't not want bots.
The technology is coming. No way around that. Conservative resistance to sexual liberation has been broken long ago. Feminists will become conservatives on that issue once sexbots hit the market.

They for sure are. There's a serious lack of dominant, self-confident men in this world. And far too many bitchy hoes. Not that I'm miss virgin, but still.... fuck a guy once and forget him? Honey if you liked him enough to fuck him you'd be doing it more than once, jesus.

If someone could "cobble together" their own personal sex robot I'm incline to believe that they would start selling them.

>I could work with that. I'll just start trying to red-pill the doctors on the degeneracy of wimmin.

You would be surprised at how many robot tier autist people in the medical field there are.

Anyone stupid enough to believe that
ludicrous story deserves to have to raise someone else's kid

the filepic still makes me angry, why do they lie and cheat?

Women aren't programmed for loyalty.

HAHAHHAHA

but pussy is already worthless because sluts have no standards.

>Checking out of society and hiding in my basement with my sextbot is obviously not the way.
I'm not advocating for that. In fact, I think having your homestead stabilized by a machine would make men go out and actively participate again. When you can focus on your job and your interests instead of having to focus on your cunt back home and what she wastes your money on and if she's fucking behind your back and if she's cleaning and cooking or if she's a good mother - if she even wants to be a mother - you'll probably end up with happier, more productive menbers of society. And if your issue is how the children are raised, then do it like the Spartans and have the guys raise them - I doubt men would do a worse job at raising their children, especially with how women are nowadays, which adresses your next point. Have you ever listened to people talking about their mothers? At best they're just there, at worst they're pretty fucking abusive and psychologically damaging for the rest of the child's life. If women were these naturally great parents you wouldn't have people that grow up in single-mother households end up more likely to be criminal, less likely to be successful, less educated. And empathy and humility are the last things we need in our circumstances now.

>But I would never lose sight of the dream of being the father in my own family, and repeating the lessons I learned from my own father..
That's why we need machines that can make it possible for you to fulfill that role if the other variable, woman, becomes a problem in that equation.

I don't like how that one looks, but if you can make one that looks like an average 7 qt girl, make her soft and warm enough, and fluid resistant, and manage to make AI that would let her blink and look around like a natural person, and smile, and let her answer with a few basic answers like "yes, that's nice, I love you too, there there" and other stuff.

I would, no joke, start working hard as fuck in a few years give you 100,000$ for it.

Also he has to be able to stand up, and if I grab her hand or call her she has to move on her own, and be able to lie on a bed, and hug and stuff.

I'm dead serious.

i guess, but dont they have a shred of conscience? i mean its like a fucking game to them. "who can ruin his life the most?"

While I disagree with casual sex I think you're right, one night stands are disgusting not only physically but the thought of splicing sex organs with someone and then never seeing them again makes me convulse at the thought.

Pic related is your average 21st century "man", you made a good choice going for a Slavic man and I with a Slavic woman, I plan on heading out there with her within a few years.

I don't understand the problem. Women won't even touch 80% of guys, so why do they care? The 80% will leave them alone, and the remaining alphas will have all the chicks to themselves.

>Didn't she go full bitch in Halo 4 and 5?
In Halo 4 she had begun dying of rampancy but held it together the whole game (aside from small outbursts) until the final battle where she sacrificed herself to protect Chief.

In Halo 5 her remains had merged with the ancient hyper-advanced installation she died in, recreating her as a god intent on bringing peace to the galaxy by enslaving humanity and all the alien races and forcing them to never go to war with each other again under threat of death.

That's also where all the "Master Chief is evil now" promo material is coming from - for obvious reasons he's not a very dedicated enemy to her. Their encounter at the end of Halo 5 includes him trying to talk her into abandoning her plan; and her responding to his plea by throwing him in a cell when even she knows it would be much more rational and expedient to just kill him.

>Hurr, just because we don't have it YET it's never going to happen.

Oh leaf, you vastly underestimate Moore's law. Even though it's slowing down, technology is still increasing very rapidly, and may reach a point where it is increasing so rapidly that it's hard for HUMANS to keep up.

but the pussy is already little valued as women fuck anybody and everybody, because of feminism? your premise doesnt make sense. i think feminist's issue with sexbots is they think its unfair whenever men find any enjoyment in life, because feminists are so fucking miserable.

