TOO MUCH WINNING!

...

>every one of these premises are infallible.

>Voting is cheating
Democrats, everyone.

>damage control

Thanks for your great cyber efforts, really thanks your great isnt he great really the donald has donated 20 rubles into the vetted fund of your choice.

lol at online polls.

CNN actually produced a legitimate poll that showed Clinton winning by a landslide. Using "muh online polls" as a counterargument is pretty lame, and indicative of a general ignorance of both scientific polling and politics.

Not an argument.

You fucking Abbos are losing your game. Leaves are way ahead of you now.

>CNN actually produced a legitimate poll

How and through what means?

Like any online reader poll, this is not a scientific survey, nor is it statistically representative of the American electorate.

>>Let's fuck with the online polls to make it look like he won

normies will take it the wrong way and go along with it

>I guess he won the debate. man, I was so wrong about clinton

That's like asking Hillary to prove the Russians hacked her server.

Telephone poll through both landline and cell phones.

i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/09/27/poll.pdf

*guaranteed replies*

>Telephone poll through both landline and cell phones.

>You fucking Abbos are losing your game.

And you burgers are losing your presidency

>Voting 64 times isn't cheating

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

>CNN
>The Clinton network had a poll which had Clinton winning
Oh gee wow what a suprise

Well, yes.. That is how legitimate scientific polling is done. It isn't done through a poll on some website where anyone can bombard it with votes.

Did you even read that methodology before you called it legitimate, or are you being sarcastic?

REKT

>I don't understand how scientific polling works
Isn't it past your bedtime, kiddo?

I love how polls are unscientific now that Trump is leading them, even though shit like NBCs Survey Monkey is supposed to be legitimate

Bernie won all the online polls too... Beware trump supporters this means NOTHING

Hill dog will try to rig election just like the primary

A phone poll asked by less than 600 people is more legitimate than the opinions gauged by a multitude of other online resources?

Again. Prove it.

The methodology is absolutely legitimate.

>Projection
Democrats which include tombstones and cats, everybody.

It was our entire plan.

...

Implying Trump is ever satisfied with something just working
The guy's life has been about innovation and improvement
Also Cred Forums doesn't have enough power to make all the polls in his favor
Even if we did, good, if the public sees he won, then the public will think he won

>scientific polling

You can't produce a traditional statistical survey in less then a day.

it's pretty clear Trump was the only thing memorable about the debate

Hillary just came off as yet another in a long line of practiced and phony politicians

people want a whirlwind that will fucking destroy Washington.

they gonna get it.

>A phone poll asked by less than 600 people is more legitimate than the opinions gauged by a multitude of other online resources?
YES.

Learn how polling works, you tard. You don't just stick a poll on some websites and let anyone vote expecting to get a legitimate result that is going to be accurate in terms of how it is reflected in the voting behavior of the public. That's not how this shit works.

Do you really think the only reason he won these online polls is because of this Bruneian water polo enthuisist BBS?

You fuckers were literally here an hour ago when the threads were up RIGHT ON THIS BOARD that directed people to the online polls, told people to vote in them, and then told people how to vote over and over.

And now you're here, pretending that this somehow wouldn't influence the overall outcome of the polls.

It's like arguing with a block of wood, I tells ya.

Come back with polls that aren't easily rigged by anonymous people with agendas to push that still show Trump winning, and I will believe you. Until then, I'll believe my own lying eyes, which saw Trump do pretty badly, though nowhere near the landslide loss some people are claiming.

It wasn't "less than a day". The people they interviewed had been contacted since several days ago, and were expecting to be interviewed again after the debate.

There are only like 200 people on pol who voted. Probably even less in every single one of those polls. There ARE other people in the world who support Trump you know

twitter.com/tvonetv/status/780603826571096064

Hit this one up OP

TV ONE is a black television network similar to BET

>has twice as many democrats as republicans
>scientific

Yeah buddy, you might want to look into that.

>implying Democrats don't engage in election fraud in real life. (Trump defended Sanders and you still love Clintron? Wow).

i wonder how many good boy points i'll get for memeing a man into political office

Yes, and I'm sure CNN just randomly called numbers and accurately reported every question and answer. Very scientific of them to tell me they did things scientifically. I know science must have been involved. And science is infallible.

>BREITBART

what a landslide!

Yes

What's the next step you ask?

