Is this even allowed?

NYTimes has endorsed all Democrats since JFK. As LBJ said on Air Force One: I'll have these niggers voting Democrat for the next 100 years.

"bigot"
libshit with no argument detected
can't wait til President Trump is in office and little libshits like you are crying on a 24/7 basis while the rest of us enjoy life

Yeah. It's called an editorial, dick. Happens every election at every paper. Babby's first election, huh?

define bigot

no google allowed

Didn't NYT endorse Hillary like 50 million years ago? Why exactly are you surprised that they're siding with Clinton now?

By the way, yes it is, it's called the editorial board for a reason, the editorial (ie opinion) section of the newspaper isn't supposed to be strictly objective

Remember, the jew York times has a Mexican paying their bills.

Yes. It's the most common thing in the world for newspapers to publish an unsigned endorsement from their editorial board.

>the very foundation of the USA
What do you mean?

Here's an argument for you: fuck you.
Someone who makes ignorant generalizations about people.

Drumpf will not win.

Here's what's happenig:

Trump victory is inminent, to the point where rigging votes will not suffice, because 80% of the population would riot.

So some news companies are switching sides in the hopes of saving themselves and then being important when Trump reigns supreme.

However the most hardcore libtarded companies have chosen suicide before surrender, and are getting more and more ridiculous with time.

Expect these companies and names to be torn to shig when the Emperor rules.

That's not what a bigot is at all. You're allowed to use Google now if you want

I didn't know there was any part of media that had rules creating any sort of objectivity

Nickelodeon is more impartial than the New York Times.

>So some news companies are switching sides in the hopes of saving themselves and then being important when Trump reigns supreme.
Such as who?

>all men are created equal
>wants to scrap that

>country built on immigration
>wants to deport all immigrants

>freedom of religion
>except the ones I don't like!

>historically multicultural nation
>wants to create a white supremacist paradise.

Fox

topkek

literally destroyed

I agree the first amendment only applies to media entities, not individuals.

Oy m8. I don't believe anyone's gunna take you seriously.

Yeah. It's the editorial board. That said,k when it popped up on my News app on my iphone, I immediately muted the NYT for good.

No point in giving them any hits if they are going to be so blatant about their bias.

Besides, there are enough news sources I actually like to deal with such a shitty rag. Brietbart, Business Insider, Forbes, Fox Buisness, New York Post, Wall St Journal, and the Washington Times are top notch.

Its great that the (((New York Times))) makes their bias as plain to see as possible.

All men are created equal was obviously never referring to all groups of men. Why niggers were considered .6 of a person I don't know but we have never held them equal.

The country was built on legal immigration. Keyword legal.

Islam poses a threat to our continued existence. Trump is not planning on deporting Muslims he's planning on filtering refugees more strongly.

Your last point is 100% fiction. It's hard to talk to someone who refutes facts.

CTR shill, if you're gonna use a VPN, use one that isn't from NZ or Straya.

Much more believable.

Why, because >le Aussie meme?
You Americans need to understand that it is in the best interest of the rest of the world that Clinton wins. A man like Trump wouldn't get 10% of the vote here, why is he a serious candidate? Fucking disappointing to be honest, I can't even...

Wrong definition

also

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/23/trump-is-headed-for-a-win-says-professor-whos-predicted-30-years-of-presidential-outcomes-correctly/

:^)

I'm from NZ, I am honestly scared for the future now.

That's right auntie. You're beginning to see what it means to be a man.

nobody gives a shit about your fruitcake island

if anything you'd end up starving from lack of imports

wtf i hate trump now

classic ausposter

That's understandable. Hillary could win, and follow through on her promise to declare war on Russia.

@90240073
>all immigrants
I don't want to give a (You) for this post, because come on man. He wants a crackdown on ILLEGAL immigration, not immigration in general.

>Chang Wong Lee
is this a joke

>newfag detected

Also, doesn't like every newspaper editorial section do this? And didn't NYT endorse Hillary Clinton already, a really long time ago?

...

6% trust in news media

This whole campaign season has been showing why.

It's not fucking 1890 anymore, it's so stupid to think like that these days, everyone should have a global perspective and engage with issues of global importance.

What did I do, oldfag?

Fuck off faggot. Please get the fuck out of my country, cuck.

>historically multicultural nation

Yes, it's true the USA has been historically multicultural. What it hasn't been, however, is multiracial.

Multicultural societies have a plethora of problems, but these all pale in comparison to the issues brought about in a multiracial society.

Just how much of a fucking beta male are you? You are precisely what's wrong with the world.

You're the odd one out, most of us here want Clinton to win.

wsj doesn't, and yeah nyt endorsed her during primaries

says the racist...

