Holy shit Cred Forums I've figured it out. If you combine libertarian economic principles like laissez-faire and true capitalism, along with social principles of nationalism like pro-life and pro-borders.
I just found this website a few minutes ago libertariannationalism.blogspot.com
Find a flaw.
>pro life
fuck you, i find an unwanted parasite inside me i abort thatt son of a bitch, yo
>Libertarian Nationalism
What's next, Zionistic Antijudaism?
t. Paki
Liberty and tradition aren't contradictory dumbass, liberty is the freedom to choose and tradition is one sided. Plus the liberty part only applies to economics and the authoritarian part only applies to social issues (save for civil liberties 2A and a few other exceptions)
Bumping
That's called Anarcho Capitalism user. Don't fall for the open borders or statist memes. Read Hoppe.
Lol what? Ancap is socially and economically radical libertarianism. Libertarian nationalism is economically libertarian and socially conservative/authoritarian. Huge difference.
OP please goto filteries.com, and fill out that political chart.
Because I'm suspecting you haven't actually discovered something new. I too thought of something like this a long time ago.
You cannot combine cultural liberalism with radical economic libertarianism. The absence of a welfare state and the supreme reign of private property rights implies that only the nuclear, kin-centered traditional family unit can flourish and thrive in society. Besides, the right of private property owners to discriminate against undesirables (lazy, rude, unreliable, deceitful, beggars, vagrants, and all other conceivable types of human trash and incompetence) would mean that people would have to act in a civil manner (read: non-degenerate) if they wanted to participate in the division of labor and not end up as outcasts or outright banished from civilization altogether.
I've always described my ideology as 'sandbox libertarianism'. In the sand you are free, but the sand is surrounded by a wall.
Wow you are dumb as rocks. What happens when the economic interests in your country and outside ask to join forces? However the people inside your country who join this economic group must follow the laws of the group?
Do you throw away your hands off approach and remove their rights to free association? Or do you allow a foreign power to govern commerce in your borders?
Nationalism is retard on its own, but adding libertarian economic policies makes things just laughable.
This
HAHAHAHAHA WOW. YOU DONT THINK LIBERTARIAN ECONOMIC POLICIES ARE GOOD??? HAHAHAHAHAHAAAA
HEY EVERYONE TAKE A LOOK AT THIS FUCKING IDIOT AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA
No I don't think libertarian economic policies , or more accurate the lack thereof, is good.
Libertarian economic policies only allow decentralized policy to be created which would then be judged on its own merits.
I'm still waiting for a reply to my previous post OP
What does pro life have to do with nationalism?
Also this isn't really new. I am likely closest to national liberalism ideologically speaking.
Sorry I forgot about this thread
Well respond to my rebuttal then please.
>laissez-faire
>pro-life
So....the republican party?
>killing millions of potential members of the nation has nothing to do with nationalism
What?
thats retarded, national socialism already factors in liberties between people within a nation by asserting having trust in your own people, i.e. the formation of a "nation" as defined by a people with common identity
Is this basically Neoclassical liberalism?
>he thinks it is possible to combine cultural conservatism with socialism of any kind
Top kek lad
Oh fuck, pol.
Am I really a filthy degenerate? I swear to kek I had good intentions.
Here's a detailed screenshot with budget breakdown and shit