Crashing this country, with no survivors.

I know how polling works, but I find it really cute that the one poll that has your candidate winning is the only legitimate one in your book. Not biased at all, are we?

In this day and age, are you honestly comfortable saying with a straight face, that a phone poll gauges the opinions of the modern American populace?

>26% Republican
Totally legitimate.

>I don't know how polling works
Allow me to enlighten you, not that I think you'll listen. These polling outfits don't pick Democrats and Republicans out of a list and then interview them. They call phone numbers and, as part of the polling interview process, they ask them whether they identify as Democrat or Republican. If there are more of one party than another, it is only because more people who were willing to be interviewed identified that way.

0.03¢ have been deposited to your account. Thank you for Correcting The Record™

>In this day and age, are you honestly comfortable saying with a straight face, that a phone poll gauges the opinions of the modern American populace?

Yes

>directed people to the online polls, told people to vote in them

Nothing wrong with this.

>and then told people how to vote over and over.

Prove it.

i think you're making this up user.

why would you do that?

who would tell lies on the internet?

Yes, I am, because if it didn't then these polling methods wouldn't be used. For the most part, they are consistently accurate. Far more accurate than the idiotic online polls you find on places like time and drudge report, where anyone can vote, anyway.

Larger number of votes =/= more accurate result.

I'm kind've bummed the trade and jobs debate was overshadowed by other things. He did amazing there. Will probably help a lot in rust belt.

HILLARY BLOWN THE FUCK OOUT

see

This.

>landlines
top kek.

>it just werks
I'm convinced the people posting this stupid shit aren't shills but actually just retarded underage cross posters from Cred Forums.

>Just call the blue counties.
Scientific as shit.

It was landlines AND cell phones.

>Pol using it's good boy points to stay up late

I will have the last laugh when i get my Chicken tendies

Tweet this to Stefan Molyneux, Ben Shapiro, etc. and see if they we can get them to cover this incredibly stupid statement:
youtube.com/watch?v=O1xivG8LuiI

Trump fucking owned her in everything that matters to Americans- Economics and Jobs

everything else is just fluff.

Nobody cares about Nukes
Nobody cares about cyber security
Trump decimated her when he was asked about his tax returns and he said that he would release them when she showed the 33,000 emails
Trump beat her on ISIS

Notable sound bites:

>you have experience, and its bad
>we need law and order, not rioting

yes Trump couldve done better, but he couldve done worse. The fact that he stood toe to toe on issues with a 30 year politician shouldnt have happened

Again you are showing a serious lack of knowledge. The CNN poll was blatantly bias, they even said so themselves on live television, but feel free to completely ignore that.

>You fuckers were literally here an hour ago when the threads were up RIGHT ON THIS BOARD that directed people to the online polls, told people to vote in them, and then told people how to vote over and over.
>And now you're here, pretending that this somehow wouldn't influence the overall outcome of the polls.

You saying the clinton supporters are too stupid or to talentless to counter a shithole like /pol.

I'm confused. Is Hillary incompetent or are her supporters?

Trump utterly destroyed her.

He talked about real plans and policy and Clinton just talked about Trump.

He had her on the ropes the whole times. All she could do was arrogantly smirk while she was losing. It was embarrassing for her and for the Democratic party.

Almost all the polls except for LOL (((CNN))) agree.

Trump dominated

it's a Cred Forums meme, the plebs from Cred Forums have nothing to do with it

Believe it or not, there are plenty of Republicans in blue states as well. You could even argue that there might be MORE republicans in blue states based on the fact that there are more people in those states in general. Many, many red states are relatively empty.

>Let's fuck with the online polls to make it look like he won

Doesn't explain polls like Time's where there were hundreds of thousands of people voting and Trump still came out on top.

Cred Forums isn't THAT big.

>Yes, I am, because if it didn't then these polling methods wouldn't be used

Very interesting logic. Something is correct, because if it wasn't, it wouldn't be used? A looping kind of logic.

You discard every other poll, except the one that has your candidate winning, so I think I know what I'm working with here.

"Get out the vote" only applies to democrats
Don't be racist, goy.

>The CNN poll was blatantly bias, they even said so themselves on live television
Yeah, okay dude. Have fun thinking that. fucking kek

That's not true. When there are more republicans called they throw some out because "those arent traditional party percentages." But when more democrats are polled more they say "Oh, thats just the random sampling proving itself."