@90241176
Who you calling oldfag, nigger

>I wonder who is behind this post

In Canada all of our media companies endorsed specific candidates. There's nothing wrong with it, it's just transparency.
You already have a general idea of where they lean so what's wrong with endorsing a candidate?
We have some non-partisan news companies, but they're usually just statistics type deals like five thirty eight. News is usually always biased and it's nice to know what kind of bias you're getting.

Exactly how is being against globalism racist?

Praise Him, for He is here.

I'm one of those few shy Trump supporters. The only people that I've told that I support Trump is my immediately family. I've got 3 groups of friends I still need to tell.

Frankly, I've had enough of hiding. Next time they ask who I'm voting for I'm giving a direct answer: Donald Trump
>no, its not a difficult choice
>yes, I've been with him since the beginning
>Clinton is sick and corrupt
I never though the cultural struggle would be brought all out into the open like this through an election. I'm so happy that I'm living in such monuments times. When my children learn history in class, their learn about this election as a paradigm shift in American politics. I'll be able to show them the MAGA hat that'll keep for them to have. It'll become a historical artifact. An artifact that when Fallout IX is released in 2070 and they model the 2010s in a nuclear apocalyptic wasteland, the MAGA hat will be dlc.

You are incorrect, friend.

Hillary is a crackhead run that story.

youtu.be/Wc84nEfA1vw

...

Sandniggers want Clinton.

Hm, what a surprise.

Because his motivation for hating it is obviously because globalism is the end of white supremacy, just like his god, Drumpf.
Nice source, probably another online poll attacked by you alt-right Nazis.

>alt right
nice media label

no self respecting person goes by that name

>alt-right

>You alt-right nazis.
I'm libertarian. Nazism is National Socialism. While I admit that there's some nationalism in my blood, there is no Socialism. That would be closer to Bernie supporters. Hillary Clinton is actually closer to Hitler than Trump is, as well, looking at policies.

But yeah, there are Nazis on this board, along with Dems, Republicans, Libertarians, Anarchists, Socialists, Communists, and Monarchists. Hell, there are even a few outright fascists on here.

>Not 1980 anymore

And this is coming from a beta who let's a people who believe in primitive religion to come in his country :'^)

>alt-right

Of course it's not 1890, it's the current year now

Wsj has an editorial board. Google it

I'll say this much: THIS current year is shaping up to be much better than last year's current year.

>primitive religion
Primitive is already implied just by the word "religion"

When the media and politicians are the same entity, yes.

they do not endorse presidential candidates

You know, I'm atheist, and that still comes off as both edgy and retarded.

...

M'lady

>we're not going to compare the two, because that would reveal the fact that Hillary Clinton is a god awful candidate whose only appeal is the fact that she supposedly has a vagina in-between her jello legs.

Papers endorsing candidates? Are you 14 or have you just not read publications before now?

...

Statistics show intelligent people are more likely to vote hillary.

of course its the ((((new york times))))

Ah right. Thought you were saying they didn't have a board.

God damn it NL, get with the program.

Isn't the NYT in a lot of financial trouble? I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that they are struggling to stay afloat.

NYT is owned by Carlos Slim.

Well a media company like CBC is paid for by the citizens and has a mandate to be objective, but they clearly ride the liberal cock as hard as they can.

>intelligent

truly the poor man's straya

Globalist ideology and understanding global issues are totally separate spheres.

Not really. They reported a net loss of 500k last quarter but it was due to severance costs of closing print operations in Europe, I think. There was a secular decline in ad revenue, but overall healthy growth in subs.

I have a long-time friend who has a Mexican girlfriend. Both of them were Bernouts.

I haven't told him I'm voting for Trump.

Ok, fair enough. Thanks for answering.

So the washington establishment, the wall street thugs and the liberal media support her. Hmmm, who would I vote for...

Repeat after me:
Madame President

Your trolling has burned itself out, NZ. Sorry.

Excellent bait

You deflected the record.

Stop being a faggot, faggot

Maybe if you went outside and stopped looking only at alt-right havens on the internet, you'd realize a lot of people don't want an immature tyrant as leader of the free world.
>anyone that disagrees with me is trolling/JIDF/CTR
Grow the fuck up

god damnit i love this man

Yeah the CBC is supposed to be non-partisan but that's difficult to do. Like even 538 leans left despite them technically being a purported non-partisan.
It's mainly an issue where you have all the contributors leaning to a specific side but they're obligated to try and be non-partisan so their bias seeps through. It's a little different than obvious left/right leaning publications though.

they love callin ghim a biggot

but when or where has he ever proved to be that?

i bet this is bait but still responding

Trump is or savior

Trump will win

Is this even allowed?
dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20160921-why-we-should-treat-islamaphobia-as-a-public-health-issue.ece

some one make one with the towers and the plane

DO IT

Because reality as observed by humans is not objective. They live in a different reality, where what they are doing is smart.