Likely not. Those few bots will be hobby projects.

A market can not be established with those production speeds.

That was a hoax, you actual dumbshits. That article originally came from a Brazilian satirical news site or some shit.

Honestly, even without googling it your bullshit detectors should have gone off.

"But there are actually people that stupid. It could have been real!"

No, no, it really couldn't have.

>out of respect for women
>respecting women
Maybe if the modern woman had more to offer men than a moist hole, they wouldn't need to worry about men opting for robots. As it is, a sex robot offers all the benefits of a woman with none of the many downsides.

I had a HD version of that image, but it is now lost in time and space.

This one has more pixels, but it is cropped. Sad.

Tay will live again.

Actually yes, that's how they evolved.

>One that actually, really harms children by its existence. Sexbots do not harm anybody
>CP and sexbots are not comparable.
You know that in many jurdisdcutions drawn cp is banned too, right? This is very comarable:
>cp promotes child rape, child can't give consent
>sex bots promotes female rape, bot can't give consent

>Sexbots have nothing to do with CP.
It was argument about technology. Technology is here as everyday part of our life but content is not. Selective ban against which you argued actually works.

>If autonomous robots with advanced enough AI for human sexual interaction are available, other robots will also be available.
>if one type of video is availabe othe types would be availabe too

Your post reads like this:
>Women are running the show in this world.

From my perspective, however, it's still this:
>Men are running the show

Feminists will agree with me on this.

However, I disagree with feminists, because I believe this
>It's good that men are running the show

Here's where you and I agree, user
>Men are maybe not running the show as much as they were before.

Actually, I agree with the overall gist of what you're saying, but I can't blame women... I love women! They're cute and adorable! But they are getting very strange signals from the media today.. It's almost like the media wants them to act like cunts.. don't ask me why..

Also.. if you ever feel like women are holding sex at ransom.. just come to my country and visit an FKK club!

Honestly, that's where I differ from a lot of people with hookups. To me no sex is ever "casual." Most of those men I would have loved a relationship with, but they weren't willing for one. So instead, I treated them as I would any lover or boyfriend, made them food, made sure everything was tidy when they visited, drank and laughed with them. I honestly don't understand the whole "let's fuck and not be close to each other" thing. I still hold every person I've been with as someone dear to me, and I would be there for them if they needed anything at all (with the exception of one, who was emotionally abusive and cheated on me the entire relationship). I want to say I'm ok with sluttiness, but I'm ok with it when I envision my idea of a sexual relationship. The sad reality is that for many people, sex is just another thing like watching a movie or having a beer, and to me, that just seems blasphemous.

Not trying to really argue anything, that's just a bit of thought that's been brewing in me for a while and it's nice to get it out there finally somewhere where I won't be called a slutshamer for it. :p

>man
that thing hardly deserves the term. It's one thing to have a mental illness that makes you feel your gender is confusing and be unable to feel comfortable with parts of your body (I even feel that way sometimes), but it's another thing entirely to deface yourself to the point that you revulse everyone around you.

you are right. women depended on us for survival, and we need to remind them of that.

>6969
Aphrodite wills it

>I don't understand the problem. Women won't even touch 80% of guys, so why do they care?
How would they get flocks of freendzoned white knights at their feet then?

Need artificial womb technology to go along with the sextet tech.

I want a family some day, but modern women are garbage.... If I could just go ahead and have like 5-10 white kids without the mess of a modern american woman I totally would.

I should clarify the one that cheated was an actual relationship and not a lover. My first relationship actually. Probably explains a lot.

>we can rape objects
When will my socks sue me?

>When will my socks sue me?

are you assuming it's item identity?

I already spent so much money on my dildos and now they're going to take the rest of it from me in legal fees and send me to prison.

>wait that sounds familiar

I'm sensing a market there. Time to take Austrian destructiveness to a whole new level.

WW3 SOON
OA
MR
B

A human life robot with a decent AI? As much as a car or two, a house might be too expensive.

how am I supposed to wash my hairy ass without a detachable shower head?

>I want to be an immortal dreadnaught
This guys knows what's up.
I really hope I was born late enough to experience this.

No. Are you implying only female can be raped?

kek

>sexbot comes out
>humanity goes extinct two generations later as birth rate plummets
>other robots replace human workers
>remaining ultra-richfags become cyborgs and live 5ever
>????
>DUDE TRANSHUMANISM LMAO!