>online polls only work if the majority vote what I voted

Sorry it hurts to be wrong.

What did they say exactly?

So Trump is so dumb even Cred Forums can confuse him!

>They call phone numbers
>science

A online poll on the Time website or the Drudge report is not a LEGITIMATE POLL. It is a fucking online poll, which is most certainly not indicative of the real feelings that the American people as a whole have. Why don't you understand this simple concept?

...

>Yes I believe because they tell me to believe it
This is literally what you just said

nice headcanon.

There is literally nothing wrong with telling people to vote.

nice deflection

>directed people to the online polls, told people to vote in them, and then told people how to vote over and over
>making shit up
Never happened you faggot.

>Cred Forums did this
>shillary conspiracy

They said the poll was skewed democratic and skewed toward a Hillary Clinton audience. They literally used those exact words.

Yes, in fact it is demonstrably 26%.
Are you thinking that you've made some sort of cogent point?

yep.

hes a businessman and a freemason, numbers are important to him "4" was chosen

You are conveniently ignoring the fact that the majority of polling that is done through these methods is accurate. Compare that to online polls, which is absolutely not. Bernie won every single online poll during the primaries even when he was way behind in the vote itself.

this loool alt-right-retards are such failures in every way they'll even accidentally lose trump the election lmao

It's not just one or two online polls, most of them in general are pointing to numbers in his favor, but you discard them for phone poll of sub 550 people.

I'm not saying it doesn't have merit, but I find it very interesting that that's the only one you find as worth anything. Your biases are not very subtle.

Someone needs to fix this Wiki article that has CNN's liberal bias.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_debates,_2016#Reception

>LEGITIMATE POLL

except statistically about 6-10% of people actually trust the media

most have immigrated to the internet, and if an internet poll says so they will think that

and Trump won, hands down on all the things that matter

who the fuck cares about nukes. If you dont have a job you dont care if country X across the glove just increased their nuclear arsenal by 2.4%

The point is that your "durrrr the just call blue states" argument is retarded.

You are ignoring the fact that CNN themselves said their poll was bias

Why don't you understand that you only think phone polls are accurate because the pollster are TELLING you it's accurate? You do know that science isn't magical, right. You can look at their methodology for yourself and disregard it immediately.

I'm going to need to find a video of that later, but thanks for the info.

You sure about that? Do you even know what toddposting is?

>that horrible shoop
I mspaint better than this
this is meme country you dumb fuck
lurk more

>drumpfniggers so desperate they have to rig the polls

He doesn't just know us. He IS us. I don't know if that's good or bad.

Video is right here: cnn.com/2016/09/27/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-debate-poll/

It's not a matter of bias. It is a matter of what makes a legitimate poll that is likely to be accurate compared to one that is wildly off the mark. Sticking a poll on a website and telling people to have at it is not going to produce results that are accurate in terms of how they relate to actual votes in an election.

>You fuckers were literally here an hour ago when the threads were up RIGHT ON THIS BOARD that directed people to the online polls, told people to vote in them, and then told people how to vote over and over.

That never happened. You're probably imagining things.

>Unscientific online polls
You are pathetic

>Was losing the election part of your plan?
Is returning to Cred Forums then reddit part of yours?

hows that 2 million rapists you invited in?

It's what happened, as you are tacitly acknowledging whilst trying to apply spin.

>these polls are accurate
How can a fucking opinion be "accurate", you moron? You're confusing two completely separate things here, buddy.

And in your bizarro world polling twice as many democrats as republicans is a legitimate poll

did Alex's poll get raided?

>the majority of polling that is done through these methods is accurate
>argument is retarded

I cant believe la times thought trump lost every segment. Even detractors thought he did extremely well on trade and jobs.

>voting in online polls is skewing them

Makes me dink

Cred Forums, and all of Cred Forums + dailystormer crowd easily surpasses 40-50k active users on a nightly basis and gets 517,586 unique users each DAY.

take into account bots and proxies and Cred Forums could easily be responsible for 300-400k votes

Taking a poll/interview through the phone is not a matter of "trusting the media". Your point is irrelevant.

Just because you don't understand how polling works doesn't mean they said their poll was biased.