I am looking outside. I live in Kansas, one of the most conservative states in the Union. I'm also looking at the polls, and I'm seeing a dead heat. I'm also looking at the news, and seeing them become more open about their bias as desperation sinks in as they realize all of Obama's globalist work is about to be undone.

I also never stated anything even remotely close to your green text. That said, YOU, specifically, are either a troll, CTR, or a fucking retard.

Judging by your edgelord atheist stance, I would currently say definitely a retard, but possibly a troll as well, though.

ANYTHING IS ALLOWED WHEN YOU'RE A CULTURAL MARXIST...

...except criticism and family values. That's absolutely haram.

Whoa, whoa settle down.
I thought Australians were bantz bringers, not fighting faggots.

One thing that article said was right. This is not a normal election at all.

...

alternate version with plane visible

>editorial article
>allowed to do this

It is not illegal but it just isnt ethical

this is fun

> <
kek

I've got a group of friends consisting of a Mexican who I looked up to as a big brother figure, a Turkish girl, a Swiss guy who LOVES globalization and is gonna become a UN diplomat, a (((French))) guy who's parents are from Algeria. They recently tried asking who I'm voting for. I dodged the question, but I think they have the sneaking suspicion when I wasn't enthusiastically pro-Clinton. UN Diplo dude off the bat called Trump a dictator, ironic.

2nd group of friends are from my home state where I grew up in. We've grown more distant over time as I go to college in another state. They often go fishing together and since I'm not around to job them, I'm left as a third wheel. They said they're just not gonna vote and are like:
>m9 this election is garbage huh, who're you're voting for?
>I dunno
When I break it to them, I'll probably be made a pariah and they'll finally break off the dying friendship.

The final group of friends is the one in college. One guy loves bashing Trump, and he's my closest friend. Another is a cuckservative #nevertrump , who's literally autistic so I really don't want to talk to him at all. There's a third guy but I don't talk to him anymore.
Breaking the news to this group is the most dangerous, as I actually have to interact with them still on campus. They'll probably be the ones the worst to take it.

repeat after me:
I have another country's flag on my flag, and my entire flag is identical to another country's flag save different color stars.

...

I voted to change because I personally find this one offensive, I was ashamed of my country when that referendum failed.

Behold

wake me up

get the buttfuck out of here

this is hilarious

See, this just shows you don't understand the USA at all. We are "allowed" to do most anything, even if other people don't like it. It's called actual freedom, it's pretty rad.

ANYTHING is allowed in our Randian turbo-capitalist country

I think I understand why Kiwis and Aussies hate Cred Forums so much.
It's because Pepe is a cane toad.

better version

...

>why pretend?

>Primitive is already implied just by the word "religion"

>historically multicultural nation
>wants to create a white supremacist paradise.

It was multicultural in the sense of multiple European cultures. Ever heard of the Chinese Exclusion Act? There have historically been lots of immigration restriction laws in place, until the 1965 Immigration Act abolished them all.

For good reason

This. They have nothing but contempt for everyone.

>not satsuki

>You're the odd one out, most of us here want Clinton to win.
no m8, u r the odd one. no one here wants a person that has proven she is a psychopathic bitch that is funded by george soros and goldman sachs, and has a history of destroying countries and getting untold numbers of people killed in the process.

did i mention that it looks like she is dying?
pic related

Boomers can't die soon enough.
TV needs to fucking go.

Boomers vote for Trump though. It's just skypes who're afraid of losing their power

those digits are going to call Keks attention to you.
If bad things start happening to you, come back to this board, start a new thread Honoring Kek, and Praise Kek three times in your post.

Free speech? Yes, i think it is. I didn't see you get butthurt over Kikefart.com sucking off Trump every article they can

Unfortunately since desegregation googles are allowed everywhere

Why do Americans always have to remind everyone of amendment support

Who gives a shit

No one elsewhere in the western world will say they are hostile to freedom of speech

Not a single feminazi, libertarian, cuckaltright, leftliberal etc will say they oppose the 1st amendment so why state the obvious

>Someone who makes ignorant generalizations about people

Soo you are a biggot for judging a person you know nothing about other than they support trump?

You just mad cause your half way through gender re assignment but by the time your done it won't be cool anymore

By Chang W. Lee. Real American name there.

Red China is a communist country, no wonder Chang W. Lee supports Hildabeast.

Shuttup bogie

>Babby's first election, huh?

I have feeling that's a lot of people here

you know it brother

it's the new york times

par for they course

just don't read their opinion section (editorial board) and you'll be fine