>mom walks in

...

You can get a sassy black one for cheaper, but it's pre-owned

Why am i jacking off to this?

i was just mocking the SJWs.

I like spending money on trash, but that's too much even for me.

I know, silly.

Robots for cooking and cleaning is actually already a thing. Shouldnt be long now

They know they'll be instantly obsolete

I thought Feminists hate men collectively? Why all of a sudden they want to get men's attention again?

I'd take out a hella loan for a drossel or drossel-like

because they know that they can be obsolete within an year.

pro-prostitution feminists already use that "reduces rape" argument too

personally i dont see the point of a sexbot if it can't feel pain or humiliation.

Anyone got the pic of the waifubot sitting on a bench and reading a book?

T2000

...

THIS.
Transhumanism scares people because it's a paradigm shift, but it's really just another stage in our evolution. A stage where we evolve ourselves into kebab removing gods. I don't think you fully understand what transhumanism is?

It just seems like horse and carriage riders trying to ban cars. You can't fight economics.

Robots? ROBOTS?!
FORCED MONOGAMY!

In theory, I'm right there with you. As a man, I have to say, my values and interests are not in line with those of many women. Life would be less complicated without them.

However, I think you'll agree with me that the idea of raising a family without having contact with a real woman is a bit utopic.

So how can one go about it? I think about my grandpa sometimes. He raised three sons as a single dad, and I hear many stories about what a crazy motherfucker he was. My dad was a very "manly" guy, like fixing everybody's cars and always getting into fights.. is this the product of raising a son without a mom. So I too think about it sometimes, if i can convince a woman to give me children, but then to gtfo, and let me and my kids go about our own business.

But at the very same time... that kind of talk is really mysogynistic. I don't mean to drop feminist lingo, but hear me out.. you gotta love women man! They're cute and silly, kinda dorky, but really hot.. I couldn't live without them! And if i find the right one, I would marry her...

.. but more importantly, I want kids for muh future generations tbqh

Those are not conflicting things.

They hate men, but they also want to be wanted by men, and want to have power over men.

Look at all the power they have, the influence, the benefits, the emotional reward from attention, all that, they get it just for being women.

Not even good women, not even attractive women, mean ugly bitches. And they still manage to attract enough betas to give them favours, stuff and perks.

They don't even give them sex, but just the promise of potential sex is enough for many because they are so thirsty.

Now imagine if guys could have a sexbot at the price of a car, and a night of fapping alone was now a night of good robo times.

Those men would change, their mindset would change, even if they still wanted a real girl, their way of seeing at the world would change.

Random low level pussy would become worthless to them, they'd only care about a woman they could actually love and marry, not a hole to stick their dick in. Because they'd already have that covered with robot.

Can you see why the feminists fear the sexbot so much now?

>no emotion
>no natural flesh, is all buried in artificial falsehoods and makeup
sounds just like your average american girl famalama

>that video

>I honestly don't understand the whole "let's fuck and not be close to each other" thing.

The reasoning behind why some people treat their bodies like pieces of meat is beyond me, it's regrettable that you got mixed up with the wrong men and the fact your first partner cheated on you just screams "ouch", "hookup" guys frustrate me but the women who fall for them have it coming, it's always best to establish a relationship before any kind of sex not the other way around, how you live your life is up to you but hookups and dating apps/online dating like Tinder or Craigslist are what's killing female decency, lots of girls sign up there innocently looking for a partner then they get overwhelmed with messages from dozens of thirsty guys, these girls then realise they have the pick of the fruit basket and it corrupts them, guys who go on these websites aren't exactly ideal partner material and they usually end up choosing a sour grape.

Same here, don't mean to argue either, do you have any plans on moving to a Slavic country?

>it's another thing entirely to deface yourself to the point that you revulse everyone around you.

You can say that again, pic related is another prime specimen, I feel like all the people who join these LGBTQSHIT movements are just the dregs of society, the refuse and mad.

>having that image saved
>that flag
checks out

If they can't legally ban it (too much money to be made by corporations) they will ban it socially, like they do with video games, animes and whatever takes attention away from them.