>Why don't you understand that you only think phone polls are accurate because the pollster are TELLING you it's accurate
Because that statement is totally untrue. You can go back and look at polls and compare them to actual voting records in actual elections. For the most part, they are far more accurate than bullshit online polls.

I have literally never gotten a phone call from CNN.
Until I do these polls will always be bullshit.
>My buddy that I called said hilldawg won so that means she did
Fuck off, MSM is stupid as fuck.

We can't force people to vote Trump.

Christ, you might end up being right

Online polls are always but what I find out of place, is that you would come HERE, to the Trump central hub of the internet to complain that lying crooked Hillary isn't winning.

So if you aren't for Trump, why the FUCK are you even here?

>"person says "I'm democratic"
>putting down the phone isnt a variable option until a republican comes up

:/

Mr. Trump were getting tired of all this winning please stop the boat, at least slow down!

So every online poll is illegitimate, while less than 500 people asked over the phone is a solidly strong sample of American voters.

Show of hands here, who would even answer a call from CNN? With Caller ID, I'd just assume it was marketing.

Please explain how two liberal news sites with liberal viewers produced a Trump bias in their polling results

When you come up with an actual rebuttal tell me

>calling "totally random" people on the phone at 10pm is actual science
>believe us because we tell you

>Just because you don't understand how polling works doesn't mean they said their poll was biased.

You might want to watch the video.

CNN literally says the poll is skewed toward democrats and Hillary Clinton supporters.

>second

LE Cred Forums ARMY IS 1 MILLION STRONG

They can call 100% blue states and it won't fucking matter because Republicans live just as much in those states, if not more. Try using your brain for once and you'll understand it.

Oh, geee, I don't know. Try looking at poll results and compare them to election results. It's not fucking rocket science.

They didn't "poll more Democrats than Republicans" They polled people, and more of them chose to identify as Democrats than Republicans. That's not their fault.

It's an Steve Jobs meme from Cred Forums, maybe you should shut the fuck up you French rape baby

Can you find a video of it?

Is there a single bit of proof of his voter rigging?

Keep in mind, telling people to vote is not the same as botting.

See, that`s why you are pathetic. I didn't say that phone polls are more accurate, yet you tried to attack me for it, because you know that I am right.

Agents of the Russian government have been meddling with the election since the very beginning. This is all their work. The alt-right is just a bunch of trolls who are of little importance except for retards like David Duke who think he's the head of some kind of movement.

How many votes could Cred Forums brigade anyway?

>They didn't "poll more Democrats than Republicans"

Uhh yes they did. Watch the video, they polled more Democrats than Republicans. Almost twice as many Democrats were polled by CNN.

>rigged polls

This is just sad even for Cred Forums standards.

It's right here buddy: cnn.com/2016/09/27/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-debate-poll/

>You can go back and look at polls and compare them to actual voting records in actual elections. For the most part, they are far more accurate than bullshit online polls.
You are confusing national election polls with CNN's post-debate opinion poll. I'm sorry, but you're a literal moron.

>mongol speaking without permission

thx

The goal isn't to get 50% Democrats and 50% Republican. Thinking that it is shows you have a fundamental misunderstanding regarding the purpose of polling.

Anyone can go to the site and vote. They don't even have to be readers of the site. It's not hard to understand.

i just started watching the debate, it's pretty obvious lester is too biased to do his job objectively.

hillary shakes his hand
>"... good luck to you"
Trump shakes his hand
>mumbles something unintelligible

>bias polls are accurate

Wow, you really are not very bright.

>They can call 100% blue states and it won't fucking matter because Republicans live just as much in those states, if not more.
>It's not fucking rocket science.
>scientific polling

>legitimate poll

CNN literally admitted that the poll was skewed because of the high amount of Democrats polled.

I'm only going to repeat this once: They didn't "poll more Democrats than Republicans" They polled people, and more of them chose to identify as Democrats than Republicans

While I thought trump funked it a lot (I'm smart for dodging tax etc) he was at least memorable, whereas Clinton just repeated the same drivel that every democunt has been saying for 30 years

>They didn't "poll more Democrats than Republicans"

Uhh they literally did, you might want to watch the video:

cnn.com/2016/09/27/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-debate-poll/

I'm not saying there's anything nefarious going on. I'm just saying donald has a way bigger online following than Hillary that could easily dominate the polls and skew the results.

it's amazing that with enough exposure on the internet, someone could meme themselves into office. and its funny because even sanders almost had a shot at being in the race solely because of his huge online backing.

we're entering an era of memes boys

You are the only moron here considering you clearly don't understand what the purpose of polling even is.