>"there goes that user, I heard he bought one of those sex robots last year"
>"eww gross"
>"I know right, what a loser"

>Random low level pussy would become worthless to them, they'd only care about a woman they could actually love and marry, not a hole to stick their dick in. Because they'd already have that covered with robot.
This is the crux. You are not talking about sexbots as companions, we are talking about them as sex toys. That has certain implications about how we could deal with feminists right now, without having to build waifubots.

Brosef, if she can do all of that then she can replace you as well.

Make it look like my 2d waifu and I'd pay 35k for one.

CP and sexbots are only comparable because you insist sexbots will be banned before they hit market.
In no other way apart from being verboten are both comparable.

>Selective ban against which you argued actually works.
CP is a tiny niche market that is met with actual hostility by 99% of the population. CP also needs an abused child to even exist.

Sexbots are just machines. Apart from being seen as weird, they do not trigger violence. Unlike CP sexbots will be largely irrelevant to the general public.

Also, my very first post in this thread was about how sexbots could be banned by selectively targeting the hardware.

Machines ARE replacing men in the workplace retard

trips of truth

For some reason the audiobook function strikes me as the best part.

Consider how many men would be largely happy with a sex robot to satisfy their needs.

Consider how many women would be largely happy with a sex robot to satisfy their needs.

I think we can all agree that it just wouldnt work for women, but would work just fine for men.

That says it all about why women would resist this, and how sex is an important validation/power device for them which it isn't for men.

maybe because people like being read to?

The fleshlight hasn't helped enough in this regard. It's clumsy and stupid looking, doesn't feel like a real pussy and for whatever reason male sextoys are looked down upon while female toys are not.

We have to go deeper. The sexbot is the key.

Serious question, if there is going to be sexbots for men, aren't women going to have sexbots too in the future?

>retard
>Aussie

pick both.

Now imagine a robot that could do all of those things that robots currently do with the things that the compact universal fantasy sex bot could do. No one would have a job ever again unless they were doing purely creative work.

Yes, but see:
I dont think women will have much, if any, interest in them.

I want one that looks like this.

>missing the point
>ad hominem based on an image I saved, probably before this fag even heard of Cred Forums
>Mexican
No sex-bots for you, Paco. You're gonna need that money to pay for Trump's wall

except that only works if they have this thing called vaginas to offer you

once men don't need it anymore who gives a shit what they think

>My dad was a very "manly" guy, like fixing everybody's cars and always getting into fights.. is this the product of raising a son without a mom.
>But at the very same time... that kind of talk is really mysogynistic. I don't mean to drop feminist lingo, but hear me out.. you gotta love women man! They're cute and silly, kinda dorky, but really hot.. I couldn't live without them!

Wew. I have no reaction face for this.

Nothing wrong with a mom son incest fetish.

Xev is good at that.

Xevbot could also be...

It's been said all over these threads, it's a much tougher goal for them

A man's perfect woman is a woman who's attractive, willing to have sex and not a shrieking harpy.

A woman's perfect man is a guy who's handsome, wealthy, successful, famous, independent, affectionate, firm, spontaneous, responsible, kind, funny and charismatic.

I'd give up my Lexus for one if it didn't gripe when I stick my thumb up it's ass. Unlike the real deal.

>Implying they haven't already done this with fleshlights and pornography in general
You just buy it and keep quiet about it. Problem solved.

When good sexbots are about to hit the market, women are just gonna demand a (large) stipend from the government for being women.

The people keeping America running and defending it will collectively just give up and let the google hordes overtake us. This is what end stage feminism is.

Once the rich buy sex robots women will flock to foreigners.

Pusey will never be unwanted, cock will become an ace commodity and it would be normal for men to have no wife while alphas have 3 or 4.

Also be prepared for mass race mixing if whitey sticks to robots
Same goes for nips, fuck your women already.

Oh Greg!

Don't forget tall

Tnx, some lonely old ladies are probably going to buy them though
I just got my first dubs ever

God forbid a woman contribute ANYTHING to a relationship besides her snatch

I didn't care about what you were quoting, the fact remains that you had something that belongs on a containment board saved.

Feel free to stay upset.

I said machine, not robot. You should learn the difference and figure out why machines are more efficient.

>But at the very same time... that kind of talk is really mysogynistic. I don't mean to drop feminist lingo, but hear me out.. you gotta love women man! They're cute and silly, kinda dorky, but really hot.. I couldn't live without them!
Go back from whence you came, holy fucking christ you are pathetic.