Having more of one party than the other doesn't automatically make it biased, you moron.

praise kek

I don't know how botnets work, the thread.

I've been spamming votes in each of the polls you stupid shitheads have been posting hoping to swing for trump since the debate ended.

This is exactly the outcome I wanted.

>Republicans hold a majority in Democrat majorities.
Is this real life? Is this the thing that I'm expected to rebut?

I'm sorry guys, but trump got undeniably, positively blown the fuck out.

> 41% described themselves as Democrats, 26% described
themselves as Republicans, and 33% described themselves as independents or members of another party

Such a fair poll.

It's not supposed to be 50-50, but traditional party voters are 4% more D than R. CNN goes way over that.

Polling twice as many democrats than republicans isn't bias?

Wow, that's one of the stupidest things I've heard in ages.

>They didn't "poll more Democrats than Republicans" They polled people, and more of them chose to identify as Democrats than Republicans.

Chances are, unless the poll was super shit, your 'extra' votes didn't do anything.

If that's true, then why tell us? Why not just let us dig our own graves? Wouldn't it be counter-intuitive for you to notify your enemies of their mistakes?

My guess is you're actually trying to deter your enemies from successful tactics. Either that or you're quite stupid.

>I'm only going to repeat this once
>They didn't "poll more Democrats than Republicans" They polled people, and more of them chose to identify as Democrats than Republicans
>stop fixing polls
>this isn't poll fixing because they said so

Blue states don't have to be majority-red in order to have more Republicans than red states. It doesn't take a genius to understand this simple concept.

That is how the people they polled identified, yes.

Tell me, if Trump was so damn great, then why can't he even come within 30 percentage points of Hillary in this poll when there are 33% who identify as independents? Surely it shouldn't have been the blowout that it is unless Trump truly did so poorly that independents didn't even come close to breaking for him.

Because hes a shill from ctr or other boards

>You are the only moron here

whoops

Trump won all polls that weren't bias, which means literally every poll except CNN. See

>You fuckers were literally here an hour ago when the threads were up RIGHT ON THIS BOARD

so?

Implying all the fucking media is not rigged and people just need to see that Trump is winnig and they will follow, that's how idiots works and USA is a country flooded with idiots.

You don't even understand how science works while claiming to be "super scientific". There have been ZERO peer reviews of this poll, there have been ZERO attempts to recreate this poll, there is no "science" here. You are just believing it because they are telling you to believe it. It's just a shitty CNN poll that they literally could've just made up and you wouldn't know the difference. Did they release the names and numbers of these people? No? Then how the fuck can I ever know it was real. Face it, a "phone poll" is just as bullshit as an online poll. CNN's poll is not "official science"

>inb4 national election polls are usually accurate
we're not talking about national election polls, you literal retard.

Well, he isn`t wrong from a causal point of view.
What's retarded is that he thinks that this makes the result any less useless.

Think about it.
Hillary spent how much on CTR to shitpost this forum instead of flooding the polls. And the poll results will benefit Trump much more than the minor inconvenience of the trolls.

Shows how poorly she spends her money. America really needs a business man, not the typical corrupt politician.

We're talking about percentages in polls, which a legitimately representative sample size would be accurate with. You're misrepresenting your own argument by talking about absolute numbers, which I was fallaciously giving you the benefit of the doubt on. Keep track of your own conversation.

...

Now that CTR has packed up for the night, we can get down to business.

> Incredible sounding claim
> Poorly substantiated
> Easy to respond to with bitchassery and snark
> Is actually objectively true

aum

Most people haven't seen Trump as he really is. As long as he doesn't appear to be LITERALLY HITLER he wins.

You faggots do realize that all those polls are rigged because Trump fans are telling each other and spreading on trump sites to keep spamming the voting systems to vote on trump not to mention that most of them aren't even americans so really who is gone vote for trump if half his support is not in america my fucking sides you guys are delusional as fuck

...

You can't 'spam' these polls, you can only ask other individuals to take part.

Everything you said could equally apply to Hillary, so why isn't she winning?

I have never heard of about six of those sites.

I don't understand why people aren't seeing this, but I'm kind of glad I guess. If he can make it through the debates without giving CNN some way to say he had a "meltdown," it's a landslide.

Trump was more credible than Hillary was.

When he mentioned New York had 2000 murders, and it got reduced to 500 due to Stop&Frisk, he came off as the sane guy, the guy who sticks to the things that works.

Hillary didn't have any good counter answer to that.
And that's bad since she needs to sway the people in the middle who are in doubt.

>Unscientific online polls
Pathetic.

You sound just like the Shillaryfags. Really, this election will probaly remain too close to call until you guys actually start voting, sans some really big scandal. (Looking at you, wikileaks)

George W. Bush "won" his debates because he exceeded expectations and his opponents reinforced their deficiencies (smug gore & aloof kerry).

Trump made a case for vote FOR him, while the cunt tried to make a case to vote AGAINST him.

Is it a wonder that Johnson and Stein are doing so well with former Sanders supporters?

> remain too close to call until you guys actually start voting

> i have absolutely no fucking clue how any of this works

Why is Cred Forums riding the polls when you guys know full well some of you abused them?

Hillary hadn't had the narrative built around her being crazy so there's no way for anyone's opinion of her to change by watching the debate. Trump has that advantage. Before I even cared about this election even I heard that "trump is crazy".

Propaganda. The media does it all the time.

Look Goy! This article one of our (((reporters))) just fabricated totally proves this.

Getting people to vote in a poll is not abuse.

Time has well over million votes.

>liberal news station
>calls a bunch of liberals asking who won the debate
>TRUMP STUMPED AGAIN !!

so voting once on multiple sites for the candidate you support is cheating?

As it stands now, most swing states are toss-ups. And looking back at the year to date, every small thing was blown up as the next big thing that is going to kill the respective canidate, only to be forgotten two weeks later.

So I doubt that anyone will be able to push ahead in a manner that allows you to call the election, unless something actually big happens

Psyops.
You should know all about it, shill.
You're just mad we've learned your Jewish tricks against you.

I watched it and although Trump said a couple of a rather enigmatic phrases, Hillary's performance seemed way too to studied and dishonest to be seriously taken into account. The timing of her 'ooooh wheeew' phrases and stuff like that, it all seemed a little bit out of place.

Because it's known to everyone at this point that Trump has a large internet following biased on the events that have happened over these past months go ahead and deny it all you want but it's kinda obvious Trump's internet following is made out of allot of none americans that are literally only participating for the LULZ

freaking check this board out if you don't believe it hahahahaha

And just as many other people outside the States who find the mere existence of Trump to send trembles through their cucksheds could vote as well.

Are you seriously saying Cred Forums's influence is so strong, that we can sway hundreds of thousands of votes in a Time poll?

What the online polls prove is that Hillary represents an old bygone era. Bernie had the younger white vote that's online 24/7. Trump has the white vote and a significant enough portion of the black and hispanic vote. Trump's base is similar to Bernie's being online more than Hillary's. The difference here is Trump pulls in massive numbers anywhere he goes. 32,000 people tried to attend Trump's rally in Fort Myers and Germain Arena only holds 8500. That's four times what the stadium can handle. He can do this just about anywhere. The polls mimic his real support in reality perhaps a bit less even.

I mean think about it a politician pulling in crowds a popular music band would kill for it's crazy.

The same thing happened with Brexit, and look how that turned out.

Fuck off shill. Meme Magic is real, and with Kek's blessing, international support WILL help win us this election.

>Cred Forums's influence is so strong, that we can sway hundreds of thousands of votes in a Time poll
THIS IS ACCURATE

top kek

>Are you seriously saying Cred Forums's influence is so strong, that we can sway hundreds of thousands of votes in a Time poll?

these fucking newfags have no idea

You keep saying pol rigged the polls but many of these results are very similar with trump ~60% and clinton at ~40%. There's another graphic floating around with 10+ polls and it's curious how many are so similar even with varying vote totals.

White guy triggering poor black lady when she just want to interview him about Donald and his lies.

instagram.com/p/BK2EknXDehl/

I was a little disappointed with his performance. He let important things slide with minimal or no comment, and got bogged down in trivialities.

jesus take the wheel

twitter.com/investorsplan/status/780615028567191552
twitter.com/investorsplan/status/780615028567191552
twitter.com/investorsplan/status/780615028567191552

VOTE

...