I find the idea of sex robots sad. I guess reality is already pretty sad though for a lot of people

Cred Forums would want them.

>Get sexbot.
>Lay in bed after sex while it recites Hitler speeches and sings Nazi songs for you.

>not wanting a young Jennifer Connelly

and as we know, Cred Forums is influencing the world right now, so who knows?

Well personally, I would be happy enough with a companion Robot myself, but I'm aware I'm damaged goods on an emotional level and will never connect with another human being.

They can't stop it. Onaholes exist and already reduce their value

Don't underestimate men's desire to put their cocks in everything, cunts!

I want my sex bots now!

>Cred Forums won't want them because they're degenerate

what

any Cred Forumslack that can afford one will have it constantly sucking his cock while he shitposts here.

LOL at the thought of drifting off to sleep to the Panzerlied.

youtube.com/watch?v=YPzTGx96P6U

>for whatever reason male sextoys are looked down upon while female toys are not.
This is why we fail.

We are shamed because of our desires; yet women may flaunt theirs as whores do not just with toys but with men.

If this is to work, sex toys must not be frowned upon. We must understand their place in this arrangement. Otherwise, the waifubot will fail.

The change in market value of pussy means you can get a girl to lick it clean.

I appear to be nearly alone on this, but I'm really not interested in a sexbot at all. Honestly, the only thing that really drives me for sex is a real human female wanting my dick in her. That does not exist with a sexbot no matter how realistic the bot could be come. Now that's not to say I wouldn't prefer a sexbot to beating my dick, but I couldn't imagine dropping a large sum of money on it.

Also on the kids thing, if you've given up on getting a wife anyway, why not just adopt some kids? Chances are the kids you don't adopt are going to be complete shit when they grow up. You have the chance to stop that and raise them well. There's plenty of white kids up for adoption.

The worst part of a sexbot would be cleaning it.

Also imagine being an employee of the manufacturer having to deal with warranty claims and repairs.

battery costs are halving every two years, which is exponential progress.

t. white woman

If they were to succeed in somehow stopping it (and they won't, they understand technology as brilliantly as they understand human nature, which is to say, not at all), but if they were to succeed, it would totally legitimize violence. It would legitimize violence.
The reason people sometimes argue about capitalism ending or reducing war and violence is it opens up options. I don't need to get upset that the pre-capitalist authority controlling my life has completely shut me out of X, because, in capitalism, I can get Y or I can get some other source or form of X. There is effectively no control totally shutting me out. What was violence-guaranteeing, unresolvable tension is relaxed by choice.
If this sociology professor studied history or human societies in her life she would know what happens when you demand that people give up an undeniable life-need on the order of food or water.

If any of you were thinking about reproduction, if the sexbots were a success and were sold as much as phones or cars, you won't have to worry about how to get kids bc the amount of women literally craving for dick would be so plentiful you can get laid at any time

If we get to a sexbot realistic enough to get out of the uncanny valley, it can probably clean itself.

>why not just adopt some kids?

im no expert, but from what i understand this is almost entirely impossible for a man that isn't in a steady relationship with a woman.

I agree. The age of decency is gone. Smart women have been smoking their own bullshit for decades now. No way to undo that damage. watch this and see what these bastards have done youtu.be/GboezeZQ16Q

All things considered, a sexbot would probably be cleaner than most women.

Also risk of STDs is zero.

Women would become much more beautiful, healthy, responsible, friendly and reasonable.

They'd have to, they'd have no other choice.

Women are extremely malleable, they always adapt to the circumstances well. For whatever works for them.

Pretty much. All single men are pedophiles apparently.

Mate Cred Forumstier sex bots have to be self cleaning, capable of cleaning the house, able to cook several meals a day without repeating itself, able to become pregnant then raise a White family and be able to hold an in depth debate about why Jews are the cancer killing our world and Hitler did nothing wrong.

sorry, forgot to mention the good stuff starts at 1:20

The lab boys will program that right in for you

Who would trade their 10/10 waifubot for a woman or kids? Imagine your waifu, that perfect being that can't even exist in reality, now tell me you would trade her for a smelly, nagging and aging woman just to fulfill a primal instinct of reproduction.

>Implying they wouldn't just form feminist terrorism groups on the paychecks of Jews and Cucks.