Holy shit that racist fag with a killary shirt. I bet he feels justified with that sort of opinion.

No but subtly altering the perspective of Trump via forced shitposting on pol is definitely your plan, you fucking shill.

Probably no one from the raid team got to it because they knew Trump would win in it no matter what

Can we all just admit that Trump didn't do as good as he could have? He did do a good job, but he needed to press Hillary Clinton more on things like Benghazi, etc. Another thing is the fucking moderator only had soft ball questions for Hillary.

>Trump quoted policy and facts for most of that debate he had to stoop down to her level for a few minutes but in the end he came out as more presidential
>Hillary only used personal attacks
Go watch the debate again then come back.

>implying Cred Forums is big enough to fuck with polls containing over 300K votes....

>winning

That makes me smart

I hate to "Correct the Record" Here, but uhh...

CNN publically announced on TV that they rigged the polls by 15%

prod-video-cms-amp-microsoft-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BBwFNSK?blobrefkey=103&$blob=1

Which means trump actually was winning by 3% in CNN's own poll.

He seemed to miss or ignore certain opportunities to hit back on certain things like the race issue and his country club. I have to say though he did quite well considering how fucking biased the debate was last night. Jesus fucking christ it was so one sided. I can't really fault him as being in the spotlight like that and being attacked by the moderator as well can be a chore. Imagine being put under that kind of pressure and being attacked on all sides no friendlies on or off that stage really.

Dude those are betting odds. Not actual wide public sentiment.

It's all about setting the narrative. If people see enough people supporting him, they might be tempted to switch.

Millions of dollars spent on you CTR faggots and you can't even rig an online poll for Shrillary outside of CNN. Democrat spending at its finest.

Yeah jesus fucking christ was that moderator biased against him.

Why is a suspended trade even in the front fucking page? Why suspend trading the moment Trump won the Primary? There is something fishy about this site.

they couldn't even rig the CNN one, see

time.com/4506217/presidential-debate-clinton-trump-survey/

time.com/4506217/presidential-debate-clinton-trump-survey/

time.com/4506217/presidential-debate-clinton-trump-survey/

time.com/4506217/presidential-debate-clinton-trump-survey/

time.com/4506217/presidential-debate-clinton-trump-survey/

THEY ARE 50-50, THE SHILLS ARE DISTRACTING YOU! STAY ON TARGET YOU FAT NEET BASTARDS!

familia litteraly doing ctr tactics ain't the best of idea if you want the god emperor to win you only need to check the archives.

that was weak af you should be ashamed desu

Fuck he has a big fucking forehead.

>Can we all just admit that Trump didn't do as good as he could have?

Sure. If he'd done as well throughout the entire debate as he did in the first segment, it would've been a blowout. Instead, it was decent performance with some awesome moments.

Coolio. We do what we must to win.

time is 50/50 holy shit!!!

For real, though, Trump should go into the next two debates, exactly like he did this one. He's winning Breitbart polls, and those are the polls that matter.

Oh wow that's fucking amazing. Shrillary's running the saddest campaign I've seen since Dukakis.

>our institutions are under cyber attack, and our secrets are being stolen

In my opinion, Trump should have roasted Hillary as being the #1 enemy of national security for this whole segment.

Did he not do it because of the whole "presidential" thing? After the absolute JUSTing that Jeb and the others got, I'd have expected it.

I actually thought this too until I watched the debate a second time. Hillary isn't a bad speaker, she's very articulate and convincing, which is scary because when I watched it a second time I noticed that most of what she said was completely non-concrete pandering. And it was a good move on her part to avoid any kind of public confrontation until now.

In the debate the questions were controlled and each only had a limited time to answer. Talking about policies and critiquing the other candidate was limited to the question asked.

As for Trump, frankly I think that while other countries stealing jobs from America is true and is a real economic problem, he should have spent less time talking about it. He also seemed to go easy on Hillary in the cyber security segment, I don't know if Americans at large appreciate the British parliament kind of humor, but he should have given Hillary a much harder time for being a threat to national security, what with the emails and everything.

After what I saw in the Republican primaries, it felt like Trump is holding back with his better stuff. Maybe he's saving it for the later debates.

What happened to the Australians we used to know? I remember when I would literally have to step away from my keyboard in awe when I saw an Aussie hit his shitpost perfectly, but now Canadians are